Palavras-chave
Partidarismo
Necessidade de cognição
Teste de reflexão cognitiva
Conhecimento político
Como Citar
Dados de financiamento
Resumo
Com objetivo de expandir a crescente literatura sobre misinformação para um contexto diferente dos países desenvolvidos, este artigo busca respostas para perguntas como: que tipo de pessoas são mais suscetíveis à misinformação? O que determinaria tal vulnerabilidade? Esta pesquisa usa uma amostra de eleitores brasileiros, ouvidos entre maio e junho de 2019, e constata que as preferências partidárias isoladamente não explicam a suscetibilidade à misinformação. O efeito das preferências partidárias sobre a propensão à misinformação é moderado pela capacidade analítica, necessidade de cognição e conhecimento político. Pessoas com altos níveis desses atributos tendem a ser mais capazes de avaliar uma informação através das lentes de suas crenças políticas. Os achados também sugerem que as pessoas que mais confiam no jornalismo profissional podem ser menos propensas à misinformação.
Referências
ABRAMOWITZ, A. I.; WEBSTER, S. W. “Negative Partisanship: Why Americans dislike parties but behave like rabid partisans”. Political Psychology, vol. 39, p. 119–35, 2018.
ALM, J.; MCCLELLAND, G. H.; SCHULZE, W. D. “Why do people pay taxes?”. Journal of Public Economics, vol. 48, n° 1, p. 21–38, 1992.
BARTELS, L. M. “Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions”. Political Behavior, vol. 24, n° 2, p. 117–50, 2002.
BERINSKY, A. J. “Rumors and Health Care Reform: experiments in political misinformation”. British Journal of Political Science, vol. 47, n° 2, p. 241–62, abr. 2017.
BORGES, A.; CASALECCHI, G. A.; RENNÓ, L. “Generalized anti-partisans, conservative and moderate antipetistas: Unpacking Bolsonaro’s vote in Brazil’s 2018 elections”. 12º Encontro da ABCP, 19 a 20 de outubro, 2020. Available in: <https://bit.ly/3JAWPti>. Accessed on: March 1, 2022.
BORGES, A.; VIDIGAL, R. “Do lulismo ao antipetismo? Polarização, partidarismo e voto nas eleições presidenciais brasileiras”. Opinião Pública, vol. 24, n° 1, p. 53–89, 2018.
BULLOCK, J. G. “Elite influence on public opinion in an informed electorate.” American Political Science Review, vol. 105, n° 3, p. 496–515, 2011.
CACIOPPO, J. T.; PETTY, R. E. “The need for cognition”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 42, n° 1, p. 116-131, 1982.
CAMPBELL, A., et al. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
CARL, N. “Cognitive ability and political beliefs in the United States”. Personality and Individual Differences, n° 83, p. 245–48, 2015.
CARREIRÃO, Y. “O sistema partidário brasileiro: um debate com a literatura recente”. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, p. 255-295, 2014.
CARREIRÃO, Y. S.; KINZO, M. D. G. “Partidos políticos, preferência partidária e decisão eleitoral no Brasil (1989/2002)”. Dados, vol. 47, n° 1, p. 131–67, 2004.
CARUANA, N. J.; MCGREGOR, R. M.; STEPHENSON, L. B. “The power of the dark side: negative partisanship and political behaviour in Canada”. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de Science Politique, vol. 48, n° 4, p. 771–89, 2015.
CHAIKEN, S. “Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 39, n° 5, 1980.
CITRIN, J.; STOKER, L. “Political trust in a cynical age”. Annual Review of Political Science, n° 21, p. 49–70, 2018.
CLARKE, S. “Conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorizing”. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 32, n° 2, p. 131–50, 2002.
CLEMM VON HOHENBERG, B. “Truth and bias, left and right: testing ideological asymmetries with a realistic news supply”. Public Opinion Quarterly, p. 1-26, 2023.
COHEN, A. R.; STOTLAND, E.; WOLFE, D. M. “An experimental investigation of need for cognition”. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, vol. 51, n° 2, 1955.
CONVERSE, P. E. The nature of belief systems in mass public. In: APTER, D. (ed.). Ideology and discontent. New York: Free Press, 1964.
DALTON, R. J.; WELDON, S. “Partisanship and party system institutionalization”. Party Politics, vol. 13, n° 2, p. 179–196, 2007.
DANILLER, A., et al. “Measuring trust in the press in a changing media environment”. Communication Methods and Measures, vol. 11, n° 1, p. 76–85, 2017.
