Abstract
Aim: Facial aesthetics is a dynamic field requiring precise professional assessment, considering beauty concepts, variability in cultural and ethnic facial features, and patient perception. This study aimed to develop the Orna Face Analysis (OFA), an integrated tool for detailed facial evaluation to improve the planning of aesthetic treatments. Methods: The OFA integrates multiple analysis methods, considering key aspects such as youthfulness, average appearance, symmetry, and dimorphic features to create a comprehensive evaluation protocol based on a critical review of the scientific literature searched through PubMed, Scielo, Web of Science, and Scopus databases without language or time restrictions. Results: The OFA was designed as an electronic form that can generate a printed file, allowing for a deep understanding of patients faces by highlighting these essential aspects. This approach enables detailed and personalized diagnostics essential for effectively planning facial aesthetic treatments and meeting patient expectations. The OFA emerges as a complementary and integrative tool in facial aesthetics, promoting a personalized and evidence-based approach to facial harmonization. After constructing the OFA prototype in electronic and printed formats, the tool was tested in a clinical setting (TRL 6 – technology readiness level) to assess its objectivity, clarity, coherence, precision, and usability. TRL 6 indicates that the system has been demonstrated in a relevant environment but requires further testing for full validation. Conclusion: A preliminary evaluation by a facial harmonization specialist confirmed that the OFA enables the creation of highly personalized treatment plans, accurately reflecting a range of aesthetic outcomes. Further validation will solidify its applicability across diverse patient populations and settings.
References
Wilkinson N, Paikan A, Gredebäck G, Rea F, Metta G. Staring us in the face? An embodied theory of innate face preference. Dev Sci. 2014 Nov;17(6):809-25. doi: 10.1111/desc.12159.
Kaiser D, Nyga K. Tracking cortical representations of facial attractiveness using time-resolved representational similarity analysis. Sci Rep. 2020 Oct;10(1):16852. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74009-9.
Jack RE, Schyns PG. The human face as a dynamic tool for social communication. Curr Biol. 2015 Jul;25(14):R621-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.052.
Diego-Mas JA, Fuentes-Hurtado F, Naranjo V, Alcañiz M. The influence of each facial feature on how we perceive and interpret human faces. Iperception. 2020 Sep;11(5):204166952096112. doi: 10.1177/2041669520961123.
O’Connor KM, Gladstone E. Beauty and social capital: Being attractive shapes social networks. Soc Networks. 2018 Jan;52:42-7. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2017.05.003.
Langlois JH, Kalakanis L, Rubenstein AJ, Larson A, Hallam M, Smoot M. Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychol Bull. 2000;126(3):390-423. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390.
Hönekopp J. Once more: Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006;32(2):199-209. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.199.
Wang JV, Rieder EA, Schoenberg E, Zachary CB, Saedi N. Patient perception of beauty on social media: Professional and bioethical obligations in esthetics. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 May 24;19(5):1129-30. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13118.
Greywal T, Dayan SH, Goldie K, Guillen Fabi S. The perception bias of aesthetic providers. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021 Jun;20(6):1618-21. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13785.
Solov’ev MM, Katinas EB, An IA. Pattern of facial beauty: previously undefined proportions. Russian Med Inquiry. 2020;4(4):226-32. doi: 10.32364/2587-6821-2020-4-4-226-232.
Armengou X, Frank K, Kaye K, Brébant V, Möllhoff N, Cotofana S, et al. Facial anthropometric measurements and principles – overview and implications for aesthetic treatments. facial plastic surgery. 2024 Jun;40(03):348-62. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1770765.
Ahuja V, Ahuja A, Thosar NR. Evaluation and comparison of facial appearance using the golden ratio: an anthropometric study in preschool and school-going children of Santhal Tribe in west Bengal. Cureus. 2024 Jan 29;16(1):e53200. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53200.
Jain R, Huang P, Ferraz RM. A new tool to improve delivery of patient‐engaged care and satisfaction in facial treatments: the Aesthetic Global Ranking Scale. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017 Mar;16(1):132-43. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12297.
