Abstract
O objetivo do artigo é apresentar e analisar a abordagem macroeconômica ecológica do ponto de vista metodológico. Como a economia ecológica, esta abordagem emergente está sendo constituída por um conjunto metodologicamente plural de estudos. Identificamos e classificamos três principais vertentes macroeconômicas desenvolvidas a partir de problemáticas econômico-ecológicas. Em primeiro lugar, apresentamos o modelo macroeconômico convencional IS-LM adaptado a uma escala de produção sustentável. Em segundo lugar, discutimos uma visão pós-keynesiana fundamentalista para a economia ecológica mais crítica ao uso dos modelos. Finalmente, descrevemos as tentativas de construir modelos macroeconômicos ecológicos baseados na abordagem pós-keynesiana. Para cada uma delas, teorias, métodos e pressupotos são discutidos e criticados à luz dos fundamentos econômicos ecológicos. Concluímos reforçando o papel da crítica metodológica para a consolidação de uma macroeconomia ecológica relevante.
References
ANDRADE, D. C.; GARCIA, J. R. Estimating the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) for Brazil from 1970 to 2010. Ecological Economics, v. 118, p. 49-56, 2015.
BERR, E. Keynes and sustainable development. International Journal of Political Economy, v. 38, n. 3, p. 22-38, 2009.
CALDWELL, B. J. Beyond positivism: economic methodology in the twentieth century. London and New York: Routledge, 1994.
CALDWELL, B. J. Does methodology matter? How should it be practiced? Finnish Economics Papers, v. 3, n. 1, p. 64-71, 1990.
CALDWELL, B. J. Post-Keynesian methodology: as assessment. Review of Political Economy, v. 1, p. 43-64, 1989.
CAVERZASI, E.; GODIN, A. Post-Keynesian stock-flow consistent modeling: a survey. Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 39, p. 157-187, 2015.
COHEN, A. J.; HARCOURT, G. C. Whatever happened to the Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies? Journal of Economic Perspectives, v. 17, 2003.
COSTANZA, R. Ecological economics: a research agenda. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, v. 2, n. 2, p. 335-357, 1991.
COSTANZA, R. What is ecological economics? Ecological Economics, v. 1, 1-7, 1989.
DAFERMOS, Y.; NIKOLAIDI, M.; GALANIS, G. A stock-flow-fund ecological macroeconomic model. Ecological Economics, v. 131, p. 191-207, 2017.
DALY, H. E.; FARLEY, J. [2004]. Ecological economics: principles and applications. 2 nd ed, Washington: Island Press, 2011.
DALY, H. E. Towards an environmental macroeconomics. Land Economics, v. 67, n. 2, p. 255-259, 1991.
DAVIDSON, P. Responses to lavoie, king, and dow on what post Keynesianism is and who is a post Keynesian. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, v. 27, n. 3, p. 393-408, 2005.
DAVIDSON, P. Reality and economic theory. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, v. 18, n. 4, summer, p. 479-508, 1996.
DAVIDSON, P. Money and the real world. 2 nd ed. London: Macmillan, 1978.
DECKER, S.; WOHAR, M. E. Substitutability or complementarity? Re-visiting Heyes’ ISLM-EE model. Ecological Economics, v. 74, p. 3-7, 2012.
DEQUECH, D. Uncertainty: a typology and refinements of existing concepts. Journal of Economic Issues, v. XLV, n. 3, p. 621-640, 2011.
DEQUECH, D. Neoclassical, mainstream, orthodox, and heterodox economics, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, v. 30, n. 2, p. 279-302, 2007.
DOS SANTOS, C.H. Keynesian theorizing during hard times: stock-flow consistent models as an unexplored ‘frontier’ of Keynesian macroeconomics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 30, n. 4, p. 541-565, 2006.
DOW, S. C. Axioms and Babylonian thought: a reply. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, v. 27, n. 3, p. 385-391, 2005.
DOW, S. C. Methodological pluralism and pluralism of method. In: SALANTI, A.; SCREPANTI, E. (Ed.). Pluralism in economics: new perspectives in history and methodology. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1997. p. 89-99.
DOW, S. C. Macroeconomics thought: a methodological approach. Oxford, New York: Basil Blackwell, 1985.
ECOLOGICAL Economics. Ecological macroeconomics: special section, v. 121, p. 181-253, 2016.
