Keywords
Political inequality
Congruence
Affluence bias
Schooling bias
How to Cite
Abstract
An emerging line of research indicates that in many democracies members of the parliament under-represent certain groups. Hoping to expand this research agenda in Brazil, we analyzed whether the degree of congruence between preferences of representatives and voters varies across segments of the populace and, if so, which groups are best represented. Our expectation was that congruence would be smaller for socially disadvantaged groups, which have fewer resources for political participation and for the exercise of other forms of influence. We use the distance of preferences in voter-representative pairs (dyads), considered the most suitable measure for collective representation. Our analysis considers 11 issues in the period 2004-2014. The results confirm the expectation; notably, the representative advantage of the more educated seems to be greater than that of the more affluent.
References
Achen, C. H. “Measuring representation”. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 22, nº 3, p. 475-510, ago. 1978.
Adams, J.; Ezrow, L. “Who do European parties represent? How Western European parties represent the policy preferences of opinion leaders?”. The Journal of Politics, vol. 71, nº 1, p. 206-223, jan. 2009.
Aronow, P. M.; Samii, C.; Assenova, V. A. “Cluster-robust variance estimation for dyadic data”. Political Analysis, vol. 23, nº 4, p. 564-577, 2015.
Bartels, L. M. Unequal democracy: the political economy of the New Gilded Age. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2008.
Bauer, P. C., et al. “Is the left-right scale a valid measure of ideology? Individual-level variation in associations with ‘left’ and ‘right’ and left-right self-placement”. Political Behavior, vol. 39, nº 3, p. 553-583, 2017.
BLS – Brazilian Legislative Surveys. Disponível em: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/bls. Acesso em: 8 jan. 2019.
Boas, T. C.; Smith, A. E. “Looks like me, thinks like me: descriptive representation and opinion congruence in Brazil”. Latin American Research Review, vol. 54, nº 2, p. 310-328, 2019.
Brady, H. E. “The perils of survey research: inter-personally incomparable responses”. Political Methodology, vol. 11, nº 3-4, p. 269-291, 1985.
Caesar, G. “Perfil médio do deputado federal eleito é homem, branco, casado e com ensino superior” (online). G1, 21 out. 2018. Disponível em: https://g1.globo.com/politica/eleicoes/2018/eleicao-em-numeros/noticia/2018/10/21/perfil-medio-do-deputado-federal-eleito-e-homem-branco-casado-e-com-ensino-superior.ghtml. Acesso em: 25 out. 2020.
Calvo, E.; Murillo, M. V. Non-policy politics: richer voters, poorer voters, and the diversification of electoral strategies. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
Carreirão, Y. S. “O debate metodológico nos estudos de congruência política: uma revisão da literatura internacional”. Revista de Sociologia e Política, vol. 27, nº 69, 2019. Disponível em: https://search.scielo.org/?q=*⟨=pt&count=15&from=0&output=site&sort=&format=summary&fb=&page=1&filter%5Bta_cluster%5D%5B%5D=Rev.+Sociol.+Polit.&q=%28au%3A%28carreir%C3%A3o%29%29⟨=pt&page=1. Acesso em: out. 2021.
Carreirão, Y. S.; Melo, D. J. C. “Representação política na Assembleia Nacional Constituinte (1987-88): congruência entre preferências dos cidadãos e políticas aprovadas na Constituição”. Teoria e Pesquisa: Revista de Ciência Política, vol. 23, nº 2, p. 107-149, 2014.
Corral González, M. C. “Uneven representation? Analysis of democratic responsiveness in Latin America”. Tese de Doutorado em Ciência Política. Vanderbilt University, Nashville, 2013.
Dahl, R. A. On democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998.
Dalton, R. J. “Party representation across multiple issue dimensions”. Party Politics, vol. 23, nº 6, p. 609-622, nov. 2017.
Delli Carpini, M. X.; Keeter, S. What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996.
Driscoll, A., et al. “Prejudice, strategic discrimination, and the electoral connection: evidence from a pair of field experiments in Brazil”. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 62, nº 4, p. 781-795, out. 2018.
Erikson, R. S. “Income inequality and policy responsiveness”. Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 18, p. 11-29, maio 2015.
Erikson, R.; Goldthorpe, J. H.; Portocarero, L. “Intergenerational class mobility in three Western European societies: England, France and Sweden”. The British Journal of Sociology. Special Issue: Current Research on Social Stratification, vol. 30, nº 4, p. 415-441, dez. 1979.
Espírito-Santo, A.; Freire, A.; Serra-Silva, S. “Does women’s descriptive representation matter for policy preferences? The role of political parties”. Party Politics, vol. 26, nº 2, p. 227-237, mar. 2020.
Flavin, P. “State campaign finance laws and the equality of political representation”. Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, vol. 13, nº 3, p. 362-374, set. 2014.
Gallego, A. Unequal political participation worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
Gilens, M. Affluence and influence. Princeton: Princeton University Press; New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2012.
Giuberti, A. C.; Menezes-Filho, N. “Discriminação de rendimentos por gênero: uma comparação entre o Brasil e os Estados Unidos”. Economia Aplicada, vol. 9, nº 3, p. 369-383, jul.-set. 2005.
Golder, M.; Stramski, J. “Ideological congruence and electoral institutions”. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 54, nº 1, p. 90-106, jan. 2010.
