Abstract
This article presents a crucial test for the theory of party cues by investigating the association between the legislative positions of the Brazilian political party system in a government-opposition dimension and the governmental assessment made by their supporters. The context of the test is the Fernando Henrique Cardoso government (1995-2002), characterized by successive economic crises, which would tend to reduce the parties’ influence over public opinion, in face of the traditional explanatory power of theories of economic voting and VP-functions. The results, based on multilevel models built upon seven surveys, suggest that party cues work even in a country like Brazil and in the adverse context chosen for this empirical test. The findings also indicate that party cues were stronger according to the media relevance of each political party.
References
ALCÁNTARA, M. ¿Instituciones o máquinas ideológicas? Origen, programa y organización de los partidos políticos latinoamericanos. Barcelona: Institut de Ciències Polítiques i Socials (ICPS), 2004.
ALDRICH, J. Why parties? The origin and transformation of political parties in America. Chicago e Londres: The University of Chicago Press, 1995.
AMORIM NETO, O.; COX, G. W.; MCCUBBINS, M. D. “Agenda power in Brazil’s Câmara dos Deputados 1989-98”. World Politics, vol. 55, nº 4, p. 550-578, 2003.
ANDERSON, C.; TVERDOVA, Y. “Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies”. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 47, nº 1, p. 91-109, 2003.
BARTOLINI, S. Metodología de la investigación política. In: PASQUINO, G., et al. Manual de ciencia política. Madri: Alianza Editorial, 1988.
BISGAARD, M.; SLOTHUUS, R. “Partisan elites as culprits? How party cues shape partisan perceptual gaps”. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 62, nº 2, p. 456-469, 2018.
BORGES, A. ”Nacionalização partidária e estratégias eleitorais no presidencialismo de coalizão”. Dados, vol. 58, nº 3, p. 651-688, 2015.
BORGES, A.; VIDIGAL, R. “Do lulismo ao antipetismo? Polarização, partidarismo e voto nas eleições presidenciais brasileiras”. Opinião Pública, Campinas, vol. 24, nº 1, p. 53-89, abr. 2018.
BOUDREAU, C.; MACKENZIE, S. “Informing the electorate? How party cues and policy information affect public opinion about initiatives”. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 58, nº 1, p. 48-62, 2014.
BRAGA, M. S. S. “Eleições e democracia no Brasil: a caminho de partidos e sistema partidário institucionalizados”. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, Brasília, nº 4, p. 43-73, jul.-dez. 2010.
CAMPBELL, A., et al. The American voter. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1960.
CARLIN, R. E., et al. “Public support for Latin American presidents: the cyclical model in comparative perspective”. Research & Politics, vol. 5, nº 3, p. 1-8, 2018.
CARREIRÃO, Y. “Avaliação do governo e ‘voto econômico’”. Lua Nova, vol. 48, p. 213-232, 1999.
CARREIRÃO, Y. “Relevant factors for the voting decision in the 2002 presidential election: an analysis of the Eseb (Brazilian Electoral Study) data”. Brazilian Political Science Review, vol. 1, nº 1, p. 70-101, 2007a.
CARREIRÃO, Y. “Identificação ideológica, partidos e voto na eleição presidencial de 2006”. Opinião Pública, Campinas, vol. 13, nº 2, p. 307-339, 2007b.
CARREIRÃO, Y.; KINZO, M. D. G. “Partidos políticos, preferência partidária e decisão eleitoral no Brasil (1989-2002)”. Dados, Rio de Janeiro, vol. 47, nº 1, p. 131-167, 2004.
CARRUBBA, C. “The electoral connection in European Union politics”. Journal of Politics, vol. 63, nº 1, p. 141-158, 2001.
CHHIBBER, P.; KOLLMAN, K. The formation of national party systems: federalism and party competition in Canada, Great Britain, India, and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.