FLEISCHER, D. Os partidos políticos. In: AVELAR, L.; CINTRA, A. O. (Orgs). Sistema político brasileiro: uma introdução. Rio de Janeiro: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung; São Paulo: Editora Unesp. p. 303-348, 2007.
FREDERICK, S. “Cognitive reflection and decision making”. Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 19, n° 4, p. 25-42, 2005.
FUKS, M.; MARQUES, P. H. “Polarização e contexto: medindo e explicando a polarização política no Brasil”. Opinião Pública, vol. 28, p. 560-93, 2023.
FUKS, M.; RIBEIRO, E.; BORBA, J. “From antipetismo to generalized antipartisanship: the impact of rejection of political parties on the 2018”. Brazilian Political Science Review, vol. 15, 2020.
GERBER, A. S.; HUBER, G. A.; WASHINGTON, E. “Party affiliation, partisanship, and political beliefs: A field experiment”. American Political Science Review, vol. 104, n° 4, p. 720-44, 2010.
GILENS, M. “Political ignorance and collective policy preferences”. American Political Science Review, vol. 95, n° 2, p. 379-96, 2001.
GOERTZEL, T. “Belief in conspiracy theories”. Political Psychology, p. 731-42, 1994.
GREENE, S. “Understanding party identification: a social identity approach”. Political Psychology, vol. 20, n° 2, p. 393-403, 1999.
HAIME, A.; CANTÚ, F. “Negative Partisanship in Latin America”. Latin American Politics and Society, p. 1-21, 2022.
HALPERN, D., et al. From belief in conspiracy theories to trust in others: which factors influence exposure, believing and sharing fake news. In: MEISELWITZ, G. (Ed.). Social computing and social media. Design, human behavior and analytics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 11578. Cham: Springer, 2019.
HERTZBERG, L. “On the attitude of trust”. Inquiry, vol. 31, n° 3, p. 307-22, 1988.
HOCHSCHILD, J. L.; EINSTEIN, K. L. Do facts matter? Information and misinformation in American Politics. Oklahoma City: University of Oklahoma, Norman, 2015.
IYENGAR, S, et al. “The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States”. Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 22, p. 129-46, 2019.
JOHNSON, H. M.; SEIFERT, C. M.; “Sources of the continued influence effect: when misinformation in memory affects later inferences”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol. 20, n° 6, p. 1420-36, 1994.
JONES, P.; HUDSON, J. “The role of political parties: an analysis based on transaction costs”. Public Choice, vol. 94, n° 1, p. 175-89, 1998.
JOST, J. T. “Ideological asymmetries and the essence of political psychology”. Political Psychology, vol. 38, n° 2, p. 167-208, 2017.
KAHAN, D. M., et al. “Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government”. Behavioural Public Policy, vol. 1, n° 1, p. 54-86, 2017.
KAHNEMAN, D. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2013.
KAM, C. D. “Who toes the party line? Cues, values, and individual differences”. Political Behavior, vol. 27, n° 2, p. 163-82, 2005.
KOLTKO-RIVERA, M. E. “The psychology of worldviews”. Review of general psychology, vol. 8, n° 1, p. 3-58, 2004.
KUKLINSKI J. H., et al. “Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship”. The Journal of Politics, vol. 62, n° 3, p. 790-816, 2000.
KUNDA, Z. “The case for motivated reasoning”. Psychological Bulletin, vol. 108, n° 3, p. 480-498, 1990.
LAZER, D. M. J., et al. “The science of fake news”. Science, vol. 359, n° 6380, p. 1094-96, 2018.
LEWANDOWSKY, S. “The ‘post-truth’ world, misinformation, and information literacy: a perspective from cognitive science”. Informed Societies, 2020.
LEWANDOWSKY, S., et al. “Misinformation and its correction: continued influence and successful debiasing”. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, vol. 13, n° 3, p. 106-31, 2012.
LEWANDOWSKY, S.; VAN DER LINDEN, S. “Countering misinformation and fake news through inoculation and prebunking”. European Review of Social Psychology, vol. 32, n° 2, p. 348-84, 2021.
LONG, J. A. jtools: Analysis and Presentation of Social Scientific Data. R package version 2.1.0. Available at: <https://cran.r-project.org/package=jtools>, 2020. Accessed on: Jan. 10, 2021.
