Resumo
As reflexões acerca da política industrial e, em termos mais amplos, dos caminhos para a superação do subdesenvolvimento devem estar apoiadas numa adequada compreensão dos condicionantes tecnoprodutivos característicos à cada período histórico. Este editorial relaciona o recente revigoramento do debate em torno da política industrial à emergência da Indústria 4.0 e da China como potência manufatureira. Apresenta-se uma visão panorâmica sobre a evolução desta temática, desde as ideias fundadoras dos clássicos do desenvolvimento econômico até as formulações contemporâneas mais relevantes, para introduzir e contextualizar as contribuições dos artigos que compõem essa seção especial da Revista Brasileia de Inovação.
Referências
AMSDEN, A.H. Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
ANDREONI, A. Technical change, the Shifting Terrain of the ‘Industrial’ and Digital Industrial Policy. In: CHANG, H-J.; CRAMER, C.; KOZULWRIGHT, R.; OQUBAY, A. (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Industrial Policy. Oxford University Press, 2020.
ANDREONI, A.; CHANG, H.-J. Industrial policy and the future of manufacturing. Economia e Politica Industriale, v. 43, n. 4, p. 491-502, 2016.
ANDREONI A.; CHANG, H.-J. The Political Economy of Industrial Policy: Structural Interdependencies, Policy Alignment and Conflict Management. In: ANDREONI, A.; CHANG, H.-J.; SCAZZIERI, R. (Ed.). Structural change and economic dynamics, v. 48, p. 136-150, 2019. (Special Issue: Frontiers of Industrial Policy: Structures, Institutions and Policies).
ANDREONI, A.; GREGORY, M. Why and how does manufacturing still matter: old rationales, new realities. Revue d’Economie Industrielle, v. 144, n. 4, p. 21-57, 2013.
BEARSON, D.; KENNEY, M.; ZYSMANM, J. New Work and Value Creation in the Platform Economy: A Taxonomy and Preliminary Evidence. Berkeley, University of California, 2019. (BRIE Working Paper, 2).
BORRUS, M.; ZYSMAN, J. Wintelism and the Changing Terms of Global Competition: Prototype of the Future? Berkeley, University of California, Feb. 1997. (BRIE Working Paper, 96B, p. 1-23).
BRUN, L.; GEREFFI, G.; ZHAN, J. The “lightness” of Industry 4.0 lead firms: implications for global value chains. In: BIANCHI, P.; DURÁN, C.R.; LABORY, S. (Ed.). Transforming industrial policy for the digital age – production, territories and structural change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2019.
BUTOLLO, F. Digitalization and the geographies of production: Towards reshoring or global fragmentation? Competition & Change, p. 1-20, 2020.
CHANG, H.-J. The Political Economy of Industrial Policy. London: Macmillan, 1994.
CHANG, H.-J; ANDREONI, A. Industrial Policy in a Changing World: Basic Principles, Neglected Issues and New Challenges. Cambridge Journal of Economics 40 Years Conference, 2016.
CHEN, L; NAUGHTON, B. An institutionalized policy-making mechanism: China’s return to techno-industrial policy. Research Policy, v. 45, n. 10, p. 2138-2152, 2016.
CHERIF, R.; HASANOV, F. The Return of the Policy That Shall Not Be Named: Principles of Industrial Policy. International Monetary Fund, 2019. (IMF Working Papers, 19/74).
CUSUMANO, M.A.; GAWER, A. Driving High-Tech Innovation: The Four Levers of Platform Leadership. Center for e-Business@MIT, Oct. 2001. (Paper, 152).
DAUDT, G.M.; WILLCOX, L.D. Reflexões críticas a partir das experiências dos Estados Unidos e da Alemanha em manufatura avançada. BNDES Setorial, n. 44, p.5-45, set. 2016.
EVANS, P.B. Embedded autonomy: states and industrial transformation. Princeton University Press, 1995.
FURTADO, C. Desenvolvimento e subdesenvolvimento. Editora Fundo de Cultura, 1961.