ECOLOGICAL Economics. The contribution of Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen: special issue, v. 22, 1997.
FEYERABEND, P. K. Against method: outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London: New Left Books, 1975.
FEYNMAN, C. The character of physical law. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1965.
FONTANA, G.; SAWYER, M. Towards post-Keynesian ecological macroeconomics. Ecological Economics, v. 121, p. 186-195, 2016.
FONTANA, G.; SAWYER, M. Post-Keynesian and Kaleckian thoughts on ecological macroeconomics. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, v. 10, n. 2, p. 256-267, 2013.
FRIEDMAN, M. The methodology of positive economics. In: FRIEDMAN, M. (Ed.). Essays in positive economics. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1953.
FUNTOWICZ, S. O.; RAVETZ J. The worth of a songbird: ecological economics as a postnormal science. Ecological Economics, v. 10, p. 197-207, 1994.
GEORGESCU-ROEGEN, N. The entropy law and the economic process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.
GOODWIN, R. M. The nonlinear accelerator and the persistence of business cycles. Econometrica, v. 19, p. 1-17, 1951.
GOWDY, J.; ERICKSON, J. Ecological economics at a crossroad. Ecological Economics, v. 53, p. 17-20, 2005.
HAMOUDA, O. F.; HARCOURT, G. C. Post Keynesianism: from criticism to coherence. Bulletin of Economic Research, v. 40, n. 1, p. 1-33, 1988.
HARDT, L.; O’NEILL, D. W. Ecological macroeconomic models: assessing current developments. Ecological Economics, v. 134, p. 198-211, 2017.
HARRIS, J. M. Ecological macroeconomics: consumption, investment, and climate change. Global Development and Environmental Institute, 2008. (Working Paper, n. 08-02).
HEYES, A. A proposal for the greening of textbook macro: ‘IS-LM-EE’. Ecological Economics, v. 32, p. 1-7, 2000.
HICKS, J. R. IS-LM: an explanation. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, v. 3, n. 2, p. 139- 154, 1981.
HICKS, J. R. Value and capital. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1939.
HICKS, J. R. Mr. Keynes and the “classics”: a suggested interpretation. Econometrica, v. 5, n. 2, p. 147-159, 1937.
HODGSON, G. On the problem of formalism in economics. In: FULLBROOK, E. (Ed.). Ontology and economics. Tony Lawson and his critics. London and New York: Routledge, 2009.
HOLT, R. P. F.; PRESSMAN, S. E.; SPASH, C. (Ed.). Post Keynesian and ecological economics. Confronting environmental issues. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2009.
HOLT, R. P. F.; SPASH, C. L. Post Keynesian and ecological economics: alternative perspectives on sustainability and environmental economics. In: HOLT, R. P. F.; PRESSMAN, S.; SPASH, C. L. (Ed.). Post Keynesian and ecological economics: confronting environmental issues. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2009. p. 3-24.
JACKSON, T. Prosperity without growth: economics for a finite planet. London: Sterling, VA, Earthscan, 2009.
JACKSON, T.; DRAKE, B.; VICTOR, P.; KRATENA, K.; SOMMER, M. Foundations for an ecological macroeconomics: literature review and model development. Workpackage 205, Milestone 38, Welfare Wealthy Work for Europe Project. Vienna: WIFO, 2014. (Working Paper, n. 65).
JACKSON, T.; VICTOR, P. Does slow growth lead to rising inequality? Some theoretical reflections and numerical simulations. Ecological Economics, v. 121, p. 206-219, 2016.
JACKSON, T.; VICTOR, P. Does credit create a ‘growth imperative’? A quasi-stationary economy with interest-bearing debt. Ecological Economics, v. 120, p. 32-48, 2015a.
JACKSON, T.; VICTOR, P. Towards a stock-flow consistent ecological macroeconomics. An overview of the FALSTAFF framework with some illustrative result. UNEP Inquiry/CIGI Research Convening United Nations Environment Programme, 2015b. (Inquiring working paper 15/04).
JACKSON, T.; VICTOR, P. Productivity and work in the ‘green economy’ – some theoretical reflections and empirical tests. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, v. 1, p. 101-108, 2011.
KALDOR, N. A model of the trade cycle. The Economic Journal, v. 50, p. 78-92, 1940.
