Banner Portal
On continental and analytic philosophies


Analytic philosophy
continental philosophy

Como Citar

CREMASCHI, S. On continental and analytic philosophies. Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia, Campinas, SP, v. 25, n. 2, p. 51–79, 2016. Disponível em: Acesso em: 1 abr. 2023.


I discuss the way in which the cleavage between the Continental and the Anglo-American philosophies originated, the (self-) images of both philosophical worlds, the converging rediscoveries from the Seventies, as well as recent ecumenical or anti-ecumenical strategies. I argue that pragmatism provides an important counterinstance to both the familiar self-images and to fashionable ecumenical or antiecumenical strategies. My conclusions are: (i) Continental philosophy does not exist; (ii) less obviously, also analytic philosophy does not exist, or does not exist any longer as a current or a paradigm; what does exist is, on the one hand, philosophy of language and, on the other, philosophy of mind, that is, two disciplines; (iii) the dissolution of analytic philosophy as a school has been extremely fruitful, precisely in so far as it has left room for disciplines and research programmes; (iv) what is left, of the AngloAmerican/Continental cleavage is primarily differences in styles, depending partly on intellectual traditions, partly owing to sociology, history, institutional frameworks; these differences should not be blurred by rash ecumenical; besides, theoretical differences are alive as ever, but within both camps; finally, there is indeed a lag (not a difference) in the appropriation of intellectual techniques by most schools of ‘Continental’ philosophy, and this should be overcome through appropriation of what the best ‘analytic’ philosophers have produced.


APEL, K.-O. (1976). Was heisst Universalpragmatik? In Apel 1976, pp. 174-272.

———————. (ed.) (1976). Sprachpragmatik und Philosophie (Frankfurt, a.M., Suhrkamp.

———————. (1997). L’influsso della filosofia analitica sul mio itinerario intellettuale. In Cremaschi 1997, pp. 209-248.

BERNSTEIN, R.J. (1972). Praxis and Action (London, Duckworth).

—————. (1983). Beyond Objectivism and Relativism (Oxford, Blackwell). —————. (1989). Pragmatism, Pluralism and the Healing of Wounds, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, vol. 63.

—————. (1991). The New Constellation. The Ethical-political Horizons of Modernity/Postmodernity (Oxford, Polity Press).

BUBNER, R. (1990). Zur Wirkung der analytischen Philosophie in Deutschland. In Prinz and Weingart. 1990, pp. 448-458.

BUBNER, R., CRAMER, K., & R. WIEHL (eds.) (1970). Hermeneutik und Dialektik (Tübingen, Mohr).

CARNAP, R. ([1932] 1959). The Elimination of Metaphysics Through Logical Analysis of Language. In A.J. Ayer (ed.) Logical Positivism. (Glencoe (Ill), The Free Press), pp. 60-81.

CASTAÑEDA, H.-N. (1989). Philosophy as a Science and as a WorldView. In Cohen and Dascal (1989), pp. 35-60.

CAVELL, S. (1979). The Claim of Reason (Oxford, Clarendon Press).

COHEN, A. & DASCAL, M. (eds.) (1989). The Institution of Philosophy. A Discipline in Crisis? (La Salle, Il, Open Court).

CREMASCHI, S. (ed.) (1997). Filosofia Analitica e Filosofia Continentale (Florence, La Nuova Italia).

DASCAL, M. (1989). Hermeneutic Interpretation and Pragmatic Interpretation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 22.4, pp. 239-259.

—————. (1995). Epistemología, controversias, y pragmatica. Isegoría 12, pp. 8-43.

—————. (2001). How Rational can a Polemic across the AnalyticContinental 'Divide' be?. In M. Dascal et al. (eds.) Controversies in the The German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development).

DAVIDSON, D. (1980). Essays on Action and Events (Oxford, Oxford University Press).

—————. (1984). Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation (Oxford, Oxford University Press).

DERRIDA, J. (1988). Limited Inc. (Evanston (Il), Northwestern University Press).

DUMMETT, M. (1978). Truth and Other Enigmas. (London, Duckworth.)

