Palavras-chave
Como Citar
Resumo
Este artigo busca delinear uma noção de deliberação compatível com a teoria do reconhecimento. Embora tenham dado origem a literaturas distintas, essas duas perspectivas teóricas ressaltam o potencial emancipatório da comunicação intersubjetiva. Para propor uma abordagem combinada, o artigo contesta quatro questionamentos que sugerem a incompatibilidade entre reconhecimento e deliberação. Sustenta-se, então, um viés deliberacionista marcado por: 1) uma concepção não altruísta de reciprocidade; 2) um foco em metaconsensos; 3) uma visão não cognitivista das formas comunicativas; 4) uma compreensão ampliada dos processos deliberativos; e 5) um entendimento sobre a importância do associativismo.
Abstract:
This paper aims at outlining a concept of deliberation compatible with the theory of recognition. Despite fostering different bodies of knowledge, these two theoretical perspectives emphasize the emancipatory potential of intersubjective communication. In order to suggest a joint approach, the article challenges four questions that seem to indicate incompatibilities between recognition and deliberation. The paper advocates a deliberative approach marked by: 1) a non-altruist conception of reciprocity; 2) a focus on meta-consensus; 3) a non-cognitive understanding of communicative forms; 4) a broad comprehension of deliberative processes; and 5) an understanding about the importance of civil society associations.
Keywords: public deliberation; recognition; discursive democracy; social struggles
Referências
BARNES, M; NEWMAN, J; SULLIVAN, H. Discursive Arenas: deliberation and the Constitution of Identity in Public Participation at a Local Level. Social Movement Studies, v. 5, n. 3, p. 193–207, Dec. 2006.
BELL, D. Democratic deliberation — the problem of implementation. In: MACEDO, S. (Ed.) Deliberative Politics: essays on democracy and disagreement. Nova York/ Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999, p. 70-87.
BOHMAN, J. Public Deliberation: pluralism, complexity and democracy. Cambridge: MIT, 1996.
BOHMAN, J. Democracy across borders: from Dêmos to Dêmoi. Cambridge: MIT, 2007a.
BOHMAN, J. Political communication and the epistemic value of diversity: deliberation and legitimation in media societies. Communication Theory, v. 17, n. 4, p. 348-355, 2007b.
BOHMAN, J. Beyond Distributive Justice and Struggles for Recognition: Freedom, Democracy, and Critical Theory. European Journal of Political Theory, v. 6, n. 3, pp. 267-276, 2007c.
BRADY, J. S. No contest? Assessing the agonistic critiques of Jürgen Habermas’s theory of the public sphere. Philosophy & Social Criticism, v. 30, n. 3, p. 331–354, 2004.
BURKHALTER, S; GASTIL, J; KELSHAW, T. A conceptual definition and theoretical model of public deliberation in small face-to-face groups. Communication Theory, v. 12, n. 4, p. 398–422, 2002.
CHAMBERS, S. Deliberative Democratic Theory. Annual Review of Political Science, v. 6, p. 307–326, 2003.
CHAMBERS, S; KOPSTEIN, J. Bad civil society. Political Theory, v. 29, n. 6, p. 837- 865, 2001.
CONOVER, P. J; SEARING, D. D. Studying ‘Everyday Political Talk’ in the Deliberative System. Acta Politica, International Journal of Political Science, Houndmills, v. 40, n. 3, p. 269-283, set 2005.
CONOVER, P. J; SEARING, D. D; CREWE, I. The Deliberative Potential of Political Discussion. British Journal of Political Science, v. 32, p. 21-62, 2002.
DAHLBERG, L. The habermasian public sphere: taking difference seriously? Theory and Society, v. 34, n. 2, p. 111-136, 2005.
DELLA PORTA, D. Deliberation in Movement: Why and How to Study Deliberative Democracy and Social Movements. Acta Politica, International Journal of Political Science, Houndmills, v. 40, n. 3, p. 336-350, set 2005.
DEVEAUX, M. A Deliberative Approach to Conflicts of Culture. Political Theory, v. 31, n. 6, p. 780-807, 2003.
DRYZEK, J. S. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: liberals, critics, contestations. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000a.
DRYZEK, J. S. Deliberative democracy in divided societies: alternatives to agonism and analgesia. Political Theory, v. 33, n. 2, p. 218-242, 2005.
DRYZEK, J. S. Deliberative Global Politics – Discourse and democracy in a divided world. Cambridge: Polity Press: 2006.
DRYZEK, J. S. Legitimidade e economia na democracia deliberativa. In: COELHO, V; NOBRE, M. Participação e deliberação — teoria democrática e experiências institucionais no Brasil contemporâneo. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2004a. p. 41-62.
DRYZEK, J. S. Discursive democracy vs. liberal constitutionalism. In: SAWARD, M. (Ed.). Democratic innovation. Londres: Routledge, 2000b. p. 78-89.
