Resumen
O artigo investiga se há evidência de uma “ascensão e queda” das potências emergentes nos últimos 20 anos aos olhos da opinião pública. Comparamos diversos surveys nacionais e regionais sobre a política externa da África do Sul, Brasil e Turquia em busca de indícios de endosso ou reprovação das políticas exteriores mais assertivas exercitadas por esses países. Os resultados sugerem uma ascensão e declínio pronunciados para Ancara, algum declínio para Brasília, mas são inconclusivos para Pretoria. O artigo busca contribuir com o debate sobre status e liderança regional agregando perspectivas de opinião pública e regionalismo comparado, além de oferecer um sumário conveniente de surveys diplomáticos para países do Sul Global.
Citas
ABDO, G. The new sectarianism: the Arab uprisings and the rebirth of the Shi’a-Sunni divide. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.
AKGÜN, M.; GÜNDOĞAR, S. S. The perception of Turkey in the Middle East 2011. Istambul: TESEV Publications, 2012a.
AKGÜN, M.; GÜNDOĞAR, S. S. The perception of Turkey in the Middle East 2012. Istambul: TESEV, 2012b.
AKGÜN, M.; GÜNDOĞAR, S. S. The perception of Turkey in the Middle East 2013. Istambul: TESEV Publications, 2014.
AKGÜN, M.; PERÇINOĞLU, G.; GÜNDOĞAR, S. S. The perception of Turkey in the Middle east. Istambul: TESEV Publications, 2009.
ALDEN, C.; SOKO, M. “South Africa’s economic relations with Africa: hegemony and its discontents”. The Journal of Modern African Studies, Cambridge, vol. 43, n° 3, p. 367-392, 2005.
ALTUNIŞIK, M. B. Turkey’s “return” to the Middle East. In: FÜRTIG, H. (Ed.). Regional powers in the Middle East: new constellations after the Arab revolts. Basingstoke, GB: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 123-142, 2014.
AMORIM, C. Teerã, Ramalá e Doha: memórias da política externa ativa e altiva. São Paulo, Brazil: Benvirá, 2015.
ARDA, M. “Turkey – the evolving interface of international relations and domestic politics”. South African Journal of International Affairs, vol. 22, n° 2, p. 203-226, 2015.
BANK, A.; KARADAG, R. Before the Arab revolts and after: Turkey’s transformed regional power status in the Middle East. In: FÜRTIG, H. (Ed.). Regional powers in the Middle East: new constellations after the Arab revolts. Basingstoke, GB: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 103-122, 2014.
BATTAGLINO, J. M. “The coexistence of peace and conflict in South America: toward a new conceptualization of types of peace”. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, Brasília, vol. 55, p. 131-151, 2012.
BÖRZEL, T. A.; RISSE, T. (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
BRYANT, R.; HATAY, M. Soft politics and hard choices: an assessment of Turkey’s new regional diplomacy. PRIO Cyprus Centre Report. Nicosia: Peace Research Institute Oslo, 2013. Available at: <https://www.prio.org/Publications/Publication/?x=6891>. Access on: 7 Dec. 2021.
ÇARKOĞLU, A.; EDER, M.; KIRIŞCI, K. The political economy of regional cooperation in the Middle East. London; New York: Routledge, 1998.
CEYHUN, H. E. Turkey in the Middle East: Findings from the Arab barometer. Arab Barometer, Working Paper 02/2018. 2018. Available at: <https://www.arabbarometer.org/wp-content/uploads/Turkey.pdf>. Accessed on: 12 Nov. 2020.
CIFTCI, S.; TEZCÜR, G. M. “Soft power, religion, and anti-Americanism in the Middle East”. Foreign Policy Analysis, vol. 12, n° 3, p. 374-394, 2016.
DAVUTOĞLU, A. “Turkey’s foreign policy vision: an assessment of 2007”. Insight Turkey, vol. 10, n° 1, p. 77-96, 2008.
DUQUE, M. G. “Recognizing international status: a relational approach”. International Studies Quarterly, vol. 62, n° 3, p. 577-592, 2018.
EKONOMI VE DIŞ POLITIKA ARAŞTIRMALAR MERKEZI (EDAM). “Turks in favour of cooperation with the European Union”. Public Opinion Surveys of Turkish Foreign Policy, vol. 2, 2015.
FURIA, P. A.; LUCAS, R. E. “Determinants of Arab public opinion on foreign relations”. International Studies Quarterly, vol. 50, n° 3, p. 585-605, 2006.
GERHARDS, J.; HANS, S. “Why not Turkey? Attitudes towards Turkish membership in the EU among citizens in 27 European countries”. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 49, n° 4, p. 741-766, 2011.
