Banner Portal
Sobre a concordância de foco do agente em Proto-Maia
PDF (English)

Palavras-chave

Proto-Maia
Q'eqchi'
Construção de foco do agente
Concordância
Maia Clássico

Como Citar

HOLTMANN, Thilo Momme. Sobre a concordância de foco do agente em Proto-Maia. LIAMES: Línguas Indígenas Americanas, Campinas, SP, v. 22, n. 00, p. e022009, 2022. DOI: 10.20396/liames.v22i00.8670032. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/liames/article/view/8670032. Acesso em: 19 abr. 2024.

Resumo

Em muitas línguas maias, uma construção especial é usada se o sujeito de um verbo transitivo estiver em foco, a chamada construção de foco do agente. Embora essa construção tenha dois participantes, ela é morfologicamente intransitiva e corresponde a apenas um argumento. As línguas maias modernas diferem em qual argumento o verbo concorda na construção do foco do agente. Em algumas, o verbo concorda com o sujeito, em outras com o objeto e em outras com o sujeito ou o objeto, dependendo de qual argumento é mais alto na hierarquia de pessoa. Todos esses sistemas de concordância foram propostos por diferentes autores como o sistema original usado no Proto-Maya. Com base em evidências do Q'eqchi' colonial, este artigo propõe que em proto-maia o verbo não concordava com nenhum argumento na voz antipassiva do foco. A variedade de diferentes sistemas de concordância dessa construção nas línguas maias modernas resulta do fato de que a concordância na construção do agente-foco se desenvolveu após a divisão do proto-maia.

https://doi.org/10.20396/liames.v22i00.8670032
PDF (English)

Referências

Acker, Ann Michelle (2016). Voice and valence in Q’anjob’al (PhD dissertation). Los Angeles: University of California. Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4mk3j9sr

Aissen, Judith (1999). Agent focus and inverse in Tzotzil. Language 75(3): 451-485. https://doi.org/10.2307/417057

Aissen, Judith (2017). Agent focus and passive in Tsotsil. In Jason Ostrove; Ruth Kramer; Joseph Sabbagh (Eds.), Asking the right questions: Essays in honor of Sandra Chung, pp. 143-161. Santa Cruz: University of California, Santa Cruz. Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8255v8sc

Ayres, Glenn (1983). The antipassive “Voice” in Ixil. International Journal of American Linguistics 49(1): 20-45. https://doi.org/10.1086/465763

Barrett, Edward Rush (1999). A grammar of Sipakapense Maya (PhD dissertation). Austin: The University of Texas at Austin.

Berendt, Carl Hermann (1875). Arte de lengua Cacchí Para Bien común. Available at https://archives.lib.byu.edu/repositories/ltpsc/archival_objects/ref733_wla

Brown, Linda Kay (1978). Word formation in Pocomchi (Mayan) (PhD dissertation). Stanford: Stanford University.

Campbell, Lyle (1977). Quichean linguistic prehistory. Berkeley: The University of California Press.

Campbell, Lyle (1984). The implications of Mayan historical linguistics for Glyphic Research. In John S. Justeson; Lyle Campbell (eds.), Phoneticism in Mayan Hieroglyphic Writing, pp. 1-17. Albany: State University of New York.

Corbett, Greville G. (2006). Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dayley, Jon Philip (1981). Tzutujil grammar (PhD dissertation). Berkeley: University of California. Available at: https://escholarship.org/content/qt4cx9t9b1/qt4cx9t9b1_noSplash_aa75d270aef86e270815c99e2bf9ede2.pdf

Dayley, Jon Philip (1983). Voice and ergativity in Mayan languages. In Alice Schachter; Wallace L. Chafe; Leanne Hinton (Eds.), Studies in Mesoamerican Linguistics, pp. 5-119. Survey of California and Other Indian Languages. Santa Barbara: University of California.

DuBois, John William (1981). The Sacapultec language (PhD Dissertation). Berkeley: University of California.

Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka (2016). Anti-locality and optimality in Kaqchikel agent focus. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 34: 429-479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9310-z

Freeze, Ray (1980). A petición of 1619 in K’ekchi’ (Maya). Tlalocan 8: 111-129.

Gelderen, Elly van (2011). The grammaticalization of agreement. In Heiko Narrog; Bernd Heine (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, pp. 491-501. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0039

Grinevald Craig, Colette (1979). The antipassive and Jacaltec. In Laura Martin (Ed.), Papers in Mayan Linguistics, pp. 139-164. Columbia: Lucas Brothers Publishers.

Heaton, Raina (2017). A typology of antipassives with special reference to Mayan (PhD dissertation). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i at Manoa. Available at: http://ling.hawaii.edu/wp-content/uploads/HEATON_Raina_Final_Dissertation.pdf

Hou, Liwen (2013). Agent focus in Chuj reflexive constructions (BA honors thesis). Montreal: McGill University.

