Palavras-chave
Partidarismo
Religião
COVID-19
Telejornais
Como Citar
Resumo
Este artigo investiga a ocorrência da exposição seletiva no Brasil, tendo em vista a frequência com que os brasileiros disseram buscar informações sobre a pandemia de COVID-19 no Jornal Nacional e no Jornal da Record. Utiliza dados de uma análise de conteúdo da cobertura desses veículos acerca do assunto em 2020 e os dados de uma pesquisa de opinião pública nacional. As análises realizadas mostram que o partidarismo e a religião foram importantes preditores do consumo de notícias desses veículos. Evangélicos e adeptos do “partido do Bolsonaro” eram telespectadores mais assíduos do Jornal da Record; católicos, partidários de outras legendas e apartidários consumiam mais o Jornal Nacional. Esses resultados indicam que os brasileiros consomem notícias em consonância com suas convicções políticas e que alguns grupos podem estar recebendo menos informação sobre a COVID-19.
Referências
ABRAMOWITZ, A. I.; SAUNDERS, K. L. “Is polarization a myth?”. The Journal of Politics, vol. 70, nº 2, p. 542-555, 2008.
ACHEN, C. H. Interpreting and using regression. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1982.
AJZENMAN, N.; CAVALCANTI, T.; MATA, D. “More than words: leaders' speech and risky behavior during a pandemic”. American Economic Journal-Economic Policy, 2023. (no prelo)
ALVES, M. “Desarranjo da visibilidade, desordem informacional e polarização no Brasil entre 2013 e 2018”. Tese de Doutorado em Comunicação. Programa de Pós-graduação em Comuni-cação, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, 2019.
ASANO, C. L., et al. Direitos na pandemia: mapeamento e análise das normas jurídicas de res-posta à Covid-19 no Brasil. São Paulo: [s.n.], 2021.
BARBERIA, L. G.; GÓMEZ, E. J. “Political and institutional perils of Brazil’s COVID-19 crisis”. The Lancet, nº 396, p. 367-368, 2020.
BAUM, M. A. Soft news goes to war: public opinion and American foreign policy in the new me-dia age. 1. ed. [s.l.] Princeton University Press, 2003.
BAUM, M. A.; KERNELL, M., S. “Has cable ended the golden age of presidential television?”. American Political Science Review, vol. 93, nº 1, p. 99-114, 1999.
BOCZKOWSKI, P. J.; MITCHELSTEIN, E.; MATASSI, M. “News comes across when I’m in a moment of leisure: Understanding the practices of incidental news consumption on social media”. New Media and Society, vol. 20, nº 10, p. 3.523-3.539, 2018.
BORGES, A.; VIDIGAL, R. “Do lulismo ao antipetismo? Polarização, partidarismo e voto nas elei-ções presidenciais brasileiras”. Opinião Pública, vol. 24, nº 1, p. 53-89, 2018.
BOVITZ, G. L.; DRUCKMAN, J. N.; LUPIA, A. “When can news organization lead public opinion? Ide-ology versus market forces in decisions to make news”. Public Choice, vol. 113, p. 127-155, 2002.
BOXELL, L.; GENTZKOW, M.; SHAPIRO, J. M. “Greater Internet use is not associated with faster growth in political polarization among US demographic groups”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 115, nº 3, p. 10.612-10.617, 2018.
BRINGEL, B.; GEOFFREY, P. “Junho de 2013… dois anos depois: polarização, impactos e reconfi-guração do ativismo no Brasil”. Nueva Sociedad, vol. 259, p. 4-17, 2015.
CASTRO, M. C., et al. “Spatiotemporal pattern of COVID-19 spread in Brazil”. Science, p. 1-9, 2021.
D’ALESSIO, D.; ALLEN, M. “Media bias in presidential elections: a meta-analysis”. Journal of Communication, vol. 50, nº 4, p. 133-156, 2000.
DAHLGREN, P. M.; SHEHATA, A.; STRÖMBÄCK, J. “Reinforcing spirals at work? Mutual influences between selective news exposure and ideological leaning”. European Journal of Communica-tion, vol. 34, nº 2, p. 159-174, 2019.
DELLAVIGNA, S.; KAPLAN, E. “The Fox News effect: media bias and voting”. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.122, nº 3, p. 1.187-1.234, 2007.
