Palavras-chave
Como Citar
Resumo
En el artículo se revisa una amplia bibliografía acerca del conjunto de argumentos para justificar el apoyo con fondos públicos a las artes y la cultura. Desde la presencia de condiciones particulares en la oferta (“enfermedad de los costes”), o en la demanda (bienes públicos), la existencia de preferencias comunitarias (bien de mérito), hasta la aportación a la actividad económica y al empleo (Estudios de Impacto Económico de la Cultura). Se señalan las limitaciones que presenta cada argumento y aquellos que pueden resultar convincentes desde la teoría económica.
Abstract
This article will review an extensive bibliography concerning the complete set of arguments justifying the use of public funds to support Arts and Culture. Particular conditions regarding the supply (“the cost disease”) and the demand (public goods), the existence of community preferences (merit good), and the contribution to economic activity and employment (Studies of the Economic Impact of Culture) are all taken into consideration. The limitations of each argument are pointed out, as well as those that gain strength based on economic theory.
Keywords: Cultural economics. Cultural policy. Baumol’s cost-disease. Copyright
Referências
ATKINSON, A; STERN, N. Pigou, taxation, and public goods. Review of Economic Studies, n. 41, p.119-128, 1974.
BANFIELD, E. The democratic muse: visual arts and the public interest. New York: Basic Books, 1984.
BAUMOL, W. Performing arts: the permanent crises. Business Horizons, v. 10, n. 3, p. 47-50, 1967a.
BAUMOL, W. Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: the anatomy of urban crisis. American Economic Review, v. 57, n. 3, p. 415-426, 1967b.
BAUMOL, W. Performing arts. In: EATWELL, J.; MILGATE, M.; NEWMAN, P. (Ed.). The New Palgrave: a dictionary of economics, 2. London: Macmillan Press, 1987.
________. Applied welfare economics. In: TOWSE, R. (Ed.). A handbook of cultural economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2003. p. 20-31.
BAUMOL, W.; BOWEN, W. On the performing arts: the anatomy of their problems.
American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, n. 55, p. 495-502, 1965.
________; ________. Performing arts. The economic dilemma. Cambridge, Ma: Twentieth Century Found, 1966.
BECKER, G.; STIGLER G. De gustibus non est disputandum. American Economic Review, v. 67, n. 2, p. 76-90, 1977.
________; MURPHY, K. A theory of rational addiction. The Journal of Political Economy, v. 96, n. 4, p. 675-700, 1988.
BENTHAM, J. The works of Jeremy Bentham. Chapter I: Art and science-divisions, published under the Superintendence of his Executor, John Bowring, Edinburgh: William Tait, 1838-1843. The Online Library of Liberty, [1843]. 1962. Disponível em: http://oll.libertyfund.org/title/1921/113884 on 2009-05-02. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2008.
BLAUG, M. Where are we now in cultural economics. Journal of Economic Surveys, v. 15, n. 2, p. 123-143, 2001.
________. Welfare economics. In: TOWSE, R. (Ed.). A handbook of cultural economics.
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2003. p. 476-482.
BORGONOVI, F. Do public grants to American theatres crowd-out private donations? Public Choice, n. 126, p. 3-4, p. 429-451, 2006.
CHAMPARNAUD, L.; GINSBURGH, V.; MICHEL, P. Can public arts education replace arts subsidization? Journal of Cultural Economics, v. 32, n. 2, p. 109-126, 2008.
COWEN, T.; GRIER, R. Do artists suffer from a cost-disease? Rationality and Society, n. 8, p. 5-24, 1996.
CUCCIA, T. Contingent valuation. In: TOWSE, R. (Ed.). A handbook of cultural economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2003. p. 119-131.
CWI, D. Public support of the arts: three arguments examined. Journal of Behavioral Economics, v. 8, n. 1, p. 39-68, 1979.
De MARCHI, N.; GREENE, J. Adam Smith and private provision of the arts. History of Political Economy, n. 37, p. 431-454, 2005.
DEVESA, M. El impacto económico de los festivales culturales. El caso de la Semana Internacional de Cine de Valladolid. Madrid: Fundación Autor, 2006.
