Palavras-chave
Como Citar
Resumo
O artigo examina a noção de extensão conceitual em Kant, a fim de determinar uma visão de predicação que possa integrar, de forma coerente, compromissos teóricos básicos da lógica geral como ele a concebia e os fundamentos de sua lógica transcendental. Após um breve panorama das diversas caracterizações da noção no corpus kantiano, distingo três modelos interpretativos acerca da mesma na literatura. Tais modelos são criticados e suas perspectivas de integrar os compromissos de Kant de modo inteiramente satisfatório são rejeitadas. Finalmente, esboço um tratamento alternativo da concepção kantiana de extensão conceitual, o qual respeita os critérios de adequação que guiaram o exame dos modelos anteriores. Ele aponta, por sua vez, para uma reavaliação da noção kantiana de conteúdo conceitual.
Abstract:
The article examines Kant’s notion of conceptual extension in order to determine a conception of predication that could integrate, in a coherent fashion, basic theoretical commitments of general logic as he conceived it and the central tenets of his transcendental logic. After a brief overview of the several characterizations of thatnotion in the Kantian corpus, I distinguish three interpretative models concerning it in the literature. Such models are criticized and their prospects of integrating Kant’s commitments in a fully satisfactory way are rejected. Finally, I sketch an alternative account of Kant’s notion of conceptual extension, which respects the criteria of adequacy that guided the examination of the former models. It points, on its turn, to a revaluation of Kant’s notion of conceptual content.
Keywords: Kant. Conceptual extension. Predication. General logic. Transcendental logic.
Referências
ALLISON, H. “Kant and the two dogmas of rationalism”. In: A. Nelson (ed.) (2006), pp. 343-359.
ALLISON, H. “Where have all the categories gone? Reflections on Longuenesse’s reading of the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories”. Inquiry, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2000, pp. 67-80.
ANDERSON, R. L. “It adds up after all: Kant's philosophy of arithmetic in light of the traditional logic”.¬Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 69, No. 3, 2004, pp. 501-540.
ARNAULD, A., NICOLE, P. La Logique ou l’Art de Penser. Paris: Gallimard, 1992.
CHENET, F.-X. L'Assise de l'Ontologie Critique: l'Esthétique Transcendantale. Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille, 1994.
CODATO, L. “Extensão e forma lógica na Crítica da Razão Pura”. Discurso, Vol. 34, 2004, pp. 145-202.
CODATO, L. “Lógica geral e lógica transcendental: Kant e a questão das relações entre intuição e conceito no juízo”. Analytica, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2006, pp. 125-145.
FRIEDMAN, M. Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.
HANNA, R. Kant and the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001.
KANT, I. Kants gesammelte Schriften. 29 vols. Ed. Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Vols. I-XXII); Deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin (Vol. XXIII); Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen (Vols. XXIVXXIX). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1902–.
KANT, I. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Ed. Jens Timmermann. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1998.
LEIBNIZ, G. W. Die philosophischen Schriften. Ed. C. I. Gerhardt. 7 vols. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung, 1857-90.
LONGUENESSE, B. Kant and the Capacity to Judge. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.
LONGUENESSE, B. Kant on the Human Standpoint. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
MATES, B. “Leibniz’s Philosophy of Logic and Language. By Hidé Ishiguro” (Book Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 12, n.1, 1974, pp. 106-113.
MEIER, G. F. Auszug aus der Vernunftlehre. Halle: Johann Justinus Gebauer, 1752.
NELSON, A. A Companion to Rationalism. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006.
PRIEN, B. Kants Logik der Begriffe. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2006.
REICH, K. The Completeness of Kant’s Table of Judgments. Trad. J. Kneller & M. Losonsky. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992.
ROBINSON, H. “Kant on apriority, syntheticity, and judgments”. In: O. K. Wiegand & T. M. Seebohm (eds.) (2000), pp. 225- 248.
SCHULTHESS, P. Relation und Funktion: Eine systematische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchung zur theoretischen Philosophie Kants. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1981.
WIEGAND, O. K., SEEBOHM, T. M. Phenomenology on Kant, German Idealism, Hermeneutics and Logic. Dordrecht: Springer, 2000.
WOLFF, C. Philosophia Prima sive Ontologia, Methodo Scientifica Pertractata, qua Omnis Cognitionis Humanae Principia Continentur. Frankfurt & Leipzig: Officina Libraria Rengeriana, 1730.
WOLFF, C. Vernünftige Gedancken von den Kräfften des menschlichen Verstandes und ihrem richtigen Gebrauche in Erkänntniss der Wahrheit. Frankfurt & Leipzig: Officina Libraria Rengeriana, 1754.
Downloads
