Cómo citar
Resumen
It has long been known that, because of aggregation problems and the Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies, the aggregate production function cannot theoretically exist. Nevertheless, the concept is still widely and uncritically used, presumably because it gives good statistical fits to the data with plausible results. It is shown that this occurs because of the existence of an underlying accounting identity. A suitable mathematical transformation of this identity ensures that it is always possible to specify an “aggregate production function” where the putative output elasticities equal the factor shares, even though the aggregate production does not exist. This is illustrated by reference to a simulation exercise by Felipe and McCombie (2006) and a study by Oulton and O’Mahony (1994). The latter reject the hypothesis that capital is “special”, in that their regression estimates demonstrate that the “output elasticity” of capital does not significantly differ from its factor share. However, it is shown in this paper why the data could not have given any other result.
Citas
AGHION, P.; HOWITT, P. Endogenous growth theory. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1998.
ARROW K. J. The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, v. 29, p. 155-173, 1962.
BARRO, R. J., SALA-I-MARTIN, X. (1995). Economic growth. 2nd. ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 2004.
BEAN, C.; CRAFTS, N. F. R. British economic growth since 1945. In: CRAFTS, N.; TONIOLO, G. (Ed.). Economic growth in Europe since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
BRONFENBRENNER, M. Production functions: Cobb-Douglas, interfirm, intrafirm. Econometrica. v. 12, p. 35-44, 1944.
CRAFTS, N. F. R. Post-neoclassical endogenous growth theory: what are its policy implications? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, v. 12, p. 30-46, 1996.
CRAFTS, N. F. R; TONIOLO, G. Postwar growth: an overview. In: CRAFTS, N.; TONIOLO, G. (Ed.). Economic growth in Europe since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
COHEN, A. J.; HARCOURT, G. C. Whatever happened to the capital controversies? Journal of Economic Perspectives, v. 17, p. 199-214, 2003a.
COHEN, A. J.; HARCOURT, G. C [Cambridge capital controversies] Response. Journal of Economic Perspectives, v. 17, p. 227-232, 2003b.
CRAMER, J. S. Empirical econometrics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1969.
DOUGLAS, P. H. Are there laws of production? American Economic Review, v. 38, p. 1- 41, 1948.
DOUGLAS, P. H. The Cobb-Douglas production function once again: its history, its testing, and some new empirical values. Journal of Political Economy, v. 84, p. 903-915, 1976.
FELIPE, J. Endogenous growth, increasing returns, and externalities: an alternative interpretation of the evidence. Metroeconomica, v. 52, p. 391-427, 2001a.
FELIPE, J. Aggregate production functions and the measurement of infrastructure productivity: a reassessment. Eastern Economic Journal, v. 27, p. 323-344, 2001b.
FELIPE, J; ADAMS, F. G. ‘A theory of production’. The estimation of the Cobb-Douglas function: a retrospective view. Eastern Economic Journal, v. 31, p. 427-445, 2005.
FELIPE, J; FISHER, F. M. Aggregation in production functions: what applied economists should know. Metroeconomica, v. 54, p. 208-262, 2003.
FELIPE, J; HOLZ, C. Why do aggregate production functions work? Fisher’s simulations, Shaikh’s identity, and some new results. International Review of Applied Economics, v. 15, p. 261-285, 2001.
FELIPE, J; MCCOMBIE, J. S. L. The CES production function, the accounting identity, and Occam’s razor. Applied Economics, v. 33, p.1221-1232, 2001.
________; ________. Methodological problems with neoclassical analyses of the East Asian miracle. Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 54, p. 695-721, 2003.
FELIPE, J.; MCCOMBIE, J. S. L. How sound are the foundations of the aggregate production function. Eastern Economic Journal, v. 31, p. 467-488, 2005a.
________; ________. Why are some countries richer than others? A sceptical view of Mankiw-Romer-Weil’s test of the neoclassical growth model. Metroeconomica, v. 56, p. 360-392, 2005b.
________; ________. The tyranny of the accounting identity: growth accounting revisited.
International Review of Applied Economics, v. 20, p. 283-299, 2006.
________; ________. On the rental price of capital and the profit rate: the Perils and Pitfalls of total factor productivity growth. Review of Political Economy, v. 19, p. 317- 345, 2007.
FISHER, F. M. Aggregation. Aggregate production functions and related topics / Ed. by J. Monz. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1992.
________. Aggregate production functions – A pervasive, but unpersuasive, fairytale. Eastern Economic Journal, v. 31, p. 489-491, 2005.
