Palavras-chave
Como Citar
Resumo
Este artigo trata do papel das interações sociais sobre o voto correto na perspectiva de avaliar a qualidade da democracia no Brasil. Nas novas democracias, o sistema político complexo – multipartidarismo, voto personalista, identificação partidária fraca e múltiplos candidatos – pode prejudicar o voto correto. Argumento, principalmente, que as redes interpessoais e o contexto social funcionam como atalhos cognitivos, substituindo os mecanismos institucionais. As redes interpessoais e o contexto social são desagregados pelos atributos de conflito e diversidade, os quais influenciam distintamente o ato de votar corretamente. O resultado confirma a ideia de que existe uma lógica social do voto correto.Referências
ALTHAUS, S. L. "Information effects in collective preferences". American Political Science Review, vol. 92, n° 3, p. 545-558, 1998.
AMES, B. "Electoral strategy under open-list proportional representation". American Journal of Political Science, p. 406-433, 1995.
AMES, B. Os entraves da democracia no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV, 2003.
BAKER, A.; AMES, B.; RENNÓ, L. R. "Pesquisa eleitoral em duas cidades brasileiras". Universidade de Pittsburgh/National Science Foundation, 2002.
BAKER, A. "Social context and campaign volatility in new democracies: networks and neighborhoods in Brazil’s 2002 elections". American Journal of Political Science, vol. 50, n° 2, p. 382-399, 2006.
BARTELS, L. M. "Uninformed votes: information effects in presidential elections". American Journal of Political Science, vol 40, n° 1, p. 194-230, 1996.
BAYBECK, B.; MCCLURG, S. D. "What do they know and how do they know it? An examination of citizen awareness of context". American Politics Research, vol. 33, n° 4, p. 492-520, 2005.
BERELSON, B. "Democratic theory and public opinion". Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 16, n° 3, p. 313-330, 1952.
BURT, R. Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Boston: Harvard University Press, 1992.
CAMPBELL, A. The american voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
CAMPBELL, A., et al. The American voter. Survey Research Center, Michigan: University of Michigan, 1960.
CARPINI, M. X. D.; KEETER, S. What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997.
CONVERSE, P. E. The nature of belief systems in mass publics. Survey Research Center, University of Michigan, 1964.
DAHL, R. A. "The concept of power". Behavioral Science, vol. 2, n° 3, p. 201-215, 1957.
DAHL, R. A. Um prefácio à teoria democrática. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar Editora, 1989.
DAHL, R. A. Poliarquia: participação e oposição. Trad.: C. Paciornik. Pref.: F. Limongi. São Paulo: Edusp, 1997.
DIAMOND, L. J.; MORLINO, L. (eds.). Assessing the quality of democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005.
DOWNS, A. An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and How, 1957.
FIELD, A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage publications, 2009.
GILENS, M. "Political ignorance and collective policy preferences". American Political Science Association, vol. 95, n° 2, p. 379-396, 2001.
GRANOVETTER, M. S. "The strength of weak ties". American Journal of Sociology, vol. 78, p. 1.360-1.380, 1973.
HUCKFELDT, R. "Political participation and the neighborhood social context". American Journal of Political Science, vol. 23, p. 579-592, 1979.
HUCKFELDT, R. "Social contexts, social networks, and urban neighborhoods: environmental constraints on friendship choice". American Journal of Sociology, vol. 89, p. 651-669, 1983.
HUCKFELDT, R. Citizens, politics and social communication: information and influence in an election campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
HUCKFELDT, R. Information, and political communication networks. In: DALTON, R.; KLINGEMANN, H. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
HUCKFELDT, R.; SPRAGUE, J. "Networks in context: the social flow of political information". American Political Science Review, vol. 81, n° 4, p. 1.197-1.216, 1987.
HUCKFELDT, R. Citizens, politics and social communication: information and influence in an election campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1995.
HUCKFELDT, R.; JOHNSON, P. E.; SPRAGUE, J. "Political environments, political dynamics, and the survival of disagreement", The Journal of Politics, vol. 64, n° 1, p. 1-21, 2002.
HUCKFELDT, R. Political disagreement: the survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
HUNTINGTON, S. P. A terceira onda: a democratização no final do século XX. São Paulo: Ática, 1994.
KATZ, E. "The two-step flow of communication: An up-to-date report on an hypothesis". Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 21, n° 1, p. 61-78, 1957.
KATZ, E.; LAZARSFELD, P. F. Personal influence: the part played by people in the flow of mass communications. New Jersey: Transaction Pub, 1955.
KLOFSTAD, C. A. "Talk leads to recruitment how discussions about politics and current events increase civic participation". Political Research Quarterly, vol. 6, n° 2, p. 180-191, 2007.
