Banner Portal
A comparative evaluation of the sealing ability of two calcium silicate based sealers and a resin epoxy-based sealer through scanning electron microscopy and bond strength
PDF

Keywords

Calcium compounds
Silicates
Epoxy resins
Root canal filling materials
Electron microscope tomography

How to Cite

1.
Abdelrahman MH, Hassan MY. A comparative evaluation of the sealing ability of two calcium silicate based sealers and a resin epoxy-based sealer through scanning electron microscopy and bond strength: an in vitro study. Braz. J. Oral Sci. [Internet]. 2021 Jul. 15 [cited 2024 Apr. 20];20(00):e214073. Available from: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8664073

Abstract

Aim: this study aimed to compare the sealing ability of two types of commercially available calcium silicate bioceramic based root canal sealers and a resin based root canal sealer. Methods: Twenty one single-rooted teeth were used, samples (n= 21) were randomly divided into three groups according to the sealer used (group A; ADSEAL, group B; Wellroot, group C; Ceraseal). Roots were then cleaved longitudinally in the labiolingual direction; all samples were then sectioned at three, six, and nine mm from the root tip. The penetration of sealers into the dentinal tubules was examined at 1000x with a scanning electron microscope. Data were tested for normality using Shapiro Wilk test. ANOVA test was used for analyzing normally distributed data followed by Bonferroni post hoc test for pair-wise comparison. Significance level p≤0.001. Results: groups B and C showed better sealing ability than group A in all the three sections. The coronal section showed higher sealing ability than the middle section followed by the apical section in the three tested groups. Conclusion: it can be concluded that both calcium silicate-based sealers had better sealing ability and higher bond strength than the resin epoxy- based sealer.

https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v20i00.8664073
PDF

References

Al-Haddad A, Che Ab Aziz ZA. Bioceramic-based root canal sealers: a review. Int J Biomater. 2016;2016:9753210. doi: 10.1155/2016/9753210.

Reszka P, Nowicka A, Lipski M, Dura W, Droździk A, Woźniak K. A comparative chemical study of calcium silicate-containing and epoxy resin-based root canal sealers. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:9808432. doi: 10.1155/2016/9808432.

Wang Y, Liu S, Dong Y. In vitro study of dentinal tubule penetration and filling quality of bioceramic sealer. PLoS One. 2018 Feb 1;13(2):e0192248. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192248.

Ha JH, Kim HC, Kim YK, Kwon TY. An Evaluation of Wetting and Adhesion of Three Bioceramic Root Canal Sealers to Intraradicular Human Dentin. Materials (Basel). 2018 Jul;11(8):1286. doi: 10.3390/ma11081286.

Abdul Khader M. An in vitro scanning electron microscopy study to evaluate the dentinal tubular penetration depth of three root canal sealers. J Int. Oral Health. 2016;8(2):191-4.

Gad RA, Farag AM, El-Hediny HA, Darrag AM. Sealing ability and obturation quality of root canals filled with gutta-percha and two different sealers. Tanta Dent. J. 2016;13(4):165-70. doi: 10.4103/1687-8574.195703.

Huang Y, Orhan K, Celikten B, Orhan AI, Tufenkci P, Sevimay S. Evaluation of the sealing ability of different root canal sealers: a combined SEM and micro-CT study. J Appl Oral Sci. 2018 Jan;26:e20160584. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0584.

Kim HJ, Baek SH, Bae KS. Sealing ability of root canals obturated with gutta-percha, epoxy resin-based sealer, and dentin adhesives. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2004;29(1):51-7. doi: 10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.1.051.

Vemisetty H, Ravichandra PV, Reddy S J, Ramkiran D, Krishna M JN, Sayini R, et al. Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of three endodontic sealers with and without amoxicillin-an invitro study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Jan;8(1):228-31. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7180.3919.

Kapasi A, Bishnoi A, Meena SS, Singh P, Patodia A. Sealability of bioceramic cements on root ends prepared using a hard tissue LASER evaluated by stereomicroscope - an in vitro study. Acta Scient Dent Sci. 2018;2(8):9-18.

Toursavadkohi S, Zameni F, Afkar M. Comparison of tubular penetration of AH26, EasySeal, and Sure-Seal root canal sealers in single-rooted teeth using scanning electron microscopy. J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci. 2018;3(3):27-32. doi: 10.29252/jrdms.3.3.27.

Gyulbenkiyan E, Gusiyska A, Vassileva R, Dyulgerova E. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the sealer/dentine interface of two sealers using two protocols of irrigation. J IMAB. 2020;26(1):2887-91. doi: 10.5272/jimab.2020261.2887.

Baruah K, Mirdha N, Gill B, Bishnoi N, Gupta T, Baruah Q. comparative study of the effect on apical sealability with different levels of remaining gutta-percha in teeth prepared to receive posts: an in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Sep;9(Suppl 2):S261-5. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_196_18.

Abdelrahman MH, Hassan MY. Comparison of root canals walls cleanliness filled with two different calcium silicate bioceramic based sealers and a resin-based sealer after retreatment. Int. J Dentistry Res. 2020;5(1):20-3.

Vujasković M, Teodorović N. Analysis of sealing ability of root canal sealers using scanning electronic microscopy technique. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2010 Nov-Dec;138(11-12):694-8. doi: 10.2298/sarh1012694v.

Eid BM, Waly AS, Princy P, Venkatesan R. Scanning electron microscope evaluation of dentinal tubules penetration of three different root canal sealers. EC Dent. Sci. 2019;18(6):1121-7.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.