The conflictual craft



Skepticism, Dogmatism, Neo-pyrrhonism, Conflict, Disputes.


Are contemporary philosophers to follow Pyrrho of Elis in adopting his skeptic craft or at least core aspects of it as a reaction to the fact that, since immemorial times, persons have been engaged in disputes in metaphysics? Over the last 2500 years or so, most Western philosophers have not done so in being more influenced by Aristotle’s dogmatic craft than by
Pyrrho’s skeptic one. Over the last fifty years or so, a few Brazilian neo-Pyrrhonist philosophers, such as Oswald Porchat, Otávio Bueno and Plínio Junqueira Smith, have done the opposite in aiming to spell out the pertinence of Ancient Pyrrhonism to contemporary philosophy. On its part, this essay makes a case for the claim that one is to react to the stated fact by adopting a conflictual craft that promotes a synthesis of Pyrrho’s skeptic craft and the dogmatic craft. This synthesis: brings to light the core features of the skeptic and of the dogmatic craft; problematizes the dogmatic craft by means of the skeptic one and vice-versa so that the shortcomings of these crafts are avoided; and aims to keep certain positive aspects both of the skeptic craft and of the dogmatic one.


Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Felipe G. A. Moreira, University of Miami

Department of Philosophy - University of Miami, Florida - United States.


BARNES, J. The beliefs of a pyrrhonist. In: Burnyeat and Frede (1997), 58-92.

BUENO, O. Davidson and skepticism: how not to respond to the skeptic. Principia 9, 2005.

BUENO, O. Is the pyrrhonist an internalist. In: Machuca (2011), 179-192.

BUENO, O. Disagreeing with the pyrrhonist. In: Machuca (2013), 24-45.

BUENO, O. Carnap, logicism, and ontological commitment. In: Costreie (2016), 205-236.

BUENO, O. and SMITH, P. J. Skepticism in Latin America. In: Zalta (2016), URL: /skepticism-latin-america/.

BURNYEAT, M. F. Can the sceptic live his scepticism?. In: Burnyeat (2012), 205-236.

BURNYEAT, M. F. Explorations in ancient and modern philosophy. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

BURNYEAT, M. F. and FREDE, M. (eds.) (1997), The Original Sceptics: A Controversy, Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.

COSTREIE, S. (ed.) (2016), Early Analytic Philosophy: New Perspectives on the Tradition, Dordrecht: Springer.

DIOGENES LAERTIUS. Lives of eminent philosophers. Trans. Pamela Mensch. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.

FINE, G. Scepticism, existence, and belief: a discussion of R.J. hankinson, the sceptics. In: Taylor (1996), 273-290.

FOGELIN, R. J. Pyrrhonian reflections on knowledge and justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.

FORSTER, M. N. Hegel and skepticism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1989.

FORSTER, M. N. Hegelian vs. Kantian interpretations of pyrrhonism: revolution or reaction?. Kritisches Jahrbuch der Philosophie Vol. 10, 53-70, 2005.

FORSTER, M. N. Kant and skepticism. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2008.

FREDE, M. The sceptic’s beliefs. In: Burnyeat and Frede (1997), 1-25.

GIOVANNI, G. D. (ed.). Between Kant and Hegel: texts in the development of post-kantian idealism. Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 2000.

HEGEL, G.W.F. On the relationship of skepticism to philosophy, exposition of its different modifications and comparison of the latest form with the ancient one. Trans. H.S. Harris. In: Giovanni (2000), 311-363.

KLEIN, P. How to be an infinitist about doxastic justification. Philosophical Studies 134.1, 25-29, 2007.

MACHUCA, D. (ed.). New essays on ancient pyrrhonism. Leiden: Brill, 2011.

MACHUCA, D. Disagreement and skepticism. New York: Routledge, 2013.

MOREIRA, F. G. A. Por uma estética do constrangimento, Rio de Janeiro: Oito e Meio, 2013.

MOREIRA, F. G. A. An apology of carnap. Manuscrito 37 (2), 261-289, 2014.

MOREIRA, F. G. A. Overcoming metametaphysics: Nietzsche and Carnap. Nietzsche-Studien, Volume 47, Issue 1, 240- 271, 2018.

MOREIRA, F. G. A. Disputes: the incommensurable greatness of micro-wars. University of Miami. PhD Dissertation. 2019. URL:

MOREIRA, F. G. A. Deleuze’s left-wing approach to metaphysics. Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger, forthcoming.

MUNIZ, F. A potência da aparência: um estudo sobre o prazer e a sensação nos Diálogos de Platão. São Paulo: Editora Annablume, 2011.

OLASO, E. D. La crisis pirrónica de Hume. Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofía 3(2), 131-143, 1977.

OLASO, E. D. Otra vez sobre el escepticismo de Hume. Manuscrito 1 (1), 65-82, 1978.

OLASO, E. D. Los dos escepticismos del vicario saboyano. Manuscrito, 2(3), 7–23, 1980a.

OLASO, E. D. Thomas Hobbes y la recta razón. Manuscrito, 4(1), 29–35, 1980b.

OLASO, E. D. La investigación y la verdade. Manuscrito, 6(2), 45– 62, 1983.

OLASO, E. D. Certeza y escepticismo. In: Villoro (1999).

PORCHAT, O. Rumo ao ceticismo. São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 2007.

ROWLANDS, M. Can animals be persons?. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.

SEXTUS EMPIRICUS. Outlines of scepticism. Trans. Julia Annas and Jonathan Barnes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

SMITH, P. J. Uma visão cética do mundo: Porchat e a Filosofia. São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 2017.

TAYLOR, C. C. W. (ed.). Oxford studies in ancient philosophy. Vol 14. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

VILLORO, L. (ed.) El conocimiento (Enciclopedia Iberoamericana de Filosofía, Vol. 20), Madrid: TROTTA, 1999.

WHITE, T. In Defense of Dolphins: the new moral frontier. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell, 2007.

ZALTA, E. N. (ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of Philosophy, (2016), URL:




Como Citar

MOREIRA, F. G. A. The conflictual craft. Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia, Campinas, SP, v. 42, n. 2, p. 47–83, 2019. Disponível em: Acesso em: 9 dez. 2022.