Abstract
Aim: to evaluate the intra and inter-device reliability of two intraoral spectrophotometers in measuring the Commission Internationale de l’Éclairage (CIE) L*a*b* color coordinates and to compare the color difference (ΔE) between both devices. Methods: the central region of the labial surface of the maxillary central incisor of 31 participants was measured twice by each of the devices (VITA EasyShade and Degudent Shadepilot) by one examiner. CIE L*a*b* color coordinates were obtained for all teeth and ΔE was measured and compared. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Mann-whitney U test were used to analyze the data (p<0.05). Results: inter-device reliability ICCs in measuring CIE L*a*b* color coordinates ranged between 0.08-0.49 with significant difference between devices only concerning the b coordinate (p<0.05). While intra device reliability ICCs ranged between 0.86-0.89 for VITA EasyShade and 0.81-0.86 for Degudent Shadepilot. The mean ΔE for CIE L*a*b* color coordinates of VITA EasyShade was 3.61 (±1.93) compared to 3.60 (± 1.45) for Degudent Shadepilot with insignificant difference between both devices (p>0.05). Conclusions: high intra device reliability in measuring CIE L*a*b* color coordinates was achieved particularly of Vita EasyShade, and both devices had clinically acceptable color difference (ΔE <3.7) however, inter device reliability was low to moderate. Consequently, the same spectrophotometer should be used throughout the steps of performing any tooth- colored restoration.
References
-Bahannan SA. Shade matching quality among dental students using visual and instrumental methods. J Dent. 2014 Jan;42(1):48-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.001.
-Yılmaz B, Irmak Ö, Yaman BC. Outcomes of visual tooth shade selection performed by operators with different experience. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019 Sep;31(5):500-7. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12507.
-Farah RI, Elwi H. Spectrophotometric evaluation of color changes of bleach-shade resin-based composites after staining and bleaching. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014 Sep 1;15(5):587-94. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1584.
- Farah RI. Agreement between digital image analysis and clinical spectrophotometer in CIEL*C*h° coordinate differences and total color difference (ΔE) measurements of dental ceramic shade tabs. Int J Esthet Dent. 2016;11(2):234-45.
- Haddad HJ, Jakstat HA, Ametzl G, Borbely J, Vichi A, Dumfahrt H, et al. Does gender and experience influence shade matching quality. J Dent. 2009;37 Suppl 1:e40-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.05.012.
- Paul SJ, Peter A, Rodoni L, Pietrobon N. Conventional visual vs. spectrophotometric shade taking for porcelain‑fused‑to‑metal crowns: a clinical comparison. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2004 Jun;24(3):222-31.
- Witkowski S, Yajima ND, Wolkewitz M, Strub JR. Reliability of shade selection using an intraoral spectrophotometer. Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Jun;16(3):945-9. doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0590-3.
-Chen H, Huang J, Dong X, Qian J, He J, Qu X, et al. A systematic review of visual and instrumental measurements for tooth shade matching. Quintessence Int. 2012 Sep;43(8):649-59.
-Lehmann KM, Devigus A, Igiel C, Wentaschek S, Azar MS, Scheller H. Repeatability of color-measuring devices. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2011;6(4):428‐35.
- Kalantari MH, Ghoraishian SA, Mohaghegh M. Evaluation of accuracy of shade selection using two spectrophotometer systems: Vita Easyshade and Degudent Shadepilot. Eur J Dent. 2017 Apr-Jun;11(2):196-200. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_195_16.
- Igiel C, Lehmann KM, Ghinea R, Weyhrauch M, Hangx Y, Scheller H, et al. Reliability of visual and instrumental color matching. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017 Sep;29(5):303-8. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12321.
-Liberato WF, Barreto IC, Costa PP, de Almeida CC, Pimentel W, Tiossi R. A comparison between visual, intraoral scanner, and spectrophotometer shade matching: A clinical study. J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Feb;121(2):271-5. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.05.004.
-Kim-Pusateri S, Brewer JD, Davis EL, Wee AG. Reliability and accuracy of four dental shadematching devices. J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Mar;101(3):193-9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60028-7.
- Lehmann KM, Igiel C, Schmidtmann I, Scheller H. Four color-measuring devices compared with a spectrophotometric reference system. J Dent. 2010;38 Suppl 2:e65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.07.006.
-Gehrke P, Riekeberg U, Fackler O, Dhom G. Comparison of in vivo visual, spectrophotometric and colorimetric shade determination of teeth and implant-supported crowns. Int J Comput Dent. 2009;12(3):247-63.
-Browning WD, Chan DC, Blalock JS, Brackett MG. A comparison of human raters and an intra-oral spectrophotometer. Oper Dent. 2009;34(3):337-43. doi: 10.2341/08-106.
-Yuan K, Sun X, Wang F, Wang H, Chen JH. In vitro and in vivo evaluations of three computer-aided shade matching instruments. Oper Dent. 2012;37(3):219-27. doi: 10.2341/11-230-c.
- Sarafianou A, Kamposiora P, Papavasiliou G, Goula H. Matching repeatability and interdevice agreement of 2 intraoral spectrophotometers. J Prosthet Dent. 2012 Mar;107(3):178-85. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60053-5.
- Dozić A, Kleverlaan CJ, El-Zohairy A, Feilzer AJ, Khashayar G. Performance of five commercially available tooth color-measuring devices. J Prosthodont. 2007;16(2):93-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00163.x.
-Khashayar G, Dozic A, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Data comparison between two dental spectrophotometers. Oper Dent. 2012;37(1):12-20. doi: 10.2341/11-161-C.
- Sabour S, Moezizadeh M, Dastjerdi EV. Reliability of shade selection using an intraoral spectrophotometer: common mistakes in reliability analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Apr;17(3):1025. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-0930-6.
- Lagouvardos PE, Fougia AG, Diamantopoulou SA, Polyzois GL. Repeatability and interdevice reliability of two portable color selection devices in matching and measuring tooth color. J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Jan;101(1):40-5.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences