Palavras-chave
Como Citar
Resumo
This paper works with one central idea that Small Clauses (as put forward basically by Stowell 1981 and 1983 and Chomsky 1981 and 1986, our Hypothesis A) do not exist, if they are understood as Complement Small Clauses. Kreps (1994) argues that Small Clauses are IP complement clauses, containing a subject and a verb just like any other clause. The only difference would be that in some of these IP complements, if the verb is a copula, it may be deleted at PF. Hence, Small Clauses are formally identical to IP clauses, better, Small Clauses are themselves IPs, headed by an empty Io, the complement of which is a VP headed by non-overt copula. This paper also draws interesting consequences if we adopt this proposal by Kreps, our Hypothesis B.Referências
BORGES NETO, J. (2003). Semântica de Modelos. In. Müller, A. L., Negrão, E. e M. J. Foltran (org.). Semântica Formal. São Paulo: Contexto.
BRESNAN, B. (1978). A realistic transformational grammar. In. Halle, Bresnam and Miller (eds). Linguistic Theory and Psichological reality. Cambridge: Mit Press.
CARDINALETTI, A e GUASTI, M, T. (1993). Negation in Small Clauses. Probus 5, 39-61.
CINQUE, G. (1991). The pseudo-relative and ACC-ing constructions after verbs of perception. Unpublished manuscript, University of Venice.
CHOMSKY, N. (1975). The logical structure of linguistic theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
CHOMSKY, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Foris, Dordrecht.
CHOMSKY, N. (1986). Barriers. Linguistic inquiry Monograph Series 13. Cambridge: MIT Press.
CHOMSKY, N. (1989). Some notes on the economy of derivation and representation. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 10. Cambridge, Mass.
CHOMSKY, N. (1993). A minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory. In. Hale, K. and Keiser (eds). The view from Building 20. Cambridge: MIT Press.
CHOMSKY, N. (1995). Programa Minimalista. Trad, Eduardo Raposo. Lisboa: Caminho.
CHOMSKY, N. (1998). Minimalist Inquiry: the framework. Cambridge, MIT Working Papers in linguistics.
CHOMSKY, N. (1999). Derivation by Phase. Cambridge, MIT Working Papers in linguistics.
CONTRERAS, H. (1995). Small Clauses and complex predicates. In Cardinaletti e Guasti (eds.). Syntax and Semantics. San Diego: Academic Press.
GUÉRON J. e HOEKSTRA, T. (1995). The temporal interpretation of predication. In Cardinaletti e Guasti (eds.). Syntax and Semantics. San Diego: Academic Press.
HORNSTEIN, N e LIGHTFOOT, D. (1987). Predication and PRO. Language 63, 23-52.
KITAGAWA, Y. (1985). Small but clausal. Chicago Linguistic Society 21, 210-220.
KREPS, C. (1994). Another look at Small Clauses. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 6.
LARSON, R. (1988). On the double object construct. Linguistic Inquiry 19.
MIOTO, C., FIQUEREDO SILVA, M.C. e LOPES, R.E.V. (2000). Manual de sintaxe. Florianópolis: Insular.
MOUCHAWEH, L. (1984). En faveur des Small clause. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 12, 92124.
POLLOCK, J. Y. Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365424.
RAPOPORT, T. R. (1995). Specificity, Objects, and Nominal Small Clauses. In Cardinaletti e Guasti (eds.). Syntax and Semantics. San Diego: Academic Press.
RAPOSO, E. e URIAGEREKA, J. (1990). Long distance case assignment. Linguistic Inquiry 17, 501557.
RIZZI, L. (1986). Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17.
ROTHSTEIN, S. (1995). Copular Constructions. In Cardinaletti e Guasti (eds.). Syntax and Semantics. San Diego: Academic Press.
SAFIR, K. (1987). What explains the definiteness effect? In. Reuland and Ter Meulen (eds). The representation of (in)definiteness. Cambridge: MIT Press.
SCHEIN, B. (1995). Small Clauses and Predication. In Cardinaletti e Guasti (eds.). Syntax and Semantics. San Diego: Academic Press.
SPORTICHE, D. (1995). French Predicate Clitics and Clause Structure. In Cardinaletti e Guasti (eds.). Syntax and Semantics. San Diego: Academic Press.
STARKE, M. (1995).On the format for Small Clauses. In Cardinaletti e Guasti (eds.). Syntax and Semantics. San Diego: Academic Press.
STOWELL, T. (1980). The origins of Phrase Structure. PhD dissertation, MIT.
STOWELL, T. (1083). Subjects across categories. The Linguistic Review 2.
STOWELL, T. (1995). Remarks on Clause Structure. In Cardinaletti e Guasti (eds.). Syntax and Semantics. San Diego: Academic Press.
WILLIANS, E. (1980). Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11.
WILLIANS, E. (1983). Against Small Clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 14.
O periódico Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto.
Downloads
