Banner Portal
The Governance feminism at CEDAW
PDF (Español (España))

Keywords

Governance feminism
Prostitution
Sex work
CEDAW
Human right

How to Cite

JARAMILLO RUIZ, Felipe; CÉSPEDES-BÁEZ, Lina-María. The Governance feminism at CEDAW: the question of sex work and prostitution. Cadernos Pagu, Campinas, SP, n. 59, p. e205917, 2021. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/cadpagu/article/view/8664546. Acesso em: 17 aug. 2024.

Abstract

Based on a discussion of governance feminism, this article analyzes the general recommendations and concluding observations of the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). The objective is to critically analyze the approach that this body has used to address the commercialization of sex. In this sense, we find that the CEDAW Committee has promoted an abolitionist approach or one favoring partial decriminalization, which penalizes those who participate in the sex trade, except women in prostitution, who are primarily seen as victims. Thus, the empirical findings serve to understand the approaches to sexuality that prevail in international norms and organizations and their possible implications for governance feminism.

PDF (Español (España))

References

ABU-LUGHOD, Lila. “Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving? Anthropological Reflections on Cultural Relativism and Its Others.” American Anthropologist 104 (3), 2002, pp.783–90 [www.jstor.org/stable/3567256 - accesado el 7 Octubre 2020].

ADRIAENSSENS, Stef, Giulia Garofalo Geymonat, Laura Oso, K U Leuven, and Martin A Monto. “Female Prostitution, Customers, and Violence.” Sociological Research Online 10 (2), 2016, pp.1–12 [https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.4165 - accesado el 7 Octubre 2020].

BERNSTEIN, Elizabeth. “What‟s Wrong with Prostitution? What‟s Right with Sex Work? Comparing Markets in Female Sexual Labor.” Hastings Women‟s Law Journal 10 (1), 1999, pp.91–117 [Accesado el 7 Octubre 2020].

______. “Sex Work for the Middle Classes.” Sexualities 10 (4), 2007. pp.473–88 [https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460707080984 - accesado el 7 Octubre 2020].

BINDEL, Julie. The Pimping of Prostitution: Abolishing the Sex Work Myth. Londres: Springer, 2017.

COMITÉ PARA LA ELIMINACIÓN DE LA DISCRIMINACIÓN CONTRA LA MUJER (CEDAW), Recomendación General Nº 19: La violencia contra la Mujer.

CEDAW, 29 enero 1992 [https://www.refworld.org.es/docid/5d7fbd535.html - accesado el 3 Septiembre 2020].

______. Recomendación General Nº 24: La mujer y la salud. CEDAW, 2 febrero 1999 [https://www.refworld.org.es/docid/5d7fbd5113.html - accesado el 3 Septiembre 2020].

______. Recomendación General Nº 37: Dimensiones de género de la reducción del riesgo de desastres en el contexto del cambio climático. CEDAW, 13 marzo 2018 [https://undocs.org/CEDAW/C/GC/37 - accesado el 3 Septiembre 2020].

______. Observaciones finales sobre los informes periódicos Alemania, 12 de febrero de 2009, CEDAW/C/DEU/CO/6 [https://undocs.org/es/CEDAW/C/DEU/CO/6 - accesado el 3 Septiembre 2020].

______. Observaciones finales sobre los informes periódicos Uganda, 3 de noviembre de 2010, CEDAW/C/UGA/CO/7 [https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/Download .aspx?symbolno=CEDAW/C/UGA/CO/7&Lang=Sp - accesado el 3 Septiembre 2020].

______. Observaciones finales sobre los informes periódicos séptimo y octavo combinados del Perú, 24 de julio de 2014, CEDAW/C/PER/CO/7 [https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/Download .aspx?symbolno=CEDAW/C/PER/CO/7-8&Lang=Sp - accesado el 3 Septiembre 2020].

______. Observaciones finales sobre los informes periódicos séptimo y octavo combinados del Japón, 10 marzo 2016, CEDAW/C/JPN/CO/7-8 [https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/Download .aspx?symbolno=CEDAW/C/JPN/CO/7-8&Lang=En - accesado el 3 Septiembre 2020].

