Keywords
Dental arch
Orthodontic anchorage procedures
How to Cite
Abstract
Background and Aim: It is acknowledged that controlling the vertical dimension is a crucial and frequently challenging aspect of orthodontic treatment. The present study evaluated the micro-implant effect in angle class II malocclusion patients. Methods: All articles published in international databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, ISI Web of Knowledge, and Embase between 2012 and July 2022 are included. Meta-analysis data collected from selected studies were performed using Stata/MP.V17 software. Results: The abstracts of 718 studies were reviewed, and finally, 12 studies were selected. The mean differences of vertical change of lower and upper molar between micro-implants were -0.88 (MD, 95% CI -1.15, -0.60; p=0.00). Conclusion: Based on the present study’s findings, using a Micro-implant compared to conventional anchorage has better vertical control. It is suggested that future studies be conducted with a similar cognitive methodology of higher quality and get help from methodological guidelines. Keywords: Malocclusion,
References
Batista KB, Thiruvenkatachari B, Harrison JE, O'Brien KD. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar;3(3):CD003452. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003452.pub4.
Li Y, Wu J, Guo J, Yu L, Wang J, Li X, et al. The efficacy of different treatment approaches for pediatric OSAHS patients with mandibular retrognathia: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2020 Jun;21(1):595. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04398-9.
Volodymyr A, Sergii K, Kozyk O. Evaluation of the effectiveness of mini-screw-facilitated micro-osteoperforation interventions on the treatment process in patients with orthodontic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Sci Res Dent Med Sci. 2021;3(3):147-52. doi: 10.30485/ijsrdms.2021.306970.1196.
Sotelo Núñez N, Hatamzade Z, Zamiri SS, Safi M. Evaluation the effect of micro-osteoperforation on the tooth movement rate and the level of pain on miniscrew-supported maxillary molar distalization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Sci Res Dent Med Sci. 2020;2(3):81-6. doi: 10.30485/ijsrdms.2020.240891.1077.
Liu Y, Yang ZJ, Zhou J, Xiong P, Wang Q, Yang Y, et al. Comparison of anchorage efficiency of orthodontic mini-implant and conventional anchorage reinforcement in patients requiring maximum orthodontic anchorage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2020 Jun;20(2):101401. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2020.101401.
Wang K, Fan H, Yang H, Li J, Xie W. Efficacy and safety of micro-implant anchorage in Angle class II malocclusion orthodontic treatment: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec;99(50):e23221. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023221.
Antoszewska-Smith J, Sarul M, Łyczek J, Konopka T, Kawala B. Effectiveness of orthodontic miniscrew implants in anchorage reinforcement during en-masse retraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Mar;151(3):440-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.08.029.
Tian H, Xie C, Lin M, Yang H, Ren A. Effectiveness of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices in canine retraction and anchorage preservation during the two-step technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2020 Oct;20(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01271-8.
Li GF, Yang ZJ, Wang TC, Zhang CX, Zhang JY, Chen JD, et al. Meta-analysis dataset comparing orthodontic mini-implants and conventional anchorage reinforcement for maximum orthodontic anchorage. Data Brief. 2020 Jul;32:106010. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106010.
Liu YH, Ding WH, Liu J, Li Q. Comparison of the differences in cephalometric parameters after active orthodontic treatment applying mini-screw implants or transpalatal arches in adult patients with bialveolar dental protrusion. J Oral Rehabil. 2009 Sep;36(9):687-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01976.x.
Deguchi T, Kurosaka H, Oikawa H, Kuroda S, Takahashi I, Yamashiro T, et al. Comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes in adults with skeletal open bite between conventional edgewise treatment and implant-anchored orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Apr;139(4 Suppl):S60-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.04.029.
Al-Sibaie S, Hajeer MY. Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2014 Jun;36(3):275-83. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjt046. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
Kuroda S, Yamada K, Deguchi T, Kyung HM, Takano-Yamamoto T. Class II malocclusion treated with miniscrew anchorage: comparison with traditional orthodontic mechanics outcomes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Mar;135(3):302-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.038.
Sohrabi C, Franchi T, Mathew G, Kerwan A, Nicola M, Griffin M, et al. PRISMA 2020 statement: What's new and the importance of reporting guidelines. Int J Surg. 2021 Apr;88:105918. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105918.
Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011 Oct;343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.
Kim SY, Park JE, Lee YJ, Seo HJ, Sheen SS, Hahn S, et al. Testing a tool for assessing the risk of bias for nonrandomized studies showed moderate reliability and promising validity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Apr;66(4):408-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.016.
Ding SH, Liu MH, Zou TQ. Comparative study on vertical effect between miniscrew and face-bow in orthodontic treatment of hyperdivergent classⅡ protrusion. J Oral Sci Res. 2019;35(4):351-4. doi: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2019.04.011.
Tan Y, Wenli L. Comparison of the treatment outcomes between self-ligating brackets with microimplant and J hook anchorages in patients with Class II1 malocclusion. J Pract Stomatol. 2018;34:782-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3733.2018.06.013.
Meng QJ, Wang LC, Du X. Comparative study on the effect of miniscrew implants and transpalatal arch anchorage in the control of bi-maxillary dentoalveolar in adults. Chin J Pract Stomatol. 2017;10(2):88-91.
Ma N, Li WR, Chen XH, Zheng X. [Comparison of treatment results between implant anchorage and traditional intraoral anchorage in patients with maxillary protrusion]. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2016 Aug;25(4):475-80. Chinese.
Wu X, Liu GY, Jiang YL. [Comparing the anchorage effects of micro-implant and J hook on treating patients with maxillary protrusion]. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2015 Oct;24(5):623-6. Chinese.
Liang Y, Qian H, Sun WH. Effect of micro-implant anchorage in the treatment of Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion. Chin J Aesthet Med. 2014(24):2089-93.
Si XQ, Zhang L, Zhang CD, Lu Z, Guo YC. [Comparison of the efficacy of implant-supported and J-hook-supported orthodontic treatment of ankylosing Class II, Division 1 malocclusion in young women]. Shaanxi Medi J. 2014;10:1345-7. Chinese. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2014.10.036.
Chen M, Li ZM, Liu X, Cai B, Wang DW, Feng ZC. Differences of treatment outcomes between self-ligating brackets with microimplant and headgear anchorages in adults with bimaxillary protrusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Apr;147(4):465-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.11.029.
Ouyang ZF, Du X. Comparison of the treatment of Angle class II division 1 malocclusion in female adults with micro-implant anchorage and headgear anchorage technique. J Dent Prev Treat. 2013;21:203-7.
Liao SS, Liu ZT, Chen JL. Comparison of treatment effects between two anchorages in patients with skeletal class II malocclusion. Med J Commun. 2012;26:649-51.
Yu XH, Chen JC, Xun CL, Peng SY. Comparative analysis of the effects of micro-implant And J hook Treatmen for adult patients of angle class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion with the anterior of the alveolar vertical macroplasia. Chin Mod Doc. 2012;50(7):42-4. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9701.2012.07.020.
Peng J, Lei Y, Liu Y, Zhang B, Chen J. Effectiveness of micro-implant in vertical control during orthodontic extraction treatment in class II adults and adolescents after pubertal growth peak: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2023 May;27(5):2149-62. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04881-y.
Yao CC, Lai EH, Chang JZ, Chen I, Chen YJ. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Nov;134(5):615-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.12.022.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Sareh Keshavarz Meshkinfam , Fatemeh Teimoori , Ali Amiri, Fereshte Keikha
Downloads
