Resumo
Logic for Husserl is a science of science, a science of what all sciences have in common in their modes of validation. Thus logic deals with universal laws relating to truth, to deduction, to verification and falsification, and with laws relating to theory as such, and to what makes for theoretical unity, both on the side of the propositions of a theory and on the side of the domain of objects to which these propositions refer. This essay presents a systematic overview of Husserl's views on these matters as put forward in his Logical Investigations. It shows how Husserl's theory of linguistic meanings as species of mental acts, his formal ontology of part, whole and dependence, his theory of meaning categories, and his theory of categorial intuition combine with his theory of science to form a single whole. Finally, it explores the ways in which Husserl's ideas on these matters can be put to use in solving problems in the philosophy of language, logic and mathematics in a way which does justice to the role of mental activity in each of these domains while at the same time avoiding the pitfalls of psychologism.Referências
BRENTANO, F. (1982). Deskriptive Psychologie. Ed. R. M. Chisholm and W. Baumgartner. (Hamburg, Meiner). English translation as Descriptive Psychology, by B. Müller. (London, Routledge, 1995).
HILL, C. ORTIZ and ROSADO HADDOCK, G. E. (2000). Husserl or Frege? Meaning, Objectivity, and Mathematics. (La Salle, Open Court).
HILL, C.O. (2000a). “Abstraction and Idealization in Edmund Husserl and Georg Cantor Prior to 1895”, in Hill and Rosado Haddock (2000), pp. 109–160.
—————. (2000b). “Did Georg Cantor Influence Edmund Husserl?” in Hill and Rosado Haddock (2000), pp. 137–60.
HUSSERL, E. (1891). Philosophie der Arithmetik. Psychologische und logische Studien, vol. I. (Halle, Pfeiffer, as repr. in Husserliana XII [ed. L. Eley], The Hague, Nijhoff, 1970).
—————. (1900/01). Logische Untersuchungen, 1st ed. (A), (Halle, Niemeyer); 2nd ed. (B), (1913/21). Repr. as Husserliana XVIII [= vol. I, ed. by E. Holenstein], and XIX/1, XIX/2 [= vol. II, ed. by U. Panzer], (The Hague, Nijhoff, 1975, 1984). English translation of the 2nd edition as Logical Investigations, by J. N. Findlay. (London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970).
—————. (1929). “Formale und transzendentale Logik”, Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung, 10, pp. 1-298. Repr. in Husserliana XVII (P. Janssen, ed., 1974). Eng. trans. as Formal and Transcendental Logic, by D. Cairns. (The Hague, Nijhoff, 1969).
—————. (1983). Studien zur Arithmetik und Geometrie. Ed. I. Strohmeyer. (The Hague, Nijhoff, Husserliana, BJ. XXI).
JAKOBSON, R. (1940/42). “Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze”, in Jakobson’s Selected Writings, vol. I. (The Hague, Mouton, 1962), pp. 328–401.
MILLER, J. P. (1982). Numbers in Presence and Absence: A Study of Husserl’s Philosophy of Mathematics. (Phaenomenologica 90, The Hague/Boston, London, Nijhoff).
MOHANTY, J. N. (1977). “Husserl’s Theory of Meaning”, in F. A. Elliston and P. McCormick, eds., Husserl. Expositions and Apprais- als. (Notre Dame and London, University of Notre Dame Press), pp. 18–37.
MULLIGAN, K. (1995). “Perception”, in B. Smith and D. W. Smith (eds.), pp. 168–238.
MULLIGAN, K. (ed.) (1987). Speech Act and Sachverhalt. Reinach and the Foundations of Realist Phenomenology, (Dordrecht/Boston/-Lancaster, Nijhoff).
MULLIGAN, K., SIMONS, P.M. & SMITH, B. (1984). “Truth- Makers”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 44, pp. 287–321. MULLIGAN, K. & SMITH, B. (1985). “Franz Brentano on the Ontology of Mind”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 45, pp. 627–44.
—————. (1986). “A Relational Theory of the Act”, Topoi, 5/2, pp. 115–30.
PETITOT, J. VARELA, F. J., PACHOUD, B. and ROY, J.-M. (eds.) (2000). Naturalizing phenomenology. Issues in Contemporary Phenome- nology and Cognitive Science. (Stanford, Stanford University Press).
