Palavras-chave
Como Citar
Resumo
Este artigo explora os critérios utilizados Resumo nas pesquisas da área de Deliberação Online. Através de uma ampla revisão de literatura, foram selecionados os 59 artigos que elencam os indicadores a serem medidos em discussões na internet. Nestes artigos, foram encontrados, ao todo, 369 critérios, com média de 6,25 por artigo e desvio padrão de 2,69. Em um segundo momento, o esforço da pesquisa se deu no agrupamento de tais critérios em categorias mais amplas e conectadas aos princípios deliberativos. Os critérios foram então resumidos a 8 categorias, a saber: Justificação, Reciprocidade, Reflexividade, Respeito, Pluralidade, Igualdade, Informação e Tópico. Conclui-se que, apesar dos muitos critérios utilizados, não se trata de uma dispersão dos estudos de deliberação online. Este resultado está ligado às diferentes correntes teóricas da democracia deliberativa, à difícil operacionalização dos critérios, à necessidade de critérios específicos para os diferentes contextos e objetos de análise e, em vários casos, à simples diferença de taxonomia.
Abstract:
This paper explores the main criteria use Abstract: d in researches in the field of online deliberation. Through an extensive literature review, we selected 59 articles that list indicators to assess discussions in the internet. In these articles were found, altogether, 369 criteria, with an average of 6,25 per item and standard deviation of 2,69. In a second stage, the research effort is made to group these criteria into broad categories and connected to the deliberative principles. The criteria were summarized in eight categories, namely: Justification, Reciprocity, Reflexivity, Respect, Pluralism, Equality, Information and Topic. We conclude that despite the many criteria used, one cannot say there is an excessive dispersion at online deliberation studies. This result is linked to different deliberative democracy approaches, the difficult to operationalize the criterion, the need for specific criterion for different contexts and objects and, in many cases, the mere difference of taxonomy.
Keywords: deliberative democracy; online deliberation; political communication; public sphere
Referências
BACHTIGER, A.; SHIKANO, S.; PEDRINI, S.; RYSER, M. Measuring Deliberation 2.0: Standards, Discourse Types, and Sequenzialization. ECPR General Conference, Potsdam, 2009.
BAEK, Y. M; WOJCIESZAK, M. E.; CARPINI, M. X. D. “Online Versus Face-to-Face Deliberation: Who? Why? What? With What Effects?” New Media & Society, vol. 13, n˚ 7, p. 135-162, 2011.
BENN, N.; MACINTOSH, A. Argument Visualization for eParticipation: Towards a Research Agenda and Prototype Tool. International Conference ePart, Delft, 2011 Aug.Sept.
BESSETTE, J. Deliberative Democracy: The Majority Principle in Republican Government. In: GOLDWIN, R. A.; SCHAMBRA, W. A. (Orgs.). How Democratic is the Constitution? Washington: AEL Press, 1980.
BLACK, L.; BURKHALTER, S.; GASTIL, J.; STROMER-GALLEY, J. Methods for Analyzing and Measuring Group Deliberation. In: HOLBERT, L. (Org.). Sourcebook of Political Communication Research: Methods, Measures, and Analytical Techniques. New York: Routledge, 2009.
BOHMAN, J. Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1996.
COHEN, J. Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In: BOHMAN, J.; WILLIAM, R. (Orgs.). Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge, 1997.
DAHLBERG, L. Net-Public Sphere Research: Beyond the 'First Phase'. Javnost-The Public, Liubliana, Eslovênia, vol. 11, n˚1, p. 27-44, 2004.
DECINDIO, F.; PERABONI, C. Design Issues for Building Deliberative Digital Habitats. Anais do International Conference ePart,Leeds, 2010 June-July.
DELLI CARPINI, M. “Gen.com: Youth, Civic Engagement, and the New Information Environment”. Political Communication, n° 17, p. 341-349, 2000.
DRYZEK, J. Theory, Evidence and the Tasks of Deliberation. In: ROSENBERG, S.W. (Org.). Deliberation, Participation and Democracy: Can the people govern? New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
FERREIRA, G. B. “Political debate on weblogs: a virtual public sphere for deliberation?” Communication Studies, vol. 10, p. 213-226, Dec. 2011.
