Palavras-chave
Como Citar
Resumo
Usando dados de nove países – Argentina, Brasil, Chile, República Tcheca, Polônia, Federação Russa, Finlândia, Alemanha e Estados Unidos – coletados pelo projeto World Values Survey, o artigo analisa a validade de quatro variáveis que potencialmente avaliam o nível de legitimidade do setor privado em relação ao setor público. Esta análise dá-se no contexto das discussões sobre o futuro das reformas pró- mercado, implementadas em diversos países nos últimos 20 anos. A investigação adotou uma estratégia em dois níveis: primeiramente, foram analisadas as freqüências agregadas por países e, em seguida, foram examinados os resultados de uma análise bivariada visando verificar a consistência interna das variáveis. O artigo conclui que as quatro variáveis consideradas não constituem uma dimensão capaz de avaliar a legitimidade do setor público versus a do setor privado.
Abstract
Using data collected in nine countries – Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Czech Republic, Poland, Russian Federation, Finland, Germany and the USA – through the World Values Survey, the article analyses the validity of four variables with a supposed potential to evaluate the legitimacy level of the private sector vis-à-vis the public sector. This analysis in undertaken in the context of the discussions on the future of market reforms that were implemented in several countries in the past 20 years. The investigation adopted a two level strategy: first, the aggregated frequencies for the nine countries were analyzed, followed by a bivariate analysis aimed at verifying the internal consistency of the variables. The article concludes that the four variables under consideration do not compose a valid dimension capable of assessing the legitimacy of the public sector versus the private sector.
Key words: legitimacy, political culture, market reforms, public opinion .
Referências
ALMOND, G. A.; VERBA, S. The civic culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963.
BILLIET, J.; CAMBRÉ, B.; WELKENHUYSEN-GYBELS, J. Equivalence of measurement instruments for attitude variables in comparative surveys, taking method effects into account: the case of ethnocentrism. In: FERLIGOJ, A.; MRVAR, A. (eds.). Developments in social science methodology. Ljubljana: FDV, 2002. (Metodološki zvezki, 18). Disponível em: <http://mrvar.fdv.uni-lj.si/pub/ mz/mz18/billet.pdf>. Acesso em: 10 jul. 2006.
BOURDIEU, P. The social space and the genesis of groups. Theory and Society, v. 14, n. 6, p. 723 – 744, 1985.
BRADY, H.; COLLIER, D. (orgs.) Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield, 2004.
BROADBENT, J.; LAUGHLIN, R. Evaluating the 'new public management' reforms in the UK: A constitutional possibility? Public Administration, v. 75, n. 3, p. 487-507, 1997.
BUNCE, V. Comparative democratization - big and bounded generalizations. Comparative Political Studies, v. 33, n. 6-7, p. 703-734, 2000.
CARRERA, J.; CHECCHI, D.; FLORIO, M. Privatization discontent and its determinants: evidence from Latin America. Trabalho apresentado 60TH IIPF CONGRESS, Milão, 23 a 26 de agosto, 2004. Disponível em: <http://www.economia.unimi.it/pubb/wp203.pdf>. Acesso em 16 de maio de 2005.
COHN, D. Creating crises and avoiding blame: the politics of public service reform and the new public management in Great Britain and the United States. Administration & Society, v. 29, n. 5, p. 584-616, 1997.
DEMOCRACY’s ten year rut. The Economist, London. Disponível em: <http://www.economist.com/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=5093522>. Acesso em: 31 out. 2005.
EUROPEAN VALUES STUDY GROUP AND WORLD VALUES SURVEY ASSOCIATION. European and world values surveys four-wave integrated data file, 1995-2000, v. 4. Produtores dos arquivos agregados: Análisis Sociológicos Económicos y Políticos (ASEP) and JD Systems (JDS), Madrid, Spain/Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands. Data Files Suppliers: Analisis Sociologicos Economicos y Politicos (ASEP) and JD Systems (JDS), Madrid, Spain/Tillburg University, Tillburg, The Netherlands/ Zentralarchiv fur Empirische Sozialforschung (ZA), Cologne, Germany. Distribuidores de arquivos agregados: Análisis Sociológicos Económicos y Políticos (ASEP) e JD Systems (JDS), Madrid, Spain/Tillburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands/Zentralarchiv fur Empirische Sozialforschung (ZA) Cologne, Germany, 2004.
ESPING-ANDERSEN, G. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990.
FUKUYAMA, F. The end of history and the last man. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1992.
FINE, B. Social capital: “The World’s Bank fungible friend”. Journal of Agrarian Change, v. 3, n. 4, p. 586-603, 2003.
GOW, J. I.; DUFOUR, C. Is the new public management a paradigm? Does it matter?. International Review of Administrative Sciences, v. 66, n. 4, p. 573-597, 2000.
GRAHAM, C.; SUKHTANKAR, S. Does economic crisis reduce support for markets and democracy in Latin America? Some evidence from surveys of public opinion and well being. Journal of Latin American Studies, v. 36, p. 349-377, 2004.