DiMAGGIO, P. (2002). Taking the measure of culture: a meeting at Princeton University citado en: MCCARTHY, K.; ONDAATJE, E.; ZAKARAS, L.; BROOKS, A. Gifts of the muse: reframing the debate about the benefits of the arts. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation, 2004.
FREY, B. Has Baumol’s cost disease disappeared in the performing arts? Ricerche Economiche, v. 50, n. 2, p. 173-182, 1996.
________. Superstar museums: an economic analysis. Journal of Cultural Economics, v. 22, n. 2, p. 113-125, 1998.
FREY, B. State support and creativity in the arts: some new considerations. Journal of Cultural Economics, n. 23, p. 71-85, 1999.
________. Art and economics. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2000.
________. Public support. In: TOWSE, R. (Ed.). A handbook of cultural economics.
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2003. p. 389-398.
________. What values should count in the arts? The tension between economic effects and cultural value. In: HUTTER, M.; THROSBY, D. (Ed.). Beyond price: value in culture, economics, and the arts. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008. p. 261- 269.
________; MEIER, S. The economics of museums. In: GINSBURGH, V.; THROSBY, D. (Ed.). Handbook of the economics of art and culture. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2006.
GINSBURGH, V. Economics of art and culture. In: SMELSER, N.; BALTES, P. (Ed.).
International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2001. p. 758-764.
GOODWIN, C. Art and culture in the history of economic thought. In: GINSBURGH, V.; THROSBY, D. (Ed.). Handbook of the economics of art and culture. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2006. p. 25-68.
GRAMPP, W. Should the arts support themselves? Economic Affairs, p. 41-45, Dec./Jan.
/1987.
________. Pricing the priceless: art, artists, and economics. New York: Basic Books, 1989a.
________. Rent-seeking in arts policy. Public Choice, v. 60, n. 2, p. 113-121, 1989b.
HANLEY, N.; MOURATO, S.; WRIGHT, R. Choice modelling approaches: a superior alternative for environmental valuation? Journal of Economic Surveys, v. 15, n. 3, p. 435- 462, 2001.
HEILBRUN, J. Baumol’s cost disease. In: TOWSE, R. (Ed.). A handbook of cultural economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2003. p. 91-101.
________; GRAY, C. The economics of art and culture, 2. Cambridge, Ma.: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
HERRERO, L.; SANZ, J.; BEDATE, A. Valoración económica de bienes públicos en relación al patrimonio cultural de Castilla y León: propuesta metodológica y aplicación empírica. Revista de Investigación Económica y Social de Castilla y León, n. 6, p. 6-122, 2003.
HOWSON, S. Lionel Robbins’s “Art and the State”. History of Political Economy, n. 37, p. 617- 646, 2005.
JOHNSON, A.; SACK, A. Assessing the value of sports facilities: the importance of non economic factors. Economic Development Quarterly, v. 10, n. 4, p. 369-381, 1996.
KEYNES, J. Economic possibilities for our grandchildren. In: ESSAYS in persuasion.
New York: W.W. Norton & Co, [1930], 1963. p. 358-373.
KLAMER, A.; PETROVA, L.; MIGNOSA. Financing the arts and culture in the European Union. Study Policy Department Structural and Cohesion Policies, European Parliament, Brussels, 2006.
LANCASTER, K. A new approach to consumer theory. The Journal of Political Economy, n. 74, p. 132-157, 1966.
LANDES, W.; POSNER, R. An economic analysis of copyright law. Journal of Legal Studies, v. 18, n. 2, p. 325-363, 1989.
LASUÉN, J.; GARCÍA, M.; ZOFÍO, J. Cultura y economía. Madrid: Sociedad General de Autores y Editores/Fundación Autor, 2005.
LEVY-GARBOUA, L.; MONTMARQUETTE, C. A microeconomic study of theatre demand. Journal of Cultural Economics, n. 20, p. 25-50, 1996.
________; ________. The demand for the arts. In: TOWSE, R. (Ed.). A handbook of cultural economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2003. p. 201-213.
LIEBOWITZ, S.; WATT, R. How to best ensure remuneration for creators in the market for music? Copyright and its alternatives. Journal of Economic Surveys, v. 20, n. 4, p. 513-545, 2006.
________; MARGOLIS, S. Seventeen famous economists weigh in on copyright: the role of theory, empirics, and network effects. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, v. 18, n. 2, p. 436-457, 2005.
