Keywords
Classic Mayan
Q'eqchi'
Agent focus construction
Agreement
How to Cite
Abstract
In many Mayan languages, a special construction is used to focus subjects of transitive verbs, the so-called agent focus construction. Though this construction has two participants, it is morphologically intransitive and agrees with only one argument. Modern Mayan languages differ in which argument is cross-referenced in the agent focus construction, with some of them showing agreement with the agent, others with the patient and others with either the agent or the patient depending on their respective position on a person hierarchy. All of these patterns have been proposed by different authors to be the original pattern found in Proto-Mayan. Based on evidence from colonial Q’eqchi’, this paper suggests that in Proto-Mayan the verb did not agree at all in the agent focus construction. The variety of different agreement patterns in modern Mayan languages reflects the fact that agreement in the agent focus construction developed only after Proto-Mayan had split up.
References
Acker, Ann Michelle (2016). Voice and valence in Q’anjob’al (PhD dissertation). Los Angeles: University of California. Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4mk3j9sr
Aissen, Judith (1999). Agent focus and inverse in Tzotzil. Language 75(3): 451-485. https://doi.org/10.2307/417057
Aissen, Judith (2017). Agent focus and passive in Tsotsil. In Jason Ostrove; Ruth Kramer; Joseph Sabbagh (Eds.), Asking the right questions: Essays in honor of Sandra Chung, pp. 143-161. Santa Cruz: University of California, Santa Cruz. Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8255v8sc
Ayres, Glenn (1983). The antipassive “Voice” in Ixil. International Journal of American Linguistics 49(1): 20-45. https://doi.org/10.1086/465763
Barrett, Edward Rush (1999). A grammar of Sipakapense Maya (PhD dissertation). Austin: The University of Texas at Austin.
Berendt, Carl Hermann (1875). Arte de lengua Cacchí Para Bien común. Available at https://archives.lib.byu.edu/repositories/ltpsc/archival_objects/ref733_wla
Brown, Linda Kay (1978). Word formation in Pocomchi (Mayan) (PhD dissertation). Stanford: Stanford University.
Campbell, Lyle (1977). Quichean linguistic prehistory. Berkeley: The University of California Press.
Campbell, Lyle (1984). The implications of Mayan historical linguistics for Glyphic Research. In John S. Justeson; Lyle Campbell (eds.), Phoneticism in Mayan Hieroglyphic Writing, pp. 1-17. Albany: State University of New York.
Corbett, Greville G. (2006). Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dayley, Jon Philip (1981). Tzutujil grammar (PhD dissertation). Berkeley: University of California. Available at: https://escholarship.org/content/qt4cx9t9b1/qt4cx9t9b1_noSplash_aa75d270aef86e270815c99e2bf9ede2.pdf
Dayley, Jon Philip (1983). Voice and ergativity in Mayan languages. In Alice Schachter; Wallace L. Chafe; Leanne Hinton (Eds.), Studies in Mesoamerican Linguistics, pp. 5-119. Survey of California and Other Indian Languages. Santa Barbara: University of California.
DuBois, John William (1981). The Sacapultec language (PhD Dissertation). Berkeley: University of California.
Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka (2016). Anti-locality and optimality in Kaqchikel agent focus. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 34: 429-479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9310-z
Freeze, Ray (1980). A petición of 1619 in K’ekchi’ (Maya). Tlalocan 8: 111-129.
Gelderen, Elly van (2011). The grammaticalization of agreement. In Heiko Narrog; Bernd Heine (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, pp. 491-501. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0039
Grinevald Craig, Colette (1979). The antipassive and Jacaltec. In Laura Martin (Ed.), Papers in Mayan Linguistics, pp. 139-164. Columbia: Lucas Brothers Publishers.
Heaton, Raina (2017). A typology of antipassives with special reference to Mayan (PhD dissertation). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i at Manoa. Available at: http://ling.hawaii.edu/wp-content/uploads/HEATON_Raina_Final_Dissertation.pdf
Hou, Liwen (2013). Agent focus in Chuj reflexive constructions (BA honors thesis). Montreal: McGill University.
Houston, Stephen; Robertson, John; Stuart, David (2000). The language of Classic Maya inscriptions. Current Anthropology 41(3): 321-356. https://doi.org/10.1086/300142
Hull, Kerry; Carrasco, Michael D.; Wald, Robert (2009). The first-person singular independent pronoun in Classic Ch’olan. Mexicon 31(2): 36-43.
