Banner Portal
Posthumanism and assistive technologies
PDF

Keywords

low-tech cyborgs
disability
social inclusion

How to Cite

KATH, Elizabeth; COELHO NETO, Osorio; BUZATO, Marcelo El Khouri. Posthumanism and assistive technologies : on the social inclusion/exclusion of low-tech cyborgs . Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada, Campinas, SP, v. 58, n. 2, p. 679–703, 2019. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/tla/article/view/8655880. Acesso em: 27 sep. 2024.

Abstract

In this paper, we elaborate on the consequences of a post-humanist perspective to the problem of physical disability by approaching the use of assistive technologies (AT) by disabled people as the introduction of a low-tech cyborg in the world. In doing so, we highlight examples of communication ATs and provide analogies between ATs and languages in the constitution of selves and social contexts. ATs are informed ideologically, so they can be seen both as a way to “fix” an “impaired” person, or as a strategy to overcome a physical and social context that disables some people and makes other people “able-bodied”. We argue that becoming a low-tech cyborg can be a form of social inclusion if we understand disability to be produced by the context, rather than as an inherent dysfunctionality of the individual. Based on this assumption, we identify two strategies of social inclusion of the low-tech cyborg: disembodiment of the Self, and embodied virtuality. We remark, however, that low-tech cyborgs can be configured out of necessity or choice and add that the same socioeconomic factors that produce inequality in general are also active in the social exclusion/inclusion of the low-tech cyborg. Thus, ATs can be adopted and transformed by choice so as to broaden the gap between cyborg haves and have nots, while both kinds of cyborgs can become increasingly subject to cognitive and affective exploitation in the context of cognitive capitalism. We conclude that the potential of a post-humanist perspective to disability should not be about making “impaired humans” integer, nor making “integer humans” more than human, but keeping selves ethically connected with others whether by virtual embodiment or embodied virtuality.

PDF

References

BARAD, K. (2003) Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, v.28, n.3, pp. 801-31.

BARNES, C., & MERCER, G. J. (2001). Disability culture. IN: Handbook of disability studies. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, pp. 515-34.

BEYOND BLUE. (2019). Beyond Blue Support Service. Retrieved from: https://www.beyondblue.org.au/. Last accessed: 10 April 2019

BOWLES, N. (2019). Human Contact is Now a Luxury Good, The New York Times, 23 March. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/23/sunday-review/human-contact-luxury-screens.html. Last accessed: 10 April 2019

BRAIDOTTI, R. (2016). Posthuman Critical Theory. In: Banerji, D.; Paranjape, M. (eds) Critical Posthumanism and Planetary Futures. Springer, New Delhi, pp. 13-32

BREWSTER, K. (2016). Digital detox: A family’s struggle with technology addiction, ABC News, 13 September. Retrieved from: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-09-13/digital-detox-family-struggles-with-technology-addiction/7836026 Last accessed: 10 April 2019

BROWN, V. (2016). The digital addiction that has teens wearing nappies so they don’t need a toilet break. News.com.au, 8 June. Retrieved from: https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/the-digital-addiction-that-has-----teens-wearing-nappies-so-they-dont-need-a-toilet-break/news-story/5e0d321846a93337dc9f0260fc0ffc23. Last accessed: 10 April 2019

BUZATO, M. E. K. (2017), Towards a theoretical mashup for studying posthuman/postsocial ethics, Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, V. 15, nº 01, pp. 74-89. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-06-2016-0021

CAMPBELL, F. (2009). Contours of ableism: The production of disability and abledness: London: Palgrave Macmillan Ed., 2009

CASE, A. (2010). What is a Cyborg? Retrieved from: <http://cyborganthropology.com/What_is_a_Cyborg%3F>. Last accessed: 22 June 2019.

CHANG, Y.J., CHEN, S.F., & HUANG, J.D. (2011). A Kinect-based system for physical rehabilitation: A pilot study for young adults with motor disabilities. Research in developmental disabilities, v.32, nº 6, pp. 2566-2570.

CLYNES, M. E., & KLINE, N. (1960). Cyborgs and space , Astronautics, September: 26–7 and 74–5. Reprinted in Gray, Mentor, and Figueroa-Sarriera. 1995. IN: The cyborg handbook . New York Routledge, pp. 29 – 34.

