Dialogo, falacias y retorica. El caso de la falacia naturalista

  • Eduardo Rabossi
Palavras-chave: Dialogo, falacia, falacia naturalista, retórica, ética

Resumo

The first sections of the paper deal with the notion of a dialogue and some basic dialogic modalities. The critical or rational modality is highlighted as typical of philosophical argumentation. The following sections deal with a widespread phenomenon in current philosophical controversies: to charge the dialogic counterpart with the commission of a philosophical fallacy. The Naturalistic Fallacy is taken as the most famous example of that sort of strategy. Its structure and aims are analized, and it is concluded that, leaving aside other sorts of critical points, the accusation violates the canons of the rational dialogue.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Eduardo Rabossi
Sociedad de Analisis Filosofico/SADAF Bulnes, BUENOS AIRES ARGENTINA

Referências

CHURCH, A (1958). Fallacy, in D. Runes (ed.) Dictionary of Philosophy (Arnes, Iowa,Littlefield, Amas & Co.).

FRANKENA, W. (1939). The Naturalistic Fallacy, Mind 48.

GUARIGLIA, O. (1992). Ideología, Verdad y Legitimación (México, Fondo de Cultura Económica).

JACQUES, F. (1988). Trois Strategies Interactionelles. Conversation, Negotiation, Dialogue, in J. Cosnier, N. Gelas & C. KerbratOrecchini (eds.) Exchanges sur Conversation (Paris, CNRS).

LEWY, C. (1968). Moore on the Naturalistic Fallacy, in P.F. Strawson (ed.) Studies in the Philosophy of Action (Oxford, Oxford University Press).

MACKIE, J.L. (1967). Fallacies, in P. Edwards (ed.) The Encyclopaedia of Philosophy vol.3, pp. 169-179 (New York, Macmillan).

MOORE, G.E. (1903). Principia Ethica (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

————. (1912). Ethics (Oxford, Oxford University Press).

————. (1933). Is Goodness a Quality?, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume. ————. (1952). A Reply to My Critics, in P. Schilpp (ed.) The Philosophy of G.E. Moore (New York, Tudor).

MOULINES, U. (1991). Hechos y Valores: Falacias y Metafalacias. Un ejercicio integracionista. Isegoría 3.

MUGUERZA, J. (1977). La Razón sin Esperanza (Madrid, Taurus).

NUDLER. O. (ed.) (1996). La Racionalidad: Su Poder y Sus Límites (Buenos Aires, Paidós).

PLATTS. M. (1991). Moral Realities: An Essay in Philosophical Psychology (London, Routledge).

RABOSSI, E. (1961). La Falacia Naturalista. Algunas Notas Críticas, Revista Jurídica de Buenos Aires, 6.

————. (1975). Austin y la Falacia Descriptiva, Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia, 1.

————. (1993). Estrategias Dialogicas, Universalidad y Relativismo, in O Nudler & G. Klimovsky (eds.) La Racionalidad en Debate (Buenos Aires, Centro Editor de América Latina).

SCHOPENHAUER, A (1946-50). Parerga und Paralipomena, Sämtliche Werke vol.7 (Wiesbaden).

STROUD, B. (1977). Hume (London, RKP).

WALTON, D. (1989). Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

Publicado
2016-03-29
Como Citar
Rabossi, E. (2016). Dialogo, falacias y retorica. El caso de la falacia naturalista. Manuscrito, 25(2), 353-380. Recuperado de https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644561
Seção
Artigos