Gonçalves, R. B.; Pedra, G. M. “O surgimento das denominações evangélicas no Brasil e a presença na política”. Diversidade Religiosa, vol. 7, nº 2, p. 69-100, dez. 2017.
Haussmann, S.; Golgher, A. B. “Shrinking gender wage gaps in the Brazilian labor market: an application of the APC approach”. Nova Economia, vol. 26, nº 2, p. 429-464, maio-ago. 2016.
IBGE – Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Censo demográfico 2010: características gerais da população, religião e pessoas com deficiência (online). IBGE, 2012. Disponível em: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/periodicos/94/cd_2010_religiao_deficiencia.pdf. Acesso em: 25 out. 2020.
Lapop – Latin America Public Opinion Project. Disponível em: https://www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop. Acesso em: 11 out. 2018.
LatinoBarómetro – Opinión Pública Latinoamericana. Disponível em: https://www.latinobarometro.org/lat.jsp Acesso em: 29 dez. 2017.
King, G., et al. “Enhancing the validity and cross-cultural comparability of measurement in survey research”. American Political Science Review, vol. 98, nº 1, p. 191-207, fev. 2004.
Klüver, H.; Pickup, M. “Are they listening? Public opinion, interest groups and government responsiveness”. West European Politics, vol. 42, nº 1, p. 91-112, 2019.
Lupu, N.; Selios, L.; Warner, Z. “A new measure of congruence: the earth mover’s distance”. Political Analysis, vol. 25, nº 1, p. 95-113, jan. 2017.
Lupu, N.; Warner, Z. “Affluence and congruence: unequal representation around the world”. The Journal of Politics, 2021a. No prelo. Disponível em: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/714930. Acesso em: out. 2021.
Lupu, N. “Why are the affluent better represented around the world?”. European Journal of Political Research, 2021b. No prelo. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12440. Acesso em: out 2021.
Madalozzo, R.; Martins, S. R.; Shiratori, L. “Participação no mercado de trabalho e no trabalho doméstico: homens e mulheres têm condições iguais?”. Estudos Feministas, vol. 18, nº 2, p. 547-566, ago. 2010.
Miguel, L. F.; Marques, D.; Machado, C. “Capital familiar e carreira política no Brasil: gênero, partido e região nas trajetórias para a Câmara dos Deputados”. Dados – Revista de Ciências Sociais, vol. 58, nº 3, p. 721-747, jul.-set. 2015.
Monroe, A. D. “Public opinion and public policy 1980-1993”. Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 62, nº 1, p. 6-28, 1998. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2749715. Acesso em: 20 out. 2021.
Moreira, T. C. F. “Desigualdade e congruência: uma análise das posições de diferentes segmentos do eleitorado e parlamentares brasileiros”. Tese de Doutorado em Ciência Política. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 2019.
OECD – Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Education at a glance 2019: OECD Indicators (online). Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1787/f8d7880d-en Acesso em: 25 out. 2020.
Otero Felipe, P. “Congruencia ideológica e integración europea: un análisis de los vínculos entre votantes y partidos en Europa”. Tese de Doutorado em Processos Políticos Contemporâneos. Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, 2011.
Pela – Observatorio de Élites Parlamentarias en América Latina. Disponível em: https://oir.org.es/pela. Acesso em: 6 dez. 2017.
Peters, Y. “Democratic representation and political inequality: how social differences translate into differential representation”. French Politics, vol. 16, nº 3, p. 341-357, set. 2018.
Pitkin, H. F. The concept of representation. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967.
Pitkin, H. F. “Representação: palavras, instituições e ideias”. Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política, nº 67, p. 15-47, ago. 2006.
Powell Jr., G. B. The chain of responsiveness. In: Diamond, L.; Morlino, L. (Orgs.). Assessing the quality of democracy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, p. 62-76, 2004.
Powell Jr. “The ideological congruence controversy: the impact of alternative measures, data, and time periods on the effects of election rules”. Comparative Political Studies, vol. 42, nº 12, p. 1.475-1.497, dez. 2009.
Rasmussen, A.; Reher, S. “Civil society engagement and policy representation in Europe”. Comparative Political Studies, vol. 52, nº 11, p. 1.648-1.676, set. 2019.
Schlozman, K. L.; Verba, S.; Brady, H. E. The unheavenly chorus: unequal political voice and the broken promise of American democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.
Silva, T. M. “Efeitos práticos da sub-representação política: o desalinhamento das preferências entre representantes e representados”. In: 42º Encontro Anual da Anpocs, Caxambu, 2018.
Soroka, S. N.; Wlezien, C. Degrees of democracy: politics, public opinion, and policy. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Thomassen, J. “The blind corner of political representation”. Representation: Journal of Representative Democracy, vol. 48, nº 1, p. 13-27, 2012.
Verba, S. Political equality: what is it? Why do we want it? (online). Cambridge: Russell Sage Foundation, 2001. Disponível em: https://www.russellsage.org/sites/all/files/u4/Verba.pdf. Acesso em: 25 out. 2020.
Verba, S.; Schlozman, K. L.; Brady, H. E. Voice and equality: civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995.
Weissberg, R. “Collective vs. dyadic representation in Congress”. American Political Science Review, vol. 72, nº 2, p. 535-547, jun. 1978.
Wlezien, C.; Soroka, S. N. The relationship between public opinion and policy. In: Dalton, R. J.; Klingemann, H.-D. The Oxford handbook of political behavior. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, p. 799-818, 2007.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Tábata Christie Freitas Moreira, Ana Paula Karruz
Downloads