—————. (1981). Frege: Philosophy of Language. 2nd edition. (London, Duckworth.)

—————. (1988). The Origins of Analytical Philosophy, (London, Duckworth.)

DURFEE, H.A. (ed.) (1976). Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology (The Hague, Nijhoff).

ENGEL, P. (ed.) (1993a). Philosophy and the Analytic-Continental Divide. Special issue of Stanford French Review. 17.2-3.

—————. (1993b). French and American Philosophical Dispositions. In Engel (1993b), pp. 165-181.

GADAMER, H.G. ([1960] 1988). Truth and Method (New York, Continuum).

—————. (1963). Die phänomenologische Bewegung, Philosophische Rundschau, 7.1

—————. (1980). Wahrheit und Methode. Ergänzungen (Tübingen, Mohr).

HABERMAS, J. (1975). Sprachspiel, Intention und Bedeutung. Zu Motiven bei Sellars und Wittgenstein. In Wiggershaus (1975), pp. 319-340.

—————. ([1981] 1985). The Theory of Communicative Action (Boston, Beacon Press).

HEIDEGGER, M. ([1929] 1976). Was ist Metaphysik? In Wegmarken, Klostermann, Frankfurt a.M., pp. 103-122.

HORKHEIMER, M. (1947). The Eclipse of Reason (New York, Oxford University Press).

LORENZ, K. (1997). Radici analitiche del costruttivismo dialogico, In Cremaschi (1997), pp. 155-174.

MACINTYRE, A. (1981). After Virtue (London, Duckworth).

MULLIGAN, K. (ed.) (1991). Continental Philosophy Analyzed. Special issue of Topoi 10.1.

NIZNIK, J., SANDERS, J.T. (eds.) (1996). Debating the State of Philosophy: Habermas, Rorty and Kolakowski. Westport (Cn): Praeger.

OKRENT, M. (1989). The Metaphilosophical Consequences of Pragmatism, in Cohen and Dascal (1989), pp. 177-198.

PEIRCE, CH.S. (1978a). On a few consequences of four inabilities. In Collected Papers, 8 vols., ed. by Ch. Hartshorne; P. Weiss; and A.W.

Burks (Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press), 1931-1958, vol. V.

—————. (1978b). The Fixation of Belief. Ibid.

—————. (1978c). How to Make Our Ideas Clear. Ibid.

PRINZ, W. and P. WEINGART (eds.) (1990). Die Sogehnante Geisteswissenschaften: Innenansichten (Frankfurt, a.M., Suhrkamp). QUINE, W.V. (1969). Ontological Relativity and Other Essays (New York, Columbia University Press).

RAJCHMAN, J. and WEST, C. (eds.) (1985). Post-Analytic Philosophy (New York, Columbia University Press).

RICOEUR, P. ([1969] 1974). The Conflict of Interpretations (Chicago, Nortwestern University Press).

—————. (1976). Husserl and Wittgenstein on Language. In Durfee 1976.

RORTY, R. (1979). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press).

—————. (1989). Philosophy as Science, as Metaphor, and as Politics. In Cohen and Dascal (1989), pp. 13-33.

ROSEN, S. (1980). The Limits of Analysis (New York, Basic Books).

SCHARFSTEIN, B.-A. (1997). Il dubbio alle loro due case! La cecità occidentale nei confronti delle filosofie non occidentali, In Cremaschi (1997), pp. 253-282.

SEARLE, J.R. (1977). Reiterating the Differences: a Reply to Derrida. Glyph 2, pp. 198-208.

—————. (1983). The World Turned Upside Down. New York Review of Books Oct 23.

SMITH, B. (1991). Textual deference. American Philosophical Quarterly 28.1, pp. 1-12.

STRAUSS, M. (1997). Linguaggio e percezione sensibile: un aspetto della filosofia linguistico-analitica. In Cremaschi (1997), pp. 23-47.

TUGENDHAT, E. (1970). Phänomenologie und Sprachanalyse. In Bubner, Cramer, and Wiehl (1970), vol. II, pp. 3-21.


Não há dados estatísticos.