Banner Portal
Análise da não resposta em surveys políticos
PDF

Palavras-chave

Survey político. Eleitores jovens. Item não resposta. Missing value

Como Citar

HENKEL, Karl. Análise da não resposta em surveys políticos. Opinião Pública, Campinas, SP, v. 18, n. 1, p. 216–238, 2015. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8641408. Acesso em: 20 abr. 2024.

Resumo

Este artigo analisa a estrutura social dos entrevistados que apontam o item não resposta em um survey sobre assuntos políticos. Para isso foi realizado um survey com 2.110 jovens eleitores da rede pública de ensino em Belém (PA). Os dados indicam que a quota da não resposta aumenta com a mudança de um ciclo de vida para outro ou com a própria experiência obtida pelos efeitos das políticas públicas, o que deixa o entrevistado em dúvida em relação aos valores e opiniões estabelecidos.

 

Abstract:

This article focuses on the social structure of the interviewed that practiced nonresponse item in a survey on political issues. For this was carried out a survey with 2.010 young voters of public schools in Belém (PA). The share of non response increase with the change of one life-cycle to another one or with the proper experience gained by the effects of the public politics, what leaves the interviewed in doubt in relation to the values and opinions established.

Keywords: political survey; young voters; nonresponse item; missing value

PDF

Referências

ACOCK, A. C. “Working with missing values”. Journal of Marriage and Family, v. 67, n. 4, p. 1012-1028, 2005.

AJZEN, I. “The theory of planned behavior”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, v. 50, n. 2, p. 179-211, 1991.

ALBUQUERQUE, A. de; DIAS, M. R. “Propaganda política e a construção da imagem partidária no Brasil”. Civitas ─ Revista de Ciências Sociais, v. 2, n. 2, p. 309-326, 2002.

BATINIC, B.; WERNER, A.; GRÄF, L.; BANDILLA, W. Online research: Methoden, Anwendungen und Ergebnisse. Göttingen: Hogrefe, 1999.

BISHOP, G. F.; OLDENDICK, R. W.; TUCHFABER, A. J.; BENNETT, S. E. “Pseudo-opinions on public affairs”. Public Opinion Quarterly, v. 44, n. 2, p. 198-209, 1980.

BISHOP, G. F.; TUCHFABER, A. J.; OLDENDICK, R. W. “Options in fictitious issues: the pressure to answer survey questions”. Public Opinion Quarterly, v. 50, n. 2, p. 240-250, 1986.

BRUNER, J. S. Psicología social y percepción. In: TORREGOSA, J.; CRESPO, E. (Ed.). Estudios básicos de psicología social. Barcelona: Hora S.A., 1984.

BURDEIN, I.; LODGE, M.; TABER, C. “Experiments on the automaticity of political beliefs and attitudes”. Political Psychology, v. 27, n. 3, p. 359-371, 2006.

CANNELL, C. F.; MILLER, P. V.; OKSENBERG, L. Research on interviewing techniques. In: LEINHARDT, S. (Ed.). Sociological Methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1981.

CARMO, S. I. S. do. Importância e alcance da televisão nos processos eleitorais. In: XXI CONGRESSO DA ALAS - ASSOCIAÇÃO LATINO AMERICANA DE SOCIOLOGIA, 1997, São Paulo. Anais... CD-ROM, São Paulo, 1998.

CHRISTIAN, L. M.; DILLMAN, D. A. “The influence of symbolic and graphical language manipulations on answers of selfadministered

questionnaires: result from 14 experimental comparisions”. Public Opinion Quarterly, v. 68, n. 1, p. 57-80, 2004.

CLARKE, H. D. “Refutations affirmed: conversations concerning the Euro-barometer values battery”. Political Research Quarterly, v. 53, n. 3, p. 477-494, 2000.

D’ALESSIO, G.; FAIELLA, I. Non-response behaviour in the Bank of Italy’s Survey of Household Income and Wealth. Roma: Banca D´Italia, Temi di discussione, n. 462, 2002.

DAHLBERG, I. “Teoria do conceito”. Ciência da informação, v. 7, n. 2, p.101-107, 1978.

DEMAIO, T. J. “Refusals: Who, where and why”. Public Opinion Quarterly, v. 44, n. 2, p. 233-333, 1980.

DEPNER, F. Das Internet als Datenerhebungsquelle: der nonresponse-Fehler und Möglichkeiten seiner Reduktion. Norderstedt: Grin, 2007.

DIAS, M. O. “Reflexões sobre a ética no quotidiano da profissão”. Gestão e Desenvolvimento, v. 12, p.81-103, 2004.

DISLER, W. A. Das Zürcher Modell der selbstpsychologischen Psychoanalyse. Zürich, 2002.