Houston, Stephen; Robertson, John; Stuart, David (2000). The language of Classic Maya inscriptions. Current Anthropology 41(3): 321-356. https://doi.org/10.1086/300142

Hull, Kerry; Carrasco, Michael D.; Wald, Robert (2009). The first-person singular independent pronoun in Classic Ch’olan. Mexicon 31(2): 36-43.

Kaufman, Terrence (2015). Mayan Comparative Studies. Available at: https://www.albany.edu/ims/pdlma/2015%20Publications/Kaufman-Mayan%20Comparative%20Studies.pdf

Lacadena, Alfonso (2000). Antipassive constructions in the Maya Glyphic Texts. Written Language and Literacy 3(1): 155-180.

Larsen, Thomas W. (1981). Functional correlates of ergativity in Aguacatec. Berkeley Linguistics Society 7: 136-153.

Law, Danny; Stuart, David (2017). Classic Mayan. An overview of language in ancient hieroglyphic script. In Judith Aissen; Nora C. England; Roberto Zavala Maldonado (eds.), The Mayan Languages, pp. 128-172. London / New York: Routledge.

Mateo Toledo, Eladio (2017). Q’anjob’al. In Judith Aissen; Nora C. England; Roberto Zavala Maldonado (eds.), The Mayan Languages, pp. 533-569. London / New York: Routledge.

Mondloch, James Lorin (1981). Voice in Quiche-Maya (PhD dissertation). Albany: State University of New York at Albany.

Mora-Marín, David (2009). A test and falsification of the ‘Classic Ch’olti’an’ hypothesis: A study of three Proto-Ch’olan markers. International Journal of American Linguistics 75(2): 115-157. https://doi.org/10.1086/596592

Morán, Francisco. 1695. Arte en lengua Cholti que quiere decir lengua de milperos. Available at: https://archives.lib.byu.edu/repositories/ltpsc/archival_objects/ref667_7q1

Norman, William M.; Campbell, Lyle (1978). Toward a Proto-Mayan syntax: A comparative perspective on grammar. In Nora C. England (Ed.), Papers in Mayan Linguistics, pp. 136-156. Columbia: University of Missouri.

Quizar, Robin; Knowles-Berry, Susan M. (1988). Ergativity in the Cholan languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 54(1): 73-95. https://doi.org/10.1086/466075

Robertson, John (1980). The structure of pronoun incorporation in the Mayan verbal complex, New York / London: Garland.

Romero, Sergio (2019). El K’iche’ evangeliza al Q’eqchi’: La Theologia Indorum (K’iche’) como modelo de discurso doctrinal para las Coplas de Luís de Cáncer (Q’eqchi’). In Rodolfo Cerrón-Palomino; Álvaro Ezcurra Rivero; Otto Zwartjes (Eds.), Lingüística misionera: Aspectos lingüísticos, discursivos, filológicos y pedagógicos, pp. 221-243. Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Fondo Editorial. Available at: http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/170258

Sattler, Mareike (2004). An Analysis of the Arte de la lengua Ch’olti by Fray Francisco Morán. In: Søren Wichmann (ed.), The linguistics of Maya writing, pp. 365-405. Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.

Schweitzer, Jürgen (2006). Das Grosse im Kleinen. Zur diachronen Typologie des Maya-Verbalkomplexes, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des ch’olotzeltalischen Zweiges (PhD dissertation). München: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität.

Seler, Eduard (1887). Das Konjugationssystem der Maya-Sprachen. Berlin: Gebr. Unger.

Smith-Stark, Thomas (1978). The Mayan antipassive: some facts and fictions. In Nora C. England (ed.), Papers in Mayan Linguistics, pp. 169-187. Columbia: University of Missouri.

Stiebels, Barbara (2006). Agent focus in Mayan languages. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 24: 501-570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-005-0539-9

Stoll, Otto (1884). Zur Ethnographie der Republik Guatemala. Zürich: Orell Füssli.

Verhoeven, Elisabeth; Skopeteas, Stavros (2015). Licensing focus constructions in Yucatec Maya. International Journal of American Linguistics 81 (1): 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1086/679041

Vinogradov, Igor (2017a). From enclitic to prefix: diachrony of personal absolutive markers in Q’eqchi’. Morphology 27: 105-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-016-9293-4

Vinogradov, Igor (2017b). El Arte de Lengua Cacchí para Bien comun y los estudios diacrónicos de la gramática q’eqchi’. Estudios de Cultura Maya 49: 201-225. https://doi.org/10.19130/iifl.ecm.2017.49.770

Zavala, Roberto (1997). Functional analysis of Akatek voice constructions. International Journal of American Linguistics 63 (4): 439-474. https://doi.org/10.1086/466340

Creative Commons License

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Thilo Momme Holtmann

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.