Banner Portal
A cobertura de mídia escrita tradicional e os eventos de cibersegurança
PDF (English)


Edward Snowden
Opinião pública
Análise de sentimento
Mídia escrita

Como Citar

Silva, M. G. T. ., Mello, A. C. R. de, & Nishijima, M. . (2022). A cobertura de mídia escrita tradicional e os eventos de cibersegurança: o caso NSA. Opinião Pública, 28(1), 268–291. Recuperado de


Este artigo investiga a maneira como três portais de comunicação escrita (CNN, Fox News e BBC), vistos como politicamente partidários, enquadraram as notícias sobre Edward Snowden envolvendo questões sensíveis sobre cibersegurança. Sendo a mídia um ator influente na política nacional e internacional, importa conhecer como a mídia enquadra os fatos sobre informações de falhas de segurança na internet, sob disputa narrativa. Análises de sentimentos foram realizadas em centenas de artigos destes portais de livre acesso entre 2013 e 2018. Os resultados mostram sentimentos disseminados pela maioria das manchetes, enquanto textos mais neutros são encontrados no corpo das notícias.

PDF (English)


ACKERMAN, S. “The most biased name in news: Fox News channel’s extraordinary right-wing tilt” (online). A Special FAIR Report, 2001. Available at: Accessed on: 3 Jan. 2019.

BAUMAN, Z., et al. “After snowden: rethinking the impact of surveillance”. International Political Sociology, vol. 8, nº 2, p. 121-44, 2014.

BAUMANN, G.; GILLESPIE, M.; SREBERNY, A. “Transcultural journalism and the politics of translation: interrogating the BBC World Service”. Journalism, vol. 12, nº 2, p. 135-42, 2011.

BROOKE, H. “Inside the digital revolution”. Journal of International Affairs, vol. 70, nº 1, p. 29-53, 2016.

CHANG, L. Y. C.; GRABOSKY, P. The governance of cyberspace. In: DRAHOS, P. (ed.). Regulatory theory: foundations and applications. Canberra: ANU Press, p. 533-51, 2017.

CLEMENT, A. “NSA surveillance: exploring the geographies of Internet interception”. In: Proceedings on the iConference2014, Berlin, p. 4-7, 2014.

CROWTHER, G. A. “The cyber domain”. The cyber defense review, vol. 2, nº 3, p. 63-78, 2017. Available at: Accessed on: 21 Jan. 2019.

DI SALVO, P. From Snowden to Cambridge analytica: an overview of whistleblowing cases as scandals. In: TUMBER, H.; WAISBORD, S. (eds.). The Routledge companion to media and scandal, Routledge, New York, p. 254-65, 2019.

DI SALVO, P.; NEGRO, G. “Framing Edward Snowden: a comparative analysis of four newspapers in China, United Kingdom, and United States”. Journalism, vol. 17, nº 7, p. 805-22, 2016.

DOR, D. “On newspaper headlines as relevance optimizers”. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 35, nº 5, p. 695-721, 2003.

DURANT, H. “Public opinion, polls, and foreign policy”. The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 6, nº 2, p. 149-58, 1955.

ENTMAN, R. M. Projections of power: framing news, public opinion, and US foreign policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.

ENTMAN, R. M. Scandal and Silence. Media responses to presidential misconduct. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2012.

ERIKSSON, J.; GIACOMELLO, G. “The information revolution, security, and international relations: (ir)relevant theory?”. International Political Science Review, vol. 27, nº 3, p. 221-44, 2006.

FARRELL, H.; FINNEMORE, M. “The end of hypocrisy: American foreign policy in the age of leaks”. Foreign Affairs, vol. 92, nº 22, 2013.

FELDMAN, L., et al. “Climate on cable: the nature and impact of global warming coverage on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC”. The International Journal of Press/Politics, vol. 17, nº 1, p. 3-31, 2012.

FELDMAN, R. “Techniques and applications for sentiment analysis”. Communications of the ACM, vol. 56, nº 4, p. 82-89, 2013.

FOUNTAIN, J. Building the virtual state: information technology and institutional change. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2001.

FUCHS, C. “Surveillance and critical theory”. Media and Communication, vol. 3, nº 2, p. 6-9, 2015.

GARRETT, R. K. “Social media’s contribution to political misperceptions in U.S. presidential elections”. PLoS ONE, vol. 14, n° 3, 2019.

GEIGER, A. W. How Americans have viewed surveillance and privacy since Snowden leaks (online). Pew Research Center, 2018. Available at: Accessed on: 2 Dec. 2018.

GELLER, T. “In privacy law, it's the US vs. the world”. Communications of the ACM, vol. 59, nº 2, p. 21-23, 2016.

GIL DE ZÚÑIGA, H.; CORREA, T.; VALENZUELA, S. “Selective exposure to cable news and immigration in the us: the relationship between Fox News, CNN, and attitudes toward Mexican immigrants”. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, vol. 56, nº 4, p. 597-615, 2012.

GRAMLICH, J. 5 Facts about Fox News (online), 2020. Available at: Accessed on: 23 July 2020.

HINTZ, A.; DENCIK, L.; WAHL-JORGENSEN, K. “Digital citizenship and surveillance: digital citizenship and surveillance society – Introduction”. International Journal of Communication, vol. 11, nº 9, 2017.

HOLSTI, O. “Public opinion and foreign policy: challenges to the Almond-Lippmann Consensus”. International Studies Quarterly, vol. 36, p. 439-66, Dec. 1992.