KALECKI, M. A macrodynamic theory of business cycles. Econometrica, v. 3, p. 327-344, 1935.
KALECKI, M. Selected essays on the dynamics of the capitalist economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971.
KALLIS, G.; MARTINEZ-ALIER, J. and NORGAARD, R.B., 2009. Paper assets, real debts: Na ecological-economic exploration of the global economic crisis, Critical perspectives on international business, v. 5, no. 1, 14-25.
KEYNES, J.M. The general theory of employment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 51, p. 209-223, 1937.
KEYNES, J. M. The general theory of employment, interest and money. London: Macmillan Press, 1936.
KEYNES, J. M. A treatise on probability. London: Macmillan, 1921.
KRONENBERG, T. Finding common ground between ecological economics and postKeynesian economics. Ecological Economics, v. 69, p. 1488-1494, 2010.
LAVOIE, M. Post-Keynesian economics: new foundations. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2014.
LAVOIE, M. Towards a post-Keynesian consensus in macroeconomics: reconciling the Cambridge and Wall Street views. In: HEIN, E.; NIECHOJ, T.; STOCKHAMMER, E. (Ed.). Macroeconomic policies on shaky foundations: wither mainstream economics? Marburg: Metropolis Verlag, 2009. p.75-99.
LAWN, P. A. On Heyes’ IS-LM-EE proposal to establish an environmental macroeconomics. Environment and Development Economics, v. 8, 31–562003.
LAWSON, T. Reorienting economics. London: Routledge, 2003.
LUCAS, R.E. and SARGENT, T.J. After Keynesian macroeconomics. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, v. 3, no. 2, 1-161978.
MACEDO AND SILVA, A.C. and DOS SANTOS, C.H. Peering over the edge of the short period? The Keynesian roots of stock-flow consistent macroeconomic models. Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 35, 105-124, 2011.
MAYUMI, K. The origins of ecological economics. The bioeconomics of Georgescu-Roegen. London and New York: Routledge, 2001.
MEARMAN, A. Recent developments in post Keynesian methodology and their relevance for understanding environmental issues. In: HOLT, R. P. F.; PRESSMAN, S. E.; SPASH, C. (Ed.). Post Keynesian and ecological economics. Confronting environmental issues. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2009.
MEADOWS, D.; MEADOWS, D.; RANDERS, J.; BEHRENS III, W. The limits to growth. New York: Universe Books, 1972.
MINSKY, H. P. Stabilizing an unstable economy. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2008.
MINSKY, H. P. The financial instability hypothesis: an interpretation of Keynes and an alternative to ‘standard’ theory. Nebraska Journal of Economics and Business, v. 16, n. 1, p. 5-16, 1977.
MODIGLIANI, F. Liquidity preference and the theory of interest and money, Econometrica, v. 12, p. 45-88, 1944.
MORAES, G. I.; SERRA, M. A. O Modelos IS-LM-EE para economias abertas e distinções dos efeitos para as economias nacionais. Economia e Sociedade, v. 20, n. 1(41), p. 53-78, 2001.
NAQVI, A. Modeling growth, distribution, and the environment in a stock-flow consistent framework. Welfare Wealthy Work for Europe Project, WIFO, Vienna, 2015. (Policy Paper, n. 18).
NORGAARD, R. B. The case for methodological pluralism. Ecological Economics, v. 1, p. 37-57, 1989.
PATINKIN, D. Money, interest and prices. 2 nd ed. New York: Harper & Row, 1956.
PATINKIN, D. Price flexibility and full employment. The American Economic Review, v. 38, p. 543-564, 1948.
PIKETTY, T. Capital in the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.
REZAI, A.; STAGL, S. Ecological macroeconomics: introduction and review. Ecological Economics, v. 121, p. 181-185, 2016.
REZAI, A.; TAYLOR, L.; MECHLER, R. Ecological macroeconomics: an application to climate change. Ecological Economics, v. 85, p. 69-76, 2013.
