Banner Portal
Political and party polarization in United States (1936-2016)
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Polarization
United States
Platforms
Republican party
Democratic party

How to Cite

VIDAL, Camila Feix. Political and party polarization in United States (1936-2016). Opinião Pública, Campinas, SP, v. 27, n. 2, p. 412–450, 2021. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8666890. Acesso em: 17 jul. 2024.

Abstract

This research is aimed at understanding the supposed US party polarization. Through a methodology that privileges the use of national platforms as an indicative of ideological portrait and gradation indicators, this study aims to empirically show in a historical perspective the approximations and distances between the two most important political parties in USA and, consequently, the rise or decline of ideologies as conservatism and liberalism. The time framed goes from 1936 (first election post New Deal) to 2016. The results indicate that there is a party polarization in recent period, not singular in the history of the country, but unique in the sense that both parties head to extremes of the political spectrum characterized, mainly, by a conservative ascendancy by the Republican Party with regards to social issues. Far from a centrist discourse or not committed supposedly intending to collect a higher number of electors, the US parties define themselves by opposed positionings. One still needs to know if this is a process that benefits democracy when representing society with all its idiosyncrasies or it is one process that harms democracy by contemplating extremes not always characteristics of the society as a whole.

PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

APSA. American Political Science Association. “Toward a more responsible two-party system: a report of the committee on political parties”. The American Political Science Review, vol. 44, nº 3, set. 1950.

BAWN, K., et al. “A theory of political parties: groups, policy demands and nominations in American politics”. Perspectives on Politics, vol. 10, nº 3, p. 571-597, set. 2012.

BELL, D. O fim da ideologia. Brasília: Editora da UnB, 1980.

BERNSTEIN, J. “Party network research, factions, and the next agenda. State of the parties”. Conference, Ohio, 2005. Disponível em: https://www.uakron.edu/bliss/docs/state-of-the-partiesdocuments/Bernstein.pdf. Acesso em: 4 jan. 2014.

BRENNAN, M. Turning right in the sixties: the conservative capture of the GOP. Chappel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1995.

BRODER, D. The party’s over: the failure of politics in America. New York: Harper and Row, 1972.

COHEN, M., et al. The party decides: presidential nominations before and after reform. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2008.

CRITCHLOW, D. The conservative ascendancy: how the GOP right made political history. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007.

CROTTY, W. American parties in decline. Boston: Little Brown and Company, 1984.

DOMINGUEZ, C. “Groups and party coalitions: a network analysis of overlapping donor lists”. In:

Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., set. 2005. Disponível em: http://home.sandiego.edu/~caseydominguez/groupspartycoalitions.pdf. Acesso em: 19 dez. 2013.

DOWNS, A. Uma teoria econômica da democracia. São Paulo: Edusp, 1999.

FEINSTEIN, B.; SCHICKLER, E. “Platforms and partners: the civil rights realignment reconsidered”. Studies in American Political Development, Cambridge University Press, nº 22, p. 1-31, 2008.

FIORINA, M. P. “What happened to the medium voter?”. In: MIT Conference on Parties and Congress, 1999. Disponível em:

http://www.stanford.edu/~mfiorina/Fiorina%20Web%20Files/MedianVoterPaper.pdf. Acesso em:

jan. 2013.

FIORINA, M. P. “Americans have not become more politically polarized”. The Washington Post, 23 jun.

FIORINA, M.; ABRAMS, S. J. “Political polarization in the American public”. In: Annual Review of Political Science, 2008. Disponível em:

http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~jcampbel/documents/AnnualReviewFiorina.pdf. Acesso em: 4 ago.

GIFFORD, L. J.; WILLIAMS, D. (Eds.). The right side of the sixties: reexamining conservatism’s decade of transformation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.

GOTTFRIED, P. Conservatism in America: making sense of the American right. New York: Pallgrave Macmillan, 2007.

HEANEY, M., et al. “Polarized networks: the organizational affiliations of national party convention delegates”. American Behavioral Sciences, vol. 56, nº 2, p. 1.654-1.676, 2012.

HIMMELSTEIN, J. To the right: the transformation of American conservatism. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.

HUNTER, J. D.; WOLFE, A. Is there a culture war? Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2006.

JORDAN, S.; WEBB, C.; WOOD, D. “The president, polarization and party platforms, 1944-2012”. The Forum, vol. 12, nº 1, 2014.

