Palabras clave
Karl. Análise situacional. Economia
Cómo citar
Resumen
A contribuição metodológica de Popper se estende para a aplicação do seu método crítico nas práticas científicas e sociais, ou seja, vai além do falsificacionismo e do diálogo socrático como mostrado nas diferentes interpretações dos metodólogos da economia. Com o objetivo de descrever a prática científica e social de Popper, como resultado de sua ênfase na busca e no crescimento do conhecimento, e investigar se existe alguma analogia entre ela e a lógica da situação na economia, este artigo apresenta: i) a prática científico-social popperiana na forma da análise situacional (seção 1), ii) as discussões de alguns críticos e comentadores que identificam problemas na proposta de Popper (seção 2), iii) argumentos sobre a análise situacional de Popper e a lógica da situação na economia (seção 3) e iv) as considerações finais.
Abstract
Popper’s methodological contribution could be extended in order to include the use of his critical method in social and scientific practices, that is, it is not related only to falsificationism and socratic dialogue as it has been presented by different economic methodologists. With the aim of describing Popper’s social and scientific practice, as a result of his emphasis on search and growth of knowledge, and investigating whether exists some analogy between this practice and the logic of situation in Economics, this paper presents: i) Popper’s social-scientific practice represented by his situational analysis (section 1), ii) discussions of some researchers who identify problems in Popper’s proposal (section 2), iii) arguments about Popper’s situational analysis and the situational logic of Economics (section 3) and iv) final comments.
Key-words: Popper, Karl. Situational analysis. Economics
Citas
ARTIGAS, Mariano. The ethical nature of Karl Popper’s theory of knowledge. New York: Peter Lang, 1999.
BARBIERI, Fabio. Filosofia da ciência como ferramenta microeconômica”. Nova Economia, v. 16, n. 31, p. 507-534, 2006.
BLAUG, Mark. Why I am not a constructivist. Confessions of an unrepentant Popperian. In: BACKHOUSE, Roger E. (Ed.). New directions in economic methodology. London: Routledge, 1994. p. 109-136.
________ [1983]. Metodologia da economia: ou como os economistas explicam. Trad. Afonso Santos Lima. São Paulo: Edusp, 1999.
BOLAND, Lawrence. Individualist economics without psychology. In: Peter Earl (Ed.). Psychological economics: development, tensions, prospects. [s.l.: s.n.], 1987.
________. Scientific thinking without scientific method: two views of Popper. In: BACKHOUSE, Roger E. (Ed.). New directions in economic methodology. London: Routledge, 1994.
________. [1982]. The foundations of economic method. Canada: Simon Fraser University, 1998a.
________. Situational analysis beyond neoclassical economists. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, v. 28, n. 4, p. 515-521, 1998b.
CALDWELL, Bruce. Clarifying Popper. Journal of Economic Literature, v. 29, n. 1, p. 1-33, 1991.
CALDWELL, Bruce. Situational analysis. In: DAVIS, John B.; HANDS, D. Wade; MÄKI, Uskali (Ed.). The handbook of economic methodology. USA: E. Elga, 1998.
CHALMERS, A. F. Methodological individualism: an incongruity in Popper’s philosophy. In: CURRIE, Gregory; MUSAGRAVE, Alan (Ed.). Popper and the human sciences. Dordrecht: Nijhoff international philosophy series, 1985. v. 19, p. 73-88.
CRESPO, Ricardo. Los tres Popper de la economía. In: CONGRESO Filosófico Internacional Karl Popper: vigencia y transformación de su pensamiento, Facultad de Humanidades y Artes de Rosario (UNR), 3-5 jun. 2004.
FRISBY, David. The Popper-Adorno controversy: the methodological dispute in German sociology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, v. 2, p. 105-119, 1972.
HANDS, D. Wade. Falsification, situational analysis and scientific research programs: the Popperian tradition in economic methodology. In: DE MARCHI, Neil (Ed.). PostPopperian methodology of economics: recovering practice. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.