HABERMAS, J. The theory of communicative action: reason and rationalization of society. v. 1. Boston: Beacon Press, 1984.
HABERMAS, J. Between facts and norms: contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998.
HARKNESS, J. A. In pursuit of quality: issues for cross-national survey research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, v. 2, n. 2, 1999.
HARKNESS, J. Measurement and comparability in cross-national health surveys used to inform policy decisions. In: MacGREGOR, S. (org.). The impact of social science research on social policy: governance and management. Cross-National Research Papers Seventh Series, European Cross-National Research and Policy. Disponível em: <http://www.xnat.org.uk/>. Acesso em 22 jun. 2006.
HUBER, E.; SOLT, F. Successes and failures of neoliberalism. Latin American Research Review, v. 39, n. 3, p. 150-162, 2004.
HUNTINGTON, S. The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991.
INGLEHART, R. The renaissance of political culture. American Political Science Review, v. 82, p. 1203-1230, 1988.
INGLEHART, R.; WELZEL, C. Political culture and democracy: Analyzing cross-level linkages. Comprarative Politics (no prelo). Disponível em: <http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/Upload/5_Ecolfal3.pdf>. Acesso em: 10 abr. 2004.
INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND – IMF. The IMF's Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility (ESAF): Is It Working? Disponível em: <http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/esaf/exr/index.htm>. Acesso em: 19 fev. 2005.
KING, G.; KEOHANE, R.; VERBA, S. Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.
LAGOS, M. Latinobarómetro 1996 – 2003. Focus Eurolatino Program, European Commission Directorate General for Foreign Relations, Canning House June 28th, 2004.
LATINOBARÓMETRO. Latinobarómetro: opinion latinoamericana. Disponível em: <http://www.latinobarometro.org/>. Acesso em: 1º de mai. 2005. [s.d.] LYNN, L. E. The new public management: how to transform a theme into a legacy. Public Administration Review, v. 58, n.3, p. 231-237.
MANNING, N. “The legacy of the New Public Management in developing countries”. International Review of Administrative Sciences, v. 67, n. 2, p. 297-312, 2001.
MAOR, M. The paradox of managerialism. Public Administration Review, v. 59, n. 1, p. 5-18, 1999.
MEHRTENS III, J. F. Three worlds of public opinion? Values, variation, and the effect on social policy. Public Opinion Research, v. 16, n. 2, p. 115-143, 2004.
NELLIS, J.; MENEZES, R.; LUCAS, S. Privatization in Latin America: the rapid rise, recent fall, and continuing puzzle of a contentious economic policy. Policy Brief, v. 3, n. 1, p. 1-8, 1999.
PARKER, D.; KIRKPATRICK, C. Privatization in developing countries: a review of the evidence and the policy lessons. Centre on Regulation and Competition, Institute for Development Policy and Management (Working Papers Series, Paper n. 55). Disponível em: <http://www.competitionregulation.org.uk/wpdl5099/wp55.pdf>. Acesso em: 19 fev. 2005.
PORTELLA FILHO, P. O ajustamento na América Latina: crítica ao Consenso de Washington. Lua Nova, n. 32, p. 101-131, 1994.
PINHEIRO, M. A Argentina que reage: Lavahna desafia mercado e aperta o cerco contra capitais especulativos. Carta Capital, São Paulo, 22 jun. 2005.
POLLITT, C. The new manageralism and the public services: the anglo american experience. Oxford: Basil, 1990.
PONTHIEUX, S. The concept of social capital: a critical review. 10TH ACN CONFERENCE, Paris, 21-23 jan. 2004. Disponível em: <http://www.insee.fr/en/nom_def_met/colloques/acn/colloque_10/ponthieux.pdf>. Acesso em: 10 abr. 2006.
POWELL, M.; BARRIENTOS, A. Welfare regimes and the welfare mix. European Journal of Political Research, v. 43, p. 83-105, 2004.
PUTNAM, R.; LEONARDI, R.; NANETTI, R. Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.
SELIGSON, M. The renaissance of political culture or the renaissance of the ecological fallacy? Comparative Politics, v. 34, n. 3, p. 273-292, 2002.
SELIGSON, M; BOOTH, J. A.; GOMÉZ B., M. Os contornos da cidadania crítica: explorando a legitimidade democrática. Opinião Pública, v. 12, n. 1, p. 1-37, 2006.
SIL, R.; CHEN, C. State legitimacy and the (in)significance of democracy in post-communist Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, v. 56, n. 3, p. 347-368, 2004.
SINGER, H. W. Editorial: the golden age of keynesian consensus - the pendulum swings back. World Development, v. 25, n. 3, p. 293-295, 1997.
WEYLAND, K. Threats to Latin America's market model? Political Science Quarterly, v. 119, n. 2, p. 291-313, 2004.
WORLD BANK. About privatization. Disponível em: <http://rru.worldbank.org/PapersLinks/Privatization-Strategy/>. Acesso em: 19 fev. 2005.
A Opinião Pública utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto.
Downloads
