Palavras-chave
Como Citar
Resumo
A dificuldade em encontrar nexos causais entre a fecundidade e a mudança ambiental sempre esteve presente nas pesquisas demográficas. As relações entre tais variáveis são de difícil apreensão e são raras as referências bibliográficas no tema. Neste artigo buscamos sintetizar essa discussão em dois elementos principais: tratamos das influências ambientais sobre o comportamento reprodutivo e da influência da fecundidade sobre o ambiente, enfatizando a discussão pró-natalista e controlista. Nesse sentido apontamos que as principais justificativas ambientais para tais iniciativas acabam obscurecendo as demandas por direitos reprodutivos.
Referências
AGADJANIAN, V.; PRATA, N. War, peace, and fertility in Angola. Demography, v. 39, n. 2, p. 215–231, 2002.
AGGARWAL, R.; NETANYAHU, S.; ROMANO, C. Access to natural resources and the fertility decision of women: The case of South Africa. Environment and Development Economics, v. 6, n. 2, p. 209–236, 2001.
ANDRIETTA, J. Infl uência da exposição ocupacional à poluição atmosférica de origem veicular nos parâmetros seminais de controladores de tráfego na Região Metropolitana de São Paulo. 2010. Dissertação (Mestrado em Urologia). Faculdade de Medicina. Universidade de São Paulo, 2010.
BERQUÓ, E.; CAVENAGHI, S. M. Tendências dos diferenciais educacionais e econômicos da fecundidade no Brasil entre 2000 e 2010. In: XIX Encontro Nacional de Estudos Populacionais, 2014, São Pedro/SP. Anais... São Pedro: ABEP, 2014.
BIDDLECOM, A. E.; AXINN, W. G.; BARBER, J. S. Environmental eff ects on family size preferences and subsequent reproductive behavior in Nepal. Population and Environment, v. 26, n. 3, p. 183–206, 2005.
BILLINGSLEY, S.; FERRARINI, T. Family Policy and Fertility Intentions in 21 European Countries. Journal of Marriage and Family, v. 76, n. 2, p. 428–445, 2014.
BONGAARTS, J. Fertility and reproductive preferences in posttransitional societies. Population and Development Review, v. 27, p. 260–281, 2001. Supplement: Global fertility transition.
BOSERUP, E. Population and Technological Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981.
BRANUER-OTTO, S. Environment and Fertility: The Eff ect of Flora Quality on Fertility Behavior. Population and Environment, v. 36, n. 1, p. 1-31, 2014.
BURDORF, A.; FIGA-TALAMANCA, I.; JENSEN, T.; THULSTRUP, A. Eff ects of occupational exposure on the reproductive system: core evidence and practical implications. Occupational Medicine, v. 56, n. 8, p. 56:516–520, 2006.
CALDWELL, J. C. Social upheaval and fertility decline. Journal of Family History, v. 29, n. 4, p. 382–406, 2004.
CAVENAGHI, S. Fertility Decline and Public Policies to Address Population Rights: Perspective from Latin America. Population Division, Expert Paper, n. 5, 2013.
COHEN, J. E. How Many People can the Earth Support? Nova York: W.W. Norton and Co, 1995.
CURRAN, S.; DE SHERBININ, A. Completing the Picture: The Challenges of Bringing ‘Consumption’ into the PopulationEnvironment Equation. Population and Environment, v. 26, n. 2, 2004.
DE SHERBININ, A., CARR, D., CASSELS, S.; JIANG, L. Population and environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, v. 32, p. 345–373, 2007.
DUNLOP, A. Green inclined, but missing the target. The Black Sheep Journal, 25 mar. 2013. Disponível em: h$ p://truth-out. César Marques e Angelita Alves Carvalho Idéias – Rev. Inst. Filos. Ciênc. Hum. UNICAMP, v.6, n.1, p. 13-37, jan./jun. 2015. Acesso em: 15 jan. 2015.
EHRLICH, P. The Population Bomb. Nova York: Random House, 1968.
FILMER, D.; PRITCHETT, L. H. Environmental degradation and the demand for children: Searching for the vicious circle in Pakistan. Economic and Development Economics, v. 7, p. 123– 146, 2002.
FINLAY, J. E. Fertility response to natural disasters: the case of three high mortality earthquakes. Policy Research Working Paper, n. 4883, The World Bank, 2009.