FREELON, D. G. “Analyzing online political discussion using three models of democratic communication”. New Media & Society, Washington, USA, vol. 12, n° 7, p. 1172-1190, 2010.
FREELON, D.; WATANABE, M.; BUSCH, L.; KAWABATA, A. Town Halls of the Digital Age: Controversy and Ideology in Online Deliberation (and Beyond). Conference of the Association of Internet Researchers, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2008.
GASTIL, J. “Is face-to-face citizen deliberation a luxury or a necessity?” Political Communication, Filadélfia, PA, vol. 17, p. 357-361, 2000.
GOMES, W. Internet e participação política. In: GOMES, W.; MAIA, R. C. M. (orgs.). Comunicação e Democracia: problemas e perspectivas. São Paulo: Paulus, 2008.
GRAHAM, T. “Needles in a haystack: a new approach for identifying and assessing political talk in nonpolitical discussion forums”. Javnost-The Public, Liubliana, Eslovênia, v. 15, n˚ 2, p. 17-36, 2008.
GUTMANN, A.; THOMPSON, D. “O que significa democracia deliberativa”. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Constitucionais, Belo Horizonte, Ano 1, nº 1, jan./mar. 2007.
HABERMAS, J. Direito e Democracia: entre facticidade e validade. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro, 1997.
HÄYHTIO, T. Can Virtual Spaces Become Political Public Spheres: The Internet Forums of the City of Tampere? Anais do internacional Scanning for the Future, Finland, 2003 June.
JANSSEN, D.; KIES, R. “Online Forums and Deliberative Democracy”. Acta Politica, vol. 40, p. 317-335, 2005.
JENSEN, J. L.”Public Spheres on the Internet: Anarchic or Government-Sponsored – A Comparison”. Scandinavian Political Studies, vol. 26, n° 4, 2003.
KARAMANOU, A., LOUTAS, N., TARABANIS, K. ArgVis: Structuring Political Deliberations Using Innovative Visualisation Technologies. International Conference ePart, Delft, 2011 Aug,-Sept.
KIES, R. Promises and Limits of Web-deliberation. New York; Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. .
LABCOM. Disponível em: < http://www.labcom.ubi.pt/subp/pagina.php?p=publications&cod=33>. Acesso em: 15 dez.2011.
LOUKIS, E., XENAKIS, A., TSEPERLI, N. Using Argument Visualization to Enhance e-Participation in the Legislation Formation Process. Anais do International Conference e Part, Linz, p. 125-138, 2009 Sept.
MANOSEVITCH, E.; WALKER, D. Reader Comments to Online Opinion Journalism: A Space of Public Deliberation. International Symposium on Online Journalism, 10, Austin, 2009.
MANIN, B. “On legitimacy and political deliberation”. Political Theory, vol 15, n° 3, p. 338-368, Aug. 1987.
MANSBRIDGE, J.; HARTZ-KARP, J.; AMENGUAL M.; GASTIL, J. “Norms of Deliberation: An Inductive Study”. Journal of Public Deliberation, vol. 2, n˚ 1, 2006. , MANSBRIDGE, J. “Deliberative democracy” or “democratic deliberation”? In: ROSENBERG, S. (org.). Deliberation, Participation and Democracy: Can the People Govern? Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
MEDAGLIA, R. eParticipation Research: A Longitudinal Overview. Anais do Proceedings of ePart 2011. Delft, Holanda, p.99-108, 2011.
MENDONÇA, R.; PEREIRA, M. A. Democracia digital e deliberação online: um estudo de caso sobre o VotenaWeb. Congresso Latino Americano de Opinião Pública –Wapor, 4, Belo Horizonte, 2011.
MIOLA, E. A Deliberação Online em ambientes institucionais. Um Estudo do Fórum de Discussão do Portal da Câmara dos Deputados. In: MAIA, R. C. M.; GOMES, W.; MARQUES, F. P. J. A. (orgs.) .Internet e participação política no Brasil. Porto Alegre: Sulina, 2011.