DAALDER, H. Parties: denied, dismissed, or redundant? A critique. In: GUNTHER, R.; MONTERO, J. R.; LINZ, J. J. (Eds.). Political parties: old concepts and new challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
DALTON, R. The decline of party identifications. In: DALTON, R. J.; WATTENBERG, M. P. (Eds.). Parties without partisans – Political change in advanced industrial democracies. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
DALTON, R. “Partisan mobilization, cognitive mobilization and the changing American electorate”. UC Irvine, Center for the Study of Democracy, 2004. Disponível em:
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7gz6t2bb. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2021.
DALTON, R.; WATTENBERG, M. Unthinkable democracy: political change in advanced industrial democracies. In: DALTON, R. J.; WATTENBERG, M. P. (Eds.). Parties without partisans – Political change in advanced industrial democracies. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
DANCEY, L.; SHEAGLEY, G. “Heuristics behaving badly: party cues and voter knowledge”. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 57, nº 2, p. 312-325, 2013.
DATAFOLHA. Avaliação de Fernando Henrique Cardoso (1 ano), dezembro de 1995, Brasil. In: Banco de Dados do Cesop, pesquisa nº 475. Disponível em:
https://www.cesop.unicamp.br/por/banco_de_dados/v/1531. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2021.
DATAFOLHA. Avaliação FHC (2 anos e 11 meses), dezembro de 1997, Brasil. In: Banco de Dados do Cesop, pesquisa nº 857. Disponível em:
https://www.cesop.unicamp.br/por/banco_de_dados/v/964. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2021.
DATAFOLHA. Avaliação FHC, dezembro de 1998, Brasil. In: Banco de Dados do Cesop, pesquisas nº 934 a nº 943. Disponível em: <https://www.cesop.unicamp.br/por/banco_de_dados>. Acesso em:
jun. 2021.
DATAFOLHA. Avaliação Presidente Fernando Henrique Cardoso, dezembro de 1999, Brasil. In: Banco de Dados do Cesop, pesquisa nº 980. Disponível em:
https://www.cesop.unicamp.br/por/banco_de_dados/v/75. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2021.
DATAFOLHA. Avaliação FHC, junho de 2000, Brasil. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5176332. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2021.
DATAFOLHA. Avaliação Presidente Fernando Henrique Cardoso, dezembro de 2001, Brasil. In: Banco de Dados do Cesop, pesquisa nº 1599. Disponível em:
https://www.cesop.unicamp.br/por/banco_de_dados/v/837. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2021.
DATAFOLHA. Avaliação Presidente Fernando Henrique Cardoso, dezembro de 2002, Brasil. In: Banco de Dados do Cesop, pesquisa nº 1839. Disponível em:
https://www.cesop.unicamp.br/por/banco_de_dados/v/2418. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2021.
DELLI CARPINI, M. X.; KEETER, S. What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT & London: Yale University Press, 1996.
DENHAM, B. E. “Intermedia attribute agenda setting in the New York Times: the case of animal abuse in U.S. horse racing”. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, vol. 91, p. 17-37, 2014.
DORUSSEN, H.; PALMER, H. D. The context of economic voting. In: DORUSSEN, H.; TAYLOR, M. (Eds.). Economic voting. New York: Routledge, 2002a.
DORUSSEN, H.; PALMER, H. D. Group economic voting: a comparison of the Netherlands and Germany. In: DORUSSEN, H.; TAYLOR, M. (Eds.). Economic voting. Nova York: Routledge, 2002b.
DOWNS, A. An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1957.
DRUCKMAN, J. “Using credible advice to overcome framing effects”. Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, vol. 17, nº 1, p. 62-82, 2001.
DRUCKMAN, J. N.; PETERSON, E.; SLOTHUUS, R. “How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation”. American Political Science Review, vol. 107, nº 1, p. 57-79, 2013.
ECKSTEIN, H. Case study and theory in political science. In: GREENSTEIN, F. I.; POLSBY, N. W. (Eds.). Handbook of political science 7. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
EDWARDS, E., et al. “Who’s cueing whom? Assessing the relationship between electorate opinion and party positions on the European Union”. In: Euroskepticism Conference, Amsterdam, 1-2 jul. 2005.