DRYZEK, J. S; NIEMEYER, Simon. Reconciling pluralism and consensus as political ideals. American Journal of Political Science, v. 50, n. 3, p. 634-649, 2006.
ECKERSLEY, R. Deliberative democracy, ecological representation and risk. In: SAWARD, M (Ed.). Democratic innovation – Deliberation, representation and association. Londres: Routledge, 2000, p. 117-132.
ELSTER, J. Deliberation and Constitution Making. In: ELSTER, J (ed). Deliberative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. pp. 97-122.
ERIKSEN, E. O. The European Union’s democratic deficit – a deliberative perspective. In: SAWARD, M. (Ed.). Democratic innovation. Londres: Routledge, 2000. p. 53-65.
FARIA, C. F. O que há de radical na teoria democrática contemporânea: a análise do debate entre ativistas e deliberativos. Trabalho apresentado no 6º. Encontro da Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política, Unicamp, Campinas, 29 jul. a 01 ago. 2008.
FRASER, N. Social Justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation. In: FRASER, N; HONNETH, A. Redistribution or Recognition - a political-Philosophical exchange. Londres/Nova York: Verso, 2003. p. 07-109.
FUNG, A. Deliberation before the revolution: toward an ethics of deliberative democracy in an unjust world. Political Theory, v. 33, n. 2, Jun/2005, p. 397-419.
GALSTON, W. Diversity, toleration and deliberative democracy. In: MACEDO, Stephen (ed.) Deliberative Politics: essays on democracy and disagreement. Nova York / Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999, p. 39-48.
GASTIL, J; KEITH, W. M. A nation that (sometimes) like to talk: a brief history of public deliberation in the United States. In: GASTIL, J; LEVINE, P. (eds). The deliberative democracy handbook: strategies for effective civic engagement in the twenty-first century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2005. p. 3-19.
GUTMANN, A; THOMPSON, D. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge / London. The belknap press of Harvard University Press, 1996.
GUTMANN, A; THOMPSON, D. Why deliberative democracy? Princeton/ Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2004.
HABERMAS, J. Direito e Democracia: entre a facticidade e a validade. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro, 1997.
HABERMAS, J. Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research. Communication Theory, v. 16, n. 4, p. 411-426, 2006.
HABERMAS, J. The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon Press, 1983. 464p.
HABERMAS, J. The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 2: Lifeworld and system – a critique of functionalist reason. Boston: Beacon Press, 1987. 457p.
HABERMAS, J. Concluding Comments on Empirical Approaches to Deliberative Politics. Acta Politica, International Journal of Political Science, v. 40, n. 3, p. 384-392, set 2005.
HABERMAS, J. Further Reflections on the Public Sphere. In: CALHOUN, Craig. (ed.). Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT, 1992.
HENDRIKS, C. M. Public deliberation and interest organisations: a study of responses. 2004. 375f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciência Política) — Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, 2004.
HENDRIKS, C. M. Integrated Deliberation: Reconciling Civil Society’s Dual Role in Deliberative Democracy. Political Studies, v. 54, n. 3, p. 486–508, 2006a.
HENDRIKS, C. M. When the Forum Meets Interest Politics: Strategic Uses of Public Deliberation. Politics & Society, v. 34, n. 4, p. 571-602, 2006b.
HONNETH, A. Luta por reconhecimento: a gramática moral dos conflitos sociais. São Paulo: Ed. 34, 2003.
HONNETH, A. Reification: a recognition-theoretical view. Trabalho apresentado em The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, University of California, Berkeley, 14–16 Mar. 2005. p. 91-135.
JAMES, M. R. Deliberative democracy and the plural polity. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2004.
KANRA, Bora. Deliberating across difference. Bringing social learning into the theory and practice of deliberative democracy in the case of Turkey. 2004. 266f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciência Política) — Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, 2004.
MACKIE, G. Does democratic deliberation change minds? Politics, Philosophy & Economics. v. 5, n. 3, p. 279-303, 2006.
MAIA, R. (coord). Mídia e Deliberação. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV, 2008.
MAIA, R. Dos dilemas da visibilidade midiática para a deliberação pública. In: LEMOS, A. et al. Livro do XII Compós – Mídia.br. Porto Alegre: Sulina, 2004. p. 09-38 MANSBRIDGE, J. Everyday Talk in Deliberative System. In: MACEDO, Stephen (ed.). Deliberative Politics: essays on democracy and disagreement. NY: Oxford University Press, 1999. p. 211-239.
MAIA, R; HARTZ-KARP, J; AMENGUAL, M; GASTIL, J. Norms of deliberation: an inductive study. Journal of Public Deliberation. v. 2, n. 1, p.1-48, 2006.
