Palavras-chave
Como Citar
Resumo
Apoiado em ampla bibliografia internacional, este artigo discute a contribuição dos estudos de gênero para uma análise crítica do conceito de ciência universal. As intersecções entre estudos de gênero e ciências tratam do papel do saber científico – apreendido como objetivo e neutro – na construção do natural, definido como entidade claramente separada do cultural ou do social.
Abstract
Based upon a wide international bibliographical survey, this paper discusses the contribution of gender studies to a critical analysis of
the concept of universal science. The intersections between gender studies and sciences deal with the role of scientific knowledge - given as objective and neutral – in the construction of the natural, defined as an entity clearly separated from cultural or social realms.
Referências
ALLEN, L.S. e GORSKI, R. A. Sexual Orientation and the Size of Anterior Comissure in the Human Brain. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 89, 1992, pp.7199-7202.
ARENDT, Hanna. Rahel Varrhagen: La vie d'une juive allemande à l'époque Du romantisme. Paris, Press Pocket, 1994.
BASZANGER, Isabelle. La tradition interactionniste et la sociologie des sciences ET des techniques. In: PESTRE, Dominique. (dir.) L'étude sociale des sciences. Paris, Cité des Sciences et de l'Industrie, 1992, pp.35-60.
BEM, Sandra Lipsitz. The Lenses of Gender. New Haven, London, Yale University Press, 1993.
BOURDIEU, P. La domination masculine. Paris, Ed. du Seuil, 1998, p.123.
BURR, Chandler. A Separate Creation: How Biology Makes Us Gay. Londres, Batnam Press, 1996.
BUSSCHER, Pierre Olivier. (ed.) Faut il croire au gène gay? Idol, nº 23, junho de 1996, pp.19-23.
BUTTERFIELD, H. The Origins of Modern Science. New York, Collier Books, 1962.
COHEN, R. e SCHNELLE, T. Cognition and Fact: Materials on Luwik Fleck. Dordrecht, 1986, pp.39-46.
COLE, Jonathan R. et BRUER, John T. (eds.) The Outer Circle. New York/London, W.W. Northon & Cº, 1991.
COLLIN, Françoise. Ni-Ni, ni universalisme, ni essentialisme. Seminaire CEDREF – Féminisme ET Universalisme –, 24-02-1997.
DASTON, Lorraine. The Naturalized Female Intellect. Science in Context, 5 (2), 1992.
EPSTEIN, Steven. Impure Science: AIDS, Activism and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1996.
FAULKNER, Wendy e KERR, E. A. On Seeing Brockenspectres: Sex and Gender in Twentieth-Century Science. In: KRIGE, John e PESTRE, Dominique. (eds.) Science in the Twentieth Century. Londres, Harwood, 1997.
FINK, Candida. Carta ao New York Times, 17-8-1998.
FLECK, Luwik. O nektorych swoistych cechach myslenia lekarskiego. Archivium Historji i Filozofji Medycyny, 6, 1927, pp.55-64
FLECK, L. Odpowiedz na uwagi Taduesza Bilikiewicza. Przedglad Wspolszesny (18), 1939, pp.168-174. (Tradução inglesa in LÖWY, Ilana. The Polish School of Phylosophy of Medicine. Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1990, pp. 267-273.)
FOX-KELLER, Evelyn e LONGINO, Helen E. (eds.) Feminism and Science. Oxford University Press, 1996.
FREENBERG, Andrew. Alternative Modernity: The Technical Turn in Philosophy and Social Theory. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1995, pp.96-120.
GEERTZ, Clifford. Found in Translation: Social History of Moral Imagination. In: Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretative Anthropology. New York, Basic Books, 1983, pp.36-54.
Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1976. (Tradução: F. Bradley e T. Trenn.) [1ª ed. Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenchaftlichen Tastsach: Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv, Basiléia, Bruno Schwabe, 1935.
GOULD, Stephen. Bully for Brontosaurus. Nova York e Londres, W.W. Northon and Co., 1991, pp.416-31. (NT - Existe tradução portuguesa: Viva o Brontosauro. São Paulo, Cia das Letras, 1993.)
HAMER, D.H; HU, D.H.V.L; MAGNUSON, N. Hu e PATTUCCI, A.M.L A Linkage between DNA Markers on the X Chromosome and Male Sexual Orientation. Science, 261, 1993, pp.321-27.
