From the begriffsschrift to “uber sinn und bedeutung”: frege as epistemologist and ontologist

Autores

  • Max Rosenkrantz California State University Long Beach

Palavras-chave:

Frege. Sinn. Ontology

Resumo

Frege presents the eponymous distinction of “Über Sinn und Bedeutung” (USB) as a correction to the theory of identity he held in the Begriffsschrift.1 His retrospective assessment has prompted different reactions from commentators. Many have simply taken him at his word.2 Others, who have lingered over the relevant texts, have encountered a difficulty: in the Begriffsschrift Frege appears to raise the same problem with which he begins USB and to respond to it in words that are strikingly similar to those found in the later work.3 Thus, a number of important scholars have been led to argue that Frege misrepresents his earlier view: contrary to what he says in USB, the Begriffsschrift already contains the distinction between Sinn and Bedeutung.4 Despite their obvious differences, the logic of both interpretations requires that the two works be responsive to the same problem. In this paper I challenge that fundamental premise.5 If I might be allowed to express my thesis tersely but suggestively: the problem of the Begriffsschrift is epistemological; that of USB,

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Max Rosenkrantz, California State University Long Beach

California State University Long Beach, Philosophy

Referências

ANGELELLI, I. Studies on Gottlob Frege and Traditional Philosophy (Dordrecht: D. Reidl), 1967.

ANGELELLI, I. (ed). Gottlob Frege: Begriffsschrift und Andere Aufsätze (New York: Georg Olms Verlag), 1971.

ANGELELLI, I. (ed). Gottlob Frege: Kleine Schriften (New York: Georg Olms Verlag), 1990.

BAR-ELLI, G. “Identity in Frege’s Begriffsschrift: Where Both Thau-Caplan and Heck Are Wrong,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy (38): 269 – 288, 2006.

BEANEY, M. (ed). The Frege Reader (Oxford: Basil Blackwell Publishing), 1997

BERGMANN, G. The Metaphysics of Logical Positivism (New York: Longman’s Green and Company), 1954.

BERGMANN, G.“Intentionality,” in Bergmann (1959a): 3 – 38, 1955.

BERGMANN, G.“Frege’s Hidden Nominalism,” in Bergmann (1959a): 205 – 224, 1958.

BERGMANN, G. Meaning and Existence (Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press), 1959a.

BERGMANN, G. “Sameness, Meaning and Identity,” in Bergmann (1959a): 132 – 138, 1959b.

BERGMANN, G. Logic and Reality (Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press), 1964a.

BERGMANN, G. “Ontological Alternatives,” in Bergmann (1964a): 124 – 157, 1964b.

BURGE, T. “Sinning Against Frege,” in Burge (2005a): 213 – 239, 1979.

BERGMANN, G. “Frege on Sense and Linguistic Meaning,” in Burge (2005a): 242 – 269, 1990.

BERGMANN, G. Truth, Thought and Reason: Essays on Frege (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), 2005a.

BERGMANN, G. “Introduction,” in Burge (2005a): 1 – 68, 2005b.

BYNUM, T. W. (ed). Gottlob Frege: Conceptual Notation and Related Articles (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 1972.

DICKIE, I. “Informative Identities in the Begriffsschrift and ‘On Sense and Reference’,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy (38): 269 – 288, 2008.

DUMMETT, M. “Can Analytical Philosophy Be Made Systematic, and Ought it to Be?,” in Dummett (1978): 437 – 458, 1975a.

BERGMANN, G. “Frege’s Distinction Between Sense and Reference,” in Dummett (1978): 116 – 144, 1975b.

BERGMANN, G. Truth and Other Enigmas (Cambridge, MA: 1978), 1978.

BERGMANN, G. Frege: Philosophy of Language, 2nd edition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), 1981a.

BERGMANN, G. The Interpretation of Frege’s Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), 1981b.

BERGMANN, G. “Frege and Wittgenstein,” in Dummett (1991): 237 – 248, 1981c.

BERGMANN, G. “Frege’s Myth of the Third Realm,” in Dummett (1991a): 249 – 262, 1986.

BERGMANN, G. Frege and Other Philosophers (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 1991a.

BERGMANN, G. “The Relative Priority of Thought and Language,” in Dummett (1991a): 315 – 324, 1991b.

BERGMANN, G.The Origins of Analytical Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), 1993.

FREGE, G. “On The Scientific Justification of a Conceptual Notation,” in Bynum (1972): 83 – 89, 1882.

BERGMANN, G. “Function and Concept,” in Beaney (1997): 130 – 148, 1891.

BERGMANN, G.“Thought,” in Beaney (1997): 325 – 345, 1918.

BERGMANN, G.Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence ed. Brian McGuiness and trans. Hans Kaal (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press), 1980.

GEACH, P. AND BLACK, M. (eds). Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege 3rd edition (Oxford: Basil Blackwell), 1980.

GROSSMANN, R. “Frege’s Ontology,” Philosophical Review (70): 23 – 40, 1961.

GROSSMANN, R. Reflections on Frege’s Philosophy (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press), 1969.

HAAPARANTA, L. AND HINTIKKA, J. Frege Synthesized (Dordrecht: D. Reidl), 1986.

HECK, R. “Frege on Identity and Identity-Statements: A Reply to Thau and Caplan,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy (33): 83 – 102, 2003.

KLUGE, E.H.W. The Metaphysics of Gottlob Frege: An Essay in Ontological Reconstruction (The Hague: Martinus Nijoff Publishers), 1980.

KREMER, M. “Sense and Reference: The Origins and Development of the Distinction,” in Potter and Ricketts (2010): 220 – 292, 2010.

MAKIN, G. The Metaphysicians of Meaning: Russell and Frege on Sense and Denotation (New York: Routledge), 2000.

MARSH, R.C. ed. Logic and Knowledge (London: Unwin Hyman Limited), 1956.

MOORE, G.E. Some Main Problems of Philosophy (London: George, Allen and Unwin, 1953), 1910/11.

MENDEHLSON, RICHARD. “Frege’s Begriffsschrift Theory of Identity,” Journal of the History of Philosophy (20): 279 – 299, 1982.

POTTER, M. AND RICKETTS, T. The Cambridge Companion to Frege (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 2010.

ROSENKRANTZ, M. “The King of France Restored,” Metaphysica 8 (2): 149 – 163, 2007.

RUSSELL, B. “The Philosophy of Logical Atomism,” in Marsh (1956): 177 – 281, 1918.

SLUGA, H. “Semantic Content and Cogntive Sense” in Haaparanta and Hintikka (1986): 47 – 64, 1986.

TASCHEK, W. “Frege’s Puzzle, Sense and Information Content,” Mind (101): 767 – 791, 1992.

TASCHEK, W. “On Sense and Reference: A Critical Reception,” in Potter and Ricketts (2010): 293 – 341, 2010.

THAU, M. AND CAPLAN, B. “What’s Puzzling Gottlob Frege?,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy (31): 159 – 200, 2001.

VAN HEIJENOORT, J. From Frege to Gödel: A Sourcebook in Mathematical Logic 1879 – 1931 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), 1967

WILSON, F. “Critical Notice of Michael Dummett, Orgins of Analytic Philosophy,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy (27): 377 – 406, 1997.

Downloads

Publicado

2017-03-07

Como Citar

ROSENKRANTZ, M. From the begriffsschrift to “uber sinn und bedeutung”: frege as epistemologist and ontologist. Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia, Campinas, SP, v. 39, n. 3, p. 29–90, 2017. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8647846. Acesso em: 2 fev. 2023.

Edição

Seção

Artigos