Abstract
The objective of this article is to approach the way in which Kant considers the “analogies of experience” necessary connections for the scientific representation of the physical world to occur. The method consists of carrying out a conceptual analysis of selected excerpts from the Critique of pure reason that may serve to support the interpretation that the analogies of experience are, for Kant, rules that determine the necessary links between perceptions and the ability to understand phenomena. from them. In this way, we seek to explain the divergence between pure knowledge and empirical knowledge, as well as the way in which physics manages to maintain its a priori concepts.
References
Barra, E. (2002). As duas respostas de Kant ao problema de Hume. Princípios, 9(11-12), 145–178. https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/61
Bonaccini, J. A. (2008). Analogia e imputabilidade na filosofia prática de Kant. Revista latinoamericana de filosofia, 34(2), 23–73.
Kant, I. (2018). Crítica da razão pura. (M. P. Santos e A. F. Morujão, Trad.; 9a ed.). Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
Loparic, Z. (2002). A semântica transcendental de Kant. Unicamp/CLE.
Popper, K. R. (2013). A lógica da pesquisa científica. (L. Regenberg e O. S. da Mota, Trad.; 2a ed.). Cultrix.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Bruno Camilo de Oliveira
Downloads