JARVIE, Ian C. Situational logic and its reception. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, v. 28, n. 3, p. 365-380, 1998.
KERSTENETZKY, Célia. A lógica da situação. In: ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE ECONOMIA, 34, Salvador, BA. Disponível em: http://www.anpec.org.br/encontro2006/ artigos/A06A001.pdf. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2006.
KOERTGE, Noretta. Beyond cultural relativism. In: In: CURRIE, Gregory; MUSAGRAVE, Alan (Ed.). Popper and the human sciences. Dordrecht: Nijhoff international philosophy series, 1985. Dordrecht: Nijhoff international philosophy series, 1985. v. 19, p. 121-132.
LAGUEUX, Maurice. The rationality principle and classical economics. In: CONGRESS of History of Economics Society, College of Chalerston, Chalerston, SC, 1997.
________. Popper and the rationality principle. In: POPPER Centenary Conference, Vienna, 2002. Disponível em: http//www.the-rathouse.com/popconf.html.
LATSIS, Spiro J. Situational determinism in economics. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, v. 23, n. 3, p. 207-245, 1972.
MARIN, Solange R.; FERNÁNDEZ, Ramón G. O pensamento de Karl Popper: as diferentes interpretações dos metodólogos da ciência econômica. Análise Econômica, v. 22, n. 41, p. 155-176, 2004.
MATZNER, Egon; JARVIE, Ian C. Introduction to the special issues on situational analysis. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, v. 28, n. 3, p. 333-338, 1998.
MUELLER, Dennis. Models of man: neoclassical, behavioural, and evolutionary. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, v. 3, p. 59-76, 2004.
NEIVA, Eduardo. O racionalismo crítico de Popper. Rio de Janeiro: Francisco Alves, 1999.
NOTTURNO, Mark. Truth, rationality and the situation. Philosophy of the Social Science, v. 28, n. 3, p. 400-421, 1998.
OAKLEY, Allen. Popper’s ontology of situated human action. Philosophy of the Social Science, v. 32, p. 455-486, 2002.
POPPER, Karl. The poverty of historicism, II. A Criticism of Historicist Methods.
Economica, v. 11, n. 43, p. 119-137, 1944.
________. The poverty of historicism, II. Economica, v. 12, n. 46, p. 69-89, 1945.
________ [1945]. The open society and its enemies. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul LTD, 1957. v. I.
________ [1945]. The open society and its enemies. Princeton and New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1966. v. II.
________ [1934]. The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Harper, 1968a.
________ [1963]. Conjectures and refutations. New York: Harper, 1968b.
________ [1972]. Objective knowledge. An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979.
________. Quantum theory and the schism in physics. From the postscript to the logic of scientific discovery. Edited by W.W. Bartley, III. New Jersey: Rowman and Liettlefield, 1982.
________. Realism and the aim of science. From the postscript to the logic of scientific discovery. Edited by W.W. Bartley, III. New Jersey: Rowman and Liettlefield, 1983.
________ [1967]. The rationality principle. In: MILLER, David (Ed.). Popper selections.
New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1985.
________ [1961]. Search of a better world. Lectures and essays from thirty years. London: Routledge, 1992a.
________ [1974]. Unended quest. An intellectual autobiography. London: Routledge, 1992b.
________; NOTTURNO, M. A. (Ed.). The myth of the framework. In defence of science and rationality. London: Routledge, 1994.
________ [1972]. Conhecimento objetivo. Belo Horizonte: Editora Itatiaia, 1999.
________ [1963]. Conjectures and refutations. The growth of scientific knowledge. London: Routledge Classics, 2002.
SEN, Amartya. Rational fools: a critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs, v. 6, n. 2, p. 317-344, 1977.
________. On ethics and economics. New York: Basil Blackwell, 1987.
________ [1984]. Resources, values and development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998.
________. Development as freedom. New York: Anchor Books, 1999.
________. Rationality and freedom. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2002.
A Economia e Sociedade utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto.
Descargas