GOLDSMITH, B. E.; HORIUCHI, Y.; MATUSH, K. “Does public diplomacy sway foreign public opinion? Identifying the effect of high-level visits”. American Political Science Review, vol. 115, n° 4, p. 1342-1357, 2021.
GÜRZEL, A. “Turkey’s role as a regional and global player and its power capacity: Turkey’s engagement with other emerging states”. Revista de Sociologia e Política, Curitiba, vol. 22, n° 50, p. 95-105, 2014.
HALE, W. M. Turkish foreign policy, 1774-2000. London; Portland, OR: Frank Cass, 2000.
HARDT, M. S.; MOURON, F.; APOLINÁRIO JÚNIOR, L. “Brazilian international development cooperation and public opinion: domestic costs faced by a troubled emerging donor”. Brazilian Political Science Review, São Paulo, vol. 14, n° 1, p. e0001, 2020.
HERMANN, C. F. “Changing course: when governments choose to redirect foreign policy”. International Studies Quarterly, vol. 34, n° 1, p. 3-21, 1990.
JACOBS, L. M.; VAN ROSSEM, R. “The BRIC Phantom: a comparative analysis of the BRICs as a category of rising powers”. Journal of Policy Modeling, vol. 36, p. S47-S66, 2014.
JERVEN, M. “Research note: Africa by numbers: reviewing the database approach to studying African economies”. African Affairs, London, vol. 115, n° 459, p. 342-358, 2016.
KOTZE, J. S.; BOHLER-MULLER, N. “Soft power and foreign policy priorities: South African views”. HSRC Policy Brief, 2018.
LAÇINER, S. et al. (eds.). USAK Surveys on turkish security and foreign policy. Ankara: Usak Books, 2010.
LAGE, M. C. S. “O quanto as potências regionais priorizaram o Norte e o Sul Globais ao longo do tempo?”. Undegraduate Dissertation in Political Science/International Relations. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife (PE), Brazil, 2022.
LALL, R. “How multiple imputation makes a difference”. Political Analysis, vol. 24, n° 4, p. 414-433, 2016.
LIMA, R. M. S. “Liderança regional em perspectiva comparada: Brasil e Turquia”. PhD Thesis in Political Science/International Relations. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife (PE), Brazil, 2019.
LOPES, D. B.; OLIVEIRA, J. P. F. “Latin American Secretaries-General of international organizations: a typical case of ‘diplomacy of prestige’ or just another side effect of growing cosmopolitanism?” Global Summitry, Toronto, vol. 3, n° 1, p. 68-85, 2017.
MALAMUD, A. Argentine foreign policy under the Kirchners: ideological, pragmatic, or simply Peronist? In: GARDINI, G. L.; LAMBERT, P. (eds.). Latin American foreign policies between ideology and pragmatism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 87-102, 2011a.
MALAMUD, A. “A leader without followers? The growing divergence between the regional and global performance of Brazilian foreign policy”. Latin American Politics and Society, Miami, vol. 53, n° 3, p. 1-24, 2011b.
MANDELA, N. “South Africa’s future foreign policy”. Foreign Affairs, vol. 72, n° 5, p. 86-97, 1993.
MERKE, F.; REYNOSO, D. “Dimensiones de política exterior en América Latina según juicio de expertos”. Estudios Internacionales, vol. 185, p. 107-131, 2016.
MESQUITA, R.; CHIEN, J. H. “Do regional powers prioritise their regions? Comparing Brazil, South Africa and Turkey”. Third World Quarterly, vol. 42, n° 7, p. 1.544-1.565, 2021.
MESQUITA, R.; SEABRA, P. “Severity, salience, and selectivity: understanding the varying responses to regional crises by Brazil and South Africa”. International Politics, early view, p. 1-23, 2022.
MIELNICZUK, F. “Brics in the contemporary world: changing identities, converging interests”. Third World Quarterly, vol. 34, n° 6, p. 1.075-1.090, 2013.
MILANI, C. R. S.; KLEIN, M. “South-South cooperation and foreign policy: challenges and dilemmas in the perception of Brazilian diplomats”. International Relations, vol. 35, n° 2, p. 277-298, 2021.
MILANI, C. R. S.; PINHEIRO, L.; LIMA, M. R. S. “Brazil’s foreign policy and the ‘graduation dilemma’”. International Affairs, London, vol. 93, n° 3, p. 585-605, 2017.
MOORE, C. “Thabo Mbeki and South Africa’s African identity: a review of 20 years of South Africa’s Africa policy”. African Identities, vol. 12, n° 3-4, p. 371-389, 2014.
NEL, P. “The foreign policy beliefs of South Africans: A first cut”. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, vol. 17, n° 1, p. 123-146, 1999.
NOLTE, D. “How to compare regional powers: analytical concepts and research topics”. Review of International Studies, vol. 36, n° 4, p. 881-901, 2010.