Dayan S, Romero DH. Introducing a novel model: the special theory of relativity for attractiveness to define a natural and pleasing outcome following cosmetic treatments. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018 Oct;17(5):925–30. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12732.
Haykal D, Treacy P, Lim T, Clatici VG, Fakih‐Gomez N, Leal‐Silva H, et al. Cross‐cultural perspectives on patient expectations in cosmetic dermatology: A comparative analysis across countries and ethnicities. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023 Dec;22(12):3237-40. doi: 10.1111/jocd.16023.
Bashour M. History and current concepts in the analysis of facial attractiveness. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Sep;118(3):741-56. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000233051.61512.65.
D’Souza A, Ng CL. Applied anatomy for botulinum toxin injection in cosmetic interventions. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep. 2020 Dec;8(4):336-43. doi: 10.1007/s40136-020-00308-4.
de Maio M, Brenninkmeijer E, Nurlin I, Colucci L, Sanchez T. Applying the MD CodesTM to treat emotional and social attributes with HA Fillers: a retrospective serial case study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2023 Nov;16:3441-53. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S430747.
Fisher SM, Borab Z, Weir D, Rohrich RJ. The emerging role of biostimulators as an adjunct in facial rejuvenation: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024 May;92:118-29. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.02.069.
Contreras C, Ariza‐Donado A, Ariza‐Fontalvo A. Using PDO threads: A scarcely studied rejuvenation technique. Case report and systematic review. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023 Aug;22(8):2158-65. doi: 10.1111/jocd.15709.
Landau M, Bageorgeou F. Update on chemical peels. dermatol Clin. 2024 Jan;42(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2023.06.005.
Bhargava S, Goldust M, Singer H, Negbenebor N, Kroumpouzos G. Evaluating resurfacing modalities in aesthetics. Clin Dermatol. 2022 May;40(3):274-82. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2021.01.019.
Devgan L, Singh P, Durairaj K. Minimally Invasive Facial Cosmetic Procedures. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2019 Jun;52(3):443-59. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2019.02.013.
Chatham DR. Reducing risks for a dissatisfied patient in facial cosmetic surgery. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2023 May;31(2):183-93. doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2023.01.004.
Morhy ON, Sisnando AL, Câmara-Souza MB, Carbone AC, De la Torre Canales G. High levels of physical activity reduce the esthetic durability of botulinum toxin type A: A Controlled Single-Blind Clinical Trial. Toxins (Basel). 2023 Jul;15(7):463. doi: 10.3390/toxins15070463.
Harnchoowong S, Vachiramon V, Jurairattanaporn N. Cosmetic considerations in dark-skinned patients. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2024 Feb;17:259-77. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S450081.
Esmaeili S, Malek Mohammadi N, Khosravani S, Eslamian L, Motamedian SR. Effects of age and gender on hard and soft tissue cephalometric features of an iranian population over 12 years old. J Kerman Univ Med Sci. 2022 Dec;29(6):507-19. doi: 10.34172/jkmu.2022.62.
Yurdakurban E, Duran GS, Görgülü S. Evaluation of an automated approach for facial midline detection and asymmetry assessment: A preliminary study. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 Dec;24(S2):84-91. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12539.
Zebrowitz LA, Franklin RG. The attractiveness halo effect and the babyface stereotype in older and younger adults: similarities, own-age accentuation, and older adult positivity effects. Exp Aging Res. 2014 May;40(3):375-93. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2014.897151.
Trussler AP. Facial geometry: graphic facial analysis for forensic artists. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Jun;121(6):2172. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181784221.
Novaes HMD, Soárez PC. [Health technologies assessment: origins, development, and current challenges. in the international and brazilian scenarios]. Cad Saude Publica. 2020 Sep 4;36(9):e00006820. Portuguese. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00006820.
Kim N-Y, Kim B-R, Park S-H, Jang H-J, Kim S-J. A Study on the changing of biophysical properties of the facial skin according to aging. Asian J Beauty Cosmetol. 2023 Jun;21(2):247-61. doi: 10.20402/ajbc.2023.0023.