ROCKSTRÖM, J.; STEFFEN, W.; NOONE, K.; PERSSON, A.; CHAPIN, F. S.; LAMBIN, E. R.; LENTON, T. M.; SCHEFFER, M.; FOLKE, C.; SHELLNHUBER, H. J.; NYKVIST, B.; WIT, C. A.; HUGHES, T.; VAN DER LEEUW, S.; RODHE, H.; SÖRLIN, S.; SNYDER, P. K.; COSTANZA, R.; SVEDIN, U.; FALKENMARK, M.; KARLBERG, L.; CORELL, R. W.; FABRY, V. J.; HANSEN, J.; WALKER, B.; LIVERMAN, D.; RICHARDSON, K.; CRUTZEN, P.; FOLEY, J. A safe operating space for humanity, Nature, v. 461, p. 472-475, 2009.
RØPKE, I. Complementary system perspectives in ecological macroeconomics – the example of transition investments during the crisis. Ecological Economics, v. 121, p. 237-245, 2016.
RØPKE, I. Ecological macroeconomics: implications for the roles of consumer-citizens. In: COHEN, M.J.; BROWN, H. S.; VERGRAGT, P. J. (Ed.). Innovations in sustainable consumption. New economics, socio-technical transitions and social practices. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013. p. 48-64.
RØPKE, I. Trends in the development of ecological economics from the late 1980s to the early 2000s. Ecological Economics, v. 55, n. 2, p. 262-290, 2005.
ROSSER JR., J. B. Post-Keynesian perspectives and complex ecologic-economic dynamics. Metroeconomica, v. 62, n. 1, p. 96-121, 2010.
ROSSER JR., J. B. Theoretical and policy issues in complex post Keynesian ecological economics. In: HOLT, R. P. F.; PRESSMAN, S.; SPASH, C. L. (Ed.). Post Keynesian and ecological economics: confronting environmental issues. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2009. p. 221-236.
SCHNEIDER, F.; KALLIS, G.; MARTINEZ-ALIER, J. Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 18, n. 6, p. 511-518, 2010.
SILVA, M. C. E.; TEIXEIRA, A. A. C. A bibliometric account of the evolution of EE in the last two decades: is ecological economics (becoming) a post-normal science? Ecological Economics, v. 70, p. 849-862, 2011.
SIM, N. C. S. Environmental Keynesian macroeconomics: some further discussion. Ecological Economics, v. 59, p. 401-405, 2006.
SODDY, F. [1926]. Wealth, virtual wealth and debt: the solution of the economic paradox. New York: E.P. Dutton & C., 1933.
SÖDERBAUM, P. Sustainability economics as a contested concept. Ecological Economics, v. 70, p. 1019-1020, 2011.
SOLOW, R. The economics of resources or the resources of economics, Richard T. Ely Lecture. The American Economic Review, Pittsburgh, The American Economic Association, v. 64, n. 2, p. 1-14, 1974.
SPASH, C. L. New foundations for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, v. 77, p. 36- 47, 2012.
SPASH, C. L.; SCHANDL, H. Challenges for post Keynesian growth theory: utopia meets environmental and social reality. In: HOLT, R. P. F.; PRESSMAN, S.; SPASH, C. L. (Ed.). Post Keynesian and ecological economics: confronting environmental issues. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2009. p. 47-76.
STIGLITZ, J. E. A neoclassical analysis of the economics of natural resources. In: SMITH, V. K. (Ed.). Scarcity and growth reconsidered. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press, 1979.
TAYLOR, L.; REZAI, A.; FOLEY, D. K. An integrated approach to climate change, income distribution, employment, and economic growth. Ecological Economics, v. 121, p. 196-205, 2016.
URHAMMER, E.; RØPKE, I. Macroeconomic narratives in a world of crises: an analysis of stories about solving the system crisis. Ecological Economics, v. 96, p. 62-70, 2013.
VAN DEN BERGH, J. C. J. M. Relax about GDP growth: implications for climate and crisis policies. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 18, n. 6, p. 540-543, 2010.
VATN, A. Combining post Keynesian, ecological and institutional economics perspective. In: HOLT, R. P. F.; PRESSMAN, S.; SPASH, C. L. (Ed.). Post Keynesian and ecological economics: confronting environmental issues. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2009. p. 114-138.
VERCELLI, A. Methodological foundations of macroeconomics: Keynes and Lucas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
VICTOR, P. A. Managing without growth: slower by design, not disaster. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2008.
WACKERNAGEL, M.; REES, W. Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth. Gabriola Island: British Columbia, New Society Publishers, 1996.
A Economia e Sociedade utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto.