Banner Portal
Comparison of the orthodontic treatment outcomes with the extraction of lower incisors associated with torque control
PDF

Keywords

Tooth extraction
Cephalometry
Malocclusion - Angle Class I

How to Cite

1.
Bonini FP, Carneiro DPA, Valdrighi HC, Menezes CC de, Vedovello SAS. Comparison of the orthodontic treatment outcomes with the extraction of lower incisors associated with torque control. Braz. J. Oral Sci. [Internet]. 2025 Mar. 28 [cited 2025 May 17];24(00):e254307. Available from: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8674307

Abstract

Aim: This prospective clinical study evaluated the cephalometric effects of orthodontic treatment with lower incisor extraction associated with buccal torque. Methods: Cephalograms were evaluated at the beginning (T1) and the end (T2) of orthodontic treatment of 20 patients with a mean age of 32.2 years, Angle Class I malocclusion, and anteroinferior crowding. Orthodontic treatment was performed with a MBT prescription bracket, 0.022” slot with modified torque programming in the lower incisors (central and lateral: +6º), and a single lower incisor was extracted. Cephalometric measurements were performed using Dolphin® software by a single calibrated examiner. Data analysis was performed using the t-test for dependent samples, with a significance level of 5%. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in the cephalometric measurements evaluated (p≥0.194). Conclusions: Orthodontic treatment carried out with extraction of lower incisors and associated with buccal torque did not promote dental and tegumentary cephalometric changes, positively impacting the completion of the treatment.

https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v24i00.8674307
PDF

References

Ali B, Shaikh A, Fida M. Factors affecting treatment decisions for Class I malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Aug;154(2):234-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.11.035.

Maaz M, Fida M. Comparison of treatment outcomes as assessed by 3 indexes in subjects with Class I malocclusion treated by 3 different methods: A cross-sectional study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022 Apr;161(4):537-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.10.031. Epub 2021 Dec 11.

Janson G, Barros SE, de Freitas MR, Henriques JF, Pinzan A. Class II treatment efficiency in maxillary premolar extraction and nonextraction protocols. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Oct;132(4):490-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.031.

Mahmood TMA, Qadir CA. Persuading factors for tooth extraction decision in treatment of class I malocclusion among orthodontists in Sulaimani City. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2015;14(8):20-8. doi: 10.9790/0853-14882028.

Almeida NV, Silveira GS, Pereira DM, Mattos CT, Mucha JN. Interproximal wear versus incisors extraction to solve anterior lower crowding: a systematic review. Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 Jan-Feb;20(1):66-73. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.20.1.066-073.oar.

Hwang S, Kim I, Jang W, Choi YJ, Chung CJ, Kim KH. A 15-year follow up of an orthodontic treatment including a lower incisor extraction and keeping the maxillary canine-premolar transposition. Angle Orthod. 2019 Sep;89(5):812-26. doi: 10.2319/020118-93.1. Epub 2018 Aug 3.

Konstantonis D. The impact of extraction vs nonextraction treatment on soft tissue changes in Class I borderline malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 2012 Mar;82(2):209-17. doi: 10.2319/051911-339.1. Epub 2011 Sep 20.

Kakkirala N, Saxena R. A simple technique for correction of relapsed overjet. Int J Orthod Milwaukee. 2014 Fall;25(3):31-2.

Felicita AS. Orthodontic management of a dilacerated central incisor and partially impacted canine with unilateral extraction - a case report. Saudi Dent J. 2017 Oct;29(4):185-93. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2017.04.001.

Sebastian B, Abraham ME, Sarma PS, Cherian KK. Alignment efficiency of coaxial tubular superelastic nickel-titanium vs single-stranded superelastic nickel-titanium in relieving mandibular anterior crowding in extraction cases: a single-centre randomized controlled clinical trial. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2019 May;22(2):105-111. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12289.

Paphangkorakit J, Osborn JW. Proclination of lower incisors: a design to maximize food penetration and minimize torque. J Oral Rehabil. 2008 Nov;35(11):870-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01884.x.

Viswanath D, Shetty S, Mascarenhas R, Husain A. Treatment of mandibular anterior crowding with incisor extraction using lingual orthodontics: a case report. World J Orthod. 2010 Winter;11(4):e99-103.

Ileri Z, Basciftci FA, Malkoc S, Ramoglu SI. Comparison of the outcomes of the lower incisor extraction, premolar extraction and non-extraction treatments. Eur J Orthod. 2012 Dec;34(6):681-5. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr064. Epub 2011 Jul 10.

Kamal AT, Shaikh A, Fida M. Improvement in Peer Assessment Rating scores after nonextraction, premolar extraction, and mandibular incisor extraction treatments in patients with Class I malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Apr;151(4):685-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.09.016.

Yassir YA, El-Angbawi AM, McIntyre GT, Revie GF, Bearn DR. A randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch slot orthodontic bracket systems: part 1-duration of treatment. Eur J Orthod. 2019 Mar;41(2):133-42. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjy037.