GERSCHENKRON, A. El atraso económico en su perspectiva histórica. In: GERSCHENKRON, A. El atraso económico en su perspectiva histórica. Barcelona, Ariel, 1973.
HAMILTON, A. Report on Manufactures, 1791.
HAUSMANN, R.; RODRIK, D. Economic Development as Self-Discovery. Journal of Development Economics, v. 72, n. 2, p. 603-633, Dec. 2003.
HIDALGO, C.A.; HAUSMANN, R. The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 106, n. 26, p. 10570-10575, 2009.
HIRSCH-KREINSEN, H. “Industry 4.0” as Promising Technology: Emergence, Semantics and Ambivalent Character, 2016. (Arbeitspapier, nr. 48).
HIRSCHMAN, A. The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1958. v. 10.
JOHNSON, C. MITI and the Japanese Miracle. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1982.
KALDOR, N. Causes of the slow rate of economic growth of the United Kingdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1966.
KALDOR, N. Problems of Industrialization in Underdeveloped Countries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1967.
LAZONICK, W. Reforming the financialized business corporation. EPRN, 2015.
LEE, K.-F. AI Superpowers: China, Silicon Valley and the New World Order. Bus Econ, v. 54, n. 3, p. 185-190, 2019.
LEE, K. The Art of Economic Catch-up: Barriers, Detours and Leapfrogging in Innovation Systems. Cambridge University Press, 2019.
LIN, J.Y. New structural economics: a framework for rethinking development. The World Bank, 2011. (Policy Research Working Paper Series, 5197).
LIST, G.F. Sistema nacional de economia política. São Paulo: Nova Cultural, 1989. [1841].
MANYIKA, J. et al. Disruptive technologies: Advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy. San Francisco, CA: McKinsey Global Institute, 2013.
MAZZUCATO, M. O Estado empreendedor. Desmascarando o mito do setor público x setor privado. São Paulo: Portfolio Penguin, 2014.
MAZZUCATO, M.; KATTEL, R.; RYAN-COLLINS, J. Challenge-Driven Innovation Policy: Towards a New Policy Toolkit. J Ind Compet Trade, v. 20, p. 421-437, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-019-00329-w.
NOLAN, P. Globalisation and Industrial Policy: The Case of China. The World Economy, v. 37, n. 6, p. 747-764, June 2014.
O’SULLIVAN, E.; ANDREONI, A.; LÓPEZ-GÓMEZ, C.; GREGORY, M. What is new in the new industrial policy? A manufacturing systems perspective. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, v. 29, n. 2, p. 432-462, 2013.
PEREZ, C. Revoluciones tecnológicas y capital financiero: la dinámica de las grandes burbujas financieras y las épocas de bonanza. México: Siglo XXI, 2004.
PREBISCH, R. O desenvolvimento econômico da América Latina e alguns de seus principais problemas. In: BIELSCHOWSKY, R. (Org.). Cinquenta anos de pensamento na CEPAL. Rio de Janeiro, Cofecon-Cepal; Record, 2000. [1949]. v. 1.
RODRIK, D.; AIGINGER, K. Rebirth of Industrial Policy and an Agenda for the Twenty-First Century. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, v. 20, p. 189-207, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-019-00322-3.
ROSELINO, J.E.; DIEGUES, A.C. Limites do arcabouço tradicional de política industrial para o Brasil: elementos para uma abordagem alternativa em um mundo de estruturas fluidas. Campinas, Instituto de Economia da Unicamp, 2020. (Texto para Discussão, n. 375).
ROSENSTEIN-RODAN, P.N. Problemas de industrialização da Europa do Leste e do Sudeste. In: AGARWALA, A.N.; SINGH, S.P. (Coord.). A Economia do Subdesenvolvimento. Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto-Centro Celso Furtado, 2010 [1943]. p. 265-276.
ZHOU, Y.; LIU, X. Evolution of Chinese State Policies on Innovation. In: ZHOU, Y.; LAZONICK, W.; SUN, Y. (ed.). China as an Innovation Nation. Oxford Scholarship Online, 2016. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198753568.003.0002
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Brasileira de Inovação
Downloads