DONZÉ, L.; HOLLENSTEIN, H. Aufbau, Weiterentwicklung und Pflege des KOF/ETHUnternehmenspanels. Schwerpunktprogramm „Zukunft der Schweiz“ (Phase I), Schlussbericht zum Projekt Nr. 5004-47794. Zürich: ETZ, 2000.

ESSER, H. “Über die Teilnahme an Befragungen“. ZUMA-Nachrichten, v. 18, p. 38-47, 1986.

FAULKENBERRY, G. D.; MASON, R. “Characteristics of non opinion and no opinion response groups”. Public Opinion Quarterly, v. 42, n. 4, p.533-543, 1978.

FAY, R. E. “Causal models for patterns of nonresponse”. Journal of the American Statistical Association, v. 81, n.394, p.354-365, 1986.

FÉDIDA, P. Amor e morte na transferência. In: FÉDIDA, P. (Ed.). Clínica psicanalítica: estudos. São Paulo: Escuta, 1988.

FERBER, R. “Item nonresponse in a consumer survey”. Public Opinion Quarterly, v. 30, n. 3, p. 399-415, 1966.

FRANCIS, J. D.; BUSCH, L. “What we know about ‘I don’t knows’”. Public Opinion Quarterly, v. 39, n. 2, p. 207-218, 1975.

GASPARINI, L.; GLUZMANN, P. Estimating income poverty and inequality from the Gallup World Poll. The case of Latin America and the Caribbean - ECINEQ 2009-151. La Plata: Universidad de la Plata/CEDLAS, 2009.

GENUCCHI, R. Entwicklung und Evaluation eines kognitiven Tests als Teil der Eignungsabklärung zum Physiotherapiestudium. Bern: Universität Bern, 2007.

GILLJAM, M.; GRANBERG, D. “Should we take don’t know for an answer?” Public Opinion Quarterly, v. 57, n.3, p.348-357, 1993.

GOYDER, J. “Surveys on surveys: limitations and potentialities”. Public Opinion Quarterly, v. 50, n.1, p.27-41, 1986.

GRADOWSKA, A. Dynamiken in der ästhetischen Präferenzbildung über die Zeit am Beispiel von Kleiderdesigns. Wien, 2010.

GRAUMANN, C. F. The phenomenological approach to people environment studies. In: BECHTEL, R. B.; CHURCHMAN, A. (Eds.). Handbook of environmental psychology. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2002.

GRIFFITH, L. E.; COOK, D. J.; GUYATT, G. H.; CHARLES, C. A. “Comparison of open and closed questionnaire formats in obtaining demographic information from canadian general internists”. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, v. 52, n.10, p.997- 1005, 1999.

GUIMOND, S. “Attitude change during college: normative or informational social influence?”. Social Psychology of Education, v. 2, n. 3/4, p. 237–261, 1997.

GUTIÉRREZ-FISAC, J. L.; REGIDOR, E.; RODRÍGUEZ, C. “Trends in obesity differences by educational level in Spain”. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, v. 49, n. 3, p.351-354, 1996.

HAUNBERGER, S. “Das standardisierte Interview als soziale Interaktion: Interviewereffekte in der Umfrageforschung“. ZA-Informationen, v. 58, p. 23-46, 2006.

HAWKINS, D. F.“Estimation of nonresponse bias“. Sociological Methods and Research, v. 3, n. 4, p. 462-485, 1975.

HENKEL, K.; ALMEIDA, J. (Orgs.). Pesquisa quantitativa e de opinião pública sobre o ensino superior. Belém (PA): EDUFPA, 2003.

HENKEL, K.; JACINTO, J. da M. A.; ALMEIDA, J.; CORRADI, A. L. “As vantagens comparativas dos produtos agrícolas regionais versus importados no mercado de Belém, Pará”. Amazônia, Ciência e Desenvolvimento, v. 3, n. 5, p. 225-254, 2007.

HESS, R. D.; TORNEY, J. V.; TORNEY-PURTA, J. The development of political attitudes in children. Piscataway (NJ): Transaction Publishers, 2005.

HERZOG, A. R.; BACHMANN, J. G. “Effects of questionnaire length on response quality”. Public Opinion Quarterly, v. 45, n. 4, p. 549-559, 1981.

HILMER, R.; HOFRICHTER, J. Wahltagsbefragungen in den neunziger Jahren. In: KLINGEMANN, H. D.; KAASE, M. (Eds.). Wahlen und Wähler. Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 1998. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, 2001.

HUISMAN, M.; KUNST, A. E.; MACKENBACH, J. P. “Inequalities in the prevalence of smoking in the European Union: comparing education and income”. Preventive Medicine, v. 40, n. 6, p.756-764, 2005.

