Palavras-chave
Como Citar
Resumo
Kant's than is generally recognized. Then I analyze Frege’s reasons for gradually rejecting this view. Although I concede that the demands imposed by Frege's logicism played some role, I argue that his increasingly vehement anti-psychologism provides a deeper and more interesting reason for rejecting his earlier view.Referências
FREGE, G. Grundlagen der Arithmetik [GLA]. Breslau: Verlag von Wilhelm Koebner. Transl. by J.L. Austin as Foundations of Arithmetic. Oxford: Blackwell, 1953.
———. Grundgesetze der Arithmetik [GGA]. Jena: Pohle, 1893. Partial transl. by M. Furth as Basic Laws of Arithmetic. Berkeley: University of
California Press, 1964.
———. Begriffsschrift [BS]. Halle: Verlag von Louis Nebert, 1879. Transl.
and repr. in J. van Heijenoort (ed.). From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1967.
———. Conceptual Notation and Related Articles. T.W. Bynum (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972.
———. Posthumous Writings [PHW]. H. Hermes et al., (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell, 1979.
———. Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy [CP]. B.
McGuinness (ed.). Oxford: Blackwell, 1984.
KANT, I. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Riga: Hartknoch, 1781(A)/ 1787(B).
Transl. as Critique of Pure Reason by P. Guyer and A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
———. Logik. Transl. as Logic by R.S. Hartman and W. Schwarz. New York: Dover Publications, 1974.
GOLDFARB, W. “Logic in the Twenties: The Nature of the Quantifier”.
Journal of Symbolic Logic, 44, pp. 35168, 1979.
———. “Frege’s Conception of Logic”. In: J. Floyd and S. Shieh (eds.).
Future Pasts: The Analytic Tradition in Twentieth Century Philosophy.
Oxford University Press, 2001.
VAN HEIJENOORT, J. “Logic as Calculus and Logic as Language”. Synthese, 17, pp. 32430, 1967.
Downloads