Raikar D, Javed MW, Takalkar AA. A clinical and epidemiological study of hyperpigmentary disorder of face. Int J Res Dermatol. 2020 Feb;6(2):183-6. doi: 10.18203/issn.2455-4529.IntJResDermatol20200207.
Youn SW, Kim SJ, Hwang IA, Park KC. Evaluation of facial skin type by sebum secretion: Discrepancies between subjective descriptions and sebum secretion. Skin Res Technol. 2002 Aug;8(3):168-72. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0846.2002.10320.x.
Wollenberg A, Giménez‐Arnau A. Sensitive skin: a relevant syndrome, be aware. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022 Apr 21;36(S5):3–5. doi: 10.1111/jdv.17903.
Glogau RG. Aesthetic and anatomic analysis of the aging skin. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 1996 Sep;15(3):134-8. doi: 10.1016/S1085-5629(96)80003-4.
Türkkahraman H, Gökalp H. Facial profile preferences among various layers of Turkish population. Angle Orthod. 2004 Oct;74(5):640-7. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0640:FPPAVL>2.0.CO;2.
Fabi S, Alexiades M, Chatrath V, Colucci L, Sherber N, Heydenrych I, et al. Facial aesthetic priorities and concerns: a physician and patient perception global survey. Aesthet Surg J. 2022 Mar;42(4):NP218-29. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab358.
Martinez MJ, Dixit D, White MW, Rieder EA. Motivations for seeking cosmetic enhancing procedures of the face: a systematic review. Dermatol Surg. 2023 Mar;49(3):278-82. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003702.
Toh WL, Lam S, Mangano M, Rossell SL. Multidimensional perfectionism and facial symmetry, attractiveness and approachability: comparing those with high versus low dysmorphic concerns. Psychol Rep. 2023 Oct:332941231205274. doi: 10.1177/00332941231205274.
Benedetti TRB, Antunes PC, Rodriguez-Añez CR, Mazo GZ, Petroski ÉL. Reproducibility and validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) in elderly men. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2007 Feb;13(1):11-6. doi: 10.1590/S1517-86922007000100004.
Knipping S, ter Haar E, Alkemade H, Bronkhorst E, Falk M, Hueskes K, et al. Translation and Validation of the Dutch Version of the Sun Exposure and Protection Index. Dermatology. 2024;240(2):282-90. doi: 10.1159/000535510.
Cabral LDS, Pereira SDO, Partata AK. [Sunscreens and photoprotection compounds - a review]. Infarma Cienc Farmaceut. 2013 Aug;25(2):107-10. Portuguese. doi: 10.14450/2318-9312.v25.e2.a2013.pp107-110.
Voegeli R, Schoop R, Prestat‐Marquis E, Rawlings A V., Shackelford TK, Fink B. Differences between perceived age and chronological age in women: a multi‐ethnic and multi‐centre study. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2021 Oct;43(5):547-60. doi: 10.1111/ics.12727.
Fitzpatrick TB. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol. 1988 Jun;124(6):869-71. doi: 10.1001/archderm.124.6.869.
Weigand DA, Haygood C, Gaylor JR. Cell layer and density of negro and caucasian stratum corneum. J Investigat Dermatol. 1974 Jun;62(6):563-8. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12679412.
Goldie K, Kerscher M, Fabi SG, Hirano C, Landau M, Lim TS, et al. Skin quality – a holistic 360° view: consensus results. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2021 Jun:14:643-654. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S309374.
Jungersted JM, Høgh JK, Hellgren LI, Jemec GBE, Agner T. Ethnicity and stratum corneum ceramides. Br J Dermatol. 2010 Dec;163(6):1169-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10080.x
Oesch S, Vingan NR, Li X, Hoopman J, Akgul Y, Kenkel JM. A Correlation of the glogau scale with visia-cr complexion analysis measurements in assessing facial photoaging for clinical research. Aesthet Surg J. 2022 Sep;42(10):1175-84. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjac108.
Quiñonez RL, Agbai ON, Burgess CM, Taylor SC. An update on cosmetic procedures in people of color. Part 2: neuromodulators, soft tissue augmentation, chemexfoliating agents, and laser hair reduction. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022 Apr;86(4):729-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.07.080.
