Palabras clave
Resentimiento de clase social
Cultural backlash
Antipetismo
Autoritarismo
Cómo citar
Resumen
Estudios previos sobre populismo autoritario han formulado hipótesis relacionadas con el “cultural backlash” y el partidismo negativo, sugiriendo que los valores conservadores y el odio a los partidos opositores alimentan el deseo de un liderazgo fuerte. Este artículo contribuye a la literatura poniendo a prueba la influencia del resentimiento de clase social en la llegada al poder de Bolsonaro en Brasil. El análisis, basado en datos de la encuesta del Barómetro de las Américas 2018/19, revalida las conclusiones de estudios anteriores al destacar el papel central del rechazo al Partido dos Trabalhadores (Partido de los Trabajadores) en explicar la propensión a votar por el candidato de extrema derecha y, en menor medida, la influencia de los valores autoritarios en este caso de estudio. Nuestros resultados también apoyan la hipótesis del resentimiento de clase social. Se encontró que el resentimiento de clase social modera significativamente la relación entre el sentimiento anti-petista y los comportamientos de los votantes, lo que arroja nueva luz sobre la capacidad de Bolsonaro para captar electores resentidos y dispuestos a subordinar la redistribución social a la defensa de los privilegios previamente adquiridos.
Citas
ABRAMOWITZ, A. The great alignment. Race, party transformation, and the rise of Donald Trump. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2018.
ABRAMOWITZ, A.; MCCOY, J. “United States: racial resentment, negative partisanship, and polarization in Trump’s America”. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 681, no 1, p. 137-156, 2019.
ABRAMOWITZ, A.; WEBSTER, S. “The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century”. Electoral Studies, vol. 41, p. 12-22, 2016.
ABRAMOWITZ, A.; WEBSTER, S. “Negative partisanship: why Americans dislike parties but behave like rabid partisans”. Advances in Political Psychology, vol. 39, no S1, p. 119-135, 2018.
AMARAL, O. “The victory of Jair Bolsonaro according to the Brazilian electoral study of 2018”. Brazilian Political Science Review, vol. 14, no 1, p. 1-13, 2020.
ARRETCHE, M. Trajetórias das desigualdades: como o Brasil mudou nos últimos 50 anos. São Paulo: Editora da Unesp/CEM-USP, 2015.
ARRETCHE, M. “Democracia e redução da desigualdade econômica no Brasil: a inclusão dos outsiders”. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, vol. 33, no 96, p. 395-417, 2018.
ARZHEIMER, K.; EVANS, J.; LEWIS-BECK, M. S. The SAGE handbook of electoral behaviour. London: Sage, 2017.
BACELAR DA SILVA, A. J.; LARKINS, E. R. “The Bolsonaro election, antiblackness, and changing race relations in Brazil”. The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, vol. 24, no 4, p. 893-913, 2019.
BAFUMI, J.; SHAPIRO, R. Y. “A new partisan voter”. The Journal of Politics, vol. 71, no 1, p. 1-24, 2009.
BAIOCCHI, G.; SILVA, M. K. Who supports Brazil's new strongman? [online]. Boston Review, 12 October 2018. Available at: http://bostonreview.net/world/gianpaolo-baiocchi-marcelo-k-silva-who-supports-brazils-new-strongman. Accessed on: April 19, 2022.
BARBALET, J. M. Emotion, social theory, and social structure. A macrosociological approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
BROWN, B.; BENEDICT, W. “Perceptions of the police: past findings, methodological issues, conceptual issues, and policy implications”. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, vol. 25, no 3, p. 543‐580, 2002.
CARREIRÃO, Y. A decisão do voto nas eleições presidenciais brasileiras. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Getúlio Vargas, 2002.
CARREIRÃO, Y.; RENNÓ, L. Presidential voting: partisanship, economy and ideology. In: AMES, B. (ed.). Routledge Handbook of Brazilian Politics. New York: Routledge, p. 216-235, 2018.
CHAGAS BASTOS, F. “Political realignment in Brazil: Jair Bolsonaro and the right turn”. Revista de Estudios Sociales, vol. 69, p. 92-100, 2019.
CRAMER, K. J. The Politics of Resentment. Rural consciousness in Wisconsin and the rise of Scott Walker. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016.
DAVIS, S.; STRAUBHAAR, J. “Producing antipetismo: media activism and the rise of the radical, nationalist right in contemporary Brazil”. The International Communication Gazette, vol. 82, no 1, p. 82-100, 2020.
DITTON, J.; FARRALL, S. The fear of crime. Burlington, VT: Ashgate/Dartmouth, 2000.
FIORINA, M.; ABANS, S. “Political polarization in the American public”. Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 11, p. 563-588, 2008.
HALE, C. “Fear of crime: a review of the literature”. International Review of Victimology, vol. 4, no 2, p. 79-150, 1996.
HILL, S. J.; TAUSANOVITCH, C. “A disconnect in representation? Comparison of trends in congressional and public polarization”. The Journal of Politics, vol. 77, no 4, p. 1.058-1.075, 2015.
HOCHSCHILD, A. R. Strangers in their own land. Anger and mourning on the American right. New York: The New Press, 2016.
