Globally and locally applied naturalistic metaphysics

Autores

  • Cristian Soto Universidad de Chile

Palavras-chave:

Naturalistic metaphysics. Scientific image. Applicability. Ontology. Unobservable entities. Sellars.

Resumo

This article addresses the prospects of applied naturalistic metaphysics from both a global and a local perspective. Adopting a broad Sellarsian approach, I look into whether metaphysics has a place and role in the overall scientific image and assess whether it has its own subject matter as a first- or second- order discipline. After outlining the general argument in section 1, section 2 examines our construal of science and metaphysics, drawing some considerations for restating the question about the viability of naturalistic metaphysics. Sections 3 and 4, in turn, suggest two styles of naturalistic metaphysics that can be respectively applied on a global and on a local basis. I briefly outline their respective goals, problems and categories. I argue, in particular, that globally applied naturalistic metaphysics deals with issues about the fundamental structure of reality, whereas locally applied naturalistic metaphysics tackles riddles arising from the examination of specific unobservable posits in the frontiers of scientific ontology. Section 5 closes with concluding remarks that put metaphysics within the scientific image.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Cristian Soto, Universidad de Chile

Universidad de Chile, Department of Philosophy, Ñuñoa, Chile

Referências

BUNGE, M. “Is Scientific Metaphysics Possible?” The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 78, No. 17, pp. 507-520, 1972.

CHAKRAVARTTY, A. “Metaphysics between the Sciences and Philosophies of Science”. In P. D. Magnus and J. Busch (eds.) (2010), pp. 59-77.

CHAKRAVARTTY, A. “On the Prospects of Naturalized Metaphysics”. In D. Ross, J. Ladyman and H. Kincaid (eds.) (2013), pp. 27-50.

CLOWE, D., BRADAC, M., GONZÁLEZ, A. H., MARKETEVICH, M., RANDALL, S. W., and ZARITSKY, D. “A Direct Empirical Proof of the Existence of Dark Matter”. The Astrophysical Journal, 648, pp. L109-L113, 2006.

CUMPA, J. “A Materialist Criterion of Fundamentality”. American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 37-42, 2014.

ESFELD, M. “Metaphysics of Science between Metaphysics and Science”. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 74, pp. 199-213, 2007.

FREESE, K. “The Dark Side of the Universe”. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, A, 559, pp. 337-30, 2006.

HUMPHREYS, P. “Scientific Ontology and Speculative Ontology”. In D. Ross, J. Ladyman and H. Kincaid (eds.) (2013), pp. 51-78.

LADYMAN, J. “Does Physics Answer Metaphysical Questions?” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, Vol. 61, pp. 179-201, 2007.

LADYMAN, J. “Science, Metaphysics and Method”. Philosophical Studies, Vol. 160, Issue 1, pp. 31-51, 2012.

LADYMAN, J. and ROSS, D., with SPURRETT, D. AND COLLIER, J. Every Thing Must Go. Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007.

LADYMAN, J. and ROSS, D. “The World in the Data”. In D. Ross, J. Ladyman and H. Kincaid (eds.) (2013), pp. 108-150.

LIVANIOS, V. Science and Metaphysics. Exploring the Metaphysics of Properties and Laws. England, Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.

MAGNUS, P. and BUSCH, J. (eds.) New waves in the Philosophy of Science. England, Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

MAUDLIN, T. The Metaphysics within Physics. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007.

MORGANTI, M. Combining Science and Metaphysics. Contemporary Physics, Conceptual Revision and Common Sense. England, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.

NEY, A. “Neo-Positivist Metaphysics”. Philosophical Studies, 160, pp. 53-78, 2012.

ROSS, D. “Will Scientific Metaphysics Still Be Philosophy?”, Academia.edu http://www.academia.edu/948847/Will_scientific_philosophy_still_be_philosophy 2012 (Accessed 9 October 2015.)

ROSS, D., LADYMAN, J., and KINCAID, H. (eds.) Scientific Metaphysics. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013.

SELLARS, W. Science, Perception, and Reality. California, Ridgeview Publishing Company, 1963.

SOTO, C. “The Current State of the Metaphysics of Science Debate”. Philosophica, Vol. 90, No. 1, pp. 23-60, 2015.

SOTO, C. “The Epistemic Indispensability Argument”. Forthcoming, Journal for the General Philosophy of Science.

VAN FRAASSEN, B. The Empirical Stance. New Heaven and London, Yale University Press, 2002.

WATKINS, J. W. A. “Metaphysics and the Advancement of Science”. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 26, pp. 91-121, 1975.

Downloads

Publicado

2017-11-09

Como Citar

SOTO, C. Globally and locally applied naturalistic metaphysics. Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia, Campinas, SP, v. 40, n. 3, p. 33–50, 2017. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8650952. Acesso em: 27 nov. 2022.

Edição

Seção

Artigos