Palabras clave
Petismo
Ambivalencia
Motivaciones partidistas
Partidismo
Cómo citar
Resumen
Las investigaciones sobre los votantes brasileños han demostrado una disminución tanto del partidismo como de los sentimientos hacia los partidos políticos. En este escenario, ¿cómo persiste la identidad partidista? Evaluamos cómo los votantes coordinan su identificación a través de sentimientos intra e interpartidistas, argumentando que incluso cuando los votantes evalúan a su propio partido de manera menos positiva, su identificación persiste a través de sus sentimientos interpartidistas, que se han vuelto aún más negativos en los últimos años. Utilizando datos de los Estudios Electorales Brasileños (ESEB) entre 2002 y 2018, los resultados sugieren que, en los contextos electorales más recientes, los votantes partidistas están menos entusiasmados con los partidos políticos brasileños y la relación entre los sentimientos partidistas se ha fortalecido. Estos hallazgos indican que las
alternativas partidistas al petismo mantienen una identidad partidista basada en la estrategia del “menor de dos males”
Citas
AKERLOF, G. A.; KRANTON, R. E. “Economics and identity”. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 115, nº 3, p. 715-753, 2000.
ALBERTSON, B.; GADARIAN, S. K. Anxious politics: Democratic citizenship in a threatening world. Cambridge University Press, 2015.
ARAÚJO, V. “Pentecostalismo e antipetismo nas eleições presidenciais brasileiras”. Latin American Research Review, vol. 57, nº 3, p. 517-535, 2022.
ARCENEAUX, K.; VANDER WIELEN, R. J. Taming intuition: How reflection minimizes partisan reasoning and promotes democratic accountability. Cambridge University Press, 2017.
BAKER, A.; RENNÓ, L. “Nonpartisans as false negatives: the mismeasurement of party identification in public opinion surveys”. The Journal of Politics, vol. 81, nº 3, p. 906-922, 2019.
BAKER, A., et al. “The dynamics of partisan identification when party brands change: the case of the Workers Party in Brazil”. The Journal of Politics, vol. 78, nº 1, p. 197-213, 2016.
BANKERT, A.; HUDDY, L.; ROSEMA, M. “Measuring partisanship as a social identity in multi-party systems”. Political Behavior, vol. 39, nº 1, p. 103-132, 2017.
BARTELS, L. M. “Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions”. Political Behavior, vol. 24, nº 2, p. 117-150, 2002.
BASSILI, J. N. “On the psychological reality of party identification: Evidence from the accessibility of voting intentions and of partisan feelings”. Political Behavior, vol. 17, nº 4, p. 339-358, 1995.
BAUMEISTER, R. F.; NEWMAN, L. S. “Self-regulation of cognitive inference and decision processes”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 20, nº 1, p. 3-19, 1994.
BISGAARD, M. “Bias will find a way: Economic perceptions, attributions of blame, and partisanmotivated reasoning during crisis”. The Journal of Politics, vol. 77, nº 3, p. 849-860, 2015.
BORBA, J.; RIBEIRO, E.; GIMENES, E. “Indiferenciação e alienação partidária no Brasil”. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, vol. 27, p. 105-137, 2018.
BORGES, A.; VIDIGAL, R. “Do lulismo ao antipetismo? Polarização, partidarismo e voto nas eleições presidenciais brasileiras”. Opinião Pública, vol. 24, nº 1, p. 53-89, 2018.
BRAGA, M. S.; PIMENTEL JR., J. “Os partidos políticos brasileiros realmente não importam?” Opinião Pública, vol. 17, nº 2, p. 271-303, 2011.
BULLOCK, J. G.; GERBER, A. S.; HILL, S.J.; HURBER, G. “Partisan bias in factual beliefs about politics”. Quartely Journal of Political Science, vol. 10, nº 4, p.519-578, 2015.
CARREIRÃO, Y. S. “Opiniões políticas e sentimentos partidários dos eleitores brasileiros”. Opinião Pública, vol. 14, nº 2, p. 319-351, 2008
CARREIRÃO, Y. S.; RENNÓ, L. R. Presidential voting: partisanship, economy, ideology. Routledge Handbook of Brazilian Politics, p. 216-235, 2018.
CARREIRÃO, Y. S.; KINZO, M. G. “Partidos políticos, preferência partidária e decisão eleitoral no Brasil (1989/2002)”. Dados, vol. 47, nº 1, p. 131-167, 2004.
