Palavras-chave
Instituições. Encadeamentos. Mudança estrutural e inovação.
Como Citar
Resumo
Este artigo objetiva sistematizar e interpretar os argumentos dos principais autores que configuram a literatura internacional, especialmente a mais recente (de 2005 a 2015), acerca do debate em torno da relação entre abundância de recursos naturais e desenvolvimento econômico. Como meios para alcançar o objetivo proposto, realiza-se revisão crítica da literatura e escolhe-se organizar os principais autores identificando as escolas do pensamento econômico às quais eles se alinham. Identificam-se três principais correntes de pensamento econômico que estruturam o debate vigente: os estruturalistas/keynesianos, defensores da ideia de “maldição” dos recursos naturais; os neoinstitucionalistas, adeptos da concepção de que as instituições são decisivas na inibição da “maldição”; e os neoschumpeterianos, partidários da visão de que o dinamismo tecnológico impede a “maldição”. A identificação destas correntes e o agrupamento dos seus principais autores organizam o debate permitindo melhor compreensão das suas diferenças, teóricas e empíricas.Referências
ABELLES, M.; RIVAS, D. Growth versus development: different patterns of industrial growth in Latin America during the ‘boom’ years. Cepal, UN., 2010.
ACEMOGLU, D.; JOHNSON, S.; ROBINSON, J. Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. In: AGHION, P.; DURLAUF, S. N. (Ed.). Handbook of economic growth. Elsevier, 2005. p. 386-467.
ACEMOGLU, D; ROBINSON, J. The role of institutions in growth and development. In: BRADY, D.; SPENCE, M. (Ed.). Leadership and growth. Washington: The World Bank, 2010. p. 135-164.
ANDERSEN, A. Towards a new approach to natural resources and development: the role of learning, innovation and linkage dynamics. Int. J. Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, v. 5, n. 3, 2012.
ANDERSEN, A. et al. Natural resources, innovation and development. Denmark: Aalborg University, 2015.
ANDERSEN, A.; JOHNSON, B. Monocausalism versus systems approach to development: the possibility of natural resource-based development. Denmark: Aalborg University, 2011.
AUTY, R. Sustaining development in mineral economies: the resource curse thesis. London: Routledge, 1993.
BARAN, P. A. A economia política do desenvolvimento. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, 1984.
BRUNNSCHWEILER, C. N.; BULTE, E. H. The resource curse revisited and revised: a tale of paradoxes and red herrings. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, n. 55, p. 248-264, 2008.
BOSCHINI, A.; PETTERSSON, J.; ROINE, J. Resource curse or not: a question of apropriability. Scandinavian Journal of Economic, v.109, n. 3, p.593-617, 2007.
BOSCHINI, A.; PETTERSSON, J.; ROINE, J. The resource curse and its potential reversal. Department of Economics, Uppsala University, 2012. (Working Paper, n. 17).
CAMERON, D. Watkins, innis, and Canadian economics. In: STAMFORD, J. (Ed.). The Staples Theory @50: reflections on the lasting significance of Mel Watkins’ “a staple theory of economic growth. Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. 2014. p. 25-33.
CAPPELEN, A.; MJØSET, L. Can Norway be a role model for natural resource abundant countries? UNU – World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER), 2009. (Research Paper, n. 23).
CIMOLI, M. et al. Cambio estructural, heterogeneidad productiva y tecnología en América Latina. In: CIMOLI, M. (Ed.). Heterogeneidad estructural, asimetrías tecnológicas y crecimiento en América Latina. Santiago de Chile: Cepal, BID, 2005.
CIMOLI, M.; DOSI, G.; SITIGLITZ, J. E. The future of industrial policies in the new millennium: toward a knowledge-centered development agenda. In: CIMOLI, M.; DOSI, G.; SITIGLITZ, J. E. (Ed.). Industrial policy and development: the political economy of capabilities accumulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. p. 541-60.
CORDEN, W. M. Booming sector and Dutch disease economics: survey and consolidation. Oxford Economics Papers, v. 36, n. 3, p. 359-380, Nov. 1984.
DI JOHN, J. From windfall to a curse? Oil and industrialization in Venezuela, 1920 to the present. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2009.