Yassir YA, El-Angbawi AM, McIntyre GT, Revie GF, Bearn DR. A randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch slot orthodontic bracket systems: part 2-quality of treatment. Eur J Orthod. 2019 Mar 29;41(2):143-53. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjy038.

Abid MF, Alhuwaizi AF, Al-Attar AM. Do orthodontists aim to decrease the duration of fixed appliance treatment? J Orthod Sci. 2021 Feb;10:6. doi: 10.4103/jos.JOS_36_20.

Yassir YA, McIntyre GT, El-Angbawi AM, Bearn DR. Does anchorage loss differ with 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch slot bracket systems? Angle Orthod. 2019 Jul;89(4):605-10. doi: 10.2319/081918-608.1.

Chen SS, Greenlee GM, Kim JE, Smith CL, Huang GJ. Systematic review of self-ligating brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Jun;137(6):726.e1-726.e18; discussion 726-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.11.009.

Dehbi H, Azaroual MF, Zaoui F, Halimi A, Benyahia H. Therapeutic efficacy of self-ligating brackets: A systematic review. Int Orthod. 2017 Sep;15(3):297-311. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2017.06.009.

Steiner CC. Cephalometric for you and me. Am J Orthod. 1953;39(10):729-55. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(53)90082-7.

Jacobson A. The "Wits" appraisal of jaw disharmony. 1975. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Nov;124(5):470-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(75)90065-2.

Ricketts RM. Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics. The first fifty years. Angle Orthod. 1981 Apr;51(2):115-50. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1981)051<0115:PITCAO>2.0.CO;2.

McNamara JA Jr. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod. 1984 Dec;86(6):449-69. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9416(84)90352-x.

Hassel B, Farman AG. Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Jan;107(1):58-66. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70157-5.

McLaughlin RP, Bennett JC, Trevisi HJ. [Systematized orthodontic treatment mechanics]. São Paulo: Artes Médicas; 2004. Portuguese.

Archambault A, Lacoursiere R, Badawi H, Major PW, Carey J, Flores-Mir C. Torque expression in stainless steel orthodontic brackets. A systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2010 Jan;80(1):201-10. doi: 10.2319/080508-352.1.

Alabdullah MM, Burhan AS, Nabawia A, Nawaya F, Saltaji H. Comparative assessment of dental and basal arch dimensions of passive and active self-ligating versus conventional appliances: a randomized clinical trial. J Orofac Orthop. 2023 Apr;84(Suppl 2):74-83. doi: 10.1007/s00056-022-00407-5. Epub 2022 Jul 5.

Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. New York: Interscience Publications; 1940.

Houston WJB. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod. 1983 May;83(5):382-90. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(83)90322-6.

Fleiss JL. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: John Wiley & Son; 1986.

Bahreman AA. Lower incisor extraction in orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 1977 Nov;72(5):560-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(77)90024-0.

Leitao PM. Lower incisor extraction in Class I and Class II malocclusions: case reports. Prog Orthod. 2004;5(2):186-99.

Bayram M, Ozer M. Mandibular incisor extraction treatment of a class I malocclusion with Bolton discrepancy: a case report. Eur J Dent. 2007;1(1):54-9.

Raju DS, Veereshi AS, Naidu DL, Raju BH, Goel M, Maheshwari A. Therapeutic extraction of lower incisor for orthodontic treatment. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012 Jul;13(4):574-7. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1189.

Barbosa VLT. Angle Class I malocclusion treated with lower incisor extraction. Dental Press J Orthod. 2013 May-Jun;18(3):150-8. doi: 10.1590/s2176-94512013000300024.

Zawawi KH. Orthodontic treatment of a mandibular incisor extraction case with invisalign. Case Rep Dent. 2014:2014:657657. doi: 10.1155/2014/657657.

Machado GB. Treating dental crowding with mandibular incisor extraction in an Angle Class I patient. Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 May-Jun;20(3):101-8. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.20.3.101-108.bbo.

Shah AH, Shah DH. Mandibular incisor extraction treatment in Angle's Class I malocclusion with peg-shaped maxillary lateral incisors. J Orthod Sci. 2016 Jul-Sep;5(3):100-3. doi: 10.4103/2278-0203.186167.

Hakami Z, Cherian R. Mandibular incisor extraction: a treatment alternative for large maxillary midline diastema. Int Orthod. 2019 Sep;17(3):596-605. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.06.021.

Palone M, Casella S, Bastianoni D, Siciliani G, Lombardo L. Lower incisor extraction therapy in a complex case with an ankylosed tooth in an adult patient: a case report. Int Orthod. 2020 Dec;18(4):850-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2020.08.006.

Creekmore TD. The importance of interbracket width in orthodontic tooth movement. J Clin Orthod. 1976 Jul;10(7):530-4.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Fernando Pizi Bonini, Diego Patrik Alves Carneiro, Heloisa Cristina Valdrighi, Carolina Carmo de Menezes, Silvia Amélia Scudeler Vedovello

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.