MARQUES, A. O Processo Deliberativo a partir das Margens: o programa Bolsa-Família na mídia e na fala das beneficiárias. Tese (Doutorado em Comunicação Social) — Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 2007.
MEAD, G. H. Mind Self and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1934. 389p.
MEDEARIS, J. Social movements and deliberative democratic theory. B. J. Pol. S., n. 35, p. 53-75, 2004.
MENDONÇA, R. F. Recognition and Social Esteem: A Case Study of the Struggles of People Affected by Leprosy. Political Studies, early view, pp. 1-19, 2011.
MENDONÇA, R. F. Reconhecimento e Deliberação: as lutas das pessoas atingidas pela hanseníase em diferentes âmbitos interacionais. Tese (Doutorado em Comunicação Social) — FAFICH, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 2009a.
MENDONÇA, R. F. A dimensão intersubjetiva da auto-realização: em defesa da teoria do reconhecimento. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, v. 24, n. 70, pp. 143-154, 2009b.
MENDONÇA, R. F. Challenging subtle forms of power in deliberation: A case-study on the future of Hansen’s disease colonies in Brazil. Policy and Society, v. 28, n. 3, pp. 211-223, 2009c
MENDONÇA, R. F; AYIRTMAN, S. Discourses of recognition in contemporary politics. Trabalho apresentado em New Horizons in Political Philosophy, Australian National University, Canberra, 6-7 dez. 2007.
MENDONÇA, R. F; MAIA, R. Exclusão e deliberação: buscando ultrapassar as assimetrias do intercâmbio público de razões. Contracampo, Rio de Janeiro, n. 15, p. 201-218, 2006.
MENDONÇA, R. F; MAIA, R. Poderia a deliberação enriquecer o reconhecimento? Famecos, v. 39, n. 1, pp. 70-77, 2009.
MENDONÇA, R. F; SANTOS, D. B. A cooperação na deliberação pública: um estudo de caso sobre o referendo acerca da proibição da comercialização de armas de fogo no Brasil. DADOS - Revista de Ciências Sociais, v. 52, n. 2, pp. 507-542, 2009.
MIGUEL, L. F. Um ponto cego nas teorias da democracia: os meios de comunicação.
BIB – Revista brasileira de informação bibliográfica em ciências sociais. Rio de Janeiro, n. 49, p. 51-77, 2000.
MOUFFE, C. Por um modelo agonístico de democracia. Revista de Sociologia e Política, Curitiba, n. 25, p. 11-23, 2005.
MUTZ, D. C. Hearing the other side: deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge / New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 171p.
NOBRE, Marcos. A teoria crítica. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, 2004b. 79p.
O’FLYNN, I. Deliberative democracy and divided societies. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2006.
PARKINSON, J. R. The legitimation of deliberative democracy. Tese (Doutorado em Ciência Política) — Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, 2003.
SANDERS, L. Against Deliberation. Political Theory, v. 25, n. 3, p. 347-376, 1997.
SCHAUER, F. Talking as a decision procedure. In: MACEDO, Stephen (Ed.) Deliberative Politics: essays on democracy and disagreement. NY / Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999, p. 17-27.
SIMON, W. H. Three limitations of deliberative democracy — Identitty Politics, bad faith, and indeterminacy. In: MACEDO, Stephen (ed.) Deliberative Politics: essays on democracy and disagreement. NY / Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999, p. 49-57.
SQUIRES, J. Deliberation and decision making: discontinuity in the two-track model. In: D’ENTRÈVES, M. P. Democracy as public deliberation – new perspectives. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002. p. 133-156.
THOMPSON, D. Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science. Annual Review of Political Science, v. 11, p. 497-520, 2008.
TULLY, J. Struggles over Recognition and Distribution. Constellations, v.7, n. 4, p.469-482, 2000.
TULLY, J. Recognition and Dialogue: the emergence of a new field. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, v. 7, n. 3, p. 84-106, 2004.
URBINATI, N. Representative Democracy: Principles and genealogy. Chicago/Londres: The University of Chicago Press, 2006 WESSLER, H, Investigating deliberativeness comparatively. Political Communication, v 25, n. 1, p. 1-22, 2008.
YOUNG, I. Activist Challenges to deliberative democracy. In: FISHKIN, J; LASLETT, P. (eds.) Debating deliberative democracy. Malden: Blackwell, 2003. p. 102-120.
YOUNG, I. Activist Challenges to deliberative democracy. In: FISHKIN, J; LASLETT, P. (eds.) Debating deliberative democracy. Malden: Blackwell, 2003. p. 102-120.
YOUNG, I. Communication and the Other: beyond deliberative democracy. In: BEBHABIB, S. (ed.) Democracy and difference: contesting the boundaries of the political. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996. p. 120-135.
YOUNG, I. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
A Opinião Pública utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto.
Downloads
