Reply to Oaklander

Autores

  • Lynne Rudder Baker University of Massachusetts

Palavras-chave:

The metaphysics of everyday life. A- and B-theories of time. Nathan Oaklander. Transiency .

Resumo

In September, 2016, I replied to an earlier draft of Oaklander’s Critique of my view of time for Manuscrito.  Now he has published an extremely complex 50-page expanded version.  There is no way that a reply in a journal could cover all the topics Oaklander discusses.  So, I will stick mainly to my own view to which Oaklander was responding. My reply is in two parts.  In the first, directed at Oaklander’s earlier draft, I say what I want to do in philosophy in general, and in the philosophy of time in particular.  In the second part, I mention some places where he (apparently) misunderstands my view.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Lynne Rudder Baker, University of Massachusetts

Colaboradora do Departamento de Filosofia na University of Massachusetts

Downloads

Publicado

2017-04-24

Como Citar

BAKER, L. R. Reply to Oaklander. Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia, Campinas, SP, v. 40, n. 1, p. 67–73, 2017. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8648786. Acesso em: 28 set. 2022.

Edição

Seção

Artigos

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)