FRIEDMAN, M. The methodology of positive economics. In: FRIEDMAN, M. (Ed.) Essays in positive economics. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1951.
HAACHE, G. The theory of economic growth: an introduction. London: Macmillan, 1979.
INTRILIGATOR, M. D. Econometric models, techniques and applications. EnglewoodCliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1978.
JONES, C. S. (1998). Economic growth. 2nd. ed. New York: WW Norton, 2002.
JONES, H. G. An introduction to modern theories of economic growth. Middlesex: Nelson, 1975.
MCCOMBIE J. S. L. Does the aggregate production function imply anything about the laws of production? A note on the Simon and Shaikh critiques. Applied Economics, v. 19, p. 1121-1136, 1987.
________. ‘Are there laws of production?’: an assessment of the early criticisms of the Cobb-Douglas production function. Review of Political Economy, v. 10, p. 141-173, 1998a.
________. Paradigms, rhetoric, and the relevance of the aggregate production function. In: ARESTIS, P. (Ed.). Method, theory and policy in Keynes. Essays in honour of Paul Davidson, v. III. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1998b.
________. Regional production functions and the accounting identity: a problem of interpretation. Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, v. 6, p. 133-155, 2000.
________. The Solow residual, technical change and aggregate production functions.
Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, v.23, p. 267-297, 2000-2001. (Errata, v. 23, n. 3, p. 544).
________. What do aggregate production functions show? Second thoughts on Solow’s ‘second thoughts on growth theory’”. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, v. 23, p. 589- 615, 2001.
MCCOMBIE J. S. L.; DIXON, R. Estimating technical change in aggregate production functions: a critique. International Review of Applied Economics, v. 5, p. 24-46, 1991.
________; THIRLWALL, A. P. Economic growth and the balance-of-payments constraint. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1994.
MARSHAK, J.; ANDREWS, W. H. Random simultaneous equations and the theory of production. Econometrica, v. 12, p.143-205, 1944.
MADDISON, A. Growth and slowdown in advanced capitalist economies: techniques of quantitative assessment. Journal of Economic Literature, v. 25, p. 649-698, 1987.
NADIRI, I. M. Some approaches to the theory and measurement of total factor productivity: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature, v. VIII, p. 1137-1177, 1970.
OULTON, N.; O’MAHONY M. Productivity and growth. A study of British industry, 1954-1986. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
PHELPS, Brown E. H. The meaning of the fitted Cobb-Douglas function. Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 71, p. 546-560, 1957.
ROBINSON, J. V. The production function and the theory of capital. Review of Economic Studies, v. 21, p. 81-106, 1953-1954.
SALTER, W. E. G. (1960). Productivity and technical change. 2nd. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1966.
SAMUELSON, P. A. Paul Douglas’s measurement of production functions and marginal productivities. Journal of Political Economy, v. 87, p. 923-939, 1979.
SHAIKH, A. Laws of production and laws of algebra, the Humbug production function.
Review of Economics and Statistics, v. 56, p. 115-120, 1974.
________. Laws of production and laws of algebra: Humbug II. In: NELL, E. J. (Ed.).
Growth, profits and property. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.
________. Nonlinear dynamics and pseudo-production functions. Metroeconomica, v. 31, p. 447-466, 2005.
SIMON, H. A. On parsimonious explanations of production relations. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, v. 81, p. 459-474, 1979a.
SIMON, H. A. Rational decision-making in business organizations. American Economic Review, v. 69, p.493-513, 1979b. (Nobel Memorial Lecture, 8 Dec. 1997.) ________; LEVY, F. K. A note on the Cobb-Douglas function. Review of Economic Studies, v. 30, p. 93-94, 1963.
SOLOW, R. M. Laws of production and laws of algebra: the humbug production function: a comment. Review of Economics and Statistics, v. 56, p. 121, 1974.
________. Second thoughts on growth theory. In: STEINHERR, A.; WEISERBS, D.
(Ed.). Employment and growth: issues for the 1980s. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1987.
TEMPLE, J. The new growth evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, v. 38, p. 112- 156, 1999.
VALDÉS, B. Economic growth theory, empirics and policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1999.
WAN, H. Y. Economic growth. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1971.
WALLIS, K. F. Topics in applied econometrics. London: Gray-Mills Publishing, 1979.
WALTERS, A. A. Production and cost functions. Econometrica, v. 31, p. 1-66, 1963.
WEIL, D. N. (2004). Economic growth. 2nd. ed. Addison-Wesley, 2008.
A Economia e Sociedade utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto.
Descargas