DIMITROVA, D. V.; STRÖMBÄCK, J. “Look who’s talking: use of sources in newspaper coverage in Sweden and the United States”. Journalism Practice, vol. 3, nº 1, p. 75-91, 2009.
FERES JÚNIOR, J. “Análise de valências, debate acadêmico e contenda política”. Revista Brasilei-ra de Ciência Política, nº 20, p. 313-322, 2016a.
FERES JÚNIOR, J. “Em defesa das valências: uma réplica”. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, nº 19, p. 277-298, 2016b.
FIORINA, M. P.; ABRAMS, S. J.; POPE, J. C. Culture war? The myth of a polarized America. New York: Pearson Longman, 2006.
FLAXMAN, S.; GOEL, S.; RAO, J. M. “Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consump-tion”. Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 80, nº Special issue1, p. 298-320, 2016.
FLETCHER, R.; NIELSEN, R. K. “Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? A com-parative analysis”. New Media and Society, vol. 20, nº 7, p. 2.450-2.468, 2018.
FRIEDMAN, U. “The coronavirus-denial movement now has a leader”. The Atlantic, 2020.
GANS, H. J. Deciding what’s news: a study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek and Time. New York: Vintage Books, 1980.
GRAMACHO, W., et al. “Political preferences, knowledge, and misinformation about COVID-19: the case of Brazil”. Frontiers in Political Science, vol. 3, p. 1-13, 2021.
GRAMACHO, W.; TURGEON, M. “When politics collides with public health: COVID-19 vaccine coun-try of origin and vaccination acceptance in Brazil”. Vaccine, vol. 39, p. 2.608-2.612, 2021.
HAMILTON, J. T. All the news that’s fit to sell: how market transforms information into news. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.
HAMILTON, J. T. “News that sells: media competition and news content”. Japanese Journal of Political Science, vol. 8, nº 1, p. 7-42, 2007.
IYENGAR, S.; HAHN, K. S. “Red media, blue media: evidence of ideological selectivity in media use”. Journal of Communication, vol. 59, nº 1, p. 19-39, 2009.
IYENGAR, S.; WESTWOOD, S. J. “Fear and loathing across party lines: new evidence on group polarization”. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 59, nº 3, p. 690-707, 2015.
IYENGAR, S., et al. “The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States”. Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 22, nº 1, p. 7.1-7.18, 2019.
LADD, J. M. Why Americans hate the media and why it matters. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.
LASCO, G. “Medical populism and the COVID-19 pandemic”. Global Public Health, vol. 15, p. 1.417-1.429, 2020.
LAZARSFELD, P. F.; BERELSON, B.; GAUDET, H. The people’s choice: how the voter makes up his mind in a presidential election. New York: Columbia University Press, 1948.
LEVENDUSKY, M. “Partisan media exposure and attitudes toward the opposition”. Political Com-munication, vol. 30, nº 4, p. 565-581, 2013a.
LEVENDUSKY, M. “Why do partisan media polarize viewers?”. American Journal of Political Sci-ence, vol. 57, nº 3, 2013b.
LOTTA, G. et al. “Community health workers reveal COVID-19 disaster in Brazil”. The Lancet, vol. 396, p. 365-366, 2020.
MERAZ, S. “Quantifying partisan selective exposure through network text analysis of elite politi-cal blog networks during the U.S. 2012 presidential election”. Journal of Information Techno-logy & Politics, vol. 12, p. 37-53, 2015.
MIGUEL, L. F. “Quanto vale uma valência?”. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, nº 17, p. 165-178, 2015.
MULLAINATHAN, S.; SHLEIFER, A. “The market for news”. The American Economic Review, vol. 95, p. 131-153, 2005.
MUNDIM, P. S. “Assistindo ao Jornal Nacional: determinantes da exposição aos principais tele-jornais brasileiros”. Revista Debates, vol. 9, nº 3, p. 37-62, 2015.
MUNDIM, P. S. “O viés da cobertura política da imprensa nas eleições presidenciais brasileiras de 2002, 2006 e 2010”. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, nº 25, p. 7-46, 2018.
NICOLAU, J. O Brasil dobrou à direita: uma radiografia da eleição de Bolsonaro em 2018. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2020.
ORTEGA, F.; ORSINI, M. “Governing COVID-19 without government in Brazil: ignorance, neolib-eral authoritarianism, and the collapse of public health leadership”. Global Public Health, vol. 15, nº 9, p. 1257-1277, 2020.