ELO, K.; RAPELI, L. “Determinants of political knowledge: the effects of the media on knowledge and information”. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, vol. 20, nº 1, p. 133-146, 2010.
FSB COMUNICAÇÃO. “Hábitos de informação e monitoramento político”. Mídia & Política 2019. Ano 12 (online), 2019. Disponível em: https://www.fsb.com.br/noticias/baixe-aqui-o-novo-midia-epolitica-2019-com-exclusividade/. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2021.
GERBER, A., et al. The illusion of learning from observational research. In: SHAPIRO, I.; SMITH, R.; MASOUD, T. (eds.). Problems and methods in the study of politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
GRAMACHO, W. “Ciclos de información y funciones de popularidad: el período Cardoso en Brasil (1995-2002)”. Desarrollo Económico, vol. 45, nº 177, p. 99-121, 2005.
GRAMACHO, W.; JÁCOMO, A. “Padrões de uso dos meios de comunicação no Brasil e seu impacto sobre níveis de informação política”. Debates, vol. 9, nº 3, p. 11-36, 2015.
GUNTHER, R.; DIAMOND, L. “Species of political parties: a new typology”. Party Politics, vol. 9, nº 2, p. 167-199, 2003.
HOX, J. J. Applied multilevel analysis. Amsterdam: TT-Publikaties, 1995.
IYENGAR, S.; KINDER, D. News that matters. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1987.
JONES, K.; JOHNSTON, J.; PATTIE, C. J. “People, places and regions: exploring the use of multi-level modelling in the analysis of electoral data”. British Journal of Political Science, vol. 22, nº 3, p. 343380, 1992.
JONES, M. P.; MAINWARING, S. "The nationalization of parties and party systems: an empirical measure and an application to the Americas". Party Politics, vol. 9, nº 2, p. 139-166, 2003.
JOSLYN, M.; HAIDER-MARKEL, D. “Framing effects on personal opinion and perception of public opinion: the cases of physician-assisted suicide and social security”. Social Science Quarterly, vol. 83, nº 3, p. 690-706, 2002.
KAID, L. L.; HOLTZ-BACHA, C. An introduction to parties and candidates on television. In: KAID, L. L.; HOLTZ-BACHA, C. (Eds.). Political advertising in Western democracies: parties and candidates on television. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1995.
KEELE, L. “The statistics of causal inference: a view from political methodology”. Political Analysis, vol. 23, nº 3, p. 313-335, 2015.
KREFT, I.; LEEUW, J. Introducing multilevel modeling. London: Sage Publications, 1998.
LAWSON, K.; MERKL, P. Alternative organizations: environmental, supplementary, communitarian, and authoritarian. In: LAWSON, K.; MERKL, P. (Eds.). When parties fail: emerging alternative organizations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988.
LEWIS-BECK, M. S. Economics and elections: the major Western democracies. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1990.
LEWIS-BECK, M. S.; PALDAM, M. “Economic voting: an introduction”. Electoral Studies, vol. 19, nº 2-3, p. 113-121, 2000.
LEWIS-BECK, M. S., et al. "The nature of economic perceptions in mass publics". Electoral Studies, vol. 3, nº 3, p. 524-528, 2013.
LEWIS-BECK, M. S.; STEGMAIER, M. "The VP-function revisited: a survey of the literature on vote and popularity functions after over 40 years". Public Choice, vol. 157, nº 3, p. 367-385, 2013.
LIJPHART, A. “Comparative politics and the comparative method”. American Political Science Review, vol. 65, p. 682-693, 1971.
LINZ, J. Presidential of parliamentary democracy: does it make a difference? In: LINZ, J. J.;
VALENZUELA, A. (Eds.). The failure of presidential democracy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994.
LUKE, D. Multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2004.
