Resumo
The aim of this paper is to discuss Loparic’s reading of the ethical implications of the Wittgensteinian notion of language-games. Contrary to his view that they lead to relativism and skepticism, I will argue that the so-called “Second Wittgenstein” give us the means to criticize cientificism and naturalism in Ethics and that they are not relativist. Moreover, I will show that Loparic’s comparative analysis between Heidegger and Wittgenstein is flawed precisely because the notion of language-games does not yield to skepticism.
Desde 2022, todo o conteúdo publicado pela Kant e-Prints está sob a licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0).
Downloads
Não há dados estatísticos.