CÉSPEDES-BÁEZ, Lina M. Far beyond What Is Measured: Governance Feminism and Indicators in Colombia. International Law, n. 25, 2014, pp.375–444 [http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1692- 81562014000200008 - accesado el 7 Octubre 2020].

CHARLESWORTH, Hilary. “Are Women Peaceful? ” Reflections on the Role of Women in Peace-Building. Feminist Legal Studies 16 (3), 2008, pp.347–61 [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-008-9101-6 - accesado el 7 Octubre 2020].

______. Talking to Ourselves: Should International Lawyers Take a Break from Feminism. In: KOUVO, Sari; PEARSON, Zoe (Ed.). Feminist Perspectives on Contemporary International Law: Between Resistance, Hart Publishing, 2011, pp.17–32.

CHOUDHURY, Cyra Akila. Globalizing the Margins: Legal Exiles in the War on Terror and Liberal Feminism‟s War for Muslim Women. International Review of Constitutionalism 9 (2), 2010, pp.241–61.

CRENSHAW, Kimberle. Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review 43 (6), 1991, pp.1241–99 [https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039 - accesado el 7 Octubre 2020].

DIETZ, Mary G. Current Controversies in Feminist Theory. Annual Review of Political Science 6 (1), 2003, pp.399–431 [https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085635 - accesado el 7 Octubre 2020].

FRANKE, Katherine M. Theorizing Yes: An Essay on Feminism, Law, and Desire. In: Feminist and Queer Legal Theory, Routledge. 2016. pp.43–58 [www.jstor.org/stable/1123512 - accesado el 7 Octubre 2020].

HALLEY, Janet. Split Decisions: How and Why to Take a Break from Feminism. Princeton University Press, 2008.

______. The Move to Affirmative Consent. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 42 (1), 2016 pp.257–79 [https://doi.org/10.1086/686904 - accesado el 7 Octubre 2020].

HALLEY, Janet et al. Introducing Governance Feminism. In Governance Feminism: An Introduction, ix–xxi. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 2018.

HALLEY, Janet et al. From the International to the Local in Feminist Legal Responses to Rape, Prostitution/Sex Work, and Sex Trafficking: Four Studies in Contemporary Governance Feminism. Harv. JL & Gender 29, 2006, pp.335–423 [https://ssrn.com/abstract=1438140 - accesado el 7 Octubre 2020].

JARAMILLO RUIZ, Felipe. Democracy, Parity and Change. An Institutional Space for Gender Relations. Civilizar 13 (25), 2013, pp.67–84 [http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=100230029004 - accesado el 7 Octubre 2020].

JARAMILLO RUIZ, Felipe; ERAZO, Catalina. Gender equality as a general interest of a pluralistic society: an analysis of constitutional precedent in Colombia. Bulletin of Latin American Research 35 (2), 2016, pp.178–90 [https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.12370 - accesado el 7 Octubre 2020].

LOWENKRON, Laura; PISCITELLI, Adriana. Trabajadoras sexuales, policía, migración y trata internacional de seres humanos enlos dos lados del océano. In: DAICH, Deborah; SIRIMARCO, Mariana (Ed.). Género y violencia en el mercado del sexo: política, policía y prostitución. Buenos Aires, Biblos., 2015, pp.173–203.

MACKINNON, Catharine A. Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: Toward Feminist Jurisprudence. Signs 8 (4), 1983, pp.635–58 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/3173687 - accesado el 7 Octubre 2020].

MENON, Nivedita. Is Feminism about „Women‟? Economic and Political Weekly, 2015 [https://www.epw.in/journal/2015/17/perspectives/feminism-aboutwomen.html - accesado el 7 Octubre 2020].

MILLER, Coty R.; HALTIWANGER, Nuria. Prostitution and the Legalization/Decriminalization Debate. Geo. J. Gender & L. 5, 2004, pp.207–35 [https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/grgg enl5&div=18&id=&page= - accesado el 7 Octubre 2020].