FOSDICK, B.; RAFTERY, A. Regional probabilistic fertility forecasting by modeling between-country correlations. Demographic Research, v. 30, p. 1011-1034, 2014.
GAUTHIER, A. H. The impact of family policies on fertility in industrialized countries: a review of the literature. Population Research and Policy Review, v.26, n.3, p.323-346, 2007.
GAUTHIER, A. H.; PHILIPOV, D. Can policies enhance fertility in Europe? Vienna yearbook of population research. Vienna, Austria: Austrian Academy of Sciences, 2008.
HAUSER, R.; WILLIAMS, P.; ALTSHUL, L.; CALAFAT, A. M. Evidence of interaction between polychlorinated biphenyls and phthalates in relation to human sperm motility. Environ. Health Perspect, v. 113, n. 5, p. 425–430, 2005.
HILL, K. War, humanitarian crises, population displacement, and fertility: A review of evidence. Washington, DC: National Resource Council, 2004.
HOGAN, D. J. População e meio ambiente: a emergência de um novo campo de estudos. In: HOGAN, D. J. (Org.). Dinâmica populacional e mudança ambiental: cenários para o desenvolvimento brasileiro. Campinas: Nepo/Unfpa, p. 1-25, 2007.
HOMAN, G.F.; DAVIES, M.; NORMAN, R. The impact of lifestyle factors on reproductive performance in the general population and those undergoing infertility treatment: a review. Hum Reprod Update; v. 13, n. 3, p. 209–223, 2007.
HUMMEL, D.; ADAMO, S.; SHERBININ, A. et al. Inter- and transdisciplinary approaches to population–environment research for sustainability aims: a review and appraisal. Population and Environment, v. 34, n. 4, p. 481-509, 2012.
HUNTER, L. The Environmental Implications of Population Dynamics.
RAND, 2001. Disponível em: h$ p://www.rand. org/publications/MR/MR1191/. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2015.
HUNTER, L. The Population and Environment: A complex relationship. RAND, 2000. Disponível em: h$ p://www.rand. org/pubs/research_briefs/RB5045.html. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2015.
HYMAS, L. I decided not having children for environmental reasons. Guardian Environment network. 2011. Disponível em: h$ p://www.theguardian.com/environment /2011/sep/27/ not-have-children-environmental-reasons. Acesso em: 13 jan. 2015.
KOIFMAN, S.; HATAGIMA, A. Agrotóxicos e câncer no Brasil. In: PERES, F.; MOREIRA, J. C. (Eds.). É veneno ou é remédio? 1a ed. Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, 2003, p. 75–100.
LEVINE, R. J.; BORDSON, B. L.; MATHEW, R. M. Deterioration of semen quality during summer in New Orleans. Fertil Steril, v. 49, n. 5, p. 900-907, 1988.
LICHTENFELS, A.; GOMES, J.; PIERI, P.; MIRAGLIA, S.; HALLAK, J.; SALDIVA, P. Increased levels of air pollution and a decrease in the human and mouse male-to-female ratio in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Fertility and Sterility, v. 87, n. 1, p. 230-232, 2007.
LUCI-GREULICH, A.; THÉVENON O. The impact of family policy packages on fertility trends in developed countries. European Journal of Population, v. 29, n. 4, p. 387-419, 2013.
LUTZ, W.; O’NEILL, B.C.; SCHERBOV, S. Demographics. Europe’s population at a turning point. Science, v. 299, n. 5915, p. 1991– 1992, 2003.
LUTZ, W.; PRSKAWETZ, A.; SANDERSON, W.C. Introduction. In: LUTZ, W.; PRSKAWETZ, A.; SANDERSON, W.C. (eds.). Population and Environment: methods of analysis. A suplement to Vol. 28, Population and Environment Review, p. 1-21, 2002.
LUTZ, W.; SCHERBOV, S. Exploratory Extension of IIASA's World Population Projections: Scenarios to 2300. IIASA Interim Report IR-08-022. Laxenburg, Austria: IIASA, 2008.
LUTZ, W.; SCHERBOV, S. Quantifying Vicious Circle Dynamics: The PEDA Model for Population, Environment, Development and Agriculture in African Countries. IIASA Interim Report IR-99-049. Laxenburg, Austria: IIASA, 1999.
