Banner Portal
Pragmatics and rhetoric for discourse analysis: some conceptual remarks



Como Citar

LARRAZABAL, J. M.; KOORTA, K. Pragmatics and rhetoric for discourse analysis: some conceptual remarks. Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia, Campinas, SP, v. 25, n. 2, p. 233–248, 2016. Disponível em: Acesso em: 4 out. 2023.


This paper focuses on discourse analysis, particularly persuasive discourse, using pragmatics and rhetoric in a new combined way, called by us PragmaRhetoric. It can be said that this is a cognitive approach to both pragmatics and rhetoric. Pragmatics is essentially Gricean, Rhetoric comes from a new reading of Aristotle’s Rhetoric, extending his notion of discourse to meso- and micro-discourses. Two kinds of intentions have to be considered: first, communicative intention, and, then, persuasive intention. The fulfilment of those intentions is achieved by a successful persuasive-communicative action. The psychological, philosophical and logical aspects derived from the pragma-rhetorical perspective are crucial in view of its applications in several practical domains.


APOSTEL, L. (1971). Assertion logic and a theory of argumentation. Philosophy and Rhetoric 4, 92-110.

ARISTOTLE, Rhetoric.

BAR-HILLEL, Y. (1971). Out of the Pragmatic Waste-Basket, Linguistic Inquiry 2, 401-407.

BOURDIEU, P. (1984). Questions de Sociologie (Paris, Minuit).

CAMPBELL, G. (1776). The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Re-edited in 1936 (Southern Illinois University Press).

CONLEY, Th. M. (1990). Rhetoric in the European Tradition (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).

DASCAL, M. and GROSS, A.G. (1999). The Marriage of Pragmatics and Rhetoric, Philosophy and Rhetoric 32(2).

EEMEREN, F.H. van (ed.) (2001). Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory (Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press).

EEMEREN, F.H. van, and GROOTENDORST, R. (1984). Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions (Dordrecht, Foris).

FOUCAULT, M. (1966). Les Mots et les Choses (Paris, Gallimard).

GARFINKEL, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall).

GOFFMAN, E. (1981). Forms of Talk (Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press).

GRICE, H.P. (1957). Meaning, Philosophical Review 66, 377-388. Reprinted in H.P. Grice, Studies in the Way of Words (Cambridge, Ma, Harvard University Press), 1989, pp. 213-223.

————. (1969). Utterer’s Meaning and Intentions, Philosophical Review 78, 147-177. Reprinted in H.P. Grice, Studies in the Way of Words.

(Cambridge, Ma, Harvard University Press, 1989), pp. 86-116.

ISOCRATES, Against the Sophists.

MORRIS, C. (1938), Foundations of the Theory of Signs. In O. Neurath, R. Carnap and C. Morris (eds.), International Encyclopaedia of Unified Science I (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 77-138. Reprinted in C. Morris (1971), Writings on the general theory of signs (The Hague, Mouton).

PERELMAN, Ch. and L. OLBRECHT-TYTECA (1958). Traité de l’Argumentation. La Nouvelle Rhétorique (Bruxelles, Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles).

REBOUL, O. (1991). Introduction à la Rhétorique (Paris, P.U.F.).

RESCHER, N. (1968). Topics in Philosophical Logic (Dordrecht, Reidel).

SACKS, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation (Oxford, Blackwell).

SACKS, H., SCHEGLOFF, E.A. and JEFFERSON, G. (1974). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation, Language 50, pp. 696-735.

SCHIFFRIN, D. (1994). Approaches to Discourse (Oxford, Blackwell).

SEARLE, J. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

————. (1983). Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

STRAWSON, P.F. (1964). Intention and Convention in Speech Acts, Philosophical Review 73, 439-60.

WALTON, D.N. (1989). Informal Logic (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

WATZLAWICK, P., J. HELMICK BEAVIN, and D. JACKSON DON (1972). Une Logique de la Communication (Paris, Seuil).

WHATELY, R. (1828). Elements of Rhetoric. Reprinted in 1857 (London, Parker & Son).


Não há dados estatísticos.