NOSSEL, S. “The world’s rising powers have fallen”. Foreign Policy. Available at: <http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/07/06/brics-brazil-india-russia-china-south-africa-economics-recession/>. Accessed on: 1st Feb. 2018.
OĞUZLU, T. “Middle Easternization of Turkey’s foreign policy: does Turkey dissociate from the West?” Turkish Studies, vol. 9, n° 1, p. 3-20, 2008.
OĞUZLU, T. “Turkish foreign policy at the nexus of changing international and regional dynamics”. Turkish Studies, vol. 17, n° 1, p. 58-67, 2016.
ÖNIŞ, Z. “Sharing power: Turkey’s democratization challenge in the age of the AKP hegemony”. Insight Turkey, Ancara, vol. 15, n° 2, p. 103-122, 2013.
ONUKI, J.; MOURON, F.; URDINEZ, F. “Latin American perceptions of regional identity and leadership in comparative perspective”. Contexto Internacional, Rio de Janeiro, vol. 38, n° 1, p. 433-465, 2016.
ÖZCAN, M.; KÖSE, T.; KARAKOÇ, E. “Assessments of Turkish Foreign Policy in the Middle East during the Arab Uprisings”. Turkish Studies, vol. 16, n° 2, p. 195-218, 2015.
PAIVA, F.; MESQUITA, R. “Liderando do meio? Dimensionando a liderança das potências intermediárias nas organizações internacionais (1975-2017)”. Carta Internacional, Belo Horizonte, vol. 17, n° 1, e1223, 2022.
PAUL, T. V.; LARSON, D. W.; WOHLFORTH, W. C. (eds.). Status in world politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
POWER, T. J.; ZUCCO, C. Brazilian Legislative Surveys (1990-2013). Harvard Dataverse, 2014. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/14970. Accessed on: 8 Dec. 2021.
ROBERTS, B., et al. “Contemporary South African foreign policy: public knowledge, beliefs and preferences”. HSRC Policy Brief, 2015.
ROCHA, F. F. “O exercício da liderança regional: um balanço preliminar a partir das opiniões de brasileiros e mexicanos”. Conjuntura Austral, vol. 9, n° 48, p. 20, 2018.
SANDAL, N. A. “Middle powerhood as a legitimation strategy in the developing world: the cases of Brazil and Turkey”. International Politics, vol. 51, n° 6, p. 693-708, 2014.
SCHANZER, J.; TAHIROGLU, M. “Ankara’s Failure”. Foreign Affairs, 25 Jan. 2016.
SCHIRM, S. A. “Leaders in need of followers: emerging powers in global governance”. European Journal of International Relations, vol. 16, n° 2, p. 197-221, 2010.
SIKO, J. Inside South Africa’s foreign policy: diplomacy in Africa from Smuts to Mbeki. London; New York: I. B. Tauris, 2014.
SOUZA, A. A agenda internacional do Brasil: um estudo sobre a comunidade de política externa brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: CEBRI, 2001.
SOUZA, A. A agenda internacional do Brasil: a política externa brasileira de FHC a Lula. Rio de Janeiro: CEBRI, 2009.
TELHAMI, S. The world through Arab eyes: Arab public opinion and the reshaping of the Middle East. New York: Basic Books, 2013.
THE ECONOMIST. A hard act to follow. 6 Aug. 2011.
TRANSATLANTIC TRENDS: KEY FINDINGS 2010. German Marshall Fund of the United States, 2010. Available at: http://trends.gmfus.org/files/archived/doc/2010_English_Key.pdf. Accessed on: 13 Dec. 2017
UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY. U.S.I.A. survey: national survey of P. O. In Turkey. New York: Cornell University, Ithaca, 1991.
VIGEVANI, T.; CEPALUNI, G. A política externa brasileira: a busca da autonomia, de Sarney a Lula. São Paulo: Editora UNESP, 2011.
VOLGY, T. J., et al. Status considerations in international politics and the rise of regional powers. In: PAUL, T. V.; LARSON, D. W.; WOHLFORTH, W. C. (eds.). Status in world politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 58-84. 2014.
WESTHUIZEN, J. “Class compromise as middle power activism? Comparing Brazil and South Africa”. Government and Opposition, vol. 48, n° 1, p. 80-100, 2013.
WESTHUIZEN, J.; MILANI, C. R. S. “Development cooperation, the international-domestic nexus and the graduation dilemma: comparing South Africa and Brazil”. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, vol. 32, n° 1, p. 22-42, 2019.
WESTHUIZEN, J.; SMITH, K. “Pragmatic internationalism: public opinion on South Africa’s role in the world”. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, vol. 33, n° 3, p. 318-347, 2015.
ZOGBY, J. The tumultuous decade: Arab Public Opinion and the upheavals of 2010-2019. Longmont: Steuben Press, 2019.
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2023 Opinião Pública