LUTZ, W.; SKIRBEKK, V. Policies addressing the tempo eff ect in low-fertility countries. Population and Development Review, v.3 1, n. 4, p. 699-720, 2005.
MARTINE, G. O contraste entre desenvolvimento sustentável na CIPD e a realidade atual. In: WONG, L. R. et al. Cairo +20: perspectivas da agenda de população e desenvolvimento sustentável pós-2014. Rio de Janeiro: ALAP, 2014.
MEADOWS, D. H.; MEADOWS, D. L.; RANDERS, J.; BEHRENS, W. Limits to growth. Universe Books, New York, 1972.
MONTGOMERY, M. R.; COHEN, B. From death to birth: mortality decline and reproductive change. Washington, D.C.: National Academic Press, 1998.
NOBLES, J.; FRANKENBERG, E.; THOMAS, D. The eff ects of mortality on fertility: population dynamics after a natural disaster. Demography, v. 52, n. 1, p.15-38, January, 2015.
O’NEILL, B. C.; MACKELLAR, F. L.; LUTZ, W. Population and Climate Change. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2001.
PARADA, B.; REQUIXA, A.; FIGUEIREDO, A.; MOTA, A. Infertilidade Masculina e Factores Ambientais. Acta Urológica, v. 21, n. 4, p. 9-15, 2004.
PARADISI, R.; VANELLA, S.; BARZANTI, R.; CANI, C.; BATTAGLIA, C.; SERACCHIOLI, R.; VENTUROLI, S. Eff ects of indoor air purifi cation by an air cleaning system (Koala technology) on semen parameters in male factor infertility: results of a pilot study. Andrologia, v. 41, n. 3, p. 163-168, 2009.
PEREZ, S. G. Household demographic factors as life cycle determinants of land use in the Amazon. Population Research and Policy Review, v. 20, n. 3, p. 159–186, 2001.
PHILIPOV, D., O. THÉVENON, J. KLOBAS, L. BERNARDI AND A.C. LIEFBROER. Reproductive decision-making in a macromicro perspective (REPRO): a state of the art review. A working paper of the European Commission within the Seventh Framework Programme under the Socio-economic Sciences and Humanities Theme, 2009.
RAFTERY, A.E.; LI, N.; ŠEVČÍKOVÁ, H.; GERLAND, P.; HEILIG, G. K. Bayesian probabilistic population projections for all countries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 109, n. 35, p. 13915-13921, 2012.
ROYAL SOCIETY. People and the planet. The Royal Society Science Policy Centre report 01/12, Londres, 2012.
SCHEIKE, T.H.; RYLANDER, L.; CARSTENSEN. L.; KEIDING. N.; JENSEN, T. K.; STROMBERG. U.; JOFFE, M.; AKRE, O. Time trends in human fecundability in Sweden. Epidemiology, v. 19, n. 2, p. 191–196, 2008.
SKAKKEBAEK NE, RAJPERT-DE MEYTS E, MAIN KM. Testicular dysgenesis syndrome: an increasingly common developmental disorder with environmental aspects. Human Reproduction, v. 16, n. 5, p. 972–978, 2001.
STRIESSNIG , E.; LUTZ, W. How does education change the relationship between fertility and age-dependency under environmental constraints? A long-term simulation exercise. Demographic Research, v. 30, pp. 465-492, 2014.
SUTHERLAND, E.; CARR, D.; & CURTIS, S. Fertility and the Environment in a Natural Resource Dependent Economy: Evidence from Petén, Guatemala. Poblacion y Salud en Mesoamérica, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1-14, 2004.
TAS, S.; LAUWERYS, R.; LISON, D. Occupational hazards for the male reproductive system. Critical Review in Toxicology, v. 26, n. 3, p. 261-307, 1996.
UNITED NATIONS (UN). Probabilistic population projections. UN/ DESA, New York, 2013.
UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE JUIZ DE FORA (UFJF). Estilo de vida tem mais peso sobre a fertilidade. 14 jan. 2011. Disponível em: h$ p://www.u f.br/ladem/2011/01/14/estilo-de-vida-temmais-peso-sobre-a-fertilidade/. Acesso em: 15 jan. 2015.
VANWEY, L. K.; D’ANTONA, A.; BRONDIZIO, E. Household demographic change and land use/land cover change in the Brazilian Amazon. Population and Environment, v. 28, n. 3, p. 163–185, 2007.
A Idéias utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto.
Downloads