Rhodes G, Zebrowitz LA, Clark A, Kalick SM, Hightower A, McKay R. Do facial averageness and symmetry signal health? Evol Hum Behav. 2001 Jan;22(1):31-46. doi: 10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00060-X.
Tanikawa C, Akcam MO, Gokalp H, Zere E, Takada K. Population affinity and variation of sexual dimorphism in three-dimensional facial forms: comparisons between Turkish and Japanese populations. Sci Rep. 2021 Aug;11(1):16634. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96029-9.
Taylor SC, Burgess CM, Callender VD. Safety of nonanimal stabilized hyaluronic acid dermal fillers in patients with skin of color: a randomized, evaluator-blinded comparative trial. Dermatol Surg. 2009 Oct;35 Suppl 2:1653-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01344.x.
Gao Y, Niddam J, Noel W, Hersant B, Meningaud JP. Comparison of aesthetic facial criteria between Caucasian and East Asian female populations: An esthetic surgeon’s perspective. Asian J Surg. 2018 Jan;41(1):4-11. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.07.007.
Arian H, Alroudan D, Alkandari Q, Shuaib A. Cosmetic surgery and the diversity of cultural and ethnic perceptions of facial, breast, and gluteal aesthetics in women: a comprehensive review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2023 Jun;16:1443-1456. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S410621.
Buggio L, Vercellini P, Somigliana E, Viganò P, Frattaruolo MP, Fedele L. "You are so beautiful"*: behind women's attractiveness towards the biology of reproduction: a narrative review. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2012 Oct;28(10):753-7. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2012.662545.
Naini FB, Gill DS. Facial Aesthetics: 2. Clinical Assessment. Dent Update. 2008 Apr 2;35(3):159-70. doi: 10.12968/denu.2008.35.3.159.
Mogilski JK, Welling LLM. The Relative importance of sexual dimorphism, fluctuating asymmetry, and color cues to health during evaluation of potential partners’ facial photographs. Hum Nat. 2017 Mar;28(1):53-75. doi: 10.1007/s12110-016-9277-4.
Özener B, Fink B. Facial symmetry in young girls and boys from a slum and a control area of Ankara, Turkey. Evol Hum Behav. 2010 Nov;31(6):436-41. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.06.003.
Jones AL. The influence of shape and colour cue classes on facial health perception. Evol Hum Behav. 2018 Jan;39(1):19-29. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.09.005.
Komori M, Kawamura S, Ishihara S. Averageness or symmetry: Which is more important for facial attractiveness? Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Jun;131(2):136-42. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.03.008.
Heidekrueger PI, Juran S, Szpalski C, Larcher L, Ng R, Broer PN. The current preferred female lip ratio. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017 May;45(5):655-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.01.038.
Kolte RA, Kolte AP, Kharkar V V., Bawankar P. Influence of facial index, facial profile, lip size, and angulations of teeth on gingival characteristics of anterior teeth: a gender‐based evaluation. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020 Jul;32(5):496-504. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12600.
Tonnard PL, Verpaele AM, Ramaut LE, Blondeel PN. Aging of the upper lip: part II. evidence-based rejuvenation of the upper lip—a review of 500 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 May;143(5):1333-42. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005589.
Mally P, Czyz CN, Wulc AE. The role of gravity in periorbital and midfacial aging. Aesthet Surg J. 2014 Aug;34(6):809–22. doi: 10.1177/1090820X14535077.
Mezio M, Guarnieri R, Altieri F, Padalino G, Cassetta M, Di Giorgio R, et al. Smile esthetic: comparison of perception amongst orthodontists, dental students, orthodontic patients and surgical orthodontic patients. Braz J Oral Sci. 2023 Dec ;22:e230438. doi: 10.20396/bjos.v22i00.8670438.
Rhodes G. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annu Rev Psychol. 2006 Jan;57(1):199-226. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208.
Friedman H, Zebrowitz LA. The contribution of typical sex differences in facial maturity to sex role stereotypes. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1992 Aug;18(4):430-8. doi: 10.1177/0146167292184006.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Amanda Lopes; Marcelo Germani Vieira; José Mauro Granjeiro