Resumo
In §1 I examine Boole’s “principle of wholistic reference” in relation to Frege’s postulation of truth-values as referents for sentences. I also consider in this connection Frege’s interpretation of quantification and his view that functions and concepts (of objects) must be defined for all objects. I then present my own contrasting views on the reference of sentences. In §2 I discuss Boole’s introduction of the notion of universe of discourse and consider whether one of the issues implicit in John’s paper is a confrontation between absolute interpretations of logic and relativistic interpretations of logic. I conclude with a brief examination of Tarski’s views on this issue.Referências
BOOLE, G. The Mathematical Analysis of Logic. Cambridge: MacMillan, Barclay, & MacMillan, 1847. Reprinted, Oxford: Blackwell, 1951.
GÖDEL, K. “Russell’s Mathematical Logic”. In Schilp, P. A. (ed.) The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, pp. 125-53. New York, N.Y.: Tudor, 1944.
TARSKI, A. Introduction to Logic and to the Methodology of Deductive Sciences. Third edition, revised. New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press,
TARSKI, A. “What are Logical Notions?” History and Philosophy of Logic,
, pp. 143-54, 1986.
Downloads
Não há dados estatísticos.