PEREIRA, F. B.; NUNES, F. “Media choice and the polarization of public opinion about Covid-19 in Brazil”. Revista Latinoamericana de Opinión Pública, vol. 10, nº 2, p. 1-19, 2020.
PFRIMER, M. H.; BARBOSA, R. “Brazil's war on COVID-19: crisis, not conflict-doctors, not gener-als”. Dialogues in Human Geography, vol. 10, nº 2, p. 137-140, 2021.
PORTO, M.; NEVES, D.; LIMA, B. “Crise hegemônica, ascensão da extrema direita e paralelismo político Globo e Record nas eleições presidenciais de 2018”. Compolítica, vol. 10, nº 1, p. 5-33, 2020.
PRIOR, M. Post-broadcast democracy: how media choice increases inequality in political in-volvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
PRIOR, M. “Media and political polarization”. Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 16, p. 101-127, 2013.
RECUERO, R.; SOARES, F. “O discurso desinformativo sobre a cura do COVID-19 no Twitter”. E-Compós, vol 24, p. 1-29, 2020.
RIFFE, D., et al. “The effectiveness of simple and stratified random sampling in Broadcast news content analysis”. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, vol. 73, nº 1, p. 159-168, 1996.
RUTLEDGE, P. E. “Trump, COVID-19, and the war on expertise”. The American Review of Public Administration, vol. 50, p. 505-511, 2020.
SCHMIDT, A. L., et al. “Anatomy of news consumption on Facebook”. Proceedings of the Nation-al Academy of Sciences, vol. 114, nº 12, p. 3035-3039, 2017.
SEARS, D. O.; FREEDMAN, J. L. “Selective exposure to information: a critical review”. Public Opin-ion Quarterly, vol. 31, nº 2, p. 194-213, 1967.
SHIN, J. “How do partisans consume news on social media? a comparison of self-reports with digital trace measures among Twitter users”. Social Media and Society, vol. 6, nº 4, p. 1-12, 2020.
SLATER, M. D. “Reinforcing spirals: the mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity”. Communication Theory, vol. 17, p. 281-303, 2007.
SLATER, M. D. “Reinforcing spirals model: conceptualizing the relationship between media con-tent exposure and the development and maintenance of attitudes”. Media Psychology, vol. 18, nº 3, p. 370-395, 2014.
STABILE, M.; BÜLOW, M. O velho não morreu, o novo já está aqui: informação e participação digital na era do bolsonarismo. In: AVRITZER, L.; KERCHE, F.; MARONA, M. (eds.). Governo Bolso-naro: retrocesso democrático e degradação política. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2021, p. 481-494.
STROUD, N. J. “Media effects, selective exposure, and Fahrenheit 9/11”. Political Communica-tion, vol. 24, nº 4, p. 415-432, 2007.
STROUD, N. J. “Media use and political predispositions: revisiting the concept of selective expo-sure”. Political Behavior, vol. 30, nº 3, p. 341-366, 2008.
STROUD, N. J. “Polarization and partisan selective exposure”. Journal of Communication, vol. 60, nº 3, p. 556-576, 2010.
STROUD, N. J. Niche News: the politics of news choice. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
SUNSTEIN, C. R. Republic.com 2.0. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.
TAYLOR, L. “‘We are being ignored’: Brazil’s researchers blame anti-science government for devastating COVID surge”. Nature, vol. 593, p. 15-16, 2021.
TOUCHTON, M., et al. “A partisan pandemic: State government public health policies to combat COVID-19 in Brazil”. BMJ Global Health, vol. 6, nº 6, p. 1-10, 2021.
TUCHMAN, G. Making News: a study in the construction of reality. London: The Free Press, 1978.
WATSON, K. “Coronavirus: how pandemic turned political in Brazil”. BBC, 2020. Disponível em: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-53021248. Acesso em: 6 maio 2021.
WEEKS, B. E., et al. “Incidental exposure, selective exposure, and political information sharing: integrating online exposure patterns and expression on social media”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 22, p. 363-379, 2017.
YAMEY, G.; GONSALVES, G. “Donald Trump: a political determinant of covid-19”. BMJ, vol. 369, p. 1-2, 2020.
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Opinião Pública
Downloads