COCO, A. P. (2010). Diseased, maimed, mutilated: categorizations of disability and an ugly law in late nineteenth-century chicago. journal of social history, v. 44, nº 1, pp. 23-37.

COOK, A. M., & HUSSEY, S. M. (1995). Assistive technologies : principles and practice. St. Louis: Mosby Ed., 1995.

DEVLIN, A & LAKE, E. (2018). What is a robot sex doll, how much do they cost and what is the sex robot brothel in Paris? The Sun Online - UK Editions, London. Retrieved from: <https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/2084051/robot-sex-doll-sex-brothel-paris-cost/>. Last accesseded: 19 jan. 2019.

EDYBURN, D. L. (2001). Critical issues in special education technology research: What do we know? What do we need to know? In: Technological Applications, v. 15, pp. 95-117.

FOSTER, M. (2018). Aging Japan: Robots may have role in future of elder care. Reuters, US Edition. Retrieved from: <https://www.reuters.com/article/us-japan-ageing-robots-widerimage/aging-japan-robots-may-have-role-in-future-of-elder-care-idUSKBN1H33AB>. Last accessed: 23 June 2019.

GOODWIN, C.; DURANTI, A. (1992). Rethinking Context: an Introduction. In: Duranti, A; Goodwin, C. (Org.). Rethinking context: language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge [England]; New York: Cambridge University Press, v. 11, pp. 1-42.

GOOSEY-TOLFREY, V., & MINETTI, A. (2005). Biomechanics and energetics of basketball wheelchairs evolution. International journal of sports medicine, v. 26, nº 05, pp. 388-396.

GRAY, C. H., FIGUEROA-SARRIERA, H. J., & MENTOR, S. (1995). The cyborg handbook.

GRIFFIN, G. (2017). A dictionary of gender studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

HALACY, D. S. (1965). Cyborg: Evolution of the superman. Harper & Row.

HAMILTON, M. T., HAMILTON, D. G., & ZDERIC, T. W. (2007). Role of low energy expenditure and sitting in obesity, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes, v. 56, nº 11, pp. 2655-2667.

HAMPTON, K. N., SESSIONS, L. F., HER, E. J., & RAINIE, L. (2009). Social isolation and new technology. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from https://pewrsr.ch/2KFty4T, Last accessed: 11 June 2019.

HAYLES,K. (1999). How we became posthuman: virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press Ed., 1999.

HEETER, C. (2000). Interactivity in the Context of Designed Experiences. Journal of Interactive Advertising, v.1, nº 1, pp. 3-14.

HERR, H. (2018). How we’ll become cyborgs and extend human potential. MIT Media Lab. Retrieved from: https://www.media.mit.edu/posts/hugh-herr-ted-2018/. Last accessed: 10 June 2019.

HESS, D. J. (1995). On low-tech cyborgs. In: The cyborg handbook, New York: Routledge, pp. 371-378.

HOLLOWAY, G. (1994). Susto and the career path of the victim of an industrial accident: a sociological case study. Social Science & Medicine, v. 38, nº 7, 989-997.

IRWIN, C. B., & SESTO, M. E. (2012). Performance and touch characteristics of disabled and non-disabled participants during a reciprocal tapping task using touch screen technology. Applied ergonomics, v. 43, nº 6, pp. 1038-1043.

JAMES, P. (1996) Nation formation: Towards a theory of abstract community. London: Thousand Oaks. Ed., 1996

JAMES, P. (2014) ‘Emotional Ambivalence across Times and Spaces: Mapping Petrarch’s Intersecting Worlds’, Exemplaria, v. 26 . nº 1, pp. 81-104.

JAMES, P. AND KATH, E. (2014) Siracusa. (2014). Global reconciliation: Responding to tension through a local-global process. London, United Kingdom: SAGE Publications. Ed., 2014.

JENKINS, R. (1998). Culture, classification and (in)competence. In: Questions of competence: Culture, classification and intellectual disability: Cambridge University Press., pp. 1

KIM, J., LAROSE, R., & PENG, W. (2009). Loneliness as the cause and the effect of problematic Internet use: The relationship between Internet use and psychological well-being. CyberPsychology Behavior, v. 12, nº 4, pp. 451-455.