MADDEN, C. Using ‘economic’ impact studies in arts and cultural advocacy: a cautionary note. Media International Australia, Incorporating Culture & Policy, n. 98, p. 161-178, 2001.
MARSHALL, A. Principios de economía. Madrid: Aguilar, [1890] 1954.
MAZZANTI, M. Cultural heritage as multi-dimensional, multi-value and multi-attribute economic good: toward a new framework for economic analysis and valuation. Journal of Socio-Economics, n. 31, p. 529-558, 2002.
MCCAIN, R. Taste formation. In: TOWSE, R. (Ed.). A handbook of cultural economics.
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2003. p. 445-450.
________. Defining cultural and artistic goods. In: GINSBURGH, V.; THROSBY, D.
(Ed.). Handbook of the economics of art and culture. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2006.
p. 147-167.
MCCARTHY, K.; ONDAATJE, E.; ZAKARAS, L.; BROOKS, A. Gifts of the muse: reframing the debate about the benefits of the arts. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation, 2004.
MICELI, T.; ADELSTEIN, R. An economic model of fair use. Information Economics and Policy, v. 18, n. 4, p. 359-373, 2006.
MILL, J. S. Principios de economía política. Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, [1848], 1943.
MOEN, M. Congress and the national endowment for the arts: Institutional patterns and arts funding, 1965-1994. The Social Science Journal, v. 34, n. 2, p. 185-200, 1997.
MOGGRIDGE, D. Keynes, the arts, and the state. History of Political Economy, v. 37, n. 3, p. 535-555, 2005.
MOURATO, S.; MAZZANTI, M. Economic valuation of cultural heritage: evidence and prospects. In: DE LA TORRE, M. (Ed.). Assessing the values of cultural heritage. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute, 2002. p. 51-76.
MULCAHY, K. Cultural policy: definitions and theoretical approaches. Journal of Arts Management, Law and Society, v. 35, n. 4, p. 319-330, 2006.
MUSGRAVE, R. Teoría de la hacienda pública. Madrid: Aguilar, [1959] 1968.
________. Merit goods. In: DURLAUF, S.; BLUME, L. (Ed.). The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 3. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
NELSON, P. Information and consumer behavior. The Journal of Political Economy, v. 78, n. 2, p. 311-329, 1970.
NESF. The arts, cultural inclusion and social cohesion. Dublin: National Economic and Social Forum (NESF), 2007. (NESF Report, n. 350.
NETZER, D. Nonprofit organizations. In: TOWSE, R. (Ed.). A handbook of cultural economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2003. p. 331-340.
NORDHAUS, W. Baumol’s diseases: a macroeconomic perspective. The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, v. 8, n. 1, Art. 9, 2008.
O’HAGAN, J. Tax expenditures. In: TOWSE, R. (Ed.). A handbook of cultural economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2003. p. 451-457.
PALMA, L. La controversia entre cultura y mercado. Algunos elementos para la reflexión a propósito de la Convención de la UNESCO sobre la protección y promoción de la diversidad de las expresiones culturales. Cuadernos de Economía de la Cultura, n. 6, p. 71-84, 2006.
PEACOCK, A. Welfare economics and public subsidies to the Arts. The Manchester School of Economic & Social Studies, v. 37, n. 4, p. 323-335, 1969. Reimpreso en: Journal of Cultural Economics, 1994, v. 18, n. 2, p. 151-161.
________. Public financing of the arts in England. Fiscal Studies, v. 21, n. 2, p. 171-205, 2000.
RAUSELL, P. Políticas y sectores culturales en la Comunidad Valenciana: un ensayo sobre las tramas entre economía, cultura y poder. Valencia: Universidad de Valencia, 1999.
RICARDO, D. Principios de economía política y tributación. Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, [1821] 1959.
ROBBINS, L. Art and the state. Politics and economics: Papers in Political Economy.
London: Macmillan, 1963.
________. Unsettled questions in the political economy of the arts . The Three Banks Review, n. 91, p. 3-19, 1971. Reimpreso en: Journal of Cultural Economics, v. 18, n. 1, p. 67-77, 1994.
RUSKIN, J. Unto this last: four essays on the first principles of political economy.