HUNTER, W.; POWER, T. “Bolsonaro and Brazil's illiberal backlash”. Journal of Democracy, vol. 30, no 1, p. 68-82, 2019.
IBGE. Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios Contínua. IBGE, 2018 Available at: https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/sociais/trabalho.html. Accessed on: September 14, 2022.
INGLEHART, R.; WELZEL, C. Modernization, cultural change, and democracy. The human development sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
JUCÁ, I.; MELO, M. A.; RENNÓ, L. “The political cost of corruption: scandals, campaign finance, and reelection in the Brazilian chamber of deputies”. Journal of Politics in Latin America, vol. 8, no 2, p. 3-36, 2016.
LAYTON, M. L., et al. “Demographic polarization and the rise of the far right: Brazil’s 2018 presidential election”. Research and Politics, vol. 8, no 1, 2021.
LEE, M. Inventing fear of crime. Criminology and the politics of anxiety. Portland, OR: Willan, 2007.
LEWIS-BECK, M.; COSTA LOBO, M. Economic voting in ordinary and extraordinary times. In: ARZHEIMER, K., et al. (eds.). Sage handbook of electoral behaviour. London: Sage, p. 609-629, 2017.
MASON, L. Uncivil agreement. How politics became our identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018.
MAYER, S. J. “How negative partisanship affects voting behavior in Europe: evidence from an analysis of 17 European multi-party systems with proportional voting”. Research & Politics, vol. 4, no 1, p. 1-7, 2017.
MAYKA, L.; SMITH, A. E. “The grassroots right in Latin America: patterns, causes, and consequences”. Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 63, no 3, p. 1-20, 2021.
MCGREGOR, R. M.; CARUANA, N.; STEPHENSON, L. “Negative partisanship in a multi-party system: the case of Canada”. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, vol. 25, no 3, p. 300-316, 2015.
MEDEIROS, M.; NOËL, A. “The forgotten side of partisanship: negative party identification in four Anglo-American democracies”. Comparative Political Studies, vol. 47, no 7, p. 1.022-1.046, 2014.
MENEZES‐FILHO, N.; KIRSCHBAUM, C. Educação e desigualdade no Brasil. In: ARRETCHE, A. (ed.). Trajetórias das desigualdades: como o Brasil mudou nos últimos 50 anos. São Paulo: Unesp/CEM-USP, p. 109-131, 2015.
MOFFITT, B. The global rise of populism. Performance, political style, and representation. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2016.
MUDDE, C.; KALTWASSER, C. R. “Exclusionary vs. inclusionary populism: comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America”. Government and opposition, vol. 48, no 2, p. 147-74, 2013.
NORRIS, P.; INGLEHART, R. Cultural backlash. Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
REILJAN, A. “Fear and loathing across party lines (also) in Europe: affective polarisation in European party systems”. European Journal of Political Research, vol. 59, no 2, p. 376-396, 2019.
RENNÓ, L. “The Bolsonaro voter: issue positions and vote choice in the 2018 Brazilian presidential elections”. Latin America Politics and Society, vol. 62, no 4, p. 1-23, 2020.
RENNÓ, L.; CABELLO, A. F. “The basis of Lulismo: the return of personalism. Ideological realignment or non-alignment?”. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, vol. 25, no 74, p. 39-60, 2010.
ROODUIJN, M. “Vox populismus: a populist radical right attitude among the public?”. Nations and Nationalism, vol. 20, no 1, p. 80-92, 2014.
RUNCIMAN, W. G. Relative deprivation and social justice. A study of attitudes to social inequality in twentieth century England. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972.
SAMUELS, D.; ZUCCO, C. Partisans, antipartisans, and nonpartisans. Voting behavior in Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
SENNETT, R.; COBB, J. The hidden injuries of class. New York: Vintage, 1972.
SETZLER, M. “Did Brazilians vote for Jair Bolsonaro because they share his most controversial views?”. Brazilian Political Science Review, vol. 15, no 1, 2020.
SINGER, A. V. Esquerda e direita no eleitorado brasileiro. São Paulo: Edusp, 2000.
SINGER, A. V. O Lulismo em crise: um quebra-cabeça do período Dilma (2011-2016). São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2018.
SINGER, A. V. Os sentidos do Lulismo: reforma gradual e pacto conservador. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2012.
SOARES, G.; TERRON, S. L. “Dois Lulas: a geografia eleitoral da reeleição. Explorando conceitos, métodos e técnicas de análise geoespacial”. Opinião Pública, vol. 14, no 2, p. 269-301, 2008.
SOUZA, J. A modernização seletiva. Uma reinterpretação do dilema brasileiro. Brasília: UNB, 2000.
SOUZA, P. Uma história das desigualdades. Concentração de renda entre os ricos no Brasil. São Paulo: Hucitec, 2018.
TATAGIBA, L.; GALVÃO, A. “Os protestos no Brasil em tempos de crise (2011-2016)”. Opinão Pública, vol. 25, no 1, p. 63-96, 2019.
TELLES, E. Pigmentocracies. Ethnicity, race, and color in Latin America. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 2014.
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2023 Opinião Pública
Descargas
