Banner Portal
Screening Sex Revelando e dissimulando o sexo
Remoto

Palavras-chave

Sexo. Cinema. Pornografia

Como Citar

WILLIAMS, Linda. Screening Sex Revelando e dissimulando o sexo. Cadernos Pagu, Campinas, SP, n. 38, p. 13–51, 2016. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/cadpagu/article/view/8645032. Acesso em: 26 abr. 2024.

Resumo

Neste texto, procura-se contar a história da exibição do sexo em filmes majoritariamente produzidos nos Estados Unidos no período de quase um século. Ao se perguntar quando, porque e como os Estados Unidos se transformaram de uma cultura que não exibia o sexo em uma que o exibe, a autora insiste no duplo significado do verbo screen (tanto como uma revelação quanto uma dissimulação). Exibir é revelar em uma tela. Mas um segundo e igualmente importante significado, como diz o dicionário é ―proteger ou esconder atrás de uma tela‖. Os filmes tanto revelam como escondem. O artigo analisa a forma como mudanças sociais ocorridas nos Estados Unidos, como, por exemplo, a Revolução sexual dos anos 60 e novas visões a respeito da sexualidade, possibilitaram novas maneiras de representação do sexo no cinema, reorganizando a relação entre o público e o privado. O artigo se pergunta também sobre como nossos corpos e sentidos reagem ao encontro com o sexo na tela, introduzindo a ideia de ―saber carnal‖ (carnal knowledge).

Abstract

In this paper, we try to tell the history of the exhibition of sex in movies mainly produced in the United States in almost a century. Asking when, why and how the United States became – from a culture that did not exhibit sex – into a culture that exhibits it, the author insists in the double sense of the verb to screen (as both a revelation and a dissimulation). To exhibit is to reveal in a screen. But another, and important, sense, as says the dictionary, is ―to protect or hide behind a screen‖. Movies show as well as they reveal. The paper analyzes the way social change in the United States, for example the sexual revolution of the sixties and new views on sexuality allowed new ways of representing sex in the movies, creating a new relation between public and private. The paper also asks how our bodies and senses react to sex in the screen, introducing the idea of ―carnal knowledge‖.

Key Words: Sex, Movies, Pornography

Remoto

Referências

BATAILLE, Georges. Erotism: Death and sensuality. Trans Mary Dalwood.

San Francisco, City Lights, 1962.

BAUDRY, Jean-Louis. The Apparatus: Metapshychological Apporach to the Impression of Realism in the Cinema. In: ROSEN, Philip. (ed.) Narrative, Apparatus Ideology, New York, Columbia University Press, 1986, pp.299-318.

BENJAMIN, Walter. On the Mimetic Faculty. In: BENJAMIN, Walter.

Reflections: essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings. New York, Schocken, 1978, pp.333-336.

__________. The Work of Art in the Age of its Technological Reproducibilty: Second Version. In: EILAND, Howard and JENNINGS, Michael W. (eds.) Slected Writings, vol. 3: 1935-1938. Cambridge, Belknap, 1999, pp.101-33. [trans. Edmond Jephcott and Harry Zohn] BERSANI, Leo. The Freudian Body: Psycoanalysis and Art. New York, Columbia University Press, 1986.

CRARY, Jonathan. Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge, MIT Press, 1990.

DEBORD, Guy. Society of the Spectacle. Detroit, Black and Red, 1983.

D‘EMILIO, John e FREEDMAN, Stelle. Intimate Matters: A History of Sexuality in America. New York, Harper and Row, 1988.

DOANE, Mary Ann. Film and the Masquerade: Theorizing the Female Spectator. Screen 23.3-4, 1982, pp.74-88.

GAL, Susan. A Semiotics of the Public/Private Distinction. Differences, 13 (1), 2002, pp.77-95.

GIDDENS, Anthony. The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love, and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Stanford, Standford University Press, 1992 FOUCAULT, Michel. The History of Sexuality - An Introduction. New York, Pantheon, 1978. [Trans. Robert Hurley] HANSEN, Miriam. Benjamin and Cinema: Not a One Way Street. Critical Inquiry 25.2, 1987, pp.306-43.

LUKER, Kristin. When Sex Goes to School: Warring Views on Sex – and Sex Education – Since the Sixties. New York, W.W. Norton, 2006.

MARKS, Laura. Touch: Sensous Theory and Multisensory Media.

Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 2002.

MULVEY, Laura. Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema. Screen 16.3, 1975, pp.6-18.

RUTHERFORD, Anne. Cinema and Embodied Affect. Senses of Cinema, nº 25, 2003.

SCHAUER, Frederick F. Free Speech: A Philosophical Enquiry.

Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1982.

SOBCNACK, Vivian. The Adress of the Eye: A phenomenology of Film Experience. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1992.

__________. Carnal Toughts: Embodiment and Moving Image Culture.

Berkeley, University of California Press, 2004.

TAUSSIG, Michael. Mimesis and Alterity: A particular History of the Senses. New York, Routledge, 1993.

TORRES, Sasha. Sex of a Kind: ―On Graphic Language and the Modesty of Television News‖. In‘: BERLANT, Lauren e DUGGAN, Lisa (eds.) Our Monica, Ourselves: The Clinton Affair and the National Interest. New York, New York University Press, 2001, pp.102-15.

WILLIAMS, Linda. Hard core: Power, Pleasure and the „Frenzy of the Visible‟. Exp. Ed. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1999.

__________. (ed.) Porn Studies. Durham, Duke University Press, 2004.

WILLIAMS, Raymond. Television: Technology and Cultural Form. New York, Schocken, 1975.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.