Banner Portal
THE ORIGINAL POSITION REVISITED: DUTY AND JUSTIFICATION
PDF

Palavras-chave

Rawls. Original position. Justification. Natural duty. Dworkin

Como Citar

ENGELMANN, Mauro L. THE ORIGINAL POSITION REVISITED: DUTY AND JUSTIFICATION. Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia, Campinas, SP, v. 33, n. 2, p. 407–423, 2015. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8642040. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2024.

Resumo

Dworkin claimed that hypothetical agreements are not binding and, thus, that the argument from the Original Position in Rawls’ A Theory of Justice does not justify or ground the principles of justice. I argue that the Original Position is neither foundational nor in need of a “deep theory”, as claims Dworkin; it is only a means of clarification, a sort of “perspicuous representation” of our judgments concerning justice. I also argue that the natural duty of justice works as a non-hypothetical justification for why the principles are binding. This because the natural duty of justice does not depend on agreements to hold and, as such, makes any principle of justice binding.
PDF

Referências

DREBEN, B. “On Rawls Political Liberalism.” In: S. Freeman (ed.) (2003), pp. 316-346.

DWORKIN, R. Taking Rights Seriously (with a new appendix, a response to critics). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1978.

FLOYD, J., SHIEH, S. (eds.). Future Pasts: the Analytic Tradition in Twentieth-Century Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001b.

FREEMAN, S. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

KLOSKO, G. “Multiple Principles of Political Obligation”. Political Theory, December, pp. 801-824, 2004.

LADEN, A. S. “The House that Jack Built: Thirty Years of Reading Rawls”. Ethics, 113, pp. 367-390, 2003.

RAWLS, J. Justice as Fairness (A Restatement). (JF). Edited by E. Kelly. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2001a.

RAWLS, J. “A Reminiscence”. In: J. Floyd and S. Shieh (eds.) (2001b), pp. 417-30.

RAWLS, J. Theory of Justice. (TJ). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999.

RAWLS, J. Political Liberalism (with a new introduction and the “Reply to Habermas”). New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.

RAWLS, J. “Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical”. Philosophy and Public Affairs, v. 14, n. 3, pp. 223-251, 1985.

SANDEL, M. J. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

WITTGENSTEIN, L. Philosophical Investigations. (PI). Transl. by G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.