MAINWARING, S.; TORCAL, M. “Party system institutionalization and party system theory after the third wave of democratization”. Handbook of Party Politics, vol. 11, n° 6, p. 204-27, 2006.
MARSH, E. J.; CANTOR, A. D.; BRASHIER, N. M. Believing that humans swallow spiders in their sleep: false beliefs as side effects of the processes that support accurate knowledge. In: ROSS, B. H. (Ed.). Psychology of learning and motivation. Cambridge: Academic Press, vol. 64, p. 93-132, 2016.
MIN, S. J. “Who believes in conspiracy theories? Network diversity, political discussion, and conservative conspiracy theories on social media”. American Politics Research, vol. 49, n° 5, p. 415-427, 2021.
MILLER, J. M.; SAUNDERS, K. L.; FARHART, C. E. “Conspiracy endorsement as motivated reasoning: the moderating roles of political knowledge and trust”. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 60, n° 4, p. 824-44, 2016.
MOTTA, M. “Republicans, not democrats, are more likely to endorse anti-vaccine misinformation”. American Politics Research, vol. 49, n° 5, p. 428-38, 2021.
NEWMAN, N.; FLETCHER, R. “Bias, bullshit and lies: audience perspectives on low trust in the media”. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, 2017. Available at: <http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3173579>. Accessed on: Jan. 20 2019.
NICKERSON, R. S. “Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises”. Review of General Psychology, vol. 2, n° 2, 1998.
NYHAN, B. “Facts and myths about misperceptions”. Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 34, n° 3, p. 220-236, 2020.
NYHAN, B.; REIFLER, J. “When corrections fail: the persistence of political misperceptions”. Political Behavior, vol. 32, n° 2, p. 303-30, 2010.
PEREIRA, A.; HARRIS, E. A.; BAVEL, J. V. “Identity concerns drive belief in fake news”. PsyArXiv PrePrint, 2018. Available at: <https://psyarxiv.com/7vc5d/>. Accessed on: Jan. 4, 2020.
R CORE TEAM. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021. Available at: <https://www.R-project.org/>. Accessed on: Sept. 11, 2021.
RIBEIRO, E.; CARREIRÃO, Y.; BORBA, J. “Sentimentos partidários e antipetismo: condicionantes e covariantes”. Opinião Pública, vol. 22, n° 3, p. 603-37, 2017.
SAMUELS, D. “A evolução do Petismo (2002-2008)”. Opinião Pública, vol. 14, n° 2, p. 302-18, 2008.
SAMUELS, D.; ZUCCO, C. Partisans, antipartisans, and nonpartisans: voting behavior in Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
SUEDFELD, P.; TETLOCK, P. E. Individual differences in information processing. In: TESSER, A.; SCHWARTZ, N. (eds.). Blackwell international handbook of social psychology: intra-individual processes, vol. 1. London: Blackwell Publishers, 2001.
TABER, C. S.; CANN, D.; KUCSOVA, S. “The motivated processing of political arguments”. Political Behavior, vol. 31, n° 2, p. 137-55, 2009.
TAM, K.; LEUNG, A. K.; CHIU, C. “On being a mindful authoritarian: Is need for cognition always associated with less punitiveness?”. Political Psychology, vol. 29, n° 1, p. 77-91, 2008.
THOMSON, K. S.; OPPENHEIMER, D. M. “Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test”. Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 11, n° 1, 2016.
TUCKER, J. A., et al. “Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: a review of the scientific literature”. Political Polarization, and Political Disinformation: a review of the scientific literature, 2018.
TURGEON, M., et al. “Misinformation, sophistication, trust, and cognitive abilities”. Dataset – available upon request to the author, 2019.
VAN BAVEL, J. J.; PEREIRA, A. “The partisan brain: An identity-based model of political belief”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 22, n° 3, p. 213-24, 2018.
VOSOUGHI, S.; ROY, D.; ARAL, S. “The spread of true and false news online”. Science, vol. 359, n° 6380, p. 1146-51, 2018.
WARDLE, C.; DERAKHSHAN, H. “Thinking about ‘information disorder’: formats of misinformation, disinformation, and mal-information”. Ireton, Cherilyn; Posetti, Julie. Journalism, ‘fake news’ & disinformation. Paris: Unesco, p. 43-54, 2018.
ZALLER, J. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
ZOLLO, F., et al. “Emotional Dynamics in the Age of Misinformation”. PLOS ONE, vol. 10, n° 9, 2015.
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Opinião Pública
Downloads
