Banner Portal
CONTEXTUALISM, DISAGREEMENT AND COMMUNICATION
PDF

Palavras-chave

Contextualismo. Vagueza. Comunicação. Licença semântica.

Como Citar

MONTMINY, Martin. CONTEXTUALISM, DISAGREEMENT AND COMMUNICATION. Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia, Campinas, SP, v. 32, n. 1, p. 201–230, 2015. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8642052. Acesso em: 26 abr. 2024.

Resumo

Quanto ao fenômeno da vagueza, o contextualism defende a tese de que o conteúdo dos predicados vagos é sensível ao contexto. Contrasto essa visão com uma visão similar chamada contextualismo não-indexical, e explico por que minha versão dever ser preferida à outra. Depois, eu defendo o contextualismo contra três objeções que foram apresentadas recentemente contra ele. Argumento que essas objeções valem muito mais, na verdade, não contra o contextualismo, e sim contra as visões rivais.

 

Abstract:

Contextualism about vagueness holds that the content of vague predicates is context sensitive. I contrast this view with a similar view called nonindexical contextualism, and explain why my brand of contextualism should be preferred to it. I then defend contextualism against three objections that have been recently raised against it. I show that these objections are actually more damaging to rival views than to contextualism itself.

Keywords: Contextualism. Vagueness. Communication. Semantic license.

PDF

Referências

ÅKERMAN, J., GREENOUGH, P. “Vagueness and Non-Indexical Contextualism”. Forthcoming in S. Sawyer (ed.) (2009).

ÅKERMAN, J., GREENOUGH, P. “Hold the Context Fixed—Vagueness Still Remains”. To appear in Cuts and Clouds, R. Dietz and S. Moruzzi (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press (forthcoming).

BACH, K. Thought and Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.

BEALL, JC (ed.). Liars and Heaps: New Essays on Paradox. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.

BURNS, L. C. Vagueness: An Investigation into Natural Languages and the Sorites Paradox. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1991.

CAPPELEN, H., LEPORE, E. Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005.

FARA, D. G. “Shifting Sands: An Interest-Relative Theory of Vagueness”. Philosophical Topics 28, pp. 45-81, 2000. (Originally published under the name ‘Delia Graff.’) HECK, R. “Semantic Accounts of Vagueness”. In: JC Beall (ed.) (2003), pp. 106-127.

KEEFE, R. Theories of Vagueness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

KEEFE, R. “Context, Vagueness, and the Sorites,” In: JC Beall (ed.) (2003), pp. 73-83.

KEEFE, R. “Vagueness Without Context Change”. Mind, 116, pp. 275-292, 2007.

KEEFE, R., SMITH, P. (eds.). Vagueness: A Reader. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1996.

LUDWIG, K., RAY, G. “Vagueness and the Sorites Paradox”. Philosophical Perspectives, 16, pp. 419-461, 2002.

MACFARLANE, J. “Making Sense of Relative Truth”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 105, pp. 321-339, 2005.

MACFARLANE, J. “Nonindexical Contextualism”. Synthese, 166, pp. 231- 250, 2009.

MALT, B., SLOMAN, S. “Artifact Categorization: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly”. In: E. Margolis and S. Laurence (eds.) (2007), pp. 85-103.

MARGOLIS, E., LAURENCE, S. (eds.). Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and their Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

MONTMINY, M. “High-Order Vagueness and the Trickle-Down Effect”. (manuscript) QUINE, W. V. “What Price Bivalence?”. Journal of Philosophy, 78, pp. 90-95, 1981.

RAFFMAN, D. “Vagueness without Paradoxes”. Philosophical Review, 103, pp. 41-74, 1994.

SAINSBURY, M. R. [1990]. “Concepts without Boundaries”. Repr. in R. Keefe and P. Smith (eds.) (1996), pp. 251-264.

SAWYER, S. (ed.). New Waves in the Philosophy of Language. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2009.

SHAPIRO, S. Vagueness in Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

SOAMES, S. Understanding Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

SOAMES, S. “Replies”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 65, pp. 429-452, 2002.

SORENSEN, R. “Ambiguity, Discretion, and the Sorites”. The Monist, 81, pp. 215-232, 1998.

SOAMES, S. “Semivaluationism: Putting Vagueness in Context in Context”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 76, pp. 471-483, 2008.

SPERBER, D., WILSON, D. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995. (2nd edition) WILLIAMSON, T. Vagueness. London: Routledge, 1994.

WRIGHT, C. “On Being in a Quandary: Relativism, Vagueness, Logical Revisionism”. Mind, 60, pp. 45-98, 2001.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.