MOHANTY, Chandra Talpade. Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses. Feminist Review, no. 30, 1988, pp.61–88 [doi:10.2307/302821 - accesado el 7 Octubre 2020].

MONROY, María Catalina; JARAMILLO RUIZ, Felipe. Violencia urbana: la red mujer y hábitat de América Latina (el caso de Colombia). Revista CIDOB d‟Afers Internacionals, n. 117, 2017, pp.123–43 [doi.org/10.24241/rcai.2017.117.3.123 - accesado el 7 Octubre 2020].

MUSTO, Clara; TRAJTENBERG, Nico. Prostitución y trabajo sexual: el estado de arte de la investigación en Uruguay. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, n. 29, 2011, pp.139–56 [ttps://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=453644790008 - accesado el 7 Octubre 2020].

NARAYAN, Uma. Cross-Cultural Connections, Border-Crossings, and „Death by Culture‟: Thinking about Dowry-Murders in India and Domestic-Violence Murders in the United States. Dislocating Cultures: Identities, Traditions, and Third World Feminism, 2006, pp.83–117.

OTTO, Dianne. International Human Rights Law: Towards Rethinking Sex/Gender Dualism and Asymmetry (November 20, 2012). Forthcoming in A Research Companion to Feminist Legal Theory, M. Davies and V. Munro. Ashgate, 2010a.

______. Power and Danger: Feminist Engagement with International Law through the UN Security Council. Australian Feminist Law Journal 32 (1), 2010b pp.97–121 [https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.2010.10854439 - accesado el 7 Octubre 2020].

PHETERSON, Gail. The Category „Prostitute‟ in Scientific Inquiry. The Journal of Sex Research 27 (3), 1990, pp.397–407 [https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499009551568 - accesado el 7 Octubre 2020].

PISCITELLI, Adriana. El debate feminista y la discusión sobre prostitución, reflexiones a partir de Brasil. In La Antropología Feminista Hoy: Desafíos Teóricos y Políticos En Un Mundo Globalizado. Argentina, 2011.

______. Revisiting Notions of Sex Trafficking and Victims. Vibrant: Virtual Brazilian Anthropology 9 (1), pp.274–310 [http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809- 43412012000100010&nrm=iso - accesado el 7 Octubre 2020].

______. Transnational Sisterhood? Brazilian Feminisms Facing Prostitution. Latin American Policy 5 (2), 2014, pp.221–35 [https://doi.org/10.1111/lamp.12046 - accesado el 7 Octubre 2020].

PRÜGL, Elisabeth. Diversity Management and Gender Mainstreaming as Technologies of Government. Politics & Gender 7 (1), 2011, pp.71– 89.

______. Neoliberalism with a Feminist Face: Crafting a New Hegemony at the World Bank. Feminist Economics 23 (1), 2017, pp.30–53 [https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2016.1198043 - accesado el 7 Octubre 2020]. SOSA, Lorena. Intersectionality in the Human Rights Legal Framework on Violence against Women: At the Centre or the Margins? Cambridge University Press, 2017.

STABILE, Carol A,; KUMAR, Deepa. Unveiling Imperialism: Media, Gender and the War on Afghanistan. Media, Culture & Society 27 (5), 2005 pp.765–82 [https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0163443705055734 - accesado el 7 Octubre 2020].

VERSCHUUR, Christine. A History of Development Through a Gender Prism: Feminist and Decolonial Perspectives. In: VERSCHUUR, Christine; GUÉRIN, Isabelle; GUÉTAT-BERNARD, Hélène (Ed.). Under Development: Gender. London, Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2014, pp.17–41 [https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137356826_2 - accesado el 7 Octubre 2020].

VIANNA, Adriana; LOWENKRON, Laura. O duplo fazer do gênero e do estado: interconexões, materialidades e linguagens. cadernos pagu, n. 51, 2017 [http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104- 83332017000300302&nrm=iso - accesado el 7 Octubre 2020].

ZWINGEL, Sussanne. Translating International Women‟s Rights, The CEDAW Convention in Context. Palgrave, 2014.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2020 Cadernos Pagu

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.