JENNINGS, M. K.; NIEMI, R. G. “The transmission of political values from parent to child”. The American Political Science Review, v. 62, n. 1, p.169-184, 1968.

JOHANN, D. J.“Probleme der befragungsbasierten Messung von Faktenwissen“. Sozialwissenschaften und Berufspraxis (SuB), ano 31, n. 1, p.53-65, 2008.

KING, G.; HONAKER, J.; JOSEPH, A.; SCHEVE, K. “Analyzing incomplete political science data: an alternative algorithm for multiple imputation”. American Political Science Review, v. 95, n. 1, p.49-69, 2001.

KUCINSKI, B. “Jornalismo, saúde e cidadania”. Interface - Comunicação, Saúde, Educação, v. 4, n. 6, p.181-186, 2000. LEEUW, E. D. de; HOX, J.; HUISMAN, M. “Prevention and treatment of item nonresponse”. Journal of Official Statistics, v.19, n. 2, p. 153-176, 2003.

LIU, J. H.; IKEDA, K.; WILSON, M. S. “Interpersonal environment effects on political preferences. The "middle path" for conceptualizing social structure in New Zealand and Japan”. Political Behavior, v. 20, n.3, p.183-212, 1998.

LONGFORD, N. T. “Multiple imputation in an international database of social science surveys”. ZA-Information, v. 46, p.72-95, 2000.

MAASSEN, G. H. “An application of structural equation modeling in public opinion research: conceptualizing public and opinions”. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, v. 9, n. 2, p. 146-169, 1997.

MONDAK, J. J.; DAVIS, B. C. “Asked and answered: knowledge levels when we will not take ‘don’t know’ for an answer”. Political Behavior, v. 23, n. 3, p. 199-224, 2001.

MUSICK, K.; ENGLAND, P.; EDGINGTON, S; KANGAS, N. “Education differences in intended and unintended fertility”. Social Forces, v. 88, n. 2, p. 543-572, 2009.

O'MUIRCHEARTAIGH, C.; MOUSTAKI, I. “Symmetric pattern models: a latent variable approach to item non-response in attitude scales”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society), v. 162, n. 2, p. 177-194, 1999.

PACHECO, R. S. Mudanças no perfil dos dirigentes públicos no Brasil e desenvolvimento de competências de direção. In: VII CONGRESO INTERNACIONAL DEL CLAD SOBRE LA REFORMA DEL ESTADO Y DE LA ADMINISTRACIÓN PÚBLICA, 2002, Lisboa, Portugal. Anais… CD-ROM, Lisboa, Portugal, 2002.

PARK, T.; BROWN, M. B. “Models for categorical data with nonignorable nonresponse”. Journal of the American Statistical Association, v. 89, n. 425, p. 44-52, 1994.

PLEIS, J. R.; DAHLHAMER J. M.; MEYER, P. S. Unfolding the answers? Income nonresponse and income brackets in the National Health Interview Survey. In: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2006 JOINT STATISTICAL MEETINGS, 06.08.-10.08.2006, CD-ROM, Seattle, Washington, 2006.

PORST, R. Im Vorfeld der Befragung: PLanung, Fragebogenentwicklung, Pretesting. Mannheim, ZUMA-Arbeitsbericht 98/02, 1998.

PORTER, S. R.; WHITCOMB, M. E. “Non-response in student surveys: the role of demographics, engagement and personality”. Research in Higher Education, v. 46, n. 2, p. 127-152, 2005.

PRÜFER, P.; REXROTH, M. Verfahren zur Evaluation von Survey - Fragen: ein Überblick. Mannheim, ZUMA-Arbeitsbericht n.96/05, 1996.

RAAIJMAKERS, Q. A. W. “Effectiveness of different missing data treatments in surveys with Likert-type data: introducing the relative mean substitution approach”. Educational and Psychological Measurement, v.59, n. 5, p. 725-748, 1999.

RAGHUNATHAN, T. E. “What do we do with missing data? Some options for analysis of incomplete data”. Annual Review of Public Health, v. 25, p. 99-117, 2004.

REJA, U.; MANFREDA, L.; HLEBEC, V.; VEHOVAR, V. Open-ended vs. close-ended questions in web questionnaires. In: FERLIGOJ, A.; MRVAR, A. (Eds.). Developments in applied statistics. Ljubljana: FDV, 2003.

RENNÓ, L. R.; LICIO, E. C.; CASTRO, H. C. de O. de. “Bolsa Família e voto na eleição presidencial de 2006: em busca do elo perdido”. Opinião Pública, v. 15, n. 1, p. 31-54, 2009.

RIBEIRO, E. A. “Bases da legitimidade democrática no Brasil: adesão a valores e avaliação de desempenho”. Opinião Pública, v. 13, n. 1, p.74-96, 2007.