MAHON, P. (2017). Posthumanism: A guide for the perplexed. Bloomsbury Publishing. Ed., 2017

MEYER, B., & ASBROCK, F. (2018). Disabled or Cyborg? How Bionics Affect Stereotypes Toward People With Physical Disabilities. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 9, pp. 1-13

MILLER, V. (2012). A Crisis of Presence: On-line Culture and Being in the World. Space and Polity, v. 16, nº 3, pp. 265-285.

MITRA, S. (2006). The Capability Approach and Disability. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, v. 16, nº 4, pp. 236-247.

MORE, M. (1990), Principles of Extropy, Version 3:11, 2003. Retrieved from: http://www.extropy.org/principles.htm. Last accessed: 22 June 2019.

MOSER, I. (2000). Against normalisation: subverting norms of ability and disability. Science as culture, v. 9, nº 2, pp. 201-240.

MOSER, I. (2005). On becoming disabled and articulating alternatives: The multiple modes of ordering disability and their interferences. Cultural Studies, v. 19, nº 6, pp. 667-700.

MOULIER-BOUTANG, Y. (2011). Cognitive capitalism. Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2011.

MUHAMMAD, N. M., SCHNEIDER, M., HILL, A., & YAU, D. M. (2019). How the Use of iPad and Smartphones Creates Social Isolation. Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. Las Vegas, NV, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), pp. 1060-1065.

NAYAR, P. K. a. (2014). Posthumanism. Cambridge: Polity Press. Ed., 2014.

OLIVER, M. B., COLIN. (2012). The new politics of disablement. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Ed., 2012.

PHILLIPS, T. (2017). Electronic heroin: China’s boot camps get tough on internet addicts. The Guardian,29 august. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/aug/28/electronic-heroin-china-boot-camps-internet-addicts. Last accessed: 22 June 2019

QUINLAN, M., & BATES, B. (2009). Bionic Woman (2007): Gender, disability and cyborgs. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs : JORSEN., v. 9, nº 1, pp. 48-58.

REEVE, D. (2012). Cyborgs, Cripples and iCrip: Reflections on the Contribution of Haraway to Disability Studies. In D. Goodley, B. Hughes, & L. Davis (Eds.), Disability and Social Theory: New Developments and Directions. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 91-111.

SCHAUBERT, V. (2019). My disabled’s son amazing gaming life in the World of Warcraft. BBC, 07 feb. Retrieved from: https://www.bbc.com/news/disability-47064773. Last accessed: 22 June 2019

SHAKESPEARE, T. (2013). Disability rights and wrongs revisited: New York: Routledge. Ed., 2014.

SHARP, G. (1985). Constitutive abstraction and social practice. Arena, v. 70, 48-82.

SHARP, G. (1993). Extended forms of the social: technological mediation and self-formation. Arena Journal, v.1, pp. 221-237.

SINGH, M. (2019). Compulsive digital gaming: an emerging mental health disorder in children. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, v. 86, nº 2, pp. 171-173.

UN (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and optional protocol. New York: United Nations. Retrieved from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html. Last accessed: 22 June 2019

UPIAS (The Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation and The Disability Alliance discuss Fundamental Principles of Disability). Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/2wNSvD6. Last accessed: 11 June 2019.

WITTINK, H., ENGELBERT, R., TAKKEN, T. (2011). The Dangers of inactivity; exercise and inactivity physiology for the manual therapist. Manual therapy, v. 16, nº 3, pp. 209-216.

WHO – World Health Organization (2018). ‘Gaming disorder’. Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/2GzsL5n: Last acessed: 4 June 2019.


Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada uses a Creative Commons (CC-BY) license, thus preserving the integrity of the articles in an open access environment. Journal authors retain the copyright of their work by licensing it under the Creative Commons Attribution license, which allows articles to be reused and distributed without restriction, as long as the original work is correctly cited.

Intellectual Property and Terms of Use

All content published in Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada, unless otherwise specified, is under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY). This allows the material to be shared and adapted without restriction, as long as due credit is given and any changes made are indicated.

The authors retain the copyright to their work and take full responsibility for its content in the event of any challenge by third parties. The opinions expressed by the authors of the articles are their sole responsibility.

TLA reserves the right to make normative changes to the originals, such as changes to spelling and grammar to comply with the cultured norm of the language, as well as adjustments to form related to the editorial standard of the journal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.