KOGER, G.; MASKET, S.; NOEL, H. “Partisan webs: information exchange and party networks”. British Journal of Political Science, vol. 39, nº 3, p. 633-653, 2009.

KOSTER, W.; ACHTERBERG, P.; VAN DER WALL, J. “The new right and the welfare state”. International Political Science Review, vol. 34, 2012.

LANGE, S. “A new winning formula? The programmatic appeal of the radical right”. Party Politics, vol. 13, nº 4, 2007.

LEVENDUSKY, M. The partisan sort. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2009.

MANN, J. “Politics is more broken than ever”. The Atlantic, 2014 (online). Disponível em: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/print/2014/05/dysfunction/371544/. Acesso em: 8 maio 2015.

MANN, T. E.; ORNSTEIN, N. J. The broken branch. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.

MANN, T. E.; ORNSTEIN, N. J. It’s even worse than it looks. New York: Basic Books, 2012.

MASKET, S. “It takes an outsider: extralegislative organization and partisanship in California”. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 51, nº 3, p. 482-497, jul. 2007.

MASKET, S. No middle ground: how informal party organizations control nominations and polarize legislatures. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press, 2012.

MCCARTY, N.; POOLE, K.; ROSENTHAL, H. Polarized America. London: The Mit Press, 2006.

NASH, G. H. The conservative intellectual movement in America since 1945. Wilmington: Intercollegiate Studies Institute, 1996.

NASH, G. H. Reappraising the right: the past and future of American conservatism. Wilmington: Isi Books, 2009.

NOEL, H. “The coalition merchants: the ideological roots of the civil rights realignment”. The Journal of Politics, vol. 74, nº 1, p. 156-173, 2012a.

NOEL, H. “Toward a network’s theory of political parties: a social network’s analysis of internal party cleavages in presidential nominations”. In: American Political Parties: Past, Present and Future Conference. Charlotesville, 2012b. Disponível em: http://faculty.virginia.edu/jajenkins/Noel.pdf. Acesso em: 2 fev. 2014.

PARTIDO DEMOCRATA. Democratic Party national platforms, 1936-2016. Disponível em: http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/. Acesso em: 20 ago. 2012.

PARTIDO REPUBLICANO. Republican Party national platforms, 1936-2016. Disponível em: http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/. Acesso em: 20 ago. 2012.

PEELE, G.; ABERBACH, J. (Eds.). Crisis of conservatism? The Republican Party, the conservative movement, and American politics after Bush. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

PEW RESEARCH CENTER. Political polarization in the American public, 2014. Disponível em: http://www.pewresearch.org. Acesso em: 21 jan. 2015.

PHILIPS-FEIN, K. Invisible hands: the making of the conservative movement from the New Deal to Reagan. New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 2009.

PIERSON, P.; HACKER, J. Off center: the Republican Revolution and the erosion of American democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005.

PIERSON, P.; SKOCPOL, T. (Eds.). The transformation of American politics: activist government and the rise of conservatism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.

POOLE, K.; ROSENTHAL, H. “The polarization of American politics”. The Journal of Politics, vol. 46, nº 4, p. 1.061-1.079, nov. 1984.

POOLE, K.; ROSENTHAL, H. “A spatial model for legislative roll call analysis”. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 29, nº 2, p. 357-384, maio 1985.

POWELL, G. B. “Representation in context: election laws and ideological congruence between citizens and government”. Discurso proferido para a APSA, 2012. Disponível em:

http://www.apsanet.org/media/PDFs/GovDept/2011%20Powell.pdf. Acesso em: jul. 2014.

PRIOR, M. “Media and political polarization”. Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 16, fev. 2013.

SCHWARTZ, M. The party network: the robust organization of Illinois republicans. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1990.

SINCLAIR, B. Party wars. Oklahoma: Oklahoma University Press, 2006.

THE AMERICAN PRESIDENCY PROJECT. website, 2013. UC Santa Barbara. Disponível em: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu. Acesso em: 3 mar. 2013.

THOMPSON, M. Confronting the new conservatism: the rise of the right in America. New York: New York University Press, 2007.

VIDAL, C. F. “Polarização partidária e ascensão conservadora: uma análise das plataformas nacionais Republicanas e Democratas nos Estados Unidos (1936-2012)”. Tese de Doutorado em Ciência Política. UFRGS, 2016.

WATTENBERG, M. The decline of American political parties. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Camila Feix Vidal

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.