CARSEY, T. M.; LAYMAN, G. C. “Changing sides or changing minds? Party identification and policy preferences in the American electorate”. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 50, nº 2, p. 464-477, 2006.
CARUANA, N. J.; MCGREGOR, R. M.; STEPHENSON, L. B. “The power of the dark side: Negative partisanship and political behaviour in Canada”. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de Science Politique, vol. 48, nº 4, p. 771-789, 2015.
DINAS, E. “Does choice bring loyalty? Electoral participation and the development of party identification”. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 58, nº 2, p.449-465, 2014.
DOWNS, A. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper, 1957.
DRUCKMAN, J. N.; BOLSEN, T. “Framing, motivated reasoning, and opinions about emergent technologies”. Journal of Communication, vol. 61, nº 4, p. 659-688, 2011.
DUQUE, D.; SMITH, A. E. “The Establishment Upside Down: A Year of Change in Brazil”. Revista de Ciência Política, vol. 39, nº 2, 2019.
ESEB – ESTUDO ELEITORAL BRASILEIRO, 2002-2018. Centro de Estudos de Opinião Pública –Cesop/Unicamp, Campinas. In: Banco de Dados do Centro de Estudos de Opinião Pública –Cesop/Unicamp. Disponível em: <https://www.cesop.unicamp.br/por/eseb/ondas/11>.
FESTINGER, L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1957.
FIORINA, M. P. Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981.
FISKE, S. T.; TAYLOR, S. E. Social cognition. New York: Mcgraw-Hill Book Company, 1991.
FLYNN, D. J.; NYHAN, B.; REIFLER, J. “The nature and origins of misperceptions: Understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics”. Political Psychology, vol. 38, p. 127-150, 2017.
FUKS, M.; RIBEIRO, E.; BORBA, J. “Antipartidarismo e tolerância política no Brasil”. Revista de Sociologia e Política, vol. 28, nº 76, 2021.
GAINES, B., et al. “Same facts, different interpretations: Partisan motivation and opinion on Iraq”. The Journal of Politics, vol. 69, nº 4, p. 957-974, 2007.
GREEN, D.; PALMQUIST, B.; SCHICKLER, E. Partisan hearts and minds. New Haven & London: Yale University Press, 2008.
GROENENDYK, E. “Justifying party identification: A case of identifying with the ‘lesser of two evils’”.Political Behavior, vol. 34, nº 3, p. 453-475, 2012.
GROENENDYK, E. Competing motives in the partisan mind: How loyalty and responsiveness shape partyidentification and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.
GROENENDYK, E. “Competing motives in a polarized electorate: political responsiveness, identity defensiveness, and the rise of partisan antipathy”. Political Psychology, vol. 39, p. 159-171, 2018.
GROENENDYK, E.; SANCES, M. W.; ZHIRKOV, K. “Intraparty Polarization in American Politics”. The Journal of Politics, vol. 82, nº 4, p. 1616-1620, 2020.
HIGHTON, B.; KAM, C. D. “The long-term dynamics of partisanship and issue orientations”. The Journalof Politics, vol. 73, nº 1, p. 202-215, 2011.
IYENGAR, S.; KRUPENKIN, M. “The strengthening of partisan affect”. Political Psychology, vol. 39, p.201-218, 2018.
IYENGAR, S.; SOOD, G.; LELKES, Y. “Affect, not ideology: a social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 76, nº 3, p. 405-431, 2012.
KAM, C. D. “When duty calls, do citizens answer?”. The Journal of Politics, vol. 69, nº 1, p. 17-29, 2007.
KLAR, S.; KRUPNIKOV, Y. Independent politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
KOLLMAN, K.; JACKSON, J. E. Dynamic Partisanship: How and Why Voter Loyalties Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2021.
KRISHNAMOORTHY, K.; LEE, M. “Improved tests for the equality of normal coefficients of variation”. Computational Statistics, vol. 29, nº 1, p. 215-232, 2014.
KUNDA, Z. “The case for motivated reasoning”. Psychological Bulletin, vol. 108, nº 3, p. 480, 1990.
LAU, R. R.; REDLAWSK, D. P. How voters decide: Information processing in election campaigns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
LAVINE, H. “The electoral consequences of ambivalence toward presidential candidates”. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 45, nº 4, p. 915-929, 2001.