RODRIGUES, N. M. C. “Amostragem matricial no questionário da amostra - cd 1.02 do Censo Demográfico de 1991”. Rio de Janeiro. 300p. [Dissertação (mestrado)] Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística – IBGE/Escola Nacional de Ciências Estatísticas – ENCE, 2003.

RUBIN, D. B.; STERN, H. S.; VEHOVAR, V. “Handling ‘Don't Know’ survey responses: The case of the Slovenian plebiscite”. Journal of the American Statistical Association, v. 90, n. 431, p. 822-828, 1995.

SAYER, A. “Moral economy and political economy”. Studies in Political Economy, v. 61, p.79-103, 2000.

SCHAFER, J. L. Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman & Hall, 1997.

SCHMUTZ, P. Der foot-in-the-door Effekt. Ein Mittel zur Reduktion von Drop-Out in Online-Untersuchungen? Basel, 2004.

SCHRÄPLER, J.-P. “Explaining income nonresponse – A case study by means of the British Household Panel Study (BHPS)”. Quality & Quantity, v. 40, n. 6, p.1013–1036, 2006.

SCHUMAN, H.; PRESSER, S. Questions and answers in attitude surveys. New York: Academic Press, 1981.

SELIGSON, M. A. “Apoio popular à integração econômica regional na América Latina”. Opinião Pública, v.6, n. 2, p. 226-247, 2000.

SHOEMAKER, P. J.; EICHHOLZ, M; SKEWES, E. A. “Item nonresponse: distinguishing between don’t know e refuse”. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, v.14, n.2, p.193-201, 2001.

SICINSKI, A. “Don´t know’ answers in cross-national-surveys”. Public Opinion Quarterly, v.34, n.1, p.126-129, 1970.

SINGER, A. Esquerda e direita no eleitorado brasileiro. São Paulo: Edusp/Fapesp, 2002.

SLOVIC, P. “Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: surveying the risk-assessment battlefield”. Risk Analysis, v. 19, n.4, p. 689-701, 1999.

SMITH, T. W. “The hidden 25 percent: an analysis of nonresponse on the 1980 General Social Survey”. Public Opinion Quarterly, v. 47, n. 3, p. 386-404, 1983.

STOCKÉ, V.“Entstehungsbedingungen von Antwortverzerrungen durch soziale Erwünschtheit. Ein Vergleich der Prognosen der Rational-Choice Theorie und des Modells der Frame-Selektion“. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, ano 33, n. 4, p.303-320, 2004.

STOCKÉ, V; BECKER, B.“Determinanten und Konsequenzen der Umfrageeinstellung. Bewertungsdimensionen unterschiedlicher Umfragesponsoren und die Antwortbereitschaft der Befragten“. ZUMA-Nachrichten, v. 54, p. 89-116, 2004.

STOCKÉ, V; STARK, T. Stichprobenverzerrung durch Item-Nonresponse in der international vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft. Mannheim: Universität Mannheim, Sonderforschungsbereich 504, Working paper 05-43, 2005.

STOOP, I. L. “Surveying Nonrespondents”. Field Methods, v. 16, n. 1, p. 23-54, 2004.

STRÖTGEN, R; MANDL, T.; SCHNEIDER, R. Entwicklung und Evaluierung eines Question Answering Systems im Rahmen des Cross Language Evaluation Forum (CLEF). Hildesheim: Universität Hildesheim, 2006.

TILLINGHAST, D. S. “Direct magnitude estimation scales in public opinion surveys”. Public Opinion Quarterly, v. 44, n. 3, p. 377-384, 1980.

TOMASKOVIC-DEVEY, D.; LEITER, J.; THOMPSON, S. “Item nonresponse in organizational surveys”. Sociological Methodology, v. 25, p. 77-110, 1995.

VANDETH, J. W.; SCARBROUGH, E. The impact of values. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.

VEIGA, L. F. “Em busca das razões para o voto: o uso que o eleitor faz da propaganda política”. Contracampo, v. 7, n. 0, p. 183-208, 2002.

WISEMAN, F. “Methodological bias in public opinion surveys”. The Public Opinion Quarterly, v. 36, n.1, p.105-108, 1972.

YU, J.; COOPER, H. “A quantitative review of research design effects on response rates to questionnaires source”. Journal of Marketing Research, v. 20, n. 1, p. 36-44, 1983.

ZALLER, J. “Information, values, and opinion”. The American Political Science Review, v.85, n.4, p.1215-1237, 1991.

ZOUWEN, J. v. d. “An assessment of the difficulty of questions used in the ISSP-questionnaires, the clarity of their wording, and the comparability of the responses”. ZA-Information, v. 46, p. 96-114, 2000.

A Opinião Pública utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.