KLOFSTAD, C. A. "Civic talk and civic participation. The moderating effect of individual predispositions". American Politics Research, vol. 37, n° 5, p. 856-878, 2009.
KLOFSTAD, C. A.; SOKHEY, A. E.; MCCLURG, S. D. "Disagreeing about disagreement: how conflict in social networks affects political behavior". American Journal of Political Science, vol. 57, no 1, p. 120-134, 2013.
LAU, R. R.; ANDERSEN, D. J.; REDLAWSK, D. P. "An exploration of correct voting in recent US presidential elections". American Journal of Political Science, vol. 52, n° 2, p. 395-411, 2008.
LAU, R. R.; REDLAWSK, D. P. "Voting correctly". American Political Science Review, vol. 91, n° 3, p. 585-598, 1997.
LAU, R. R. How voters decide: information processing during election campaigns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
LAU, R. R. "Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 45, n° 4, p. 951-971, 2001.
LAU, R. R., et al. "Correct voting across thirty-three democracies: a preliminary analysis". British Journal of Political Science, vol. 44, n° 2, p. 239-259, 2014.
LAZARSFELD, P. F.; BERELSOn, B.; GAUDET, H. The people's choice: how the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York: Columbia, 1948.
LIMA, R. C. "Modelos de respostas binárias: especificação, estimação e inferência". Agricultura em São Paulo, vol. 43, p. 19-26, 1996.
LUPIA, A. "Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections". American Political Science Review, vol. 88, n°1, p. 63-76, 1994.
LUPIA, A.; MCCUBBINS, M. D. The democratic dilemma: can citizens learn what they need to know? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
MACKUEN, M.; BROWN, C. "Political context and attitude change". American Political Science Review, vol. 81, n° 2, p. 471-490, 1987.
MAINWARING, S. "Politicians, parties, and electoral systems: Brazil in comparative perspective". Comparative Politics, vol. 24, n° 1, p. 21-43, 1991.
MCCLURG, S. D.; YOUNG; J. K. "A relational political science". Working Paper, vol. 45, 2010.
MCCLURG, S. D.; SOKHEY, A. E. "Social networks and correct voting". Working Papers, p. 3, 2009.
MONDAK, J. J. "Public opinion and heuristic processing of source cues." Political Behavior, vol. 15, n° 2, p. 167-192, 1993.
MUTZ, D. C. Impersonal influence: how perceptions of mass collectives affect political attitudes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
MUTZ, D. C. "The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation". American Journal of Political Science, vol. 46, n° 4, p. 838-855, 2002a.
MUTZ, D. C. "Cross-cutting social networks: testing democratic theory in practice". American Political Science Review, vol. 96, n° 1, p. 111-126, 2002b.
MUTZ, D. C. Hearing the other side: deliberative versus participatory democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
MUTZ, D. C.; MARTIN, P. S. "Facilitating communication across lines of political difference: the role of mass media". American Political Science Review, vol. 95, n° 1, p. 97-114, 2001.
MUTZ, D. C.; MONDAK, J. J. "The workplace as a context for cross-cutting political discourse". Journal of Politics, vol. 68, n° 1, p. 140-155, 2006.
NIR, L. "Ambivalent social networks and their consequences for participation". International Journal of Public Opinion Research, vol. 17, n° 4, p. 422-442, 2005.
NIR, L. "Disagreement and opposition in social networks: does disagreement discourage turnout?". Political Studies, vol. 59, n° 3, p. 674-692, 2011.
PATEL, P. "The effects of institutions on correct voting". PhD thesis, Rutgers University-Graduate School-New Brunswick, 2011.
POPKIN, S. L. The reasoning voter: communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
PUTNAM, R. D. "Political attitudes and the local community". American Political Science Review, vol. 60, n° 3, p. 640-654, 1966.
PUTNAM, R. D. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2000.
RENNÓ, L. "Desigualdade e informação política: as eleições brasileiras de 2002". Dados, vol. 50, n° 4, p. 721-755, 2007.
RENNÓ, L. "Qualidade da representação de interesses no Brasil". Cepal. Escritório no Brasil/Ipea. Brasília-DF, 2010.
RENNÓ, L., et al. Legitimidade e qualidade da democracia no Brasil: uma visão da cidadania. São Paulo: Intermeios, 2011.
RICHEY, S. "The social basis of voting correctly". Political Communication, vol. 25, n° 4, p. 366-376, 2008.
RYAN, J. B. "Social networks as a shortcut to information and correct voting". In: APSA Toronto Meeting Paper, 2009.
WALGRAVE, S., et al. "Why representation fails. Determinants of incorrect voting in a crowded party system". In: NCCR Democracy Workshop on Political Representation "New Ways of Measuring and Old Challenges", vol. 12, 2009.
A Opinião Pública utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto.
Downloads