Electronic Text Center, University of Virginia Library, [1862] 2001. Disponível em: http://etext.virginia.edu/toc/modeng/public/RusLast.html. Acesso em: 12 ago. 2008.
SAMUELSON, P. Diagrammatic exposition of a theory of public expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, v. 37, n. 4, p. 350-356, 1955.
SANDMO, A. Public goods. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. 2nd. ed. Edited by N. STEVEN; DURLAUF and LAWRENCE E. BLUME. Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
SCITOVSKY, T. What’s wrong with the arts is what’s wrong with society. American Economic Review, v. 62, n. 2, p. 62-69, 1972.
SEAMAN, B. Arts impact studies: A fashionable excess, 1987. Reimpreso en: TOWSE, R. (Ed). Cultural economics: the arts, the heritage and the media industries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: 1997. v. 2.
________. The economic impact of the arts. In: TOWSE, R. (Ed.). A handbook of cultural economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2003. p. 224-231.
________. The relationship among regional economic impact models: contingent valuation versus economic impact in the case of cultural assets. Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, 2006. (Research Paper Series, n. 07-05).
SMITH, A. Investigación sobre la naturaleza y causa de la riqueza de las naciones.
Madrid: Alianza Editorial, [1776] 1994.
SNOWBALL, J. Measuring the value of culture. Methods and examples in cultural economics. Berlin: Springer, 2008.
________; ANTROBUS, G. Valuing the arts: pitfalls of economic impact studies of arts festivals. South African Journal of Economics, v. 70, n. 8, p. 1297-1319, 2002.
THROSBY, D. The production and consumption of the arts: a view of cultural economics.
Journal of Economic Literature, v. 32, n. 1, p. 1-29, 1994.
________. Economic circumstances of the performing artist: Baumol and Bowen thirty years on. Journal of Cultural Economics, v. 20, n. 3, p. 225-240, 1996.
________. Cultural capital. Journal of Cultural Economics, v. 23, n. 1, p. 3-12, 1999.
________. Economics and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
________. Determining the value of cultural goods: how much (or how little) does contingent valuation tell us? Journal of Cultural Economics, v. 27, n. 3, p. 275-285, 2003.
________. Assessing the impacts of a cultural industry. Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, v. 4, n. 3, p. 188-204, 2004.
THROSBY, D. Introduction and overview. In: GINSBURGH, V.; THROSBY, D. (Ed.).
Handbook of the economics of art and culture. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2006. p. 3-22.
________. Art, economics of.. In: DURLAUF, S.; BLUME, L. (Ed.). The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 3. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
TOWSE, R. Cultural economics: the arts, the heritage and the media industries.
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Pub, 1997. 2v.
TOWSE, R. (Ed.). A handbook of cultural economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2003.
________. Alan Peacock and cultural economics. Economic Journal, n. 115, p. F262- F276, 2005.
________. Copyright and artists: a view from cultural economics. Journal of Economic Surveys, v. 20, n. 4, p. 567-585, 2006.
________ (Ed.). Recent developments in cultural economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Pub, 2007.
________; HANDKE, C.; STEPAN, P. The economics of copyright law: a stocktake of the literature. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, v. 5, n. 1, p. 1-22, 2008.
________; WATT, R. (Ed.). Recent trends in the economics of copyright. The International Library of Critical Writings in Economics, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Pub, n. 224, 2008.
VAN den HAAG, E. Should the government subsidize the arts? Policy Review, n. 10, p. 63-73, 1979.
VAN DER PLOEG, F. The making of cultural policy: A European perspective. In: GINSBURGH, V.; THROSBY, D. (Ed.). Handbook of the economics of art and culture. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2006. p. 1183-1221.
VARIAN, H. Copying and copyright. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, v. 19, n. 2, p. 121-138, 2005.
WEST, E. Arts vouchers to replace grants. Economic Affairs, p. 9-16, Feb./Mar. 1986.
WILLIS, K.; SNOWBALL, J. Investigating how the attributes of live theatre productions influence consumption choices using conjoint analysis: the example of the National Arts Festival, South Africa. Journal of Cultural Economics, v. 33, n. 3, p. 167-183, 2009.
A Economia e Sociedade utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto.
Downloads