HOLT, J.; MALČIĆ, S. “The privacy ecosystem: regulating digital identity in the United States and European Union”. Journal of Information Policy, vol. 5, p. 155-78, 2015.

IFANTIDOU, E. “Newspaper headlines and relevance: ad hoc concepts in ad hoc contexts”. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 41, nº 4, p. 699-720, 2009.

KARPF, D. “Social science research methods in Internet time”. Information, Communication & Society, vol. 15, nº 5, p. 639-61, 2012.

KNECHT, T.; WEATHERFORD, M. S. “Public opinion and foreign policy: the stages of presidential decision making”. International Studies Quarterly, vol. 50, n° 3, p. 705-27, 2006.

KREPS, S.; DEBAK, D. A. S. “Warring from the virtual to the real: assessing the public’s threshold for war over cyber security”. Research & Politics, vol. 4, nº 2, 2017.

KSHETRI, N. “Cybercrime and cyber-security issues associated with China: some economic and institutional considerations”. Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 13, nº 1, p. 41-69, 2013.

LASHMAR, P. “No more sources?”. Journalism Practice, vol. 11, nº 6, p. 665-88, 2017.

MARTIN, S.; RAINIE, L.; MADDEN, M. Americans’ privacy strategies post-snowden, Pew Research Center, 2015. Available at: Accessed on: 23 Sep. 2018.

MILINA, V. “Security in a communications society: opportunities and challenges”. Connections, vol. 11, n° 2, p. 53-66, 2012.

MILLMAN, K. J.; AIVAZIS, M. “Python for scientists and engineers”. Computing in Science & Engineering, vol. 13, nº 2, p. 9-12, 2011.

MOON, M. “How America lost its secrets: Edward Snowden, the man and the theft”. Journal of Strategic Security, vol. 10, p. 143-47, 2017.

MOTEL, S. NSA coverage wins pulitzer, but Americans divided on leaks (online). Pew Research Center, 2014. Available at: Accessed on: 23 Sep. 2018.

MUELLER, M. Networks and states: the global politics of Internet governance. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2010.

PERSSON, P. “Attention manipulation and information overload”. NBER Working Paper nº 23823, 2017.

PUYVELDE, D. V.; COULTHART, S.; HOSSAIN, M. S. “Beyond the buzzword: big data and national security decision-making”. International Affairs, vol. 93, nº 6, p. 1.397-1.416, 2017.

RUSSELL, A.; WAISBORD, S. “Digital citizenship and surveillance: the snowden revelations and the networked Fourth Estate”. International Journal of Communication, vol. 11, nº 21, 2017.

SANTORO, M.; BORGES, B. “Brazilian foreign policy towards Internet governance”. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, vol. 60, nº 1, p. 1-16, 2017.

SCHEUERMAN, W. E. “Whistleblowing as civil disobedience: the case of Edward Snowden”. Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 40, nº 7, p. 609-28, 2014.

SHAPIRO, C.; VARIAN, H. Information rules: a strategic guide. Cambridge: Harvard BusinessPress, 1999.

SINK, J. NSA surveillance story cuts into Obama's popularity with young voters (online). The Hill, 2013. Available at: Accessed on: 21 Jan. 2020.

SOROKA, S. N. “Media, public opinion, and foreign policy”. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, vol. 8, nº 1, p. 27-48, 2003.

TEIRILÄ, O. J. “Small state intelligence dilemmas: struggling between common threat perceptions and national priorities”. International Journal of Intelligence and Counter Intelligence, vol. 28, nº 2, p. 215-35, 2015.

TODOROV, A.; MANDISODZA, A. N. “Public opinion on foreign policy: the multilateral public that perceives itself as unilateral”. Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 68, nº 3, p. 323-48, 2004.

TRAPANI, J. “Transnational culture in the Internet age”. Science and Public Policy, vol. 41, nº 1, p. 134-35, 2014.

WAHL-JORGENSEN, K.; BENNETT, L.; TAYLOR, G. “The normalization of surveillance and the invisibility of digital citizenship: media debates after the snowden revelations”. International Journal of Communication, vol. 11, p. 740-62, 2017.

WAHL-JORGENSEN, K., et al. “Rethinking balance and impartiality in journalism? How the BBC attempted and failed to change the paradigm”. Journalism, vol. 18, nº 7, p. 781-800, 2017.

WEATHERLY, J. N., et al. “Perceptions of political bias in the headlines of two major news organizations”. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, vol. 12, nº 2, p. 91-104, 2007.

WEBSTER, J. G.; KSIAZEK, T. B. “The dynamics of audience fragmentation: public attention in an age of digital media”. Journal of Communication, vol. 62, nº 1, p. 39-56, 2012.

WEINSTEIN, D. “Snowden and U.S. cyber power”. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, vol. 4, nº 11, 2014.

WEST, S. “Globalizing Internet governance: negotiating cyberspace agreements in the post-snowden era”. In: 2014 TPRC Conference Paper, 2014.

WINSECK, D. “The geopolitical economy of the global Internet infrastructure”. Journal of Information Policy, vol. 7, p. 228-67, 2017.

WU, A.; MA, W. W. K.; CHAN, W. W. L. Whistleblower or leaker? Examining the portrayal and characterization of Edward Snowden in USA, UK, and HK posts. In: MA, W. W. K., et al. (eds.). New Media, Knowledge Practices, and Multiliteracies, p. 53-66. Singapore: Springer, 2015.

YANNAKOGEORGOS, P. A. “Internet governance and national security”. Strategic Studies Quarterly, vol. 6, nº 3, p. 102-25, 2012.

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Opinião Pública


Não há dados estatísticos.