LAVINE, H.; BORGIDA, E.; SULLIVAN, J. L. “On the relationship between attitude involvement and attitude accessibility: Toward a cognitive‐motivational model of political information processing”. Political Psychology, vol. 21, nº 1, p. 81-106, 2000.
LAVINE, H. G.; JOHNSTON, C. D.; STEENBERGEN, M. R. The ambivalent partisan: How critical loyalty promotes democracy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.
LODGE, M.; TABER, C. S. The rationalizing voter. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
LUPU, N. Party brands in crisis: Partisanship, brand dilution, and the breakdown of political parties in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
MASON, L. Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018.
MUIRHEAD, R.; ROSENBLUM, N. L. “The political theory of parties and partisanship: Catching up”. Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 23, p. 95-110, 2020.
PAIVA, D.; KRAUSE, S.; LAMEIRÃO, A. P. “O eleitor antipetista: partidarismo e avaliação retrospectiva”. Opinião Pública, vol. 22, nº 2, p. 638-674, 2017.
PARKER-STEPHEN, E. “Tides of disagreement: How reality facilitates (and inhibits) partisan public opinion”. The Journal of Politics, vol. 75, nº 4, p. 1077-1088, 2013.
PAVÃO, N. “Corruption as the only option: The limits to electoral accountability”. The Journal of Politics, vol. 80, n° 3, p. 996-1010, 2018
REDLAWSK, D. P. “Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making”. The Journal of Politics, vol. 64, nº 4, p. 1021-1044, 2002.
REDLAWSK, D. P.; CIVETTINI, ANDREW J.W.; EMMERSON, M. “The affective tipping point: Do motivated reasoners ever “get it”?”. Political Psychology, vol. 31, nº 4, p. 563-593, 2010.
RENNÓ, L. R. “Escândalos e voto: as eleições presidenciais brasileiras de 2006”. Opinião Pública, vol.13, nº 2, p. 260-282, 2007.
RENNÓ, L. R.; AMES, B. “PT no purgatório: ambivalência eleitoral no primeiro turno das eleições presidenciais de 2010”. Opinião Pública, vol. 20, nº 1, p. 01-25, 2014.
RIBEIRO, E.; CARREIRÃO, Y.; BORBA, J. “Sentimentos partidários e atitudes políticas entre os brasileiros”. Opinião Pública, vol. 17, nº 2, p. 333-368, 2011.
RIBEIRO, E.; CARREIRÃO, Y.; BORBA, J. “Sentimentos partidários e antipetismo: condicionantes e covariantes”. Opinião Pública, vol. 22, nº 2, p. 603-637, 2016.
ROBISON, J. “What's the Value of Partisan Loyalty? Partisan Ambivalence, Motivated Reasoning, and Correct Voting in US Presidential Elections”. Political Psychology, vol. 42, nº 6, p. 977-993, 2021.
SAMUELS, D. J. “Pork barreling is not credit claiming or advertising: Campaign finance and the sources of the personal vote in Brazil”. The Journal of Politics, vol. 64, nº 3, p. 845-863, 2002.
SAMUELS, D. J.; ZUCCO, C. “Crafting mass partisanship at the grass roots”. British Journal of Political Science, vol. 45, nº 4, p. 755-775, 2015.
SAMUELS, D. J.; ZUCCO, C. Partisans, antipartisans, and nonpartisans: voting behavior in Brazil. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
STANLEY, M. L., et al. “Resistance to position change, motivated reasoning, and polarization”. Political Behavior, vol. 42, nº 3, p. 891-913, 2020.
TABER, C. S.; LODGE, M. “Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs (2006)”. Critical Review, vol. 24, nº 2, p. 157-184, 2012.
VEIGA, L. F. “Os partidos brasileiros na perspectiva dos eleitores: mudanças e continuidades na identificação partidária e na avaliação das principais legendas após 2002”. Opinião Pública, vol. 13, nº 2, p. 340-365, 2007.
WINTER, N.; BERINSKY, A. J. “What’s your temperature? Thermometer ratings and political analysis”. In: Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA. 1999.
WINTERS, M. S.; WEITZ-SHAPIRO, R. “Political corruption and partisan engagement: evidence from Brazil”. Journal of Politics in Latin America, vol. 7, nº 1, p. 45-81, 2015.
ZUCCO, C.; POWER, T. Fragmentation without cleavages? “Endogenous fractionalization in the Brazilian party system”. Comparative Politics, vol. 53, nº 3, p. 477-500, 2021.
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2023 Opinião Pública
Descargas