NOVECK, B. S. “Designing Deliberative Democracy in Cyberspace: The Role of the Cyber-Lawyer”. Journal of Science and Technology Law, vol.9, n˚ 1, p. 1-91, 2003.
PAPACHARISSI, Z. “Democracy online: civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups”. New Media and Society, vol. 6, n° 2, p. 259-283, 2004.
KRÆMMERGAARD, P.; SCHLICHTER, B. R. A comprehensive literature review of the e-government research field over a decade. tGov Workshop 2011 (tGOV11). Brunel University, Londres, 2011 Mars.
RAWLS, J. O liberalismo político. São Paulo: Ática, 2000.
RAWLS, J. Uma teoria de Justiça. São Paulo, Martins Fontes, 2002.
SAEBO, Ø.; ROOSE, J.; FLAK, L. S. “The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area”. Government Information Quarterly, vol. 25, n°3, p.400–428, 2008.
SAMPAIO, R. C.; MAIA, R. C. M.; MARQUES, F. P. J. A. “Participação e deliberação na internet: um estudo de caso do Orçamento Participativo Digital de Belo Horizonte. Opinião Pública, Campinas, vol. 16, n° 2, p.446-477, nov. 2010. , SAMPAIO, R. C.; BARROS, S. A. R. “Deliberação no jornalismo online: um estudo dos comentários do Folha.com”. Intexto, Porto Alegre, vol. 2, n° 23 p. 183- 202, Jul./Dez. 2010.
SCHNEIDER, S. M. Expanding the public sphere through computer-mediated communication: Political discussion about abortion in a Usenet newsgroup. PhD Thesis. 189f. 1997. Departament of Political Science da Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1997.
SILVA, F. C. Democracia deliberativa: Avaliando os seus limites. Congresso da Associação Portuguesa de Ciência Política, 2, Lisboa, 2004. Disponível em: <http://www.ces.fe.uc.pt/publicacoes/oficina/203/203.pdf>. Acesso em: 3 jan. 2009 STRANDBERG, K. “Public Deliberation goes on-line? An analysis of citizens’ political discussions on the internet prior to the finnish parliamentary elections in 2007”. Javnost-The Public, vol. 15, n° 1, p. 71-90, 2008.
STROMER-GALEY, J. “Measuring Deliberation’s Content: A Coding Scheme”. Journal of Public Deliberation, vol. 3, 2007.
SZABO, A. Measuring Deliberation Online. Seminar Paper, Universidade de Vaasa, Finlândia, 2009. Disponível em: <http://raatali.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/szabo_seminarpaper_09.pdf> Acesso em: 25 nov. 2009.
TALPIN, J.; MONNOYER-SMITH, L. Talking with the wind? Discussion on the quality of deliberation in the Ideal-EU project.
IPSA International Conference, Luxemburgo, 2010. , TAMBOURIS, E.; DALAKIOURIDOU, E.; PANOPOULOU, E.; TARABANIS; K. Evaluation of an Argument Visualisation Platform by Experts and Policy Makers. International Conference ePart, Delft, 2011 Aug. Sept.
TRÉNEL, M. Measuring the quality of online deliberation. Coding scheme 2.4. Berlim, Alemanha: Social Science Research Center Berlin, 2004.
TSALIKI, L. “Online Forums and the enlargement of public space: research findings from a European project”. Javnost-The Public, v. 9, n˚ 2, p. 95-112, 2002.
WALES, C.; COTTERILL, S.; SMITH, G. “Do Citizens ‘deliberate’ in on-line discussion forums? Preliminary findings from an Internet experiment”. Political Studies Association Conference, Edimburgo, 2010.
WARREN, M. E. Institutionalizing Deliberative Democracy. In: ROSENBERG, S. (Org.). Deliberation, Participation and Democracy: Can the people govern? New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
WILHELM, A. Democracy in the digital age: challenges to political life in cyberspace. New York: Routledge, 2000.
WRIGHT, S.; STREET, J. “Democracy, deliberation and design: the case of online discussion foruns”. New Media Society, Londres, vol. 9, p. 849-869, 2007.
ZHANG, W. Diverse and Regulated? A Study on the Relationship Between Online Deliberation and Structural Design.
A Opinião Pública utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto.
Downloads