HARAWAY, D. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Priviledge of Patrial Perspective. Feminist Studies 14 (3), 1988. [NE – traduzido em Cadernos Pagu (5), Núcleo de Estudos de Gênero-Pagu, Unicamp, 1995, pp.7-42.]
HARAWAY, Donna. Primate Visions. Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York e Londres, Routledge, 1989.
HARAWAY, D. Modest Witness: Feminist Difraction in Science Studies. In: GALISON, Peter e STUMP, David J. (eds.) The disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contextes and Power. Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1996.
HARDING, S. The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, Cornell Univ. Press, 1991
HARDING, S. Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What is “Strong Objectivity”. In: ALCOFF, Linda e POTTER, Elisabeth. (eds.) Feminist Epistemologies. New York, Routledge, 1993.
HÉRITIER, F. Masculin/Féminin. La pensée de la difference. Paris, Odile Jacob, 1996.
HU, S. et alii. Linkage between Sexual Orientation and Chromosome Xq28. Males but not in Females, Nature/ Genetics, 11, 1995, pp.248-256.
KELLER, Evelyn Fox. The Who/Man Scientists: Issues of Sex and Gender in the Pursuit of Science. In: ZUKERMAN, Harriet
KOHLER, Robert E. The Lords of the Fly. Chicago & Londres, The University of Chicago Press, 1994.
LAQUEUR, Thomas. La fabrique du sexe. Essai sur le corps et le genre en Occident. Paris, Gallimard, 1992 (ed. orig. em inglês 1990).
LATOUR, Bruno. Give me a Laboratory and I will raise the World. In: KNORRCETINA, Karen e MULKAY, Michael. (eds.) Science Observed. Londres, Sage, 1983, pp.141-70.
LE VAY, Simon. A Difference in Hypothalamic Structure between Homosexual and Heterosexual Men. Science, 253, 1991, pp.1034-1037
LE VAY, Simon. Queer Science: The Use and Abuse of Research Into Homosexuality. Cambridge, Mass, The MIT Press, 1996.
LONGINO, Helen. Science as a Social Knowledge. Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1990.
MARTIN, Emily. The Egg and the Sperm: How Science Has Constructed a Romance Based on Stereotypical Male-Female Roles. Signs, 16 (3), 1991.
MOSCUCCI, Ornella. The Science of Women: Gynecology and Gender in Britain, 1800-1929. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1990.
OUDHSORN, Nelly. Beyond the Natural Body. An Archeology of Sex Hormones. Londres e Nova Iorque, Routledge, 1994.
PESTRE, Dominique. Pour une histoire sociale et culturelle des sciences: nouvelles définitions, nouveux objects, nouvelles pratiques. Annales HSS, nº 3, mai-juin 1995.
PICKERING, Andy. Objectivity and the Mangle of Practice. In: MEGILL, Allan. (ed.) Rethinking Objectivity. Durham e Londres, Duke University Press, 1994, pp.109-126.
POOVEY, Mary. Speaking for the Body: Mid-Victorian Constructions of Female Desire. In: JACOBUS, Mary et alii (eds.) Body/Politics: Women and the Discourses of Science. Nova Iorque e Londres, Routledge, 1990.
RASMUSSEN, Anne. L'Internationale Scientifique, 1890-1914. Tese de História. EHESS, 1995.
Refiguring Life: Metaphors of Twentieth Century Biology. Columbia University Press, 1992.
RUSE, Michael. Glad to be Gay. Time Literary Suplement, 01-11-1996, p.14
RUSSET, Cynthia. Sexual Science, Victorian Construction of Womanhood. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1989.
SCHAFFER, Simon. The Manufactures of Ohms. In: SCOZZNES, Susan e BUD, Robert. (eds.) Invisible Connections, SPIE Press, 1992, pp.23-56.
SCHIEBINGER, Londa. The Mind has no Sex? Women in the Origins of Modern Science. Cambridge, Massachussetts, Harvard University Press, 1989.
SHAPIN, Steven e SCHAFFER, Simon. Leviathan and the Air Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1985, p.342.
STENGHERS, Isabelle. Le médecin et le charlatan. In: NATHAN, Tobie e Stenghers, Isabelle. Médecins ET Sorciers. Paris, Les Empêcheurs de Penser en Rond, 1995, pp.156-158.
Downloads