REINACH, A. (1913). “Die apriorischen Grundlagen des bürgerlichen Rechts”, Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 1, pp. 685–847, reprinted in REINACH (1989). Eng. trans. by John F. Crosby in Aletheia, 3, 1983, pp. 1–142.
—————. (1989). Sämtliche Werke. Kritische Ausgabe mit Kommentar, Band I: Die Werke, Teil I: Kritische Neuausgabe (1905–1914), Teil II: Nachgelassene Texte (1906–1917); Band II: Kommentar und Textkritik. (Munich/Hamden/Vienna, Philosophia), Karl Schuhmann and Barry Smith (eds.).
ROSADO HADDOCK, G. E. (1973). Edmund Husserls Philosophie der Logik und Mathematik im Lichte der gegenwärtigen Logik und Grundla- genforschung. (Dissertation, Bonn University).
SCHUHMANN, K. & SMITH, B. (1985). “Against Idealism: Johannes Daubert vs. Husserl’s Ideas I”, Review of Metaphysics, 39, pp. 763–93.
—————. (1987). “Questions: An Essay in Daubertian Phenome- nology”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 47, pp. 353–84.
SIMONS, P. M. (1982). “The Formalisation of Husserl’s Theory of Wholes and Parts”, in Smith, (ed.), pp. 113–59. SMITH, B. & MULLIGAN, K. (1984). “Framework for Formal Ontology”, Topoi, 2, pp. 73–85.
SMITH, B. (1981). “Logic, Form and Matter”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Sociey, Supplementary Volume 55, pp. 47–63.
—————. (ed.) (1982). Parts and Moments. Studies in Logic and Formal Ontology. (Munich, Philosophia).
—————. (1984). “Acta cum fundamentis in re”, Dialectica, 38, pp. 157–78.
—————. (1984a). “Phänomenologie und angelsächsische Philosophie”, Philosophischer Literaturanzeiger, 37, 387–406.
—————. (1987). “Husserl, Language and the Ontology of the Act”, in D. Buzzetti and M. Ferriani, (eds.), Speculative Grammar,
Universal Grammar, and Philosophical Analysis of Language. (Amster- dam, John Benjamins), pp. 205–227.
—————. (1987a). “On the Cognition of States of Affairs”, in K. Mulligan, (ed.), Speech Act and Sachverhalt: Reinach and the Founda- tions of Realist Phenomenology. Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster, Ni- jhoff), pp. 189–225
—————. (ed.) (1988). Foundations of Gestalt Theory. (Munich, Philosophia).
—————. (1990). “Towards a History of Speech Act Theory”, in A. Burkhardt, (ed.), Speech Acts, Meanings and Intentions. Critical Ap- proaches to the Philosophy of John R. Searle. Berlin/New York, de Gruyter), pp. 29–61.
—————. (1990a). “Brentano and Marty: An Inquiry into Being and Truth”, in K. Mulligan, (ed.), Mind, Meaning and Metaphysics. The Philosophy of Anton Marty. (Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster, Ni- jhoff), pp. 111–49. —————. (1994). Austrian Philosophy: The Legacy of Franz Brentano. (La Salle and Chicago, Open Court).
—————. (1995a). “On Drawing Lines on a Map”, in Andrew U. Frank and Werner Kuhn (eds.), Spatial Information Theory. A Theo- retical Basis for GIS (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 988, Ber- lin/Heidelberg/New York, etc., Springer), pp. 475–484.
—————. (1995b). “Common Sense”, in B. Smith and D. W. Smith (eds.), (1995) pp. 394–436.
—————. (1997). “On Substances, Accidents and Universals: In Defence of a Constituent Ontology”, Philosophical Papers, 26, pp. 105–127.
—————. (1999). “Truthmaker Realism”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 77 (3), pp. 274–291.
SMITH, B. & SMITH, D. W. (eds.) (1995). The Cambridge Companion to Husserl. (Cambridge and New York, Cambridge University Press).
SMITH, B. & MULLIGAN, K. (1982). “Pieces of a Theory”, in Smith (ed.), (1982), pp. 15–109
SOKOLOWSKI, R. (1974). Husserlian Meditations. (Evanston, Northwestern University Press).
STUMPF, C. (1873). Über den psychologischen Ursprung der Raumvorstellung. (Leipzig, Hirzel).
WILLARD, D. (1980). “Husserl on a Logic that Failed”, Philosophical Review, 89, pp. 46–64.
—————. (1984). Logic and the Objectivity of Knowledge. (Athens, Ohio, University of Ohio Press).
Downloads
