Banner Portal
EL REALISMO Y LA FIJACIÓN DE LA REFERENCIA
PDF

Palavras-chave

Realismo interno. Realismo metafísico. Interpretación radical. Internal realism. Metaphysical realism. Radical interpretation

Como Citar

PINTO, Silvio. EL REALISMO Y LA FIJACIÓN DE LA REFERENCIA. Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia, Campinas, SP, v. 30, n. 1, p. 9–34, 2016. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8643484. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2024.

Resumo

En este trabajo intento mostrar, en primer lugar, que el realismo interno de Hilary Putnam no logra explicar filosóficamente la fijación de la referencia de las expresiones del lenguaje cotidiano. En segundo lugar, sugiero una explicación alternativa del mecanismo de fijación de la referencia apelando al concepto de interpretación radical; además, el enfoque interpretativo lo concebiré como una variante del realismo que acepta la relatividad conceptual, pero rechaza la relatividad ontológica.

This paper intends to show, first, that Hilary Putnam’s internal realism does not provide a satisfactory philosophical explanation of the fixation of reference of natural language’s expressions. Second, I suggest an alternative explanation of the determination of reference in terms of radical interpretation; besides, the interpretative approach is conceived here as a variant of realism which accepts conceptual relativity while rejecting ontological relativity.

PDF

Referências

BOYD, R. “Realism, Approximate Truth, and Philosophical Method”. In: D. Papineau (ed.) (1996), pp. 215-255.

CUMMINS, R. Meaning and Mental Representation. Cambridge: The MIT

Press, 1989.

DAVIDSON, D. “A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge”. In: Davidson (2001), pp. 137-153.

————. Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

————. “Could There Be a Science of Rationality?”. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 3(1), pp. 1-16, 1995.

————. “The Structure and Content of Truth”. Journal of Philosophy, 87, pp. 279-328, 1990.

————. “Truth and Meaning”. In: Davidson (1984), pp. 17-36.

————. “Radical Interpretation”. In: Davidson (1984), pp. 125-139.

————. “Belief and Basis of Meaning”. In: Davidson (1984), pp. 141-

————. “Reality without Reference”. In: Davidson (1984), pp. 215-

————. “The Inscrutability of Reference”. In: Davidson (1984), pp.

-241.

————. “Towards a Unified Theory of Meaning and Action”. Grazer Philosophische Studien, II, pp. 1-12, 1980.

————. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.

————. “Expressing Evaluations”. The Lindley Lecture, Kansas: University of Kansas, 1982.

DUMMETT, M. “Realism”. In: Dummett (1978), pp. 145-165.

————. Truth and Other Enigmas. London: Duckworth, 1978.

FODOR, J. Psychosemantics, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1987.

LOPARIC, Z. A Semântica Transcendental de Kant. Campinas: Coleção

CLE, 2000.

PAPINEAU, D. The Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

PUTNAM, H. Philosophy of Logic. New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1971.

————. Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press, 1981.

————. The Many Faces of Realism. Chicago: Open Court, 1987.

————. Representation and Reality. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1988.

QUINE, W. Word and Object. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1960.

————. Ontological Relativity & Other Essays. New York: Columbia

University Press, 1969.

STRAWSON, P. The Bounds of Sense. London: Methuen, 1966.

TARSKI, A. “The Concept of Truth in Formalizad Languages”, In: A. Tarski (1956), pp. 152-278.

————. Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Oxford: Oxford University

Press, 1956.

WITTGENSTEIN, L. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge,

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.