MAINWARING, S. Brazil: weak parties, feckless democracy. In: MAINWARING, S.; SCULLY, T. R. (Eds.). Building democratic institutions: party systems in Latin America. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995.
MANCINI, P.; SWANSON, D. Politics, media, and modern democracy: introduction. In: SWANSON, D. L.; MANCINI, P. (Eds.). Politics, media, and modern democracy: an international study of innovations in electoral campaigning and their consequences. Westport: Praeger Publishers, 1996.
MANIN, B. Los principios del gobierno representativo. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 1998.
MARAVALL, J. M.; PRZEWORSKI, A. Political reactions to the economy: the Spanish experience. In: STOKES, S. C. (Ed.). Public support for market reforms in new democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
MARGOLIS, M.; MAUSER, G. A. Introduction: public opinion as a dependent variable. In: MARGOLIS, M.; MAUSER, G. A. (Eds.). Manipulating public opinion. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, 1989.
MASIERO, G. Origens e desenvolvimento do populismo. In: BRESSER PEREIRA, L. C. (Org.). Populismo econômico. São Paulo: Nobel, 1991.
MCDERMOTT, R. “Experimental methods in political science”. Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 5, p. 31-61, 2002.
MELO, C. R. “Partidos e migração partidária na Câmara dos Deputados”. Dados, vol. 43, nº 2, p. 207-223, 2000.
MELO, C. R. Retirando as cadeiras do lugar: migração partidária na Câmara dos Deputados (19852002). Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG, 2004.
MELO, C. R.; CÂMARA, R. “Estrutura da competição pela presidência e consolidação do sistema partidário no Brasil”. Dados, Rio de Janeiro, vol. 55, nº 1, p. 71-117, 2012.
MENEGUELLO, R. "Electoral behavior in Brazil: the 1994 presidential elections". International Social Science Journal, vol. 147, nº 47, p. 627-641, 1996.
MÉROLA, V.; HITT, M. “Numeracy and the persuasive effect of policy information and party cues”. Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 80, nº 2, p. 554-562, 2016.
MONTERO, J.; GUNTHER, R. Introduction: reviewing and reassessing parties. In: MONTERO, J.; GUNTHER, R.; LINZ, J. J. (Eds.). Political parties: old concepts and new challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
MUNDIM, P. S. “Um modelo para medir os efeitos da cobertura da imprensa no voto: teste nas eleições de 2002 e 2006”. Opinião Pública, vol. 16, nº 2, p. 394-425, 2010.
MUNDIM, P. S.; GRAMACHO, W.; PINTO, A. J. P. ”Razão e emoção: reações ao estado da economia e aprovação do governo federal”. Opinião Pública, vol. 24, nº 1, p. 90-113, 2018.
NADEAU, R., et al. “Economics and elections revisited”. Comparative Political Studies, vol. 46, nº 5, p. 551-573, 2012.
NICHOLSON, S.; HANSFORD, T. G. “Partisans in robes: party cues and public acceptance of supreme court decisions”. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 58, nº 3, p. 620-636, 2014.
NICKELSBURG, M.; NORPOTH, H. “Commander-in-chief or chief economist? The president in the eye of the public”. Electoral Studies, vol. 19, nº 2-3, p. 313-332, 2000.
NICOLAU, J. “Disciplina partidária e base parlamentar na Câmara dos Deputados no primeiro governo Fernando Henrique Cardoso (1995-1998)”. Dados, Rio de Janeiro, vol. 43, nº 4, p. 709-736, 2000.
NORRIS, P. Democratic phoenix: reinventing political activism. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
O’DONNELL, G. “Delegative democracy?”. Journal of Democracy, vol. 5, nº 1, p. 55-69, 1992.
PAIVA, D.; TAROUCO, G. S. “Voto e identificação partidária: os partidos brasileiros e a preferência dos eleitores”. Opinião Pública, Campinas, vol. 17, nº 2, p. 426-451, nov. 2011.
