Palavras-chave
Como Citar
Resumo
The aim of this paper is twofold: First, to critically discuss Lynne Rudder’s Baker BA-theory of time, and second to contrast it with the R-theory (after Russell). In the course of my discussion I will contrast three different methodological approaches regarding the relation between common sense and ontology; clarify Russell’s authentic view in contrast to the B-theory which is McTaggart’s misrepresentation of Russell, and consider how the R-theory can respond to objections Baker makes to eternalism (as she understands it).Referências
BAKER, LYNNE RUDDER. “Temporal Reality,” in J. K. Campbell, M. O’Rourke and H. S. Silverstein (eds.), (2010), pp. 27-47.
BAKER, LYNNE RUDDER. The Metaphysics of Everyday Life. Cambridge: University Press, 2007.
BAKER, LYNNE RUDDER. “On the Mind-Dependence of Temporal Becoming”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 39, pp. 341-357, 1979.
BAKER, LYNNE RUDDER. “Temporal Becoming: The Argument from Physics”. Philosophical Forum, 6, pp. 218-236, 1974-75.
BARDON, ADRIAN (ed.), The Future of the Philosophy of Time. New York: Routledge, 2012.
BLAKE, R. M. “On Mr. Broad’s Theory of Time”. Mind, 34, pp. 418-35, 1925.
BONINO, G.; JESSON, G., CUMPA, J. Defending Realism: Ontological and Epistemological Investigations. Boston: De Gruyter, 2014.
BROAD, C. D. “Time and Change”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Vol. 8, pp. 175-88, 1928. BROAD, C. D. “Time,” in J. Hastings et al., eds., Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, Vol. 12. Edinburgh and New York: T. & T. Clark and Scribners, 1921. (http://www.ditext.com/broad/time/timeframe.html) Repr. in Oaklander (2008), Vol. I, pp. 143-–173. CAMPBELL, J. K., O’ROURKE, M.,
SILVERSTEIN, H.S. Time and Identity. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2010.
DAINTON, B. ‘Time and Temporal Experience’, in A. Bardon (ed.) (2012), pp.123-148. DOLEV, Y. Time and Realism: Metaphysical and Antimetaphysical Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007.
FRIEDMAN, EUGENE AND SELLARS, Wilfrid. (eds.) Basic Issues in the Philosophy of Time. La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1971.
GALE, R. “Tensed Statements”. Philosophical Quarterly, 12, 1962. Repr. in Oaklander (2008), Vol. I, pp. 210-217.
GRÜNBAUM, A. “The Meaning of Time”. In Eugene Friedman and Wilfrid Sellars (eds.) (1971), pp. 193-228.
HOY, RONALD C. and L. NATHAN OAKLANDER. (eds.) Metaphysics: Classic and Contemporary Readings. Belmont, Ca: Thomson Wadsworth, 2005.
KAPITAN, T. “Indexicality and Self-Awareness”. In U. Kriegel and K. Williford, (eds.) (2006), pp. 397-408.
KRIEGEL, U. and WILLIFORD, K. Consciousness and Self-Reference, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2006.
LE POIDEVIN, ROBIN. (ed.), Questions of Time and Tense. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.
MARSH, ROBERT C. (ed.) Logic and Knowledge: Essays 1901-1950. London and NY: Routledge, 2001.
MCTAGGART, JOHN M. E. and C.D. BROAD. (eds.) The Nature of Existence, vol. II. Cambridge University Press, 1921-1927.
MCTAGGART, JOHN M. E. “Time”. (1921). Repr. in Ronald C. Hoy and L. Nathan Oaklander. (eds.) (2005), pp.44-55. ______The unreality of time. Mind 17, pp. 457-84, 1908. MOORE, G. E. “Symposium: Is There ‘Knowledge by Acquaintance’”. Aristotelian Soc. Supp. 2, pp. 185-205, 1919.
OAKLANDER, L. N. “Temporal Phenomena, Ontology and the R-theory”. Metaphysica: International Journal of Ontology, pp. 253-269, 2015.
OAKLANDER, L. N. “Temporal Realism and the R-theory,” In Guido Bonino, Greg Jesson, Javier Cumpa (eds.) (2014a), pp.123-139.
OAKLANDER, L. N. Debates in the Metaphysics of Time. Bloomsbury: New York and London, 2014b.
OAKLANDER, L. N. “Dolev's Anti-Metaphysical Realism: A Critique”. In L. Nathan Oaklander (ed.) (2014c), pp. 4-29
OAKLANDER, L. N. "A-, B- and R-Theories of Time: A Debate”. In Adrian Bardon (ed.) (2012), pp. 1-24.
OAKLANDER, L. N. “Be Careful What You Wish For: A Reply to Craig”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 76, no. 1, 2008.
OAKLANDER, L. N. The Ontology of Time. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2004.
OAKLANDER, L. N. The Philosophy of Time: Critical Concepts in Philosophy. London and New York: Routledge, 2008.
OAKLANDER, L. N. "Freedom and the New Theory of Time". In Robin Le Poidevin (ed.), Questions of Time and Tense. (1998) Repr. in L. Nathan Oaklander. (ed.) (2008), vol. 3, pp.250-270 ORILIA, F., OAKLANDER, L.N. “Do we really need a new B-theory of time?” Topoi, (2013), Vol 34, No. 1, pp. 157-170. Special Issue on “Time and Time Experience,” edited by Roberto Ciuni and Guiliano Torrengo. DOI 10.1007/s11245-013-9179-6.
RUSSELL, B. “On the Experience of Time”. The Monist. 1915. Repr. in L. N. Oaklander (2008), vol. 1, pp. 174-187.
RUSSELL, B. Philosophical Essays. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd. 1966.
RUSSELL, B. “The Monistic Theory of Truth”. 1906-07. In B. Russell (1966) pp. 131-146
RUSSELL, B. ” On the Nature of Acquaintance. III Analysis of Experience”. The Monist. 1914. Repr. in R. C. Marsh (ed.) (2001), pp. 159-174.
RUSSELL, B. “The Philosophy of Logical Atomism”. The Monist, 1918. Repr. in R. C. Marsh (ed.) (2001), pp. 177-281.
SCHILPP, PAUL ARTHUR. (ed.) The Philosophy of C. D. Broad. New York: Tudor Publishing Co., 1959.
SIDER, T. Four-Dimensionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
SMART, J. J. C. “Philosophy and Scientific Realism”. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963. Partial repr. in L. Nathan Oaklander. (ed.) (2008), vol. 1, pp.187-97. TEGTMEIER, ERWIN. “McTaggart’s error: temporal change.” Revue Romaine de Philosophie, pp. 56:89-96, 2012.
Downloads