Kaufman, Terrence (2015). Mayan Comparative Studies. Available at: https://www.albany.edu/ims/pdlma/2015%20Publications/Kaufman-Mayan%20Comparative%20Studies.pdf
Lacadena, Alfonso (2000). Antipassive constructions in the Maya Glyphic Texts. Written Language and Literacy 3(1): 155-180.
Larsen, Thomas W. (1981). Functional correlates of ergativity in Aguacatec. Berkeley Linguistics Society 7: 136-153.
Law, Danny; Stuart, David (2017). Classic Mayan. An overview of language in ancient hieroglyphic script. In Judith Aissen; Nora C. England; Roberto Zavala Maldonado (eds.), The Mayan Languages, pp. 128-172. London / New York: Routledge.
Mateo Toledo, Eladio (2017). Q’anjob’al. In Judith Aissen; Nora C. England; Roberto Zavala Maldonado (eds.), The Mayan Languages, pp. 533-569. London / New York: Routledge.
Mondloch, James Lorin (1981). Voice in Quiche-Maya (PhD dissertation). Albany: State University of New York at Albany.
Mora-Marín, David (2009). A test and falsification of the ‘Classic Ch’olti’an’ hypothesis: A study of three Proto-Ch’olan markers. International Journal of American Linguistics 75(2): 115-157. https://doi.org/10.1086/596592
Morán, Francisco. 1695. Arte en lengua Cholti que quiere decir lengua de milperos. Available at: https://archives.lib.byu.edu/repositories/ltpsc/archival_objects/ref667_7q1
Norman, William M.; Campbell, Lyle (1978). Toward a Proto-Mayan syntax: A comparative perspective on grammar. In Nora C. England (Ed.), Papers in Mayan Linguistics, pp. 136-156. Columbia: University of Missouri.
Quizar, Robin; Knowles-Berry, Susan M. (1988). Ergativity in the Cholan languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 54(1): 73-95. https://doi.org/10.1086/466075
Robertson, John (1980). The structure of pronoun incorporation in the Mayan verbal complex, New York / London: Garland.
Romero, Sergio (2019). El K’iche’ evangeliza al Q’eqchi’: La Theologia Indorum (K’iche’) como modelo de discurso doctrinal para las Coplas de Luís de Cáncer (Q’eqchi’). In Rodolfo Cerrón-Palomino; Álvaro Ezcurra Rivero; Otto Zwartjes (Eds.), Lingüística misionera: Aspectos lingüísticos, discursivos, filológicos y pedagógicos, pp. 221-243. Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Fondo Editorial. Available at: http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/170258
Sattler, Mareike (2004). An Analysis of the Arte de la lengua Ch’olti by Fray Francisco Morán. In: Søren Wichmann (ed.), The linguistics of Maya writing, pp. 365-405. Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.
Schweitzer, Jürgen (2006). Das Grosse im Kleinen. Zur diachronen Typologie des Maya-Verbalkomplexes, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des ch’olotzeltalischen Zweiges (PhD dissertation). München: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität.
Seler, Eduard (1887). Das Konjugationssystem der Maya-Sprachen. Berlin: Gebr. Unger.
Smith-Stark, Thomas (1978). The Mayan antipassive: some facts and fictions. In Nora C. England (ed.), Papers in Mayan Linguistics, pp. 169-187. Columbia: University of Missouri.
Stiebels, Barbara (2006). Agent focus in Mayan languages. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 24: 501-570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-005-0539-9
Stoll, Otto (1884). Zur Ethnographie der Republik Guatemala. Zürich: Orell Füssli.
Verhoeven, Elisabeth; Skopeteas, Stavros (2015). Licensing focus constructions in Yucatec Maya. International Journal of American Linguistics 81 (1): 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1086/679041
Vinogradov, Igor (2017a). From enclitic to prefix: diachrony of personal absolutive markers in Q’eqchi’. Morphology 27: 105-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-016-9293-4
Vinogradov, Igor (2017b). El Arte de Lengua Cacchí para Bien comun y los estudios diacrónicos de la gramática q’eqchi’. Estudios de Cultura Maya 49: 201-225. https://doi.org/10.19130/iifl.ecm.2017.49.770
Zavala, Roberto (1997). Functional analysis of Akatek voice constructions. International Journal of American Linguistics 63 (4): 439-474. https://doi.org/10.1086/466340
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Thilo Momme Holtmann
Downloads