PEREIRA, C.; MÜELLER, B. “Partidos fracos na arena eleitoral e partidos fortes na arena legislativa: a conexão eleitoral no Brasil”. Dados, vol. 46, nº 4, p. 735-771, 2003.
PETERS, G. B. Comparative politics: theory and methods. New York: New York University Press, 1998.
PETERSEN, M. B., et al. “Motivated reasoning and political parties: evidence for increased processing in the face of party cues”. Political Behavior, vol. 35, nº 4, p. 831-854, 2012.
PRICE, V. Communication concepts 4: public opinion. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1992.
PRIOR, M. Post-broadcast democracy: how media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
POPKIN, S. The reasoning voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
POWELL, G. Elections as instruments of democracy: majoritarian and proportional visions. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000.
RAY, L. “When parties matter: the conditional influence of party positions on voter opinion about European integration”. Journal of Politics, vol. 65, nº 4, p. 978-994, 2003.
RENNÓ, L.; GRAMACHO, W. “Let’s blame everyone: executive and legislative evaluations of economic performance in Brazil and Chile”. Journal of Politics in Latin America, vol. 2, p. 53-78, 2010.
RENNÓ, L.; SPANAKOS, A. P. “Fundamentos da economia, mercado financeiro e intenção de voto: as eleições presidenciais brasileiras de 1994, 1998 e 2002”. Dados, vol. 49, nº 1, p. 11-40, 2006.
RIBEIRO, E.; CARREIRÃO, Y.; BORBA, J. “Sentimentos partidários e antipetismo: condicionantes e covariantes”. Opinião Publica, Campinas, vol. 22, nº 3, p. 603-637, dez. 2016.
ROBERTS, K. El neoliberalismo y la transformación del populismo en América Latina: el caso peruano. In: MACKINNON, M. M.; PETRONE, M. A. (Comps.). Populismo y neopopulismo en América Latina: el problema de la cenicienta. Buenos Aires: Eudeba, 1998.
RUESCHEMEYER, D. Can one or a few cases yield theoretical gains? In: MAHONEY, J.; RUESCHEMEYER, D. (Eds.). Comparative historical analysis in social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
SAMUELS, D. “Determinantes do voto partidário em sistemas eleitorais centrados no candidato:
evidências sobre o Brasil”. Dados, vol. 40, nº 3, p. 493-536, 1997.
SAMUELS, D.; ZUCCO JUNIOR, C. “The power of partisanship in Brazil: evidence from survey experiments”. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 58, nº 1, p. 212-225, 2014.
SAMUELS, D.; ZUCCO JUNIOR, C. Frontmatter. In: SAMUELS, D.; ZUCCO JUNIOR, C. Partisans, antipartisans, and nonpartisans: voting behavior in Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
SHIVELY, W. “The development of party identification among adults: exploration of a functional model”. American Political Science Review, vol. 73, nº 4, p. 1.039-1.054, 1979.
SNIDERMAN, P. The new look in public opinion research. In: FINIFTER, A. W. (Ed.). Political science: the state of the discipline II. Washington: The American Political Science Association, 1993.
SNIJDERS, T.; BOSKER, R. Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage Publications, 1999.
STEENBERGEN, M.; JONES, B. “Modeling multilevel data structures”. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 46, nº 1, p. 218-237, 2002.
STOKES, S. A defense of observational research. In: TEELE, D. (Ed.). Field experiments and their critics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014.
STRØM, K.; SVÅSAND, L. (Eds.). Challenges to political parties: the case of Norway. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997.
VREESE, C. “Political parties in dire straits? Consequences of national referendums for political parties”. Party Politics, vol. 12, nº 5, p. 581-598, 2006.
WEFFORT, F. O populismo na política brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1989.
WEYLAND, K. “Neopopulism and neoliberalism in Latin America: how much affinity?”. Third World Quarterly, vol. 24, nº 6, p. 1.095-1.115, 2003.
ZALLER, J. The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Wladimir Gramacho