DI JOHN, J. Is there really a resource curse? A critical survey of theory and evidence. Global Governance, n. 17, p. 167-184, 2011.
ENGERMAN, S.; SOKOLOFF, K. Economic development in the Americas since 1500: endowments and institutions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
FRANK, A. G. The development of underdevelopment. Monthly Review, p. 17-31, Sept. 1966.
FRANKEL, J. A. The natural resource curse: a survey of diagnoses and some prescriptions. John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 2012. Disponível em: https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/8694932/rwp12-014_frankel.pdf?sequence=1. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2014.
FERRANTI, D. de et al. From natural resources to the knowledge economy. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, 2002. (World Bank Latin American and Caribbean Studies).
FITTER, R.; KAPLINSKY, R. Can an agricultural ‘commodity’ be de-commodified, and if so who is to gain? Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, 2001.
GAGO, A. D. The staples trap in developing countries. In: STAMFORD, J. (Ed.). The Staples Theory @50: reflections on the lasting significance of Mel Watkins’ staple theory of economic growth. Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, 2014. p. 34-40.
GUNTON, T. Staple theory and the staple boom. . In: STAMFORD, J. (Ed.). The Staples theory @50: reflections on the lasting significance of Mel Watkins’ “a staple theory of economic growth. Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, 2014. p. 43-52.
HALEY, B. The staple theory and the carbon trap. In: STAMFORD, J. (Ed.). The staples theory @50: reflections on the lasting significance of Mel Watkins’ “a staple theory of economic growth. Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, 2014. p. 75-79.
HAUSMANN, R.; RIGOBON, R. An alternative interpretation of the resource curse: theory and policy implications. 2002. (NBER Working Paper, n. 9424).
HIRSCHMAN, A. The strategy of economic development. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1958.
HIRSCHMAN, A. O desenvolvimento por efeitos em cadeia: uma abordagem generalizada. In: SORJ, B.; CARDOSO, F. H.; FONT, M. Economia e movimentos sociais na América Latina. Rio de Janeiro: Centro Edelstein de Pesquisa Social, 2008. p. 21-64. Disponível em: http://books.scielo.org/. Acesso em: 15 abr. 2015.
HODGSON, G. M. The approaches of institutional economics. Journal of Economic Literature, v. 36, p. 166-192, Mar. 1998.
HUMPHREYS, M.; SACHS, J.; STIGLITZ, J. (Ed.). Escaping the resource curse. New York: Columbia University Press, 2007.
IMF – INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND. Research. Disponível em: http://www.imf.org/external. Acesso em: 15 mar. 2017.
JAMES, A. The resource curse: a statistical mirage? Journal of Development Economics, n. 114, p. 55-63, 2015.
LEDERMAN, D.; MALONEY, W. F. In search of the missing resource curse. The World Bank, 2008. (Policy Research Working Paper, n. 4766).
LEWIS, W. A. The theory of economic growth. London: Georg Allen & Unwin Ltd, 1955.
KALDOR, N. Further essays on applied economics. London: Duckworth, 1978.
KAPLINSKY, R.; FAROOKI, M. Promoting industrial diversification in resource intensive economies: the experiences of Sub-Saharan Africa and Central Asia regions. United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), [2012].
MEHLUM, H.; MOENE, K.; TORVIK. R. Institutions and the resource curse. The Economic Journal, n. 116, p.1-20, 2006.
MORRIS, M.; KAPLINSKY, R.; KAPLAN, D. “One thing leads to another” – commodities, linkages and industrial development. Resources Policy, n. 37, p. 408-416, 2012.
NORTH, D. C. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press, 1990.
NORTH, D. C. Desempeño económico en el transcurso de los años. Economía: teoría y práctica, n. 9, 1998.
OCAMPO, J. A.; PARRA-LANCOURT, M. The terms of trade for commodities since the mid-19th. Journal of Iberian and Latin America Economic History, v. 28, n. 1, p. 11-43, 2010.
PALMA, J. G. Four sources of de-industrialization and a new concept of Dutch disease. In: OCAMPO, J. A. (Ed.). Beyond reforms. Palo Alto (CA): Stanford University Press, 2005.
PÉREZ, Carlota. Dinamismo tecnológico e inclusión social en América Latina: una estrategia de desarrollo productivo basada en los recursos naturales. Revista de la Cepal, n. 100, abr. 2010.
PÉREZ, C. Réplica a los comentarios. Revista Econômica, Niterói, v. 14, n. 2, p. 73-81, dez. 2012.
PÉREZ, C.; MARÍN, A.; NAVAS-ALEMÁN, L. El posible rol dinámico de las redes basadas en recursos naturales para las estrategias de desarrollo en América Latina. In: DUTRÉNIT, G.; SUTZ, J. Sistemas de innovación para un desarrollo inclusivo: la experiencia latino-americana. México, D.F.: Foro Consultivo, Científico y Tecnológico, 2013. p. 347-377.
PLOEG, F. van der. Natural resources: curse or blessing? Journal of Economic Literature, v. 49, n. 2, p. 366-420, 2011.
PREBISCH, R. O desenvolvimento Econômico da América Latina e seus principais problemas. Revista Brasileira de Economia, Rio de Janeiro, v. 3, 1949.
ROY, B. C.; SARKAR, S.; MANDAL. R. N. Natural resource abundance and economic performance – A literature review. Current Urban Studies, v. 1, n. 4, p. 148-155, 2013.
ROLDRIK, D. Manufacturing is special. CEPR’s Policy Portal, 2011. Disponível em: https://voxeu.org/. Acesso em: 1 maio 2015.
ROLDRIK, D. The perils of premature deindustrialization. Project Syndicate, 2013. Disponível em: http://www.project-syndicate.org. Acesso em: 1 maio 2015.
ROLDRIK, D. Premature deindustrialization. Cambridge, Ma: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2015. (Working Paper, n. 20935).
ROSS, M. L. The Political Economy of the Resource Curse. World Politics, Cambridge University Press, v. 51, n. 2, p. 297-322, 1999.
ROSSER, A. The political economy of the resource curse: a literature survey. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies; University of Sussex. 2006. (IDS Working Paper, n. 268).
SACHS, J.; WARNER, A. Natural resources abundance and economic growth. Dec. 1995. (NBER Working Paper, n. 5398).
SACHS, J.; WARNER, A. Natural resources and economic development: the curse of natural resources. European Economic Review, v. 45, p. 827-838, May 2001.
SÆTHER, B.; ISAKSEN, A.; KARLSEN, A. Innovation by co-evolution in natural resource industries: The Norwegian Experience, Geoforum, n. 42, p. 373-381, 2011.
SALA-I-MARTINA, X.; SUBRAMANIAN, A. Addressing the natural resource curse: an illustration from Nigeria. Journal of African Economies, v. 22, n. 4, p. 570-615, 2012.
SINGER, Hans. The distribution of gains between investing and borrowing countries. The American Economic Review, v. 40, n. 2, p. 473-485, May, 1950.
SMITH, A. A riqueza das nações: investigação sobre sua natureza e suas causas. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, 1983.
STEVENS, P.; DIETSCHE, E. Resource curse: an analysis of causes, experiences and possible ways forward. Energy Policy, n. 36, p. 56-65, 2008.
TORVIK, R. Natural resources, rent-seeking and welfare. Journal of Development Economics, v. 67, p. 455-470, 2002.
VILLE, S.; WICKEN, O. The dynamics of resource-based economic development: evidence from Australia and Norway. Industrial and Corporate Change, v. 22, n. 5, p. 1341-1371, 2012.
WATKINS, M. A staple theory of economic growth (1963). In: GRANT, H.; WOLFE, D. (Ed.). Staples and beyond: select writings of Mel Watkins. Montreal, Canada: McGrill-Queens University Press, 2006. p. 5-29.
WRIGHT, G.; CZELUSTA, J. Resource-based economic growth, past and present. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, 2002.
WRIGHT, G.; CZELUSTA, J. The Myth of the resource curse. Challenge, v. 47, n. 2, p.6-38, 2004.
YOGUEL, G.; BARLETTA, F.; PEREIRA, M. De Schumpeter a los postschumpeterianos: viejas y nuevas dimensiones analíticas. Revista Problemas del Desarrollo, n. 174, 2013.
A Economia